Home / Pennsylvania / New Bloomfield
213 East Main Street, New Bloomfield, PA 17068 · Perry County · (717) 582-4346
118 certified beds, about 107 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1979
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395426 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 11, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 20 health citations since January 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated May 8, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.22 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.
42.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for four of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 5, 14, 56, and 99). Findings Include:Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident 5's comprehensive care plan revealed a care plan for being at risk for elopement with an intervention for the resident to have door alarms on at all times, with an initiation date of July 15, 2025; and an intervention for a wander guard, with an initiation date of July 15, 2025. Further review of Resident 5's elopement care plan revealed an intervention for a chair alarm that was discontinued on June 25, 2025. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a performance review for nurse aide staff at least once every 12 months for two of five employees reviewed (Employees 1 and 2). Findings Include: Review of select facility documentation revealed that Employee 1 was hired on July 13, 2021, and Employee 2 was hired on October 15, 2024. Review of Employee 1's most recent employee performance evaluation revealed that it was dated as being completed on December 8, 2025. Review of Employee 2's most recent employee performance evaluation revealed that it was dated as being completed on December 9, 2025. During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 11, 2025, at 11:22 AM, she stated that Employee 1's prior performance evaluation was completed on October 17, 2024. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation to residents to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility; and failed to provide a discharge summary that included a post-discharge plan of care, including post-discharge services, for one of five discharged residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include:Review of facility policy, titled Discharging the Resident, dated December 2016, revealed If the resident is being discharged home, ensure that resident and/or responsible party receive teaching and discharge instructions. Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF-a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD-acid reflux). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, facility document reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely notify a resident's physician of an incident that had the potential to result in a negative outcome for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 44). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, with a last review date of October 24, 2024, revealed, in part, facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status; and The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): accident or incident involving the resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 8 and 60). Findings Include: Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease). Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed a physician's order for Oxygen via nasal cannula to maintain saturation above 91 as needed for shortness of breath, with an active date of November 6, 2024. Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed Resident 8 was administered oxygen via nasal cannula on November 6, 7, 8, and 9, 2024. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for three of 21 records reviewed (Residents 10, 60, and 75).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was reviewed and revised for three of 21 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 11, and 60). Findings Include: Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included epilepsy (a brain condition causing recurring seizures) and multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the central nervous system). Review of Resident 1's care plan on December 2, 2024, revealed a care plan with a focus area of, Resident has an alteration in neurological function, with an intervention of IM (intramuscular) Ativan (benzodiazepine medication) as needed for seizure activity, with a date initiated of July 3, 2024. Review of Resident 1's physician orders on December 2, 2024, failed to reveal an order for Ativan for Resident 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 44).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive feeding devices for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident 53).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary manner during one of one tray line observations in the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that Quality Assurance Committee meetings were held at least quarterly for one of four quarters reviewed (First Quarter of 2024).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility job description, clinical record review, review of facility investigation and documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance in its failure to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents, which resulted in harm, as evidenced by a scalp laceration and a leg injury for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and complications related to the use of a foley catheter (small, flexible tube that can be inserted through the urethra and into the bladder, allowing urine to drain) for one of two residents reviewed for use of a catheter (Resident 42). Findings Include: Review of Resident 42's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included paraplegia (impairment in motor or sensory function of the lower extremities) and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (urinary bladder problems due to disease or injury of the central nervous system or peripheral nerves involved in the control of urination). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that assessed nutritional interventions were provided to maintain acceptable nutritional parameters for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 20).
Inspectors wroteBased on Food and Drug Administration (FDA) information review, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 35).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, grievance review, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to offer and/or provide dental services for one of 19 resident records reviewed (Resident 16).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment after a significant change in condition of one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 68).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 54).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 53). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled IIA2: Medication Administration General Guidelines, undated, with a last review date of July 3, 2023, revealed, in part: 11) Residents are allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the attending physician and in accordance with procedures for self-administration of medications; 14) For residents not in their rooms or otherwise unavailable to receive medication on the pass, the MAR [medication administration record] is 'flagged' with appropriate tags. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of two residents reviewed for mobility (Resident 17). Findings Include: Review of Resident 17's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Multiple Sclerosis (MS-a disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of nerves) and contractures of the right and left hands and right and left elbows. Review of Resident 17's current physician orders revealed an order dated December 17, 2023, for bilateral elbow extension splints, on with AM care and off with PM care. [...]
19 fire safety citations on file: 11 on December 11, 2025, 3 on December 5, 2024, 5 on January 10, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.22 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.56 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.88 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.83 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.83 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.5% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 70.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.53 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.35 on weekdays and 2.88 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.41 in April to June 2025 to 3.22 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.22 | 0.56 | 3.35 | 2.88 | 1.2% | 0 of 90 | 107 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.20 | 0.54 | 3.34 | 2.85 | 1.3% | 0 of 92 | 99 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.33 | 0.67 | 3.44 | 3.05 | 0.6% | 0 of 92 | 94 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.41 | 0.64 | 3.55 | 3.07 | 0.7% | 0 of 91 | 91 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.1 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.6 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 29.8 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.0 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.6 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Premier at Perry Village for Nursing and Rehab, Ll's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 15 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
7.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
34.5% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
2.4% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PREMIER AT PERRY VILLAGE FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premier Members | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/18/2017 |
| El Buckeye East LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 25% | 09/18/2017 |
| Gamzeh, Kathleen | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 25% | 09/18/2017 |
| Glatzer, Akiva | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 25% | 09/18/2017 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2019 | |
| Priority Care Group LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2019 | |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2019 | |
| Brandt, Suzette | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| Creps, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| Glatzer, Akiva | General partnership interest | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| Schaffer, Daniel | General partnership interest | Individual | 09/18/2017 | |
| 213 E Main Street Propco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/18/2017 | |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/14/2025 | |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/14/2025 | |
| Brandt, Suzette | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/07/2025 | |
| Creps, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/14/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.