11910 Richmond Ave, Houston, TX 77082 · Harris County · (281) 497-2838
125 certified beds, about 105 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2005
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676059 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 30 health citations since September 2023, 7 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (6 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $33,494 in the last three years; the largest was $17,345, and the latest is dated February 9, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.25 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.
39.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Hmg Healthcare, an affiliated group of 31 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wrotePurpose: P1 Complaint Investigation Date: 6/2/2026 Intake: 1093120 [3030810] Census: 99 Abbreviations:Admin-AdministratorADL-Activities Daily LivingBIMS-Brief Interview for Mental StatusBOM-Business Office ManagerCNA-Certified Nurse AssistantC/O-Complaints OfCR-Closed RecordCVA-Cerebral Vascular AccidentDME-Durable Medical EquipmentDON- Director of NursingDX-DiagnosisFM-Family MemberHHC-Home Health CareHO-History OfHTN-HypertensionHX-HistoryIDT-Interdisciplinary TeamLTC-Long Term CareLVN - Licensed Vocational NurseMD-Medical DoctorMDS- Minimum Data SetNOMNC-Notice of Medicare Non-CoverageNP-Nurse PractitionerOT-occupational TherapyPCC-Point Click CarePCP-Primary Care PhysicianPRN- Pro Re NataPT-Physical TherapyROM- Range of MotionR/T-Related ToS/S-Signs and SymptomsSW-Social WorkerTrans-TransportationWC-WheelchairBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide and [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #6 and #107) reviewed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's call light was within reach on 04/07/2026, while he was asleep in bed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #107's call light was within reach on 04/07/2026 and 04/08/2026, while he was lying in bed. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving immediate assistance when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure withing 14-days the facility completed a resident assessment, and electronically transmitted encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System for 2 of 5 closed records (CR #10 and CR #25) reviewed for MDS transmission. The facility failed to ensure CR #10's admission MDS assessment was completed and transmitted within 14 days of CR's entry. The facility failed to ensure CR #25's admission MDS assessment was completed and transmitted within 14 days of CR's admission. Thess failures could place residents at risk of not having assessments completed and submitted in a timely manner as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 2 of 8 (Resident #21 and Resident #33) resident rooms reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure mouthwash, hand sanitizer, lotion, hair products and bath wash were properly stored and not out in the open in Resident #21's room on 04/07/2026, 04/08/2026, and 04/09/2026. The facility failed to ensure mouth wash, lotion and hair products were properly stored and not out in the open in Resident #33's room on 04/07/2026, 04/08/2026, and 04/09/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of injury due to unnecessary access to potentially harmful substances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and nutrition services for facility residents.1. The facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled and dated in the Resident Guest Refreshment Room, located on 400 hall.2. The facility failed to ensure foods were properly sealed in the Resident Guest Refreshment Room, located on 400 hall.3. The facility failed to ensure the Resident Guest Room, on 400 hall did not present with a foul odor. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and disease.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (CR #1) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to provide sufficient supervision to CR#l on 01/31/2026 at 8:00pm, he was located at approximately 7:00 AM on 02/01/2026, approximately 7 miles from the facility, in the parking lot of a local Emergency Care Center. Upon discovery, CR #1 had sustained a laceration to his right eye, suspected to be from a fall. CR #1 required hospitalization from 02/01/2026 through 02/02/2026. These failures could result in residents not receiving appropriate supervision leading to elopement, injuries, hospitalization, or death. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 01/31/2026 and ended on 02/02/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline for each resident that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for the resident that met professional standards of care within 48 hours of the resident's admission for 1 of 5 residents ( Resident # 1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan which addressed and included measurable objectives and timeframes related to Resident # 1's pressure wound of the left lateral thigh (a position or direction that is away from the midline or middle of the body) thigh which she had since her admission 4/24/2025. This deficient practice could affect any resident and contribute to residents not having their needs met according to their assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 out of 23 residents (CR #1) reviewed for adequate supervision. -CR #1 left the faciity on [DATE] on pass and did not return. The facility did not know where he was and did not make attempts to locate CR#1. This deficiency exposed residents living in the facility to potential harm, injury or death due to not being adequately monitored. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 02/21/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 11:13am. While the IJ was removed on 02/21/2025 at 1:40pm with the Administrator, DON, and Regional VP of Operations. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on Record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System within 14 days after a facility completes the resident's assessment for 2 out of 3 residents, (CR #96 and CR #97) reviewed for MDS transmission. -The facility failed to transmit a completed Discharge MDS assessment for CR #96 within 14 days of completion. -The facility failed to transmit a completed Discharge MDS assessment for CR #97 within 14 days of completion. These failures could place residents at-risk of not having their assessment completed and submitted timely, which could result in denial of services and or payment for services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for and 3 (shared medication cart between Hall 100 and 400, 200 and 300 ) of 6 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. - The facility failed to ensure the 200,300, shared 100 and 400 hall medication carts did not contain eyedrops, ointment, and nasal spray that were opened but not labeled with the resident's name and not dated. This failure could place residents at risk of adverse medication reactions and infections. Findings Include: During observation on 02/19/25 at 2:50 PM, the following medications were found in the medication carts for 200 hall with LVN AA: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #31, Residents #41 and Resident #76) reviewed for infection control practices. - The facility failed to ensure CNA C followed proper infection control and hand hygiene for Resident #31 during Foley and incontinent care. - CNA AA did not utilize appropriate hand hygiene during Foley catheter care for Resident #41 - CNA AA did not utilize appropriate hand hygiene during incontinent for Resident #41 - The facility failed to ensure CNA F Donned proper PPE while providing incontinent care for Resident # 76 who was in enhanced barrier precaution isolation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 21 (Resident #44) residents for dignity. -RT A pushed Resident #44 into the dining room with his catheter bag strapped onto his leg which had urine in it and was exposed with no privacy cover. This failure could put residents at risk of psychosocial distress from failure to protect their dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31was provided personal grooming (facial hair on the chin and under the chin) by facility staff. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the assistance needed for daily care and services
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure CNA C did not place foley bag on Resident #31's bed during foley care. The facility failed to ensure CNA C properly cleaned Resident #31during incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent complications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with gastrostomy tubes. (g-tubes) (Resident #76) CNA F did not inform the nurse to turn off Resident #76's gastrostomy tube feeding prior to providing care. CNA F lowered the head of Resident #76's bed to a flat position for incontinent care while the g-tube feeding continued to infuse. This failure could place residents with g- tubes at risk for complications, aspiration, and pneumonia.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care and services, including oxygen administration was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #81) reviewed for respiratory therapy in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #81's oxygen was set according to physician orders. This failure could place residents at risk of respiratory distress.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Residents who are incontinent of bowel received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1of 7 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for incontinent care in that: -Resident #3 did not receive incontinent care that followed infection control protocols. CNA A did not follow acceptable hand-sanitizing practices during incontinent care for Resident #3. These failures placed residents requiring incontinent care at risk of infections with the potential for complications and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish, and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 7 residents (Residents #3, #5 and #9) reviewed for infection control procedures in that: -CNA A did not use an alcohol-based sanitizer between changing gloves while providing incontinent care to Resident #3. -LVN A did not clean Resident #5's peri-wound (the area around a wound) before applying dressing during wound care. -LVN A did not remove his gown and gloves after leaving Resident B's room and came back in again and continued providing care to Resident #5. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 2 of 6 (Resident #2 and Resident #4) residents reviewed for environmental concerns in that: The facility failed to provide a safe, clean and sanitary restroom for Resident #2 on 01/31/24. The facility failed to provide a safe, clean and sanitary resident room for Resident #4 on 01/31/24. These failures place residents at risk of infection and safety hazards due to an unsafe, unsanitary and uncomfortable environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #87, Resident #27, and Resident #80) reviewed for incontinent care. - The facility failed to ensure Resident #87's privacy bag, foley bag and tubing were not placed on the floor. - The facility failed to ensure Resident # 27's privacy bag, foley bag and tubing were not touching the floor, and LVN O followed appropriate procedure and infection control during foley care for Resident #27. - The facility failed to ensure CNA J cleaned Resident #80 completely during incontinent care. These failures could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis service were provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for dialysis services. (Resident #244) The facility failed to consistently document Resident #244's dialysis communication form. This failure could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #80) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #80 was provided incontinent care in a timely manner, causing her incontinent brief and linen saturated with urine. This failure could place residents at risk for discomfort, infection, and dignity issues.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for three (CR #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for treatment of pressure ulcer. The facility failed to ensure CR #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, The facility failed to provide daily wound care for CR #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3, resulting in re-infection of wounds, hospitalization, and amputation of CR #1's right foot. Wounds were getting infected and some of the pressure ulcers increased in size and not improving. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 of 20 residents (CR #1) reviewed for neglect. - The facility failed to ensure CR #1 had adequate supervision to prevent an accident on [DATE] which resulted in a fall with major injury (left femur fracture) requiring surgery on [DATE]. CR #1 passed away on [DATE] after being released back to the facility from the hospital. The facility failed to read and notify the NP accurately of X-Ray results of CR #1's impression of left femur fracture. - The facility failed to update CR #1's care plan and put interventions in place after continued falls. The facility failed to adequately educate staff on caring for residents with high risk for fall. - An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] at 5:23 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents for 1 of 20 residents CR #1(Closed Record) reviewed for abuse and neglect policies. The facility failed to ensure CR #1 had adequate supervision to prevent an accident which resulted in a fall with major injury (left femur fracture) requiring surgery on [DATE]. The facility failed to read and notify the NP accurately of X-Ray results of CR #1's impression of left femur fracture resulting in delayed treatment. The facility failed to update CR #1's care plan and put interventions in place after continued falls, An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] at 5:23 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 20 residents (CR #1 (Closed Record)) reviewed for free of accidents, hazards, supervision, and devices., in that: The facility failed to ensure CR #1 had adequate supervision to prevent an accident on [DATE] which resulted in a fall with major injury (left sub-capital femoral neck fracture that resulted to him having surgery) on [DATE]. CR #1 declined and passed away on [DATE] after being released back to the facility from the hospital. The Facility failed to implement interventions after each incident of fall for CR #1 on, [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE], An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] at 5:23 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner or per the ordering physician order for 1 (CR #1) of 20 residents reviewed for radiology services in that: -The facility failed to report CR#1's ( Closed Record) x-ray results of a fracture of the left hip, femur, in a prompt manner. CR #1 fell on [DATE] at 2:00 PM, X-Ray done and NP got result on [DATE] and CR #1 transferred to hospital at 1:13 PM on [DATE] - CR #1 had a hip fracture that had delayed treatment which caused harm to the resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 5 residents (CR #1) reviewed for care plans in that: -- CR #1's care plan was not revised by staff after multiple falls and a fall with injury. Interventions in place were not current and updated on the plan of care. This failure affected 1 resident and placed an additional 20 residents with falls at risk of not having their individually assessed needs met to prevent further falls and to prevent resident injury, hospitalizations, and deaths.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse and neglect are thoroughly investigated and report results of the investigation to the stage agency within 5 working days of the incident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for allegations of neglect as evidence by: The facility did not complete an investigation regarding Resident #19's complaint and report the findings to the agency within 5 working days. This failure could place residents at the facility in jeopardy of having their complaints and concerns reported and investigated for potential mental, physical, or emotional abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse and neglect are thoroughly investigated and report results of the investigation to the stage agency within 5 working days of the incident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for allegations of neglect as evidence by: The facility did not complete an investigation regarding Resident #19's complaint and report the findings to the agency within 5 working days. This failure could place residents at the facility in jeopardy of having their complaints and concerns reported and investigated for potential mental, physical, or emotional abuse.
11 fire safety citations on file: 9 on April 9, 2026, 2 on December 22, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 9, 2026 | Fine | $17,345 |
| February 22, 2025 | Fine | $16,149 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.25 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.02 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.76 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 39.6% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 58.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.13 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.35 on weekdays and 3.02 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.17 in April to June 2025 to 3.25 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.25 | 0.38 | 3.35 | 3.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 105 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.41 | 0.44 | 3.48 | 3.20 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 102 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.23 | 0.36 | 3.34 | 2.97 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 109 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.17 | 0.36 | 3.28 | 2.90 | 0.0% | 5 of 91 | 108 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.4 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.9 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.8 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Park Manor of Westchase's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
11.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 61 eligible stays.
7.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Hmg Healthcare, a group of 31 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cibc Bank USA | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Sabra Health Care Reit Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Zions Bancorporation | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Murrell, Edward | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/02/2012 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/29/2021 | |
| Culp, Roland | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Dohn, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/27/2019 | |
| Hill, Carrie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/30/2024 | |
| Murrell, Edward | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Odom, Tiffany | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/13/2024 | |
| Pico, Ana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Polio, Mayra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/24/2024 | |
| Prince, Derek | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Reinarz, Christian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Vratis, Kacey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Way, George | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/24/2025 | |
| Healthmark Group Ltd | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/24/2025 | |
| Hm Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/24/2025 | |
| Hmg Healthcare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/24/2025 | |
| Hmg Park Manor of Westchase, L.L.C. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/24/2025 | |
| Sabra Health Care Reit Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Vakil Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates PLLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/29/2021 | |
| Culp, Roland | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Dohn, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/27/2019 | |
| Hill, Carrie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/30/2024 | |
| Odom, Tiffany | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Pico, Ana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Polio, Mayra | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/24/2024 | |
| Prince, Derek | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Reinarz, Christian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Stanbridge, Norma | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/29/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.