Home / South Carolina / Greenville
850 E. Butler Rd., Greenville, SC 29607 · Greenville County · (864) 675-6421
180 certified beds, about 168 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 425359 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 16, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the South Carolina average is 3.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 13 health citations since February 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $7,313 in the last three years; the largest was $7,313, and the latest is dated March 7, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.73 hours per resident per day, against 3.84 across South Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.57 of those hours.
42.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Carolina average 45.9%).
CMS links it to National Healthcare Corporation, an affiliated group of 71 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)78 was free of accidents by an improper transfer for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in R78 sustaining a closed fracture of the mid left humeral shaft (a broken upper arm bone where the skin remains intact ).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide services or care that are acceptable standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of the inventory of controlled substances for 2 of 2 residents reviewed, R48 and R 78 and failed to ensure medications were not pre-poured prior to administration for 5 of 5 residents reviewed, (R159, R170, R59, R22, and R130). 1. Review of the facility policy, titled IIA7: Controlled Substances with a revision date of 02/25/25, revealed, Policy: Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and record keeping in the facility, in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. E. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) within 14 calendar days of the facility determining that there had been a significant change in condition for Residents (R)16 and (R)148, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessment after significant change.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent. The medication administration error rate was 8%, for 2 errors out of 25 opportunities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled in 2 of 6 medication carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare and distribute food under professional standards of food safety. This had the potential to affect 167 of 167 residents who resided at the facility and increased the risk of food-borne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility menus and meal cards, the facility failed to follow menus for seven of 167 residents (Resident (R) 145, R13, R29, R80, R135, R149, and R67) whose meal service was observed. This failure had the potential to cause increased blood sugar levels and/or affect the residents' cardiac status.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to conduct medication self-administration assessments and have physician orders for self-administration of medications for one of one resident (Resident (R) 63) reviewed for self-administration of medications out of a total sample of 33. This had the potential to cause harm to R63 through medication administration errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was coded accurately for three of 33 residents (Residents (R) 95, R74, R42) whose clinical records were reviewed. The facility failed to accurately code a quarterly assessment for hospice services for R95 and for therapy services for R42. In addition, the facility failed to accurately code the use of antipsychotic medication for R74. These failures placed the residents at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a specialized wheelchair was clean and sanitary for one of one resident (Resident (R) 131) reviewed for specialized wheelchairs in a total sample of 33. This failure placed the resident at risk for a diminished quality of life and dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the removal of expired supplies from 3 of 6 medications carts, 1 of 1 treatment cart and 1 of 2 storage rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods that are stored in the freezer and 2 of 3 unit refrigerators were labeled, dated with a use by date and/or discarded after the manufacturer's expiration date.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, review of facility policy and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to clean and disinfect a blood glucose meter per device and manufacturer's instructions before and after use for 1 of 1 resident, Resident (R)146. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that its staff demonstrated proper hand hygiene while assisting a resident during meal time.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 7, 2025 | Fine | $7,313 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.73 | 3.84 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.15 | 3.33 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.26 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.90 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.9% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 32.1% | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.55 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.97 on weekdays and 3.15 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.81 in April to June 2025 to 3.73 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.73 | 0.57 | 3.97 | 3.15 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 168 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.77 | 0.62 | 4.02 | 3.14 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 169 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.82 | 0.66 | 4.05 | 3.22 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 170 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.81 | 0.62 | 4.04 | 3.22 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 168 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| South Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.62 | 0.53 | 3.81 | 3.13 | 7.2% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.90 | $16.81 to $19.08 | 21,760 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.72 | $27.59 to $34.24 | 9,400 |
| Registered nurses | $39.60 | $37.17 to $46.75 | 49,750 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 11.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.3 | 12.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.3 | 15.3 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.6 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.2 | 13.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for NHC Healthcare - Mauldin's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (63.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
63.2% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · South Carolina: 53 better, 21 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 511 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · South Carolina: 0 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 541 eligible stays.
7.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · South Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 351 eligible stays.
56.8% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 294 residents counted.
0.8% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina0.5% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 386 residents counted.
0.3% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 386 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: NHC HEALTHCARE-MAULDIN LLC. CMS links this home to National Healthcare Corporation, a group of 71 nursing homes averaging 4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moorhouse, Bradley | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2018 | |
| Moorhouse, Bradley | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2018 | |
| NHC-Op LP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2000 | |
| Dodson, Vicki | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2019 | |
| Kidd, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Moorhouse, Bradley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2018 | |
| Sellars, Gideon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/02/2018 | |
| Shelly, Timothy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/12/2024 | |
| Sherman, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/17/2020 | |
| Turnquist, Carrie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/25/2012 | |
| Ussery, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Blackrock Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/20/2019 | |
| Dimensional Fund Advisors LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/07/2023 | |
| Morgan Stanley | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/08/2024 | |
| National Health Corporation | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2000 | |
| NHC-Op LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2000 | |
| Vanguard Group Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/27/2017 | |
| Dodson, Vicki | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2019 | |
| Kidd, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Sellars, Gideon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/14/2025 | |
| Sherman, Richard | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/14/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in South Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.