Find a nursing home

Home / Kentucky / Henderson

Redbanks

851 Kimsey Lane, Henderson, KY 42420 · Henderson County · (270) 826-6436

222 certified beds, about 139 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1973

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 185124 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 12, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Kentucky average is 2.9, the national average 9.2).

None of its 13 health citations since January 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.56 hours per resident per day, against 3.95 across Kentucky and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.54 of those hours.

40.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kentucky average 46.4%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
2E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 12, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and quality. Opened foods were not dated. Expired foods and/or foods which were past their use by date were available for use and service to residents. This failure had the potential to affect 129 of 131 residents who consume food from the facility's kitchen and/or unit refrigerators.
  2. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteAMENDED Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and/or biologicals used in the facility were current for use and/or stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, including the expiration date when applicable. Medications and nutritional supplements were opened but not labeled with a date as to calculate the discard date. Medications were found loose, without identification as to whom they belonged and/or what they were. This failure affected three of three medication rooms observed (out of a total of five rooms) and two of five medication carts observed (out of a total of nine carts.)
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy and procedure, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for four (Resident (R)109, R93, R37, and R41) of five sampled residents reviewed for infection control. Facility staff failed to indicate, via signage, the need for precautions, as well as provide and/or ensure the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and hand hygiene by staff and visitors for R109, who was on contact isolation precautions. Action to protect others from the risk of infection was not taken when R109 was out of her room for non-essential purposes. In addition, staff failed to follow manufacturer's instructions after cleaning/disinfecting a used glucometer used on R41. [...]
March 13, 2020Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 24, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual 3.0, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment accurately reflects the resident's status for two (2) of thirty-four (34) sampled residents (Resident #10 and Resident #141). Resident #10's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/11/19, Section I Active Diagnosis, was coded as no infections during the seven (7) day look back period; however, review of the Physician's Orders, dated December 2019, revealed the resident was receiving an antibiotic medication for a Urinary Tract Infection. Resident #141's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/25/19, Section J Health Conditions, was coded as no falls since prior assessment; [...]
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 24, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, review of facility Policy, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual 3.0, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team composed of individuals who have knowledge of the resident and his/her needs for three (3) of thirty-four (34) sampled residents (Resident #87, Resident #109, and Resident #141). Resident #87 was diagnosed and treated for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) in March 2020; however, the CCP was not revised related to the acute infection. Resident #109 was diagnosed and treated for Pneumonia in March 2020; however, the CCP was not revised related to the acute infection. Resident #141 had a fall event on 11/05/19; [...]
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 24, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility Policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure position change alarms used as a fall prevention strategy were monitored to ensure efficacy and to ensure the alarms were the least restrictive device prior to implementation and on an on-going basis for three (3) of thirty-four (34) sampled Residents (Resident #10, Resident #96, and Resident #148). Although Resident #10 was Care Planned for the Sensor Alarm to bed and wheelchair on 01/29/19, there was no documented evidence of an Assessment for the Sensor Alarms until 03/16/19, over two (2) weeks later, in order to ensure the Alarms were effective and to ensure the Alarms were the least restrictive device to use as a fall prevention strategy. [...]
January 4, 2019Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Re-entry was completed for one (1) of forty-six (46) sampled residents (Resident #78). Resident #78 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] with return anticipated and returned on 11/08/18; however, a Reentry MDS was not initiated and/or completed upon the resident's return to the facility.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy and procedures, it was determined the facility failed to ensure it developed or implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three (3) of forty-six (46) sampled residents (Resident #12, #142, and #166). Observation on 01/04/19 revealed tracheostomy care was not provided per sterile technique according to Resident #12's Comprehensive Care Plan. Observations on 01/02/19-01/04/19 revealed staff failed to ensure foot protectors were on and a pillow or blanket was in place between the resident's knees according to Resident #142's care plan. In addition, Resident #166 returned to the facility with a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection
  3. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy and procedure, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (1) of forty-six (46) sampled residents (Resident #142). The facility failed to ensure Resident #142's foot protectors were on both feet and a pillow or blanket was between the resident's knees, at all times to promote healing of a pressure ulcer to left foot.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy and procedure, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) to the extent possible for two (2) of forty-six (46) sampled residents (Residents #138 and #142). Observations of incontinent care for Residents #138 and #142 revealed staff failed to wash hands after removing used gloves after cleaning feces from each resident, and failed to wash hands prior to placing a clean brief on each resident.
  5. D
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy and procedure, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one (1) of forty-six (46) sampled residents who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. Observation on 01/02/19 revealed the nurse did not check Resident #78's feeding tube for placement prior to flushing and administering medication per facility policy.
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy and procedure, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan for one (1) of forty-six (46) sampled residents (Resident #12). Observations on 01/04/19 at 8:40 AM, revealed staff failed to provide tracheostomy care for Resident #12, using aseptic (sterile) technique per facility policy and the resident's comprehensive care plan.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy and procedure, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (1) of forty-six (46) sampled residents #78. Observation on 01/04/19 revealed a licensed staff failed to change her gloves and wash her hands before administering a flush/medications to Resident #78's peg tube after touching bed linens and repositioning the resident.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on June 12, 2025.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · June 12, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeKentuckyUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.563.953.86
Registered nurses0.540.790.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.313.493.42
Nurse aides3.22
Licensed practical nurses0.80
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)40.2%46.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover31.8%41.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.16 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.66 on weekdays and 4.31 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 14.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.73 in April to June 2025 to 4.56 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.560.544.664.31 14.5%0 of 90139
Oct to Dec 20254.630.544.714.44 15.3%0 of 92137
Jul to Sep 20254.530.554.624.30 11.2%0 of 92137
Apr to Jun 20254.730.634.874.37 11.8%0 of 91131
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Kentucky, Jan to Mar 20263.850.714.043.403.2%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Kentucky

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Kentucky, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.45$17.38 to $21.2123,410
LPNs and LVNs$29.07$26.10 to $31.298,570
Registered nurses$38.96$36.38 to $46.7350,300
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Redbanks. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeKentuckyUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.113.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.60.50.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.61.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.53.93.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.61.71.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
26.714.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.54.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.416.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.024.223.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.313.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.51.91.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.72.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Redbanks's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

46.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Kentucky: 38 better, 49 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 151 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

12.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Kentucky: 0 better, 12 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 190 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

11.3% this home

Worse than the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Kentucky: 0 better, 6 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 123 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

49.1% this home

Median of homes: Kentucky49.5% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 110 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Kentucky0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 149 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

4.2% this home

Median of homes: Kentucky2.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 147 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Kentucky98.1% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: HENDERSON COUNTY HEALTH CARE CORPORATION.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Brown, EricManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/01/2015
Chamberlain, FrankManaging control - governing bodyIndividual11/30/1973
Forker, MauriceManaging control - governing bodyIndividual10/03/2014
Maurer, LukeManaging control - governing bodyIndividual10/02/2023
Poindexter, LeonManaging control - governing bodyIndividual10/02/2023
Williams, TimothyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual12/01/2016
Brown, EricCorporate directorIndividual06/01/2015
Chamberlain, FrankCorporate directorIndividual11/30/1973
Maurer, LukeCorporate directorIndividual10/02/2023
Poindexter, LeonCorporate directorIndividual10/02/2023
Williams, TimothyCorporate directorIndividual11/30/2003
Brown, EricCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024
Chamberlain, FrankCorporate officerIndividual12/01/2016
Poindexter, LeonCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024
Williams, TimothyCorporate officerIndividual12/01/2016
Blandford, JackieOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/19/2015
Newton, SharonOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/05/2015
Wells Health Services, Inc.Adp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2008
Blandford, JackieAdp of the SNFIndividual01/19/2015
Butler, LeonAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2017
Lehman, JanineAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2008
Newton, SharonAdp of the SNFIndividual01/05/2015
Skaggs, TerryAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2008
Wells, GregoryAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2008
Wells, JackAdp of the SNFIndividual11/15/1990

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 13, 2020: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 13, 2020: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."

Other nursing homes nearby

Kentucky contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Kentucky. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Redbanks's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Redbanks 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Redbanks get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 12, 2025. The Kentucky average is 2.9.
Has Redbanks been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Redbanks accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Redbanks?
CMS lists 25 owners and managers. Legal business name: HENDERSON COUNTY HEALTH CARE CORPORATION.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection