Paradigm at Sweeny
109 N McKinney, Sweeny, TX 77480 · Brazoria County · (979) 548-3383
90 certified beds, about 60 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675344 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 4, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 22 health citations since February 2023, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $50,189 in the last three years; the largest was $38,284, and the latest is dated July 1, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.89 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.63 of those hours.
75.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Paradigm Healthcare, an affiliated group of 17 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
July 1, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (CR#1) of 7 residents reviewed. The facility failed to initiate wound preventative measures on [DATE] when CR#1 readmitted to the facility leading to infection and hospitalization. The facility failed to assess and recognize a change in condition and initiate wound preventative measures of [DATE] when the facility became aware that CR#1 had redness on her sacrum area during weekly skin observation leading to infection and hospitalization. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator on [DATE] at 7:21p.m. [...]
May 11, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident, with or without an indwelling catheter, receives the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) reviewed for incontinent care. -CNA did not remove his contaminated gloves nor performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care for Resident #1; placing the resident at risk for UTI infection due to the incorrect incontinent care procedure. This failure could place residents at risk for UTI infections or hospitalizations. Findings Included:Record review of face sheet for Resident # 1, dated 5/11/2026, revealed a 73- year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for one (Resident # 1) of three residents reviewed for infection control. CNA A, on 5/11/2026, did not remove his contaminated gloves nor performed hand hygiene after touching multiple surfaces prior to and after incontinent care to Resident # 1. This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infection and cross contamination. Findings Included:Record review of face sheet for Resident # 1, dated 5/11/2026, revealed a 73- year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: [...]
July 4, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- K Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident #59 and Resident #60) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect were free from abuse. The facility failed to address inappropriate sexual behavior between Resident #59 and Resident #60. Resident #59 had a diagnosis which included Dementia and Resident #60 had a diagnosis which included Alzheimers. The facility failed to immediately implement the Psychology NP's recommendation to move Resident #60 off of the unit. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 6/14/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 6/14/2025 at 3:35 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 6/17/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern with the severity level at a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy, because all staff had not been trained. [...]
- K Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the residents' medical, nursing, and mental and psychological needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 residents (Resident #31, Resident #59, and Resident #60) of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. [...]
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to adequately supervise Resident #31 when she ingested plastic wrap from a container while being monitored by CMA H during dining. An IJ was identified on 07/03/35 at 1:22 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:22 PM. While the IJ was removed on 07/04/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained on accidents and supervision. This failure could place residents at risk for injury, harm, and impairment.
- E Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the notices to residents was provided when changes in coverage were made to services covered by Medicare/Medicaid for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #6, and Resident #43) reviewed for resident rights. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #6 and Resident #43 was given a Notice of Medicare NON-Coverage (resident who is not covered on a Medicare Part A skilled nursing stay) and or Beneficiary Notice CMS form 10055 (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage). This failure could place residents, or their representatives at risk for not being fully informed about services covered by Medicare Part A and not being aware of changes to provided services.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for storage, preparation and sanitation. -The facility failed to label and date gravy and milk stored in the walk-in refrigerator. -The facility failed to label and date Gelatin stored in the dry storage. -The facility failed to discard expired cooked food from the walk-in refrigerator. -The facility failed to discard juice thickener, with a best used by date of 04/16/25, from the dry storage. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food-borne illness and food contamination if consumed.
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation of resident representative to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for transfer and discharge rights.-The facility failed to notify the resident representative (Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman) of the transfer or discharge with the reasons for the move in writing in a language and manner they understand. -The facility failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the Office of the State LTC Ombudsman involving Resident #1.-This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving an advocate who can inform them of their options, rights, and the added protection from being inappropriately transferred or discharged .
June 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect for 2 of 6 residents (Resident#1 and #2) reviewed for investigating and reporting abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation and report to SSA after Resident #1 was found on the floor, observed with a skin tear and hematoma to the right eyebrow and hematoma to the right check on 5/24/2024, and Resident#1 was unable to provide details on how the incident occurred. 2. The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation and report to SSA after Resident #2 an a family member of Resdient#2 alleged an incident of abuse on 5/31/2024. These deficient practices could have placed residents at risk for abuse, neglect, exploitation, and or mistreatment. Findings Included: [...]
- E Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately but not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for reporting. 1. The facility failed to report an unwitnessed fall to the SSA when Resident #1 was found on the floor, was unable to provide details on how the fall occurred, and staff assessed Resident#1 to have a skin tear and hematoma (bruise) to the right eyebrow and a hematoma to the right check on 05/24/2024. 2. The facility failed to report the allegation of abuse alleged by Resident #2 on 05/31/2024 to the SSA. [...]
- E Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment while the investigation is in process, and failed to ensure corrective action must be taken for 2 of 6 residents (Resident#1 and #2) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to investigate after Resident #1 was found on the floor, observed with a skin tear and hematoma to the right eyebrow and hematoma to the right check on 5/24/2024, and Resident#1 was unable to provide details on how the incident occurred. 2. The facility failed to report the allegation of abuse alleged by Resident #2 on 5/31/24 to the State Agency. These deficient practices could have placed residents at risk for abuse, neglect, exploitation, and or mistreatment.
March 21, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 3 of 10 residents (Residents #52, #220, and #15) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to update Resident #52's care plan to indicate the use of a foley catheter had been discontinued. The facility failed to update Resident #220's care plan to indicate the resident's diet, ADLs, and the use of an antipsychotic medication. as noted on the MDS The facility failed to revise Resident #15's care plan to indicate the presence of a newly acquired pressure wound. These failures could affect residents by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for kitchen sanitation. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety reviewed for food and nutrition services. Several food items in the refrigerator had use by dates that were expired but were still observed in refrigerator during initial kitchen observation. This failure could have the potential to affect residents who ate food from the facility's kitchen placing them at risk of foodborne illness. The facility failed to ensure hairnets and beard guards were worn while in the kitchen. [...]
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care for 1 (Resident #60) of 18 residents reviewed for base-line care plans. The facility failed to ensure (Resident #60) had a baseline care plan developed within 48-hours after admission with goals and interventions. The failure could place newly admitted residents at risks of not receiving the care and continuity of services.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 (Resident #170) of 1 resident reviewed for pharmacy services. LVN B failed to dissolve Resident #170's Dexamethasone 4 mg tablet, Famotidine 20 mg tablet, and Midodrine 15mg tablet in water prior to administering it through the g-tube. This failure could place residents with G-tubes (Gastrostomy tube) at risk of tube clogging/obstruction, tube replacement, medical complications, or a decline in health due to inappropriate G-tube care, management, and not following appropriate procedures. Findings Include: [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #60) observed for infection control. LVN A failed to perform any hand hygiene (hand washing or hand sanitizing) with glove changes during wound care for Resident #60. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections.
March 8, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer, based on resident's comprehensive assessment, a therapeutic diet when there was a nutritional problem, and the health care provider ordered a therapeutic diet for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 received fortified meal plan as ordered by their physician. This failure could place residents who are on a modified diet at risk of weight loss and decline in health status. Findings Included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated on 03/08/2024 revealed he was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. [...]
December 14, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights. -The facility failed to immediately notify Resident #1's physician when Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall related to a syncopal episode due to pulse in the 40's . This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and/or interventions.
February 2, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident had a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of information during patient care for 1 resident (Resident #54) out of 8 residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. Nurse A failed to provide full visual privacy during incontinent and wound care for Resident #54. This failure could place residents at risk for low self-esteem, loss of dignity and decreased quality of life.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet resident's needs for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for care plan accuracy (Resident #43). --Resident # 43 did not have an individualized care plan for ADL's. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving care according to their needs and diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for 1 of 25 (Resident #21) residents reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility failed to hold Resident #21's Lisinopril medication, which lowers BP, when the resident had a BP below the safe parameters for administration. This failure could place residents with BP parameters at risk for symptoms of hypotension (low blood pressure), which could include dizziness, light headedness, lethargy (abnormal drowsiness), and unresponsiveness.
Fire safety inspections
8 fire safety citations on file: 4 on July 4, 2025, 3 on March 21, 2024, 1 on February 2, 2023.
Every fire safety citation8 citations
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Have a complete alarm system manually initiated and initiated by fire sprinkler system connection.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 1, 2026 | Fine | $38,284 |
| July 4, 2025 | Fine | $11,905 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.89 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.63 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.43 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.80 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.45 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 75.0% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 69.2% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.68 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.07 on weekdays and 2.43 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.98 in April to June 2025 to 2.89 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.89 | 0.63 | 3.07 | 2.43 | 8.7% | 0 of 90 | 60 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.06 | 0.64 | 3.26 | 2.55 | 1.3% | 0 of 92 | 61 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.64 | 0.51 | 2.87 | 2.04 | 0.9% | 0 of 92 | 62 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.98 | 0.49 | 3.24 | 2.34 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 61 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Texas
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.6 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.8 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.8 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Short-term rehab results
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Paradigm at Sweeny's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
CMS reports none of these results for this home: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Owners and operators
Legal business name: OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTER. CMS links this home to Paradigm Healthcare, a group of 17 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oakbend Medical Center | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 10/01/2022 |
| Freudenberger, Joseph | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 10/01/2022 | |
| Freudenberger, Joseph | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2022 | |
| Sweeny Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 4, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 4, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 4, 2025: "Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.43 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Oak Village Healthcare Lake Jackson, 14.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 9 citations
- Brazos Healthcare Center Lake Jackson, 16.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Country Village Care Angleton, 17 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Paradigm at Bay City Bay City, 17.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Creekside Village Richwood, 17.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Woodlake Nursing Center Clute, 17.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Matagorda Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Bay City, 18 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Cypress Woods Care Center Angleton, 18 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Paradigm at Sweeny's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Paradigm at Sweeny 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 1 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Paradigm at Sweeny get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 4, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Paradigm at Sweeny been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $50,189 in the last three years.
- Does Paradigm at Sweeny accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Paradigm at Sweeny?
- CMS lists 4 owners and managers, and links the home to Paradigm Healthcare. Legal business name: OAKBEND MEDICAL CENTER.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.