Home / North Carolina / Harrisburg
6300 Roberta Road, Harrisburg, NC 28075 · Cabarrus County · (704) 455-5553
70 certified beds, about 65 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 345515 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 28, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 14 health citations since January 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated June 25, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.17 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.77 of those hours.
57.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).
CMS links it to Pruitthealth, an affiliated group of 96 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and Physician and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to notify the physician when 70/30 Insulin (type of insulin used to control blood sugar by providing both immediate and extended insulin action) was not administered or administered late for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification (Resident #82).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of controlled opioid pain medication by staff. This affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property (Resident #75).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to law enforcement and adult protective services (APS) for Resident #10 and report an allegation of misappropriation of medication to the State Survey Agency and local law enforcement within the required time frame and did not report the allegation to adult protective services and for Resident #75. The deficient practice occurred for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for reporting of abuse allegations (Resident #10 and Resident #75).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and physician, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer 70/30 Insulin (type of insulin used to control blood sugar by providing both immediate and extended insulin action) and failed to adhere to administration times as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant medication errors (Resident #82).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, staff, and physician interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner when a resident fell out of bed during incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #11). Resident #11 sustained a laceration to the right side of his forehead requiring 6 sutures and a C-1 (cervical vertebra #1) fracture that required long-term use of a cervical collar for neck support. Resident #11 did not experience any neurological changes.
Inspectors wrote3. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation, acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and solitary pulmonary nodule. A review of Resident #26's physician orders dated 06/04/24 revealed an order for continuous oxygen at 5 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula. Resident #26's Oxygen Use care plan dated 06/04/24 revealed that his oxygen use was related to COPD with acute exacerbation, and acute on chronic respiratory failure. Interventions included saturated oxygen monitoring, ample time to perform activities of daily living (ADL), and notifying his physician of any changes. A review of Resident #26's Scheduled 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] rated Resident #26 as cognitively intact. He received oxygen therapy during the MDS assessment period. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to remove a dented canned good item stored for use, seal open-to-air frozen food, ensure pans were dry before being stacked, and cover facial hair for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, Ombudsman, and Social Work interviews, the facility failed to provide a letter of transfer or discharge to residents (Resident #39) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge and failed to send a summary of discharge and transfer residents to the Ombudsman (Resident #47) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff interview the facility failed to accurately code the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident #47).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to dry 6 of 6 steamer pans before stacking for storage. This had the potential to affect food served to all residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to resolve repeated concerns voiced at Resident Council meetings regarding call lights not being answered timely and cold coffee being served for 3 of 6 months (10/27/22, 11/30/22 and 1/4/23) reviewed for Resident Council. Findings Included: A record review of the 10/27/22 Resident Council minutes revealed the following concerns: a. Call lights were being turned off and staff stating they would come back, and they would not come back. The response from nursing was that a nursing staff huddle had been completed to address call lights. A record review of the 11/30/22 Resident Council minutes revealed the following concerns: a. Breakfast and Coffee was cold when received by residents. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and Director of Nursing interview, the facility failed to post accurate staffing information for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff for 5 of 5 posted daily staffing forms reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to issue the correct form; Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF-ABN CMS-10055) to 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification (Resident #1 and Resident #9).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff and resident interview the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. Residents # 30 and # 44 were not coded for Level ll Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). Resident # 206 was not accurately coded for anticoagulant therapy.
8 fire safety citations on file: 5 on June 25, 2024, 3 on January 26, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 25, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.17 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.77 | 0.62 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.51 | 3.42 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.03 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.38 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.9% | 49.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 76.5% | 45.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.84 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.44 on weekdays and 3.51 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.15 in April to June 2025 to 4.17 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.17 | 0.77 | 4.44 | 3.51 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 65 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.45 | 0.77 | 4.70 | 3.80 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 64 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.13 | 0.69 | 4.39 | 3.45 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 65 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.15 | 0.86 | 4.39 | 3.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 64 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.53 | 3.82 | 3.25 | 8.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.49 | $17.28 to $21.08 | 64,010 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.42 | $28.50 to $33.51 | 18,010 |
| Registered nurses | $40.56 | $37.87 to $49.06 | 111,120 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.3 | 15.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.7 | 18.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 5.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.3 | 14.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.9 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.2 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pruitthealth-Town Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (68.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
68.6% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · North Carolina: 93 better, 25 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 249 eligible stays.
11.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · North Carolina: 1 better, 4 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 258 eligible stays.
6.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · North Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 125 eligible stays.
57.4% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina54.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 115 residents counted.
0.7% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 147 residents counted.
3.6% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina2.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 147 residents counted.
95.3% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina97.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 85 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PRUITTHEALTH - TOWN CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Pruitthealth, a group of 96 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hargrave, Rhonda | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/23/2021 | |
| Pruitt, Neil | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/27/2007 | |
| Pruitthealth Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/27/2007 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.