Find a nursing home

Home / South Carolina / Orangeburg

Pruitthealth- Orangeburg

755 Whitman Street Se, Orangeburg, SC 29115 · Orangeburg County · (803) 534-7036

88 certified beds, about 80 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1979

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 425085 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 8, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the South Carolina average is 3.7, the national average 9.2).

None of its 22 health citations since October 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $3,728 in the last three years; the largest was $3,728, and the latest is dated December 13, 2023.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.58 hours per resident per day, against 3.84 across South Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.

44.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Carolina average 45.9%).

CMS links it to Pruitthealth, an affiliated group of 96 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
16D
3E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 8, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed timely for one of 26 sample residents (Resident (R) 37) reviewed for MDS assessments. The failure to submit the discharge MDS did not allow for the closure of the residents' MDS cycle.
  2. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received alternative measures prior to the installation of side rails, and assessments were completed for the risk of entrapment for one of two residents (Resident (R) 235) reviewed for side rails of 26 sample residents. The lack of alternate side rail measures and proper assessment/consent could lead to potential restraint or side rail entrapment.
December 13, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to serve food at the appropriate/preferred temperature in 1 of 1 main kitchen.
  2. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to label and date foods, discard expired foods and failed to maintain a clean ice machine, in 1 of 1 main kitchen.
  3. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications, and insulin pens were labeled and stored according to manufacturers recommendations in 2 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 2 treatment carts.
  4. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodations were provided to meet the needs and functional ability for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accommodations of needs. Specifically, Resident (R)73's call light was observed out of reach and not accessible if the resident needed assistance.
  5. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide services to Resident (R)14, who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL), necessary to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)14 with treatment to prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for range of motion.
  7. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a procedure during Foley catheter care to decrease the likelihood of infection for Resident (R)70, for 1 of 1 residents observed for Foley catheter care.
October 21, 2021Standard inspection · 13 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were removed from the walk-in refrigerator and dented cans were removed from the dry storage for 1 of 1 main kitchen.
  2. E
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    F727 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2021
    Inspectors wroteAmended 1/10/2022 Based on interviews and review of the daily postings for staffing, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was in the facility for 8 consecutive hours daily for multiple days from 9/17/2021 through 10/17/2021. The facility further failed to ensure the Director of Nursing did not serve as the charge nurse for 1 of 5 days of the survey. The facility had a census of 68 residents.
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and the review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Policies and Procedures, the facility failed to ensure employees, vendors, and contractors were COVID-19 screened before entering the facility. The facility also failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand-washing prior to meal administration, for 2 of 2 meals observed. Findings Include: A review of the facility's s policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Policies and Procedures under Procedure says the following: The facility will complete a Prevent COVID-19 Screening Checklist and/or COVID-19 Prevent Worksheet prior to entering facility, which includes vaccination history for employees, contracted staff, and consultant only. The facility will follow the screening process for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and will restrict entry if concerns are identified. [...]
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2021
    Inspectors wroteFindings: The facility admitted R18 on 02/18/2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute kidney failure, anorexia, depression, muscle weakness, pneumonia, dysphagia and aphasia, type 2 diabetes, dementia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and pulmonary embolism. During a meal observation on 10/20/21 at 1:05 PM, R18 approached a surveyor and said she wants to go to the bathroom. The surveyor passed the information on to a group of three CNAs that were close by. The CNAs kept talking among themselves and ignored the R18 request. At 1:08 PM, R18 repeated her request to go to the bathroom. CNA5 was asked if R18 has been taken to the bathroom and added she keep on saying she wants to go to the bathroom, perhaps she needs to be changed. CNA5 said in a loud voice in the hall, She is also incontinent then said to the resident (First name of the resident), go to your room. [...]
  5. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and review of the facility guidance titled, Regulate Temperature in Nursing Homes, the facility failed to ensure the temperature in the resident room and hallways was maintained at 71 degrees Fahrenheit and not less on 3 of 3 units.
  6. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman when one (1) of one (1) resident discharged to the hospital. (Resident #36)
  7. D
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, records review, and interviews, the facility failed to determine and complete a significant change in functional status assessment for Resident (R) 41. R41 had a significant decline in activities of daily living (ADLs).
  8. D
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations records review and interview the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure that R4 maintained activity of daily living (ADLs) abilities or received appropriate assistance with activities of daily living when needed for one of one sampled resident reviewed for ADLs.
  9. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 28, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring, the facility failed to provide interventions for Resident (R) 44 to promote weight maintenance or to decrease weight loss for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Nutrition.
  10. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 17, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent during 2 out of 26 opportunities for error observed during medication administration.
  11. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 17, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and review of the Medication Administration Record for Resident (R)56, the facility failed to ensure a medication dosage and form was correct as ordered by the physician during med pass for 1 of 28 opportunities observed during medication administation.
  12. D
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    F919 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain and ensure the call light system was properly working for one of 19 rooms reviewed for functioning call lights.
  13. D
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a functional, sanitary, and comfortable living environment for three of nineteen sample residents reviewed for the environment.

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
December 13, 2023Fine $3,728

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeSouth CarolinaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.583.843.86
Registered nurses0.470.630.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.733.333.42
Nurse aides2.23
Licensed practical nurses0.89
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)44.2%45.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover54.5%42.1%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.93 on weekdays and 2.73 on weekends, 31% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.48 in April to June 2025 to 3.58 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.580.473.932.73 0.0%0 of 9080
Oct to Dec 20253.530.453.832.78 0.0%0 of 9278
Jul to Sep 20253.820.514.192.87 0.0%0 of 9278
Apr to Jun 20253.480.503.842.57 0.0%0 of 9182
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
South Carolina, Jan to Mar 20263.620.533.813.137.2%0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for South Carolina

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
South Carolina, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$17.90$16.81 to $19.0821,760
LPNs and LVNs$29.72$27.59 to $34.249,400
Registered nurses$39.60$37.17 to $46.7549,750
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Pruitthealth- Orangeburg. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeSouth CarolinaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.611.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.80.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.81.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.13.23.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.21.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.812.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.85.14.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.015.315.4

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pruitthealth- Orangeburg's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

52.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · South Carolina: 53 better, 21 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 48 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

13.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · South Carolina: 0 better, 5 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 47 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · South Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: South Carolina57.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: South Carolina0.5% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

3.5% this home

Median of homes: South Carolina2.1% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: South Carolina98.3% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PRUITTHEALTH - ORANGEBURG, LLC. CMS links this home to Pruitthealth, a group of 96 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Rutland, DeborahW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/01/2020
Pruitt, NeilCorporate directorIndividual09/11/2008
Pruitt, NeilCorporate officerIndividual09/11/2008
Pruitthealth IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization09/26/2008
Pruitt, NeilOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/11/2008

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 8, 2025: "Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on December 13, 2023: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 13, 2023: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 13, 2023: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.73 hours per resident per day, below the South Carolina average of 3.33.

Other nursing homes nearby

South Carolina contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in South Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Pruitthealth- Orangeburg's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Pruitthealth- Orangeburg 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Pruitthealth- Orangeburg get at its last inspection?
2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 8, 2025. The South Carolina average is 3.7.
Has Pruitthealth- Orangeburg been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $3,728 in the last three years.
Does Pruitthealth- Orangeburg accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Pruitthealth- Orangeburg?
CMS lists 5 owners and managers, and links the home to Pruitthealth. Legal business name: PRUITTHEALTH - ORANGEBURG, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection