Find a nursing home

Home / California / Pleasant Hill

Pleasant Hill Post Acute

1625 Oak Park Boulevard, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 · Contra Costa County · (925) 935-5222

51 certified beds, about 49 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1971

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055049 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 15, 2025, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).

None of its 23 health citations since June 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.20 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.67 of those hours.

30.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).

CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
8D
11E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
2B
0C
July 6, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. F
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it kept accurate records of controlled medications (medication with a potential for abuse) as evidenced by: 1. The facility failed to ensure, for Residents 1-3, the scheduled (controlled medication, narcotic) medication system was complete (all documents available) and accurate (information matched). The record system included Shipping Manifests (pharmacy delivery receipt), Controlled Substance Accountability Sheets (CDR, Controlled Drug Record), Medication Administration Records (MAR, record of medication administration) and destruction logs. The facility records were incomplete. The facility records were inaccurate. These failures had the potential to result in undetected loss and diversion of scheduled medications. [...]
  2. F
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    F836 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow state Title 22 regulations and ensure a qualified social services director was qualified to supervise and direct the social services department for all 47 residents when the facility's previous social services director of 14 months did not have the educational qualifications, and the current social services director did not have two years of social work experience required for the position. The failure had the potential for all residents to receive inadequate social services and discharge planning care. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/12/25, at 11:17 a.m., with Operations Manager (OM), OM stated they were acting as the social services director because the previous social services director departed. OM stated they had been acting as the SSD for approximately two weeks. [...]
August 15, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 14 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for six of 47 sampled residents (Resident 2, 4, 9, 16, 64, and 68), the facility failed to inform and provide information to the resident and/or resident representatives, the option to formulate an Advance Directive (AD, a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed treatment directions to healthcare providers regarding residents' medical care. 1. [...]
  2. E
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to meet professional standards of quality for three of three sampled residents (Residents 64, 34, and 67) when the following were observed:1. Resident 64's Fiber source enteral feeding bag (food given through a feeding tube) and tubing were not labeled.2. Resident 34's Intravenous (IV - small flexible tube used to deliver medicine/fluids into a person's vein) secured by tegaderm (clear, waterproof medical device to secure IV line to a person's skin) was not labeled.3. Resident 67's IV line and tubing was not labeled. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the delivery of care services provided to Residents 64, 34 and 67.1. [...]
  3. E
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was below five percent (%) when:1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 administered three antihypertensive (medication to treat high blood pressure) medications to Resident 72 without checking vital signs prior to administering the medications.2. LVN 1 administered topical medication to Resident 45 without doctor's order. These deficient practices placed Residents 72 and 45 at risk of developing complications and adverse reaction related to error in medication administration. 1. During concurrent medication administration observation and interview on 8/14/25, at 9:18 a.m. with LVN 2, LVN 2 was doing morning medication pass. LVN 2 administered Bumetanide 2mg 1 tablet, Carvedilol 6.25mg 1 tablet, and Losartan 100mg 1 tablet by mouth to Resident 72 without checking vital signs. [...]
  4. E
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident of 27 (Resident 72) sampled residents observed during medication administration pass was free from significant medication error when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 administered the following medications without checking Resident 72's vital signs (clinical measurements that tells the state of essential body functions).1. Bumetanide (a powerful water-pill that can lower blood pressure) 2 milligrams (mg - unit of measurement)2. Carvedilol (antihypertensive - medication to treat high blood pressure)3. Losartan (antihypertensive- to treat high blood pressure)This deficient practice had the potential for dangerous drop in blood pressure, possible for stroke and increased risk of death. [...]
  5. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a safe and sanitary manner when:1. Two dietary staff members did not have their hair fully covered with a hairnet. 2. Plate covers and plate bases used were worn out and damaged. 3. A ladle spoon was found stored dirty and in poor condition. 4. Kitchen storage cabinet doors for storing food and cooking equipment were either missing or in poor condition. These failures had the potential to result in contamination of food and foodborne illness for 46 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a facility census of 47. 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/13/25, at 12:40 p.m., with [NAME] 1 and Dietary Aide 1, both dietary staff members did not have their hair fully secured with a hairnet. [...]
  6. E
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    F813 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's food items brought from outside and stored in the residents' refrigerator located in the Conference Room, were labeled and stored appropriately for one of 47 sampled residents (Resident 19). These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and foodborne illnesses. A review of Resident 19's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to provide care), dated 6/13/25, indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a therapeutic diet (a meal plan) order. During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review, on 8/13/25, at 3:15 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP) and Dietary manager (DM), in the conference room, contents of the facility's refrigerator and freezer designated for residents' food brought from outside were checked. [...]
  7. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices when following were noted:1. Doors of four out of five sampled rooms designated for COVID-19 (a disease caused by coronavirus that spreads through the air when an infected person coughs, sneezes, or talks. It can cause fever, cough, tiredness, and trouble breathing, and can be more serious in older adults or people with health problems) residents were left open.2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not perform hand hygiene after touching resident care areas and prior to serving food to Resident 51.3. Resident 57 did not have hand hygiene supplies readily available and within easy reach, to clean his hands after coughing up phlegm (yellow thick mucus).4. [...]
  8. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the tracking entry Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool) within seven calendar days after re-entry for one of 47 sampled residents (Resident 64). [...]
  9. D
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for one of 47 sampled residents (Resident 64), the facility failed to complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool) assessments. This failure had the potential to result in the delayed assessment of resident needs, goals of care and inability to monitor each resident's progress over time. [...]
  10. D
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents (Resident 57) received a thorough assessment and individualized activities program designed to meet his interests for almost two weeks. This failure resulted in Resident 57 feeling frustrated and placed him at risk for isolation. During a review of Resident 57's admission Record printed on 8/14/25, the record indicates Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 57's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], the assessment indicated Resident 57 was able to understand others and was able to make himself understood. [...]
  11. D
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    F919 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident 57's call bell was answered in a timely manner. Resident 57's call system consisted of a standalone call bell, not connected to the call light monitoring panel situated at the nursing station. The call bell did not activate a visual signal outside the room and did not allow tracking of response times. Staff did not respond to Resident 57's call promptly on multiple occasions. This failure resulted in Resident 57 feeling frustrated and placed him at risk for unmet care needs while he was already quarantined for COVID-19 infection. During a review of Resident 57's admission Record printed on 8/14/25, the record indicated Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
  12. B
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    F912 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet for each resident in multiple resident bedrooms: Rooms 14, 15, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of sufficient space for facility staff to provide proper care and increased the risk of not having enough room to store resident belongings at their bedside. During random interviews and observations of care and services from 8/12/25 to 8/15/25, there were adequate space for residents' belongings and for caregivers to provide care in all of the rooms listed. There were no complaints from residents or staff regarding the room space. [...]
  13. D
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    F573 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 63), the facility failed to ensure Resident 63 was allowed to obtain a copy of his requested medical records within the required time frame. This failure resulted in Resident 63's undue concern and anxiety pertaining to obtaining the requested medical records and contact number of his former physician. A review of Resident 63's admission Record, printed on 8/14/24, indicated that resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home upon completion of care on 4/16/23. A review of Resident 63's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to provide care) dated 3/15/23, indicated resident was understood, able to understand others, and had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool for a resident's orientation to time, and capacity to remember. [...]
  14. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled residents (Resident 68) was not given unnecessary anticoagulant (a prescription medication and powerful blood thinner) medication without a doctor's order. This failure resulted in Resident 68 to receive anticoagulant medication unnecessarily and posed a significant health risk, potentially leading to serious and life-threatening outcome. During a review of Resident 68's admission record, printed on 8/15/25, indicated Resident 68 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 68's Minimum Data Set (a federally mandated assessment tool) dated 5/11/25, indicated Resident 68 had multiple diagnoses that included Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA or stroke, where blood vessels in the brain suddenly ruptures and bleeds into the brain). [...]
May 16, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan) assessment was completed within 14 calendar days of admission date for three of three sampled residents (Resident 45, Resident 313, Resident 317). This deficient practice resulted in delayed completion of admission assessment and had the potential to result in Resident 45, 313, and 317 not receiving the appropriate care and services needed based on their health status.
  2. E
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents' (Resident 45, 315 and 316)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide resident care) discharge assessments were completed within 14 days from their discharge date from the facility. This deficient practice has the potential to result in inaccurate census of the facility that may interfere with accurate planning for safe staffing.
  3. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under safe and sanitary conditions when: - moldy and unusable foods were not discarded. - dented can was stored. - food items in dry storage room were not sealed. These failures placed the facility's 45 residents who received food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness. During initial observation of the kitchen on 5/13/24 at 9:43 a.m. accompanied by Registered Dietician (RD), showed the following: (a) opened bag with 16 moldy and unusable French bread were stored in the dry storage room labeled with received by 5/8/24 and used by 5/10/24 (b) dented can of six ounce of unsweetened applesauce was stored with remaining stock in dry storage room (c) opened box of hashbrown was not sealed (d) opened box of brown rice was not sealed. [...]
  4. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility had a 13.79% medication error rate when four medication errors out of 29 opportunities were observed during medication administration for two of four sampled residents (Resident 165 and 264). Resident 165 did not receive an eye drop and an oral medication according to the physician's order. Resident 264's medication did not have a prescribed dosage for cholecalciferol (used to treat or prevent vitamin D deficiency). These failures resulted in medication not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders, which may negatively affect the resident's health.
  5. B
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    F912 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square (sq) feet (ft) of living space per resident for 24 residents who occupied the following multiple resident bedrooms: Rooms 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of sufficient space for the provision of care by facility staff and a lack of sufficient space for residents to have personal belongings at the bedside.
June 16, 2022Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 16, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored under sanitary conditions when multiple undated food items were stored in the freezer, refrigerator and the dry storage room. This deficient practice had the potential of putting residents at risk for food-borne illness.
  2. D
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    F730 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 16, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform Annual Performance Evaluations for two of two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), CNA 1 and CNA 2. This failure had the potential for the facility to employ problematic staff.

Fire safety inspections

28 fire safety citations on file: 4 on August 15, 2025, 16 on May 16, 2024, 8 on June 16, 2022.

Every fire safety citation28 citations
  1. F
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · August 15, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · August 15, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. C
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · August 15, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. C
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · August 15, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
    K 347 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. E
    Meet other general requirements that are deficient.
    K 500 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. E
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. E
    Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
    K 921 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. D
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  19. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  20. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  21. D
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  22. D
    Address patient/client population and determine types of services needed.
    E 7 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  23. D
    Establish staff and initial training requirements.
    E 37 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  24. D
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  25. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  26. D
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  27. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  28. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 16, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.204.523.86
Registered nurses0.670.670.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.834.093.42
Nurse aides2.31
Licensed practical nurses1.22
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)30.0%36.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover50.0%38.1%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 4.28 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.35 on weekdays and 3.83 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.13 in April to June 2025 to 4.20 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.200.674.353.83 0.0%0 of 9049
Oct to Dec 20254.100.604.263.72 0.0%0 of 9248
Jul to Sep 20254.100.544.243.76 0.0%0 of 9248
Apr to Jun 20254.130.444.273.78 0.0%0 of 9148
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
California, Jan to Mar 20264.360.594.523.972.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for California

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
California, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.90$22.04 to $26.35110,060
LPNs and LVNs$38.34$35.98 to $45.0682,850
Registered nurses$67.44$58.87 to $83.25338,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.010.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.31.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.21.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.04.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.012.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
22.822.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.411.212.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pleasant Hill Post Acute's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (63.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

63.0% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · California: 301 better, 190 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 396 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · California: 10 better, 22 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 449 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

5.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · California: 8 better, 48 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 270 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

69.3% this home

Median of homes: California59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 114 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: California0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 306 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: California0.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 306 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

98.5% this home

Median of homes: California96.2% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 193 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PLEASANT HILLIDENCE OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Providence Group North LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%06/01/2016
Bills, CraigW-2 managing employeeIndividual08/01/2017
Apt, FrederickCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024
Jergensen, JoshuaCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024
Mitchell, JohnCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 6, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on August 15, 2025: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 15, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 15, 2025: "Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.83 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

California contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Pleasant Hill Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Pleasant Hill Post Acute 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Pleasant Hill Post Acute get at its last inspection?
12 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 15, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
Has Pleasant Hill Post Acute been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Pleasant Hill Post Acute accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Pleasant Hill Post Acute?
CMS lists 5 owners and managers, and links the home to PACS Group. Legal business name: PLEASANT HILLIDENCE OPCO LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection