Find a nursing home

Home / Vermont / Saint Albans

Saint Albans Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

596 Sheldon Road, Saint Albans, VT 05478 · Franklin County · (802) 524-6534

115 certified beds, about 81 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1972

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 475021 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 25, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Vermont average is 7.9, the national average 9.2).

Of 14 health citations since October 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $148,714 in the last three years; the largest was $115,044, and the latest is dated July 22, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.74 hours per resident per day, against 4.22 across Vermont and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.96 of those hours.

48.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Vermont average 55.4%).

CMS links it to Genesis Healthcare, an affiliated group of 184 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
2J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
2E
4F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
February 25, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices related to hand hygiene, glove use, and medication disposal were implemented during medication administration and wound care for two sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #6); and during the handling of a biohazard container on 1 applicable medication cart. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility with the violation cited during the previous re-certification survey dated 1/28/25.
December 22, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by staff and other residents for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 3 sampled.
July 22, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and identify individual risks and implement measures to provide supervision to prevent accidents resulting in harm to 1 of the 3 sampled residents (Resident #1).
  2. J
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    F742 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to acknowledge and assess the underlying causes of the resident's expression of distress and failed to develop and implement a care plan that addressed this distress, resulting in deterioration of the resident's mental and psychosocial well-being and resulting in the resident harming self for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) of the applicable sample and failed to revise care plans for triggers related to trauma for 9 or 12 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 1/28/25.
January 28, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment regarding resident room maintenance and repair on all resident units. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous two recertification surveys, dated 10/04/23 and 10/26/22.
  2. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that freezer food temperatures were maintained at a safe level for 3 of 4 freezers, including the walk-in freezer for the main kitchen that serves food for all residents in the facility. This is a repeat deficiency.
  3. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement facility-wide systems for the prevention and control of infections and communicable diseases of residents, staff, and visitors.
  4. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a required Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was conducted for 2 residents [Res.#16 & #75] of 23 sampled residents to ensure the residents were evaluated for serious mental illness and were not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care.
  5. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) without assistance receives the proper level of assistance for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #36 and Resident #4) related to nail care.
  6. D
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    F742 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan that addresses the assessed emotional and psychosocial needs of the resident and failed to provide services that address the assessed needs of the resident for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #5).
October 4, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary maintenance services to ensure residents have a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility also failed to ensure the environment was cared for in a sanitary manner by cleaning and properly storing a resident commode for 1 of 21 (Resident #33) residents in the sample. 1. During observations on 10/2/23 in the rooms on the East and [NAME] units, the following environmental concerns were identified: room [ROOM NUMBER] had a cove base (used as a transition material from floor to wall) peeling from the corner of the wall, exposing broken plaster pieces. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls were scratched, and sheet rock exposed. room [ROOM NUMBER] the entrance door, closet doors, and bathroom door all have scratched wood, and the register needs painting. [...]
  3. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure that services provided by the facility are provided according to professional standards regarding documentation, assessment, obtaining physician orders, and creating a plan of care regarding the use of a splint for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident #3).
  4. D
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 3, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the recommendations on a Medication Review Recommendations (MRR) made by the pharmacists, were acted on for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #58).

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on February 25, 2026.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · February 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
July 22, 2025Fine $115,044
January 28, 2025Fine $33,670

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeVermontUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.744.223.86
Registered nurses0.960.800.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.313.663.42
Nurse aides2.09
Licensed practical nurses0.68
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)48.2%55.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover0.0%39.9%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.79 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.91 on weekdays and 3.31 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 22.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.47 in April to June 2025 to 3.74 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.740.963.913.31 22.4%0 of 9081
Oct to Dec 20253.520.813.653.17 22.7%0 of 9283
Jul to Sep 20253.490.743.623.17 24.3%0 of 9283
Apr to Jun 20253.470.783.593.18 29.0%0 of 9183
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Vermont, Jan to Mar 20264.250.794.473.7123.2%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Vermont

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Vermont, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.66$19.64 to $23.533,030
LPNs and LVNs$33.62$29.56 to $37.611,130
Registered nurses$46.86$39.53 to $50.587,410
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Saint Albans Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeVermontUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.519.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.92.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.15.93.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.217.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.75.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.519.915.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
16.422.023.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
11.517.912.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.41.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.02.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Saint Albans Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

52.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Vermont: 8 better, 3 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 161 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

8.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Vermont: 1 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 181 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Vermont: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 111 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

52.2% this home

Median of homes: Vermont57.4% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 92 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.8% this home

Median of homes: Vermont0.4% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 133 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.3% this home

Median of homes: Vermont2.7% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 133 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Vermont97.6% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: FIVE NINETY SIX SHELDON ROAD OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Genesis Healthcare, a group of 184 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Genesis Omg Operations LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%09/07/2007
Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization02/02/2015
Gen Operations I LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization02/02/2015
Gen Operations II LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization02/02/2015
Genesis Healthcare Inc5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization02/02/2015
Genesis Healthcare LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization02/02/2015
Genesis Holdings LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization02/02/2015
Ghc Holdings LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization12/01/2012
Sun Healthcare Group Inc5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization02/02/2015
Whitman, Arnold5% or greater indirect ownership interestIndividual02/02/2015
Berg, MichaelCorporate officerIndividual03/02/2015
Bogdan, GregoryCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2020
Bridgeford, LauraCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2024
Mendelson, AviCorporate officerIndividual04/01/2024
Genesis Administrative Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2019
Djalayer, KasraOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2021
Jennings, JessicaOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/18/2022
Genesis Administrative Services LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/03/2025
Djalayer, KasraAdp of the SNFIndividual02/03/2025
Jennings, JessicaAdp of the SNFIndividual02/03/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 22, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 28, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 28, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.31 hours per resident per day, below the Vermont average of 3.66.

Other nursing homes nearby

Vermont contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Vermont. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Saint Albans Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Saint Albans Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Saint Albans Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on February 25, 2026. The Vermont average is 7.9.
Has Saint Albans Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $148,714 in the last three years.
Does Saint Albans Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Saint Albans Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center?
CMS lists 20 owners and managers, and links the home to Genesis Healthcare. Legal business name: FIVE NINETY SIX SHELDON ROAD OPERATIONS LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection