1236 Lincoln Ave, Evansville, IN 47714 · Vanderburgh County · (812) 464-3607
47 certified beds, about 45 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2014
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155820 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2025, inspectors cited 19 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 55 health citations since August 2022, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $38,324 in the last three years; the largest was $28,100, and the latest is dated April 9, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.83 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.74 of those hours.
65.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Aperion Care, an affiliated group of 33 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 55 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in resident spaces for 2 of 2 units observed. (100 unit, 200 unit )
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions for 2 of 2 random observations. An ice scoop was located on top of the ice machine without a cover, food was left uncovered on the steam table prior to food service, and staff touched food with contaminated gloves while serving lunch. (Dietary Pantry and Dining Room)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were followed for 4 of 4 residents observed during medication administration (Resident S, Resident R, Resident L, and Resident K) and 2 random observations of wound care (Resident G and Resident H). The rubber injectable port for insulin was not cleaned prior to placing the needle on the insulin pen. The resident's arm was not cleaned with alcohol prior to insulin administration. Vital sign equipment was not cleaned in between residents. Gloves were not changed between touching contaminated surfaces and clean surfaces. A gown was not worn while providing care for a resident who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided bathing on their scheduled days for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for bathing. ( Resident F, Resident T)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in resident spaces on 1 of 2 units observed. (100 unit )
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was admitted with pressure ulcers was provided care and services to promote healing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident D)Finding Includes: On 4/9/26 at 9:35 a.m., Resident D was observed in his room sitting in a power wheelchair. Resident D indicated he thought he had been at the facility for three weeks or longer. On 4/9/26 at 10:16 a.m., Resident D's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, traumatic brain injury, paraplegia, complete traumatic amputation of lower leg, and cognitive communication deficit. A Hospital After Visit Summary, dated 3/11/26 through 3/22/26, indicated throughout the admission, Resident D was supported with specialty beds and wound care for pressure injuries. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure employees held an active license required to provide nursing care to residents. An employee did not have an active nursing license that provided care to residents. (100 unit, 200 unit) This deficient practice was corrected on November 3, 2025, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate pharmaceutical services were available to provide physician prescribed routine medications for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. Residents routine medications were not readily available from the pharmacy to be administered per the physician orders. (Resident C, Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to report an alleged violation of sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 1 allegation of abuse reviewed. (Resident T)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident T)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's wound treatments were completed as ordered for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for wounds. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bath or shower was provided for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for bathing. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behavior management. An incident with another resident was not documented, a resident's care plan was not updated following the incident, and behaviors were not monitored. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications for 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed. The medication room, treatment cart, and medication refrigerator were not locked. (First Floor Medication Room)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity was provided for 1 of 1 observations of meal trays passed. Staff were observed to enter resident rooms without knocking or announcing themselves. ( room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was served at an appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal tested on unit 200. ( Unit 200, Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 observations of the kitchen. Floors were soiled, food unlabeled. (Kitchen)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records, quarterly assessments were completed and documented in the clinical record. The Facility elopement risks were not documented in the clinical record. (Resident E)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. A resident did not receive blood pressure medications and was admitted to the hospital two times for hypertensive emergencies. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in sanitary manner for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. Food containers were not labeled in the reach in refrigerator and dry storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure designation of a certified Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP did not currently dedicate at least part time hours to the role of IP for 1 of 1 staff members reviewed for IP.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were completed quarterly for 6 of 7 residents reviewed for care plan conferences. (Resident P, Resident S, Resident D, Resident N, Resident B, and Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public for 11 random observations on 5 of 5 days. Offensive odors were detected in public hallways, alcoves and stairwells (throughout 100-unit hallways, in front of chapel, alcoves on 200 unit, outside of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], Holy Family Nurses Station), dirty showers and resident room floors were observed. (Resident P and Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for ADLs (activities of daily living) were showered and hair was shampooed for 9 of 10 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident P, Resident S, Resident G, Resident D, Resident B, Resident N, Resident F, Resident L, and Resident U)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food that was served at palatable temperature for 1 of 1 trays tested for food temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate a resident's choice of activity for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices. A resident's morning care was not completed in time for the resident to attend mass. (Resident P)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident signed admission paperwork and resident rights and was provided a copy for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for new admissions. (Resident L)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical documentation was sent with a resident during a transfer for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident B and Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a notice of transfer was provided to the ombudsman for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospital transfers. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold was provided upon transfer for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident B and Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed accurately for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for weight loss. (Resident S)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Qualified Medication Aides (QMA) practiced within the QMA scope of practice for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident U and Resident P)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to identify the potential for the development of pressure ulcers, perform routine skin checks, and follow the plan of care to promote wound healing for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for facility acquired heel wounds. (Resident F, Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow fall protocol, revise care plans, and follow interventions to reduce the risk of falls for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident D and Resident S)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional care and services including failure to identify significant weight loss, failure to notify the physician of significant weight loss, and failure to be reviewed by the Registered Dietician for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for weight loss (Resident S).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and a resident's nutritional feedings were administered for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tube feedings. A resident's enteral nutrition refusals were not documented, and feeding equipment was not changed daily. (Resident G)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented for 2 of 3 residents observed for care. Gloves were not changed and hand hygiene was not performed. (CNA 23, RN 28, RN 7)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate safety measures were in place to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in Resident B obtaining injuries that resulted in medical intervention. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective treatment and services were provided to residents with Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) in 2 of 3 residents reviewed for UTIs. Urinalysis (UA) and Culture and Sensitivity (C&S) tests were not completed or followed up on, antibiotics were not prescribed in a timely manner, and catheter care was not performed correctly. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 21 being hospitalized for the treatment of pyelonephritis (a kidney infection). (Resident 21 and Resident 9)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were documented and resolved for 3 anonymous residents interviewed and 9 of 9 residents who attended Resident Council.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections and 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 9, Resident 26, Resident 17, Resident 30, and Resident 32).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide proper storage of medications in 1 of 3 medication carts and 1 treatment cart observed. Loose pills and unlabeled medications were found in the medication and treatment carts. (Holy Name Medication Cart and JJ Nurses Station)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, labeled, and dated properly in accordance with professional standards for food service for 2 of 2 kitchen observations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were followed in 2 of 2 residents observed during care and 3 of 3 residents observed during medication administration. Hand hygiene was not performed correctly and vital sign equipment was not cleaned between residents. (Resident 32, Resident 8, Resident 29, Resident 21, and Resident 26)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed timely within 14 days of admission for 1 of 2 new admission residents reviewed. (Resident 135)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed accurately for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 23)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a base line care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care, respiratory care, and antipsychotic medications. (Resident 85)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was properly labeled and oxygen services were provided according to physician order for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 85, Resident 17)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident's as needed antianxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days. (Resident 17)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Dates of indwelling catheter changes were incorrectly documented. (Resident 21)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post accurate actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift daily for 4 of 5 days during the annual survey period.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for 2 of 4 residents reviewed. A cognitively impaired resident had medications in their room, unlocked and unattended. Resident 24 had six falls in two months, one resulted in a fracture to the left hip with one additional fall after the fracture. (Resident 24, Resident 13)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor rights of the residents. The chapel was closed and residents were restricted to certain areas of the facility for 6 of 6 days of the survey. (Resident 37)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was implemented to address the resident's medical and physical needs for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. A resident did not receive weekly skin assessments, and a dressing was not changed per the physician's order. (Resident 11)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide showers/baths for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. Residents were not given showers or baths. (Resident C, Resident D)
16 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 9, 2025, 11 on March 4, 2024, 1 on August 1, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 9, 2025 | Fine | $28,100 |
| March 4, 2024 | Fine | $10,224 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.83 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.31 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.34 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.74 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 65.5% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 85.7% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.84 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.04 on weekdays and 3.31 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.22 in April to June 2025 to 3.83 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.83 | 0.74 | 4.04 | 3.31 | 3.2% | 0 of 90 | 45 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.17 | 0.58 | 4.42 | 3.51 | 4.5% | 0 of 92 | 44 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.39 | 1.11 | 4.61 | 3.82 | 22.4% | 0 of 92 | 43 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.22 | 0.94 | 4.47 | 3.60 | 16.5% | 0 of 91 | 42 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.0 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.6 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.5 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.0 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Aperion Care Lincoln's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 10 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 23 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 20 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
8.3% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
3.3% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: DAVIESS COUNTY HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Aperion Care, a group of 33 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daviess County Hospital | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/01/2017 |
| Lewis, Merral | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| McNeely, Teri | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Steiner, Deron | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Conroy, Tracy | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Rodewald, Amanda | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Aperion Care Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Aperion Care Lincoln, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Berkowitz, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Goldfarb, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Hoffman, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Meystel, Jay | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Meystel, Yosef | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.