Home / South Carolina / Greenville
Patewood Post Acute
2 Griffith Road, Greenville, SC 29607 · Greenville County · (864) 990-1918
120 certified beds, about 115 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 425305 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 21, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the South Carolina average is 3.7, the national average 9.2).
None of its 19 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.92 hours per resident per day, against 3.84 across South Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
43.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Carolina average 45.9%).
CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.
May 21, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not served their meals on disposable tableware to protect their dignity, which affected 1 (Resident (R)42) of 2 residents reviewed for dignity concerns.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who self-administered medications were assessed as safe to self-administer medications, which affected 2 (Resident (R)134 and R26) of 3 sampled residents who had medications in their room.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered by only licensed staff and with a physician's order for 1 (Resident(R)26) of 3 sampled residents who had medications in their room.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed physician's orders for the use of supplemental oxygen for 2 (Resident (R)26 and R114) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for oxygen therapy.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe insulin administration for 1 (Resident (R)88) of 2 residents reviewed for insulin administration. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)30 failed to verify R88's insulin order prior to preparing insulin for administration and failed to immediately document the insulin administration. The facility also failed to follow a procedure to ensure staff accurately acquired, received, and administered medicated eye drops for 1 (R72) of 25 sampled residents.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors, which affected 1 (Resident (R)72) of 25 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide prescription eye drops per the physician orders for R72.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely and securely for 2 (Resident (R)3 and R119) of 8 residents reviewed during the medication administration task and 1 (R120) of 3 sampled residents who had medications in their room.
April 8, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly label and date food items that had been opened or prepared in the kitchen, and failed to discard expired items. These failures had the potential to affect all 116 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of review of facility policy, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an ongoing and meaningful program of activities was provided for two (Residents (R) R3 and R67) of four residents reviewed for activities out of a total of 25 residents were reviewed in the sample. This had the potential for the residents to have a decreased quality of life.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a palm guard was applied to one (Resident (R) R3) of four residents reviewed for positioning/mobility. A total of 25 residents were reviewed in the sample. This had the potential for the resident to experience a decline in ROM.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care equipment was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for one (Resident (R) 413) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care out of a total sample of 25 residents. This failure had the potential to lead to respiratory infections.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed, and proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn during direct contact/care for two residents (Resident (R)49 and R313) out of two residents observed during direct contact who were on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) out of a total sample of 25 residents. This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination to the residents.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the McGeer criteria was used when an antibiotic was ordered and administered to one resident (Resident (R)45) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 25 resident. This had the potential for the resident to have unnecessary adverse reactions to a potentially unnecessary antibiotic administered.
June 2, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)80 was provided with an adapted call light control (referred to as a soft touch), to be able to request assistance from the staff when he was in need.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy by covering an indwelling urinary catheter collection bag for one Resident (R)13 of four residents reviewed for catheter care in a total sample of 32 residents. This failure resulted in the potential for an undignified appearance for the resident.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident (R)39 and R58) out of 29 sampled residents had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly label enteral feeding bag and properly sanitize the reusable enteral feeding syringes for one Resident (R)63 from a sampled 39 residents.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that two (Residents (R)44 and R60) from a sampled 39 residents were receiving oxygen therapy according to physicians' orders. The failure has the potential for residents to receive inadequate oxygen therapy.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an indwelling urinary catheter off the floor for one Resident (R)37 of four residents reviewed for catheter use, in a total sample of 32 residents. This failure resulted in the potential for increased infections to occur.
Fire safety inspections
2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 2, 2023.
Every fire safety citation2 citations
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.92 | 3.84 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.26 | 3.33 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.27 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.13 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.9% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 59.1% | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.18 on weekdays and 3.26 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.79 in April to June 2025 to 3.92 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.92 | 0.52 | 4.18 | 3.26 | 2.0% | 0 of 90 | 115 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.95 | 0.49 | 4.24 | 3.21 | 2.5% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.01 | 0.58 | 4.33 | 3.21 | 3.3% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.79 | 0.56 | 4.05 | 3.11 | 3.0% | 0 of 91 | 117 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| South Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.62 | 0.53 | 3.81 | 3.13 | 7.2% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for South Carolina
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.90 | $16.81 to $19.08 | 21,760 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.72 | $27.59 to $34.24 | 9,400 |
| Registered nurses | $39.60 | $37.17 to $46.75 | 49,750 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 11.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.7 | 12.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 15.3 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.2 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.6 | 13.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: GREENVILLE COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palmetto Community Healthcare, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/29/2021 |
| Wheeler, Kerry | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 09/01/2021 | |
| Smith, Sterling | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Apt, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 8, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.26 hours per resident per day, below the South Carolina average of 3.33.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Linville Court at the Cascades Verdae Greenville, 1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 2 citations
- The Gables of Pelham Skilled Nursing & Rehab Greenville, 1.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Promedica Skilled Nursing and Reh- Greenville West Greenville, 1.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- NHC Healthcare - Greenville Greer, 2.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 3 citations
- Rolling Green Village Greenville, 3.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 1 citation
- NHC Healthcare - Mauldin Greenville, 3.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Southpointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation Greenville, 3.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Greenville Post Acute Greenville, 5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 21 citations
South Carolina contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in South Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: South Carolina Department of Public Health, Healthcare Quality, Nursing Homes, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: South Carolina Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, Department on Aging, 1-800-868-9095. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: SC Survey and Certification Public CMS-2567 Search, where South Carolina publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Patewood Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Patewood Post Acute 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Patewood Post Acute get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 21, 2026. The South Carolina average is 3.7.
- Has Patewood Post Acute been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Patewood Post Acute accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Patewood Post Acute?
- CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to PACS Group. Legal business name: GREENVILLE COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.