Home / West Virginia / Morgantown
30 Mon General Drive, Morgantown, WV 26505 · Monongalia County · (304) 285-2720
120 certified beds, about 114 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1977
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 515058 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 2, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the West Virginia average is 11.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 56 health citations since October 2021, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.89 hours per resident per day, against 3.67 across West Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.64 of those hours.
51.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (West Virginia average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Communicare Health, an affiliated group of 110 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 56 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, staff interviews, resident interviews, and observations, the facility failed to maintain an environment free from accidents and hazards by providing inadequate supervision. This deficient practice had resulted in actual physical harm to one (1) of 21 residents. Resident #65 sustained a subarachnoid hemorrhage after being knocked down by Resident #42. Resident #42 was known to the facility as having episodes of physical agression. Resident Identifiers: #65 and #42. Facility Census: 114.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the menus were prepared in advance and followed to meet the nutritional needs of the residents. This failed practice affected five (5) of 21 residents. Resident Identifiers: #68, #40, #104, #111, and #65. Facility Census: 114.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, staff interviews, resident interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure that adaptive equipment and utensils were provided for residents at mealtimes as ordered by the physician. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #5, #53, #62, and #69. Facility Census: 114.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse was reported immediately (but not later than two (2) hours for an allegation of abuse resulting in serious bodily injury), failed to notify administration immediately per facility policy, and failed to submit a Five-Day Follow-Up to the state agency. This failed practice affected two (2) of 21 residents. Resident Identifiers: #65 and #3. Facility Census: 114.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, the facility failed to revise a resident's comprehensive care plan for behavior management interventions and activities. This failed practice affected one (1) of 21 residents. Resident Identifier: #42. Facility Census: 114.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility incident report review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure that necessary activities of daily living (ADL) services, specifically bedtime hygiene and incontinence care, were provided for the residents. This was discovered during the Long Term Survey complaint review process and affected one (1) of 21 residents. Resident Identifier #76. Census: 114. The facility was in past non-compliance. The facility identified the deficient practice on 07/27/26, implemented comprehensive corrective actions, completed staff education, and monitored implementation prior to the start of the survey on 07/28/26.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview , observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided an ongoing program to support the resident in their choice of group and individual activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the resident. Resident Identifier: #42. Facility Census: 114.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, resident interview and observations, the facility failed to ensure a resident who experienced a traumatic event received appropriate treatment and services. This failed practice affected one (1) resident. Resident identifier: #65. Facility Census: 14.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure food was provided in a form designed to meet individual needs for a resident ordered a pureed diet. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #111. Facility Census: 114.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a written notice of the room change, including the reason for the change. Additionally, the facility failed to provide the resident with the opportunity to visit the new room prior to relocation. Resident Identifiers: #69 and #70. Facility Census: 118. Findings Include a) Resident #69During an interview on 10/14/25, at approximately 12:45 PM, Resident #69 stated that she had been living in her current room since 04/0/25. She mentioned that on 07/31/25, Administrator #160 informed her that she would need to pay $327.00 a month to remain in her room. Resident #69 expressed that she was unable to afford the additional charge. She conveyed her distress over the situation and informed her daughters about Administrator #160's comments. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the dietary staff's appropriate competencies for food service handling. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) On 04/29/25 at 07:15 AM, the kitchen investigation was initiated. Cookies were found in the freezer with an incomplete date (no year). The Regional Certified Food Manager #189 stated, I'll discard. b) On 04/30/25 at 11:50 AM, the A-Wing pantry was investigated. The following items were found: -[NAME] pickles open and not dated -Cotton candy - open and not dated -Refrigerator temperature 76 degrees Fahrenheit. Items in the pantry were confirmed by Licence Practical Nurse #28 at 12:00 PM. c) On 04/30/25 at 12:01 PM, the B-Wing pantry was investigated. The following items were found: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to water management. This practice had the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Facility census: 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, the facility failed to take actions to thoroughly investigate an alleged violation related to physical abuse. Resident identifier #76. Facility census: 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to update Resident #107's care plan for discontinuation of an anticoagulant and to clarify Resident #264's care plan for level of assistance needed for activities of daily living. These failed practices were a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #107 and #264. Census: 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities intended to enhance the resident's sense of well-being and to promote or enhance physical, cognitive, and emotional health to ensure the resident's highest practicable state of well-being. Resident Identifier: #110. Facility Census:116. Findings Included: a) Resident #110: Resident #110 was diagnosed with cardiomyopathy, heart failure, hypertension, muscle weakness, localized edema, pain in left and right knees, diabetes mellitus - on insulin, and lack of coordination. During an interview with Resident #110 on 04/29/25 at 2:22 PM, the resident stated that he was unable to get out of bed. Upon being asked what activities he has planned for him, the resident said that there isn't much being offered. He reported that he spends his day lying in bed and sometimes watches TV. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to address and notify the physician about an incorrect medication order. It also neglected to ensure that the order was corrected and updated. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Additionally, the facility failed to complete a Speech Therapy Evaluation per physician's order in a timely manner for Resident #107. This was also a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #221 and #107. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #221 During observation of medication administration on 05/01/25 at 8:45 AM, RN #19 stated that Resident #221 was prescribed 37.5 MG of Metoprolol. RN #19 further stated that the resident would be administered half (½) a tablet. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery of a resident smoking in non-designated areas. Resident Identifier: #79. Facility census 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the oxygen concentrator for a resident with a tracheostomy was set to deliver the exact dose of oxygen prescribed by the physician. Resident Identifier: #94. Facility Census: 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 29 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process for Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care in conjunction with the [NAME] Virginia Health Care Decisions Act (16-30-1). Resident identifiers: #42. Facility census: 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. A large chef's knife was found lying on the sink in the dementia care unit. The knife handle was leaned up against the sprayer making it more accessible to the residents. The knife was easily reached and accessed by the Surveyor from the resident's side of the counter. The memory care unit had a census of 24 ambulatory residents with diagnosis of Dementia and/or Alzheimer's Disease. Any of the 24 Residents could have obtained access to the knife potentially causing serious harm and/or death to self or others due to their cognitive impairments and decreased safety awareness. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect by not providing a dignified dining experience and failing to knock on doors before entering. The facility also failed to treat Resident #35 with dignity and respect during a medication administration. These were random opportunities for discoveries. The practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #111, #56, #4, #87, #57 and #35. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: A) Policy Review A review of the facility policy titled Residents Rights with no effective or review date revealed the following. .Procedure: I.i. Knock before entering residents room if door is closed-wait for answer. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives for each resident. This was true for four (4) of 26 residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #86, Resident #44, Resident #97, Resident #96. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: a) Resident #86 A record review on [DATE] at 9:17 AM, of Resident #86's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Further review of the medical record revealed a care plan with an initiated date of [DATE] which read as follows: Focus: The Resident has little activity involvement the resident is a recent admission to center Goal: Resident will participate in activities of choice through review date. Inventions: Assist with transport to activities as needed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise care plans for Resident #15 regarding discontinuation of anticoagulant use, activities for Resident #100 and behavioral interventions for Resident #60. This was true for three (3) of 26 residents reviewed during the long-term survey process. Resident Identifiers: #15, #100 and #60. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #15 On 06/07/23 at 11:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #15. The record review found the care plan stated, the resident is at risk for abnormal bleeding or hemorrhage due to anticoagulant/antiplatelet use (Lovenox). The review found the anticoagulant was discontinued on 03/15/23. On 06/07/23 at 1:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and stated, I will get it changed right away. No further information was obtained during the long-term survey process. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This practice was found true for four (4) of ten (10) Residents reviewed for the Activity Care Area during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident Identifier: Resident #86, #44, #100 and #108. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: a) Resident #86 During the initial tour of the facility on 06/05/23 at 2:15 PM Resident #86 was laying in bed with family present. Family stated Resident watches TV and reads the newspaper and bible daily. But we have not brought his bible here, we thought they would let him borrow one, since he was here for a short stay. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) assistance as ordered to ensure the resident maintains, and/or improves to his/her highest level of ROM. This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for ROM. Resident identifiers: #53, #71 and #80. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: a) Resident #53 Record review on 06/06/23 at 1:53 PM showed Resident #53 had an order for: -- Nursing staff to assist with Passive range of motion (ROM) to bilateral lower extremity for exercise. one time a day, This order was dated 12/28/22. Documentation of the last twenty nine (29) days showed Resident #53 received ROM therapy seven (7) days (for a total of 112 minutes), refused nine (9) days, seven (7) days were documentation as not applicable and no documentation for six (6) days. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated upon opening and kept in proper temperature controls in accordance with the accepted professional standards of practice. These were random opportunities for discovery. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Temperature Log On 06/06/23 at 8:43 AM, a tour of the medication room was completed on A wing. The medication refrigerator temperature log was not complete. The following dates were left blank: --06/01/23 AM check: no initials or title listed --06/01/23 PM check: no temperature, initials or title listed On 06/06/23 at 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed the temperature log should be complete. b) A wing medication cart On 06/06/23 at 10:05 AM, the A wing medication cart was reviewed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide menu items according to each residents preference. Also the facility failed to provide notification of changes of the menu to residents when the menu needed to be changed. These failed practices had a potential to affect all residents receiving nourishment from the facility kitchen. Resident Identifiers: Resident #27, Resident #80 and Resident #51. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: a) Menus During a dining observation on 06/06/23 beginning at 12:20 PM on D wing Resident #108's lunch meal ticket revealed they should have had: Spaghetti Caesar Salad Garlic Bread Deluxe Fruit Salad Observations of Resident #108's tray revealed Spaghetti, mixed vegetables, garlic bread and mixed fruit. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to serve food which was palatable and at an accurate temperature. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Kitchen On 06/08/23 six (6) state surveyors tasted the noon time meal for palatability. The Macaroni and Cheese which was the main entrée tasted of a lot of garlic and left the taste on our palates. The tomato basil salad was tasteless and not palatable and also did not contain the onion and bell pepper. The mashed potatoes were also tasteless and not palatable. The beef steak with onions, the onions were still raw and unable to cut. The sugar cookies were very hard, unable to break in half or unable to chew. On 06/08/23 the CM provided recipes, ~Macaroni and Cheese: -American cheese 48 slices -Swiss Cheese 16 slices -Margarine . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The facility failed to label and date food items which were open and failed to dispose of expired food items. The facility also stores non resident foods in the nourishment room refrigerator. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nourishment from the facility's kitchen and the nourishment rooms. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: A) Policy Review A review of the facility policy titled Food Storage revised date of 09/17 read as following: .Procedures .5. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated . b) Dry Storage An initial tour of the kitchen with the Culinary Director (CD) beginning on 06/05/23 at 12:16 PM , of the dry storage revealed the following issues: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, professional board interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Social Service Director (SSD) was licensed with the [NAME] Virginia Board of Social Work in accordance with applicable state laws. This was a random opportunity for discovery and has a potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Social Service Director On 06/12/23 the facility was asked to provide a professional license or all professional staff including the Social Service Director (SSD) #40. A review of the documentation provided by the facility for SSD #40 found the following: An application for Social Work License (LSW/LGSW/LCSW) this application was completed by SSD #40 on 05/26/23. SSD #40 began working at the facility on 05/04/23 as the SSD. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record. The facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End of Life Care. This wass true for six (6) of 26 reviewed for the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #109, #97, #44, #16, #51 and #26. Facility census: 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to explain the binding arbitration agreement in a form and manner easily understood by residents. This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of arbitration. Resident identifiers: #2, #47, and #44. Facility Census: 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating conditions. The ice machines did not have a one inch air gap for drainage. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nutrition from the facility kitchen. Facility Census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, family interview and staff interview the facility failed to consider a voiced concern of a residents family as a grievance and failed to act promptly to investigate the voiced concern. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was only true for Resident #270. Resident identifier: #270. Facility Census:
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a transfer/discharge notice to the resident/resident representative or the ombudsman for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization, during the long term care survey. Resident identifier #75. Census 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #75 Record review on 06/05/23 at 4:16 PM, indicated resident #75 was hospitalized on [DATE]. On 06/06/23 at 11:10 AM, a copy of the transfer/discharge form and bed hold policy that was presented regarding resident's hospitalization on 05/23/23 was requested. On 06/12/23 at 12:09 PM, an interview with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed they did not have a discharge/transfer form or a bed hold policy for this resident's hospitalization on 05/23/23. .
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy to the resident/resident representative for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization, during the long term care survey. Resident identifier: #75. Census 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #75 Record review on 06/05/23 at 4:16 PM, indicated Resident #75 was hospitalized on [DATE]. On 06/06/23 at 11:10 AM, a copy of the transfer/discharge form and bed hold policy regarding resident's hospitalization on 05/23/23 was requested. On 06/12/23 at 12:09 PM, an interview with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed they did not have a discharge/transfer form or a bed hold policy for this resident's hospitalization on 05/23/23. .
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (1) of 26 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey. Resident identifier: #60. Census:116.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a new Pre admission Screening (PAS) when a resident received a new psychiatric diagnosis for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the category of unnecessary medications, psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review, during the long term care survey. Resident identifier #26. Census 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #26 A record review on 06/05/23 at 2:39 PM, provided a completed PAS but no level II needed This PAS was dated 02/23/17 and Section III, number 30 was answered NONE. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated, during the resident's stay at the facility, he received a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, Current Episode Depressed, Mild or Moderate Severity, Unspecified. This diagnosis was given to the resident on 04/18/2023. There was no updated PAS scanned into the EMR. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, family interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide care required to maintain hygiene to a resident who was dependent for Activities Of Daily Living (ADL) care. This is true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for ADL care are during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #270. Facility Census: 116 Findings Included: a) Resident #270 During an interview on 06/06/23 at 2:30 PM, Resident #270's representative stated, (Name of Resident # 270's) room smells like urine. Her hair is greasy, and has had no showers since she has been admitted . I spoke to the social worker today about her room and the shower situation. The Social worker stated the resident got two baths a week, If I wanted her to have more I could come in and bathe her. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow their suicide prevention policy for one (1) of 26 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier #75. Census 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #75 On 06/06/23 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor requested a copy of the resident's psychiatric notes/evaluations, copy of care plans, copy of pharmacy recommendations, and a copy of the resident's Pre admission Screening (PAS). Record review revealed the resident had suicidal ideation's since he had been at the facility. Resident #75 was admitted to facility on 10/12/22. On 10/18/2022 at 4:29 PM, Social Worker #172 documented in a progress note, During trauma informed care screening resident stated suicidal ideation multiple times. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided according to professional standards of practice. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was only true for Resident #32. Resident Identifier: #32. Facility Census: 116. Findings Included: a) Resident #32 On 06/05/23 at 12:45 PM, an observation was made of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask laying on top of the CPAP machine. The CPAP mask was not stored in a respiratory bag. Resident #32 stated, It has never been put in a bag. Registered Nurse (RN) #108 confirmed the CPAP mask was not being stored in a respiratory bag. RN #108 stated, let me get one. On 06/06/23 at 2:40 PM, an additional observation was made of the CPAP mask laying on top of CPAP machine. The CPAP mask was not stored in a respiratory bag. The resident was not present in the room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a resident on the memory unit with an alternate meal preference during lunch. This was a random opportunity for discovery and only affected Resident #93. Resident identifier: #93. Facility census: 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Proper infection control procedures were not taken during medication pass on the memory unit. Family was not provided with the proper personal protective equipment during visitation to Resident's room. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents and was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #35 and #104. Facility census: 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to treat one (1) of the 28 sample residents in the long-term care survey process with dignity and respect. The facility insisted Resident #55 must wear a large blue brief instead of a smaller size. As a result, Resident #55's brief leaked throughout the night resulting in Resident #55's bed being saturated with urine. Resident Identifier: Resident #55. Facility Census: 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by not providing a resident reachable access to a personal telephone. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #89. Facility census: 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 28 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process had a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care in conjunction with the [NAME] Virginia Health Care Decisions Act (16-30-1). Resident identifier: Resident #69. Facility census: 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide one (1) of 28 sample residents a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to change a soiled privacy curtain in a timely fashion. Resident identifier: #62. Facility census: 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident fall resulting in a fracture was reported to the required agencies. This was true for one (1) of five (5) falls reviewed. Resident identifier: Resident #304. Facility census: 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a resident/resident's representative was provided a written Notice of Transfer for an acute hospital transfer. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident identifiers: #69 and #304. Facility census: 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a resident/resident's representative was provided a written Bed Hold Notice upon transfer. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident identifiers: #69 and #304. Facility census: 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice. A nebulizer mask was on the bedside table with no protective covering. This observation was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #57. Facility Census: 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a two (2) handled spouted cup for a resident at meal times. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #70. Facility census: 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, label and date foods in a sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility Census 105 .
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for one (1) of 28 sample residents reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey. Resident identifier: #97 Facility census: 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment by the use of an extension cord connected to an electronic device for Resident #100. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #100. Facility census: 105.
8 fire safety citations on file: 5 on May 2, 2025, 3 on June 9, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.89 | 3.67 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.47 | 3.17 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.13 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 51.6% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 47.8% | 42.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.05 on weekdays and 3.47 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.16 in April to June 2025 to 3.89 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.89 | 0.64 | 4.05 | 3.47 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 114 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.83 | 0.86 | 4.03 | 3.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 117 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.86 | 0.80 | 4.01 | 3.47 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.16 | 0.85 | 4.34 | 3.73 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 116 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| West Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.67 | 3.75 | 3.08 | 3.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.66 | $17.05 to $18.47 | 9,390 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $26.61 | $23.71 to $29.47 | 6,050 |
| Registered nurses | $38.52 | $32.77 to $47.97 | 23,430 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.9 | 14.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 15.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 13.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.3 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.5 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Morgantown Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (37.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
37.9% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · West Virginia: 9 better, 28 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 99 eligible stays.
12.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · West Virginia: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 117 eligible stays.
6.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · West Virginia: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.
69.2% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia1.2% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 90 residents counted.
2.0% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 90 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: West Virginia97.6% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MON GENERAL LEASING CO., LLC. CMS links this home to Communicare Health, a group of 110 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groves, Donna | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Stoltz, Charles | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Wilheim, Ronald | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Mon General Mgt Co., LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2022 | |
| Groves, Donna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Hamrick, Trista | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/25/2025 | |
| Krupica, Troy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2014 | |
| Odenthal, Richard | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/03/2025 | |
| Mon General Mgt Co., LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/15/2025 | |
| Hamrick, Trista | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/25/2025 | |
| Krupica, Troy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in West Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.