Find a nursing home

Home / Minnesota / Mankato

Oaklawn Health Care, LLC

201 Oaklawn Avenue, Mankato, MN 56001 · Blue Earth County · (507) 388-2913

60 certified beds, about 53 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245517 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 10, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

Of 20 health citations since October 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $32,183 in the last three years; the largest was $32,183, and the latest is dated October 27, 2023.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.79 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.51 of those hours.

66.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).

CMS links it to Monarch Healthcare Management, an affiliated group of 45 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
1K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
17D
1E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 18, 2026Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist identified and reported a medication irregularity during the required monthly drug regimen review for 1 of 1 residents (R1), when an unauthorized Haloperidol order remained active despite the resident's diagnoses of epilepsy and Parkinsonism. This failure resulted in the medication remaining on the resident's medication regimen from March through June 2026 without identification during the required monthly pharmacist reviews. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R1) was free from a significant medication error when Haloperidol was entered into the facility's integrated electronic medication ordering system and administered to R1 from 3/13/26 through 6/9/26 without a valid and verified physician order.
  3. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to remove discontinued medications from the active medication storage for 2 of 2 residents (R3, R4) creating the potential for inadvertent medication administration.
June 10, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for 1 of 1 residents (R2) whose room was unkept and had resident care items placed on the floor. In addition, the facility failed to perform daily cleaning in the kitchen which had the potential to affect 54/56 residents who received food from the kitchen.
  2. E
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    F809 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nutrient and/or calorie substantive snacks were offered after the evening meal and before bedtime, for 2 of 2 residents (R2, R42) when there had been more than a 14-hour lapse between the dinner meal and breakfast the following day. This had the potential to affect 54 of 56 residents who ate meals at the facility.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure appropriate follow-up of urine culture and sensitivity results and failed to ensure antibiotic therapy was reviewed for effectiveness for 1 of 1 resident (R32) reviewed for antibiotic use. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a nutritious snack was offered for the management of low blood sugar and failed to inform the dietician of concerns with blood sugar levels for 1 of 1 resident (R50) reviewed for food.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to assess and implement interventions to maintain and/or prevent loss of range of motion (ROM) for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for ROM.
March 3, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan for diabetic management that included goals and individualized interventions was developed or 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for care plans.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented proper peri care techniques, including use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), appropriate glove changes, and hand hygiene, to prevent or mitigate the risk of urinary tract infections for 2 of 2 residents (R2, R4) reviewed for peri care.
April 16, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed during administration of eye drops for 3 of 3 residents (R12, R15, R106) observed for medication administration.
  2. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide shaving for 1 of 1 resident (R45) who was dependent on staff for assistance with grooming and personal hygiene.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a safe smoking area, extinguishing of cigarettes in designated container, and monitoring of designated smoking area for 2 of 2 residents (R20 and R18) reviewed for smoking.
  4. D
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that in the absence of a full-time registered dietician (RD), the culinary services director (CSD)-B was certified to oversee nutrition and food services. This had potential to affect all 45 residents who received meals from the kitchen.
  5. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 refrigerator/freezers designated for resident food brought into the facility, were monitored to ensure food items were properly stored, labeled, and dated to reduce the risk of contamination and/or foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect any resident who utilized the refrigerator/freezers. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a culinary services cook (CSC)-A wore covering over beard to prevent hair from contaminating food, surfaces and utensils. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents who ate food prepared in the kitchen.
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was donned (put on) and doffed (removed) appropriately for 1 of 1 resident (R206) who had been in transmission-based precautions (TBP) due to testing positive for Covid-19.
  7. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal (PCV20) vaccine was offered or administered as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for 1 of 5 residents (R157) reviewed for immunizations.
March 6, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to coordinate an appointment with a dental provider for 1 of 1 resident (R8) who requested a dental appointment for dentures.
October 27, 2023Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. K
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure safe mechanical lift transfers were completed along with following manufacturer guidelines for Med Care lift that expired, and ensuring correct sling/harness sizes for 7 of 7 residents (R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10) who utilized this mechanical lifts. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 who fell from the Med Care sit to stand lift resulting a fractured right femur (thigh bone) on 10/9/23. This had the likelihood for serious harm, impairment or death for R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9 and R10 who continued to use this Med Care sit to stand lift. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a preventive lift maintenance program was followed and staff had knowledge of using the correct size harness/sling size for their mechanical lifts. [...]
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 11, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely reporting to the State Agency (SA) was completed when 1 of 1 resident (R1) fell from a mechanical lift as a result of NA not following the care plan which resulted in a right femur fracture.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 11, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper catheter cleaning and storage was provided to prevent possible urinary tract infections (UTIs) for 4 of 6 residents (R1, R3, R5 and R15) observed for catheter use.

Fire safety inspections

9 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 10, 2026, 6 on April 16, 2025, 1 on March 6, 2024.

Every fire safety citation9 citations
  1. F
    Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
    K 347 · June 10, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · June 10, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  3. F
    Establish staff and initial training requirements.
    E 37 · April 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · April 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · April 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · April 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · April 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · April 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · March 6, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
October 27, 2023Fine $32,183
October 27, 2023Payment Denial 20 days from November 28, 2023

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.794.193.86
Registered nurses1.511.060.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.363.713.42
Nurse aides1.89
Licensed practical nurses0.40
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)66.3%42.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover52.4%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.39 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.97 on weekdays and 3.36 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 15.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.18 in April to June 2025 to 3.79 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.791.513.973.36 15.4%0 of 9053
Oct to Dec 20253.621.243.803.16 18.9%0 of 9256
Jul to Sep 20253.931.104.113.49 18.8%0 of 9254
Apr to Jun 20254.181.014.383.67 15.9%0 of 9155
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Minnesota, Jan to Mar 20264.191.054.383.735.2%0.8% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Minnesota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Minnesota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.44$19.39 to $23.7229,120
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.83 to $34.2612,840
Registered nurses$48.80$42.76 to $55.1770,110
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Oaklawn Health Care, LLC. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.318.213.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.51.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.92.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.54.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.91.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.720.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.85.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
28.117.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
15.623.523.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.914.812.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.01.61.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.71.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Oaklawn Health Care, LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (65.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

65.4% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 97 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

8.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 118 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

66.0% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 47 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: OAKLAWN HEALTH CARE LLC. CMS links this home to Monarch Healthcare Management, a group of 45 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Hml LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization13%07/01/2015
Spartan Healthcare LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization23%07/01/2015
Yazoma Holdings, LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization23%07/01/2015
Arem, Jeffrey5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual13%07/01/2015
Jaffa, Noam5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual15%07/01/2015
Stern, William5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual15%07/01/2015
Halpert, Marc5% or greater indirect ownership interestIndividual23%07/01/2015
Legum, Joshua5% or greater indirect ownership interestIndividual23%07/01/2015
Muencz, Jeffrey5% or greater indirect ownership interestIndividual13%07/01/2015
Halpert, MarcContracted managing employeeIndividual07/01/2015
Legum, JoshuaCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2015
Muencz, JeffreyCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2015
Stern, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2015
Monarch Healthcare Management LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization07/01/2015

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 3, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.36 hours per resident per day, below the Minnesota average of 3.71.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Oaklawn Health Care, LLC's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Oaklawn Health Care, LLC 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Oaklawn Health Care, LLC get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 10, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
Has Oaklawn Health Care, LLC been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $32,183 in the last three years.
Does Oaklawn Health Care, LLC accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Oaklawn Health Care, LLC?
CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to Monarch Healthcare Management. Legal business name: OAKLAWN HEALTH CARE LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection