Home / South Carolina / Greenville
600 Sulphur Springs Road, Greenville, SC 29611 · Greenville County · (864) 246-2721
88 certified beds, about 117 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 425294 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 18, 2025, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the South Carolina average is 3.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 8 health citations since February 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.12 hours per resident per day, against 3.84 across South Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.54 of those hours.
48.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Carolina average 45.9%).
CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an allegation of abuse that occurred on 03/21/26. Specifically, Resident (R)1 alleged she was physically abused and neglected by a staff member on 03/21/26, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely in their original packaging. Specifically, 8 pills and 2 capsules were found loose in 1 of 6 medication carts reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to discard expired medications for Resident (R)123, in 1 of 4 medication storage rooms reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods that were are stored in the freezer, refrigerators, and dry food storage were appropriately sealed, labeled, dated with a use by date, and/or discarded after the manufacturer's expiration date in 1 of 1 kitchen, and 1 of 3 nourishment rooms. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, interviews, review of facility policy and review of manufacturer labeling, the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly stored in 2 of 3 medication rooms and 5 of 10 medication carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement Resident (R)71's Comprehensive Care Plan, to include the usage of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)56 was not served food based on allergies/preference, for 1 of 24 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteThis deficient practice has two Deficient Practice Statements A. Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 2 residents (Residents (R) 14 and R32) reviewed for tracheostomy (trach) care in the sample of 23 residents had the necessary supplies at the bedside in the event of a life-threatening emergency, and failed to train staff on appropriate emergency tracheostomy care in the event that a resident's airway was compromised, which placed residents with a tracheostomy at increased likelihood of serious harm or death. On [DATE] at 9:05 PM, the Administrator and the Regional Director of Operations were informed of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F695-J: Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure 1 Resident ((R) 56) of 2 sampled residents' urinary catheter collection bag was positioned above the level of R56's bladder. The facility's deficient practice increased R56's risk of urinary tract infections.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.12 | 3.84 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.69 | 3.33 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.70 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.89 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 48.0% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 46.7% | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.29 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.30 on weekdays and 2.69 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 29.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.22 in April to June 2025 to 3.12 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.12 | 0.54 | 3.30 | 2.69 | 29.5% | 0 of 90 | 117 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.12 | 0.48 | 3.24 | 2.79 | 24.5% | 0 of 92 | 118 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.21 | 0.45 | 3.37 | 2.81 | 21.7% | 0 of 92 | 117 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.22 | 0.44 | 3.40 | 2.77 | 27.8% | 0 of 91 | 118 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| South Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.62 | 0.53 | 3.81 | 3.13 | 7.2% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.90 | $16.81 to $19.08 | 21,760 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.72 | $27.59 to $34.24 | 9,400 |
| Registered nurses | $39.60 | $37.17 to $46.75 | 49,750 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.1 | 11.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 12.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.9 | 15.3 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.5 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.3 | 13.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Promedica Skilled Nursing and Reh- Greenville West's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (60.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
60.9% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · South Carolina: 53 better, 21 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 107 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · South Carolina: 0 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 107 eligible stays.
7.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · South Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 65 eligible stays.
68.4% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina0.5% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.
5.0% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: REEDY RIVER COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sc Master Tenant, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/13/2023 |
| Providence Group Nh, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/09/2024 |
| Apt, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Bradford, Kody | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/09/2024 | |
| Davis, Angela | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/09/2024 | |
| Theriot Roley, Laurie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/09/2024 | |
| Oakmont West Sc Owner LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2023 | |
| Bradford, Kody | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/22/2025 | |
| Theriot Roley, Laurie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/22/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in South Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.