1311 Parkview Avenue, Rockford, IL 61107 · Winnebago County · (815) 399-8832
129 certified beds, about 120 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145751 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 21, 2025, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 65 health citations since June 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $21,212 in the last three years; the largest was $21,212, and the latest is dated July 10, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.70 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.62 of those hours.
59.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Citadel Healthcare, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 65 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident from misappropriation of funds. This applies to one of three residents (R1) reviewed for misappropriation in the sample of six.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from physical abuse for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 10The
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions of air mattress pumps were on and set to the residents' weights. This applies to 3 of 6 residents (R6, R7 and R9) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 10.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred using a mechanical lift in a safe manner for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 7.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer prevention interventions were in place for residents at risk for pressure ulcers and failed to ensure treatment orders were implemented for a resident with a pressure ulcer for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2 and R3) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was available for administration for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medications in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred with a gait belt and failed to ensure a resident was safely moved outside in a wheelchair. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for safety in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have orders in place for non-pressure wounds, failed to have interventions in place for non-pressure wound healing, and failed to ensure a resident received a specialist consult for vaginal pain for three of 24 residents (R93, R362, R365) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 24.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an adequate amount of staff were scheduled to meet the needs of residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 36 residents residing on the third floor of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to don personal protective equipment (PPE) for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene in a manner to prevent cross contamination for five of 24 residents (R66, R93, R34 R16, R362) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 24.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 24 residents (R88) reviewed for resident's rights in the sample of 24.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed anti-anxiety medications had a stop date for two of five residents (R66, R104) reviewed for chemical restraints in the sample of 24.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) assistance was provided for dependent residents for three of 24 residents (R16, R34, R93) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 24.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and implement treatment interventions for pressure wounds, and failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were in place for 3 of 8 residents (R77, R365, R362), reviewed for pressure wounds in the sample of 24.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure splints were in place for residents with contractures for 2 of 5 residents (R30, R12) reviewed for limited range of motion in the sample of 24.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred safely for 1 (R66) of 24 residents reviewed for safety/supervision in the sample of 24.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure R44's steel oxygen cylinders were stored to prevent damage to the cylinders for 1 of 5 residents (R44) reviewed for respiratory services in the sample of 24.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were legibly labeled and dated when opened for 2 of 2 residents (R24 R18) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 24.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to offer a resident the pneumonia vaccination which applies to 1 of 5 residents (R36) reviewed for vaccinations in a sample of 24
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation and failed to obtain and/or maintain documentation of a thorough investigation of monetary misappropriation for 1 of 24 residents (R364) in the sample of 24 reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with oral and/or denture care for one (R7) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL); and the facility failed to follow its policy and procedures by not ensuring that a resident with a self-care deficit (R7) received the necessary assistance to maintain oral hygiene.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment by having wallpaper falling down that had a black substance on it for 2 of 4 residents (R1 and R6) reviewed for homelike environment in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were documented as administered in the narcotic reconciliation binder for 8 of 9 residents (R4, R6-R12) reviewed for controlled medications in the sample of 13.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure misappropriation of medications did not occur for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for misappropriation of medications in the sample of 13.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of medications to the Illinois Department of Public Health for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for misappropriation of medications in the sample of 13.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of misappropriation of medication for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for misappropriation of medications in the sample of 13.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were stored under a double lock in the medication room for 2 of 9 residents (R6 and R13) reviewed for controlled medications in the sample of 13.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff follow the Abuse Prevention Policy. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff report suspicions of sexual abuse to administration in a timely manner. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's Power of Attorney regarding a reported fall, new onset of right ankle swelling, and an Xray order. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for nursing care in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who had a change of condition received services timely for suspected urinary tract infection. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with significant weight loss received the recommended nutritional supplements. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an intravenous antibiotic was administered and failed to administer medication at the scheduled times for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 10.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure daily dressing changes were completed as ordered, and failed to ensure as needed dressing changes were completed when a dressing was loose for 2 of 3 residents (R3 & R4) reviewed for dressings in the sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to give a resident an as needed nebulizer treatment when he was wheezing for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medications and respiratory treatments in the sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to give a resident his evening medications for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medications and respiratory treatments in the sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dementia had individualized interventions with behaviors of agitation/restlessness while in bed. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for dementia care in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to clarify conflicting admitting orders for a resident who was re-admitted to the facility after hospitalization to ensure necessary care and services were provided. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess and monitor a resident's(R94) ankle. This failure resulted in R94 developing an infected ankle that caused a post-surgical screw to protrude out of her ankle and be admitted to the local hospital for surgical cleaning and repair. The facility failed to identify, assess and implement treatment interventions for a resident(R24) with new wounds. This applies to 2 of 25 residents (R24 and R94) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility to report new pressure injuries. The facility failed to ensure pressure injury prevention interventions were in place. The facility failed to identify a resident's pressure injury prior to the injury becoming a Stage III injury. These failures resulted in R101 developing a Stage III pressure injury to her coccyx and Stage II pressure injuries to each of her buttocks. The facility failed to ensure pressure treatment interventions were in place and failed to complete weekly assessments on residents(R82, R24) with pressure injuries. This applies to 3 of 11 residents (R101, R82, R24) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident (R121) was assessed, in-person, by a Certified Dietary Manager or Registered Dietician, upon admission to the facility. The facility failed to obtain and monitor a resident's (R121) weight as per physician order. These failures resulted in R121 sustaining a significant weight loss of 20.3 % (49.4 pounds) in 25 days. This applies to 1 of 10 residents (R121) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the chili recipe for the noon meal. This applies to all 127 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) assistance to residents that required staff assistance for toileting and incontinence care for 7 of 25 residents (R101, R121, R113, R103, R9, R78, R24) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff removed their gloves and washed their hands to prevent cross contamination, failed to don personal protective equipment before entering an isolation room, and failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 6 of 25 residents (R9, R24, R58, R82, R101 and R103) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided the COVID-19 vaccine. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R113) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a splint was applied to a resident's left hand contracture for 1 of 2 residents (R11) reviewed for splints in the sample of 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were supervised while smoking. The facility also failed to ensure residents with a risk for aspiration pneumonia were supervised while eating. This applies to 2 of 25 residents (R5 and R83) reviewed for safety/supervision in the sample of 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was performed in a manner to prevent infections and failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter bags were kept below the level of the bladder and off of the ground to prevent infection for 3 of 9 residents (R24, R103 and R158) reviewed for incontinence care and catheters in the sample of 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 24 opportunities with 7 errors resulting in a 24.14% error rate. This applies to 2 of 9 residents (R105, R113) observed in the medication pass.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label a multi dose insulin pen with an open and/or expiration date for one of one resident (R32) reviewed for medication labeling in the sample of 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to offer residents the pneumonia vaccine. This applies to 3 of 5 residents (R22, R82 and R113) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's (R1) representative of a change in condition and need to alter treatment. This applies to 1 of 5 residents reviewed for change in condition in the sample of 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect 2 residents (R2, R3) from physical abuse by another resident. This applies to 2 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor, document, and respond to behaviors for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for behavior management in the sample of 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for a dependent resident. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for ADLs in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were obtained prior to serving the meals. This failure has the potential to affect all 122 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for homelike environment in the sample of 17.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were done after a fall for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for post fall care in the sample of 17.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications. This failure has the potential to affect all residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to communicate a resident change in condition to the Physician and to other staff in the facility. This facility failure resulted in R70 being fed a meal when he could not safely swallow the food. This applies to one of one resident (R70) reviewed for notification in the sample of 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform surgical wound care in a manner to prevent infection for 1 of 1 resident (R325) reviewed for non-pressure skin care in the sample of 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform urinary catheter care in a manner to prevent infection for 1 of 5 residents (R88) reviewed for urinary catheters in the sample of 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a significant weight loss for a resident (R109) receiving dialysis. This applies to 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dialysis in the sample of 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinent care was provided in a manner to prevent cross-contamination for 1 of 8 residents (R45) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 23.
3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 10, 2024, 2 on June 13, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 10, 2024 | Fine | $21,212 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.70 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.47 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.23 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.85 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 59.6% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 53.8% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.67 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.80 on weekdays and 3.47 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.34 in April to June 2025 to 3.70 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.70 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.47 | 1.0% | 0 of 90 | 120 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.59 | 0.60 | 3.68 | 3.36 | 1.0% | 0 of 92 | 124 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.55 | 0.64 | 3.65 | 3.30 | 1.0% | 0 of 92 | 125 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.34 | 0.61 | 3.45 | 3.08 | 0.8% | 0 of 91 | 121 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.7 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.1 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 31.1 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.1 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.1 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pa Peterson at the Citadel's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
46.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 168 eligible stays.
11.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 154 eligible stays.
8.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 87 eligible stays.
62.1% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 118 residents counted.
1.3% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 118 residents counted.
98.2% this home
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PA PETERSON AT THE CITADEL LLC. CMS links this home to Citadel Healthcare, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kohen, Tsipporah | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 06/30/2017 |
| Ripstein, Kenneth | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/30/2017 | |
| Aaron, Jonathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Graf, Marcella | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/30/2017 | |
| Michalsen, Thomas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/10/2025 | |
| Rhoe, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/31/1999 | |
| Ripstein, Kenneth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/30/2017 | |
| Aaron, Jonathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Michalsen, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/10/2025 | |
| Rhoe, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/14/2020 | |
| Ripstein, Kenneth | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.