Home / Massachusetts / Marlborough
400 Bolton Street, Marlborough, MA 01752 · Middlesex County · (339) 224-1189
144 certified beds, about 133 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225326 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 13, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
None of its 28 health citations since July 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.95 hours per resident per day, against 3.86 across Massachusetts and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.63 of those hours.
33.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).
CMS links it to National Health Care Associates, an affiliated group of 42 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with a homelike environment on three out of four Resident Units (East Two, [NAME] One, and [NAME] Two) and for one Resident (#71) out of total sample of 28 Residents. Specifically, 1. the facility failed to provide Residents #41 and #69 and other residents with appropriate and comfortable air temperature levels during Resident meals in the Sitting Rooms on the East Two, [NAME] One, and [NAME] Two resident Units. 2. the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary side rail pads for Resident #71's bed, placing the Resident at the risk of injury and contamination.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure they developed, implemented and maintained a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that was comprehensive, ensured the residents' environment was maintained to promote a clean, safe, homelike environment, and was focused on indicators of quality of life for residents in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective performance improvement plan to address the non-operational heating units on three out of four Resident Sitting Rooms, utilized for Resident meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate access to the call light system was provided for one Resident (#20) out of a total sample size of 28 residents. Specifically for Resident #20, the facility staff failed to ensure that the call light was positioned within his/her reach for use when the Resident required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care and was a falls risk due to generalized weakness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality relative to neurological evaluation, for one Resident (#54) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to evaluate Resident #54's neurological status according to the Nurse Practitioner's (NP) order after: -The Resident sustained a fall and struck his/her head. -The Resident was prescribed for anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication. -The NP ordered neurological checks to be completed according to the facility's policy, placing the Resident at risk for unidentified neurological complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services relative to enteral feeding (nutrients provided directly into the stomach), for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #2, the facility failed to ensure that enteral feeds and fluids being administered through the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube (PEG Tube) and /or Feeding Tube (medical device that provides a direct route for delivering nutrition, fluids, and medications directly into the stomach, bypassing the mouth and esophagus), were labeled and dated appropriately.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#43), out of one applicable resident receiving dialysis (process that filters waste, salt, and fluid from your blood when the kidneys are unable to work adequately) services, out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, for Resident #43, the facility failed to:-ensure that dialysis communication forms included updated and active Physician orders on the Resident's dialysis care and services.-communicate and maintain ongoing documentation with the dialysis center to ensure that the dialysis center and the facility received the most current information pertaining to the Resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#112), who was diagnosed with dementia, out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide timely assistance for Resident #112 when the Resident: -had a diagnosis of dementia. -received medication to improve urine flow. -received medication to treat constipation. -was dependent on staff for toileting and toilet transfers. -verbally expressed the need to use the bathroom repeatedly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment, according to the required Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process, for one Resident (#3) out of a total sample of 28 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to assess Resident #3's cognitive status and mood through the required resident interview process when the Resident had difficulty with communication and a fluctuating ability to communicate.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required hemodialysis (a life-saving treatment that filters waste products and excess fluid when the kidneys stop working) three times a week, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1's physician had been notified of a missed dialysis session, when on 09/13/24, due to a transport issue, Resident #1 missed his/her scheduled appointment, and required transfer to the Hospital Emergency Department for evaluation and dialysis treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents, (Resident #1 and #2), the facility failed to ensure that upon admission, nursing developed and implemented baseline care plans with interventions, treatments, goals, and outcomes that addressed the residents overall immediate care needs within 48 hours of admission, or in the absence of a baseline care plans that comprehensive care plans had been developed with in 48 hours.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required hemodialysis (a life-saving treatment that filters waste products and excess fluid when the kidneys stop working) three times a week for end stage renal disease, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received the care and services consistent with his/her care plan, when Resident #1 missed a dialysis session because of a transportation issue, and days later required transfer to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation of changes in his/her mental status, and required dialysis treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who upon admission and then re-admission, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication errors, when medications from his/her Hospital Discharge Summary (s) were not accurately reconciled by Nursing and he/she was administered the incorrect dosage of medications for multiple days.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures according to professional standards of practice on one Unit (East One Unit) out of four resident units, and for two Residents (#65 and #84) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure that staff who worked on the East One Unit and considered as exposed to COVID-19, completed initial and requisite outbreak testing when the facility was experiencing an outbreak of COVID-19 on the East One Unit, increasing the risk for transmission of infection to residents and staff. 2. Ensure timely and effective implementation of interventions to prevent the transmission of Clostridium Difficile (C. Diff: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for one Resident (#79), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility staff remained standing and stood over Resident #79 while assisting the Resident during a breakfast meal. Findngs include: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility in April 2024, with diagnoses including Dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory and loss of judgment) and Malnutrition (condition caused by not getting enough calories or the right amount of key nutrients, such as vitamins and minerals, that are needed for health). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record and policy reviewed, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) of the need to alter treatments, based on specialist medical practitioners' recommendations for two Residents (#84 and #79), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the Physician/NP of: 1. a recommended change in treatment from Resident #84's Wound Care Consultant to cleanse two Stage Four pressure ulcers (PUs: full-thickness skin and tissue loss, usually over a bony prominence, with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer), which increased the Resident's risk for infection and delayed healing. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure its staff implement the plan of care for one Resident (#75) relative to weight measurements, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to perform weight measurements for Resident #75 when the Resident had been re-admitted to the facility with a gastrostomy tube (G-tube: a small flexible tube surgically inserted into the stomach through the abdomen to provide nutrition, fluids, and medicine), a diagnosis of Malnutrition and a significant change in condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) for two Residents (#40 and #9), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans following: 1. one comprehensive and one quarterly review assessment for Resident #40. 2. one comprehensive review assessment for Resident #9.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for one Resident (#9), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #9, the facility failed to identify the discharge needs and involve the Resident in the development of a discharge plan.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services according to professional standards of practice for two Residents (#124 and #84), out of a total sample of 27 residents, with an indwelling urinary catheter (Foley Catheter/Foley - a tube placed through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) increasing the Residents' risk for indwelling urinary catheter complications. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1. For Resident #124, follow Physician orders to insert the Foley catheter with the correct balloon size and switch the Foley catheter bag from straight drainage to leg bag upon the Resident getting out of bed in the morning. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate pain management for one Resident (#84), out of a total sample of 27 residents, when Physician ordered pain medications were not administered in a timely manner. Specifically, for Resident #84, the facility staff failed to administer three pain medications as scheduled during the morning medication pass, resulting in the Resident experiencing unrelieved pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of practice relative to hemodialysis (a procedure where a machine with a special filter called a dialyzer is used to remove waste from the blood) treatment schedule coordination, for one Resident (#34) out of two residents receiving dialysis services, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #34, the facility staff failed to: -coordinate meal and medication times with the dialysis treatment schedule when the Resident was not offered breakfast or food to take with him/her on dialysis days, increasing the Resident's risk for malnutrition and weight loss. -administer a dialysis support medication as scheduled and with food as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#9) with a known history of Suicidal Ideation (SI- verbal expressions of thoughts of harming oneself that may or may not lack specific intent) and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event, causing flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #9, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services timely putting the Resident at risk for further psychosocial decline when he/she continued to express SI.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#84), out of a total sample of 27 residents, was from significant medication error. Specifically, the facility staff failed to adhere to the time and the administration of ordered pain medications for Resident #84 when he/she was having pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to remove expired medications from one medication cart, out of a sample of four medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to remove and dispose expired Famotidine (acid reducer) medication, increasing the risk of non-therapeutic benefit when the medication is administered.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy and record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority for a resident review after a significant change in mental condition occurred for one Resident (#104) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level II screen (PASRR- an evaluation done to determine if a resident has an intellectual or developmental disability and/or serious mental illness and is in need of additional specialized support services at the facility) after Resident #104 received a diagnosis of Psychosis and experienced limitations in major life activities due to mental illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on inspection and interview, the facility failed to label, date and maintain food products that were not expired, in four out of four Unit Nourishment kitchenettes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all medications were properly stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and that expired medications were removed from active supply. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1a) That staff had labels on medications in one out of four medication carts and 1b) That staff removed expired medications on four of four units reviewed with three out of eight medication carts reviewed. 2) That staff safely stored medications for one Resident (#108) in a sample of 25 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#51) who required renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps your body remove extra fluid and waste products from your blood when the kidneys are not able to) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed ensure that clamps and pressure dressings were kept with the Resident (#51) for emergency related to a tunneled hemodialysis catheter (a plastic tube used for exchanging blood between a patient and a hemodialysis machine).
7 fire safety citations on file: 3 on January 13, 2026, 4 on October 2, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.95 | 3.86 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.54 | 3.48 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.21 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.10 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 33.6% | 38.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 21.1% | 42.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.95 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.11 on weekdays and 3.54 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.83 in April to June 2025 to 3.95 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.63 | 4.11 | 3.54 | 7.4% | 0 of 90 | 133 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.99 | 0.64 | 4.16 | 3.55 | 8.8% | 0 of 92 | 132 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.88 | 0.61 | 4.01 | 3.55 | 8.2% | 0 of 92 | 135 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.83 | 0.58 | 3.96 | 3.49 | 7.9% | 0 of 91 | 133 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 3.94 | 3.41 | 5.0% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.44 | $21.32 to $23.94 | 38,130 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.57 | $34.91 to $40.66 | 13,210 |
| Registered nurses | $50.27 | $42.05 to $65.44 | 88,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.0 | 16.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 15.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.5 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.0 | 21.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.1 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.3 | 11.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Reservoir Center for Health & Rehabilitation, the's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Massachusetts: 121 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 190 eligible stays.
11.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Massachusetts: 4 better, 15 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 194 eligible stays.
9.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Massachusetts: 5 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 150 eligible stays.
56.1% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts51.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 98 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 169 residents counted.
3.1% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 169 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Massachusetts99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: VK MARLBOROUGH, LLC. CMS links this home to National Health Care Associates, a group of 42 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marvin Ostreicher Family Trust 2012 | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/28/2013 | |
| Meridian Capital Foundation | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/28/2013 | |
| Mso Associates LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/28/2013 | |
| Susan Ostreicher Family Trust 2012 | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/28/2013 | |
| Ventas Nhv Fund | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/28/2013 | |
| Bokow, Barry | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| David, Albert | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Geffner, Ira | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Gluck, Robert | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Lobell, Jonah | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Lowinger, Ben | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Lowinger, Joseph | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Ostreicher, David | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Ostreicher, Marc | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Ostreicher, Marvin | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Ostreicher, Susan | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Schoor, Kalman | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Shaya-Mograby, Moshe | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Steg, Yitzchok | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Weinstock, Abraham | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Bokow, Barry | Corporate director | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Gilmartin, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Ostreicher, Marvin | Corporate director | Individual | 01/28/2013 | |
| Idumwonyi, Eghosa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/16/2024 | |
| Shaller, Caitlin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2023 | |
| National Health Care Associates Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/28/2013 | |
| Preferred Therapy Solutions, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/28/2013 | |
| Procare LTC Holding LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2016 | |
| Bokow, Barry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2016 | |
| Gilmartin, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2016 | |
| Idumwonyi, Eghosa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/30/2025 | |
| Shaller, Caitlin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/30/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.