What is Sardis Oaks's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Sardis Oaks 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Sardis Oaks get at its last inspection?

4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 18, 2025. The North Carolina average is 4.7.

Has Sardis Oaks been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Sardis Oaks accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Sardis Oaks?

CMS lists 22 owners and managers, and links the home to Atrium Health. Legal business name: AHSNF, INC..

Sardis Oaks: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 18, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).

None of its 16 health citations since April 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.21 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.

44.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).

CMS links it to Atrium Health, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

504/23

709/24

412/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

12D

Potential for minimal harm

December 18, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations

D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 15, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments (Resident #4).
D

Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 22, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for a Level II Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation for a resident with a new diagnosis of a serious mental illness for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #45).
D

Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.

F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 15, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to separate the tube feeding syringe components prior to storing it for use, which created the potential for bacterial growth, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #79).
D

Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.

F694 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 15, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to clean normal saline solution bag connection port with alcohol prior to connecting antibiotic vial to the normal saline bag for mixing, which could introduce bacteria in the mixture. This was for 1 of 1 staff member observed for intravenous medication administration (Nurse #1).

September 27, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations

E

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 25, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to post cautionary and safety signage outside of resident rooms that indicated the use of oxygen for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #73, #52, #15, and #37) reviewed for respiratory care.
E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 25, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews with the Corporate Support Dietary Manager, and staff, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene prior to plating food, wear a hair and beard restraint, maintain a working thermometer in the reach-in refrigerator, remove expired foods from frozen storage, and store potentially hazardous foods in sealed containers with a label that recorded the date of storage and the use by date in four of six cold storage units. This failure had the potential to affect food served to 85 of 92 residents.
D

Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 25, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews with a resident and staff, the facility failed to replace a nonfunctioning air conditioner unit in room [ROOM NUMBER]. This failure occurred for on 1 of 4 halls reviewed for a safe, clean, comfortable and home like environment (200 hall).
D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 25, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide nail care for a dependent resident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (Resident #12).
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 25, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free from a potential hazard when an insulin syringe was observed lying on Resident #74's beside table with the safety cap off and the needle exposed. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #74).
D

Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.

F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 25, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an opened bottle of tube feeding formula was labeled with the date and time the formula was hung for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #74).
D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 25, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to don required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) before entering residents' room under transmission-based precautions for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #19).

April 14, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations

F

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 12, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and vendor and staff interviews, the facility failed to sanitize dishware for meal service by failing to ensure the wash and final rinse cycles of the low temperature dish machine operated at accurate temperatures for 2 of 2 observations. This practice had the potential to affect food served to all residents.
F

Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.

F867 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 12, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA) failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put into place following the annual recertification survey completed on 7/09/2021 and the complaint survey conducted on 4/22/22. The failure was for two deficiencies that were originally cited in the areas of Dietary Services (F812) and Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights (F550) and were subsequently cited again during the current annual recertification survey on 4/14/2023. The continued failure of the facility during three federal surveys of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAPI program.
D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 12, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide hand hygiene for a resident who required extensive to total assistance for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities of daily living care (Resident #2).
D

Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 12, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner and Hospice Nurse interviews, the facility failed to obtain orders for suprapubic catheter care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for catheter use. (Resident #39)
D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 12, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and resident and staff, interviews, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for the use of supplemental oxygen for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen use (Resident #39).

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 3 on December 18, 2025, 4 on September 27, 2024, 1 on April 14, 2023.

Every fire safety citation8 citations

D
Use approved construction type or materials.

K 161 · December 18, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · December 18, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.

K 511 · December 18, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.

K 211 · September 27, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · September 27, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · September 27, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

K 521 · September 27, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · April 14, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	North Carolina	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	3.21	3.85	3.86
Registered nurses	0.48	0.62	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	2.45	3.42	3.42
Nurse aides	2.04
Licensed practical nurses	0.69
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	44.0%	49.0%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	55.6%	45.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.48 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.51 on weekdays and 2.45 on weekends, 30% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.59 in April to June 2025 to 3.21 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	3.21	0.48	3.51	2.45	0.0%	1 of 90	89
Oct to Dec 2025	3.20	0.56	3.43	2.63	0.3%	0 of 92	93
Jul to Sep 2025	3.47	0.90	3.73	2.80	1.4%	0 of 92	91
Apr to Jun 2025	3.59	0.85	3.80	3.06	0.0%	0 of 91	87
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
North Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026	3.65	0.53	3.82	3.25	8.0%	0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for North Carolina

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
North Carolina, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$18.49	$17.28 to $21.08	64,010
LPNs and LVNs	$30.42	$28.50 to $33.51	18,010
Registered nurses	$40.56	$37.87 to $49.06	111,120
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	North Carolina	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	20.9	15.6	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.2	0.7	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.0	2.3	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.3	3.5	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	20.2	18.3	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	10.6	5.5	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	10.4	14.0	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	18.1	22.9	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	9.6	12.9	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	3.5	1.8	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.6	1.8	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Sardis Oaks's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (71.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

71.7% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · North Carolina: 93 better, 25 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · North Carolina: 1 better, 4 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · North Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 62 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

45.9% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina54.0% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.2% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina0.6% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 81 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.2% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina2.5% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 81 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

53.3% this home

Median of homes: North Carolina97.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: AHSNF, INC.. CMS links this home to Atrium Health, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Ball, Rodney	Managing control - governing body	Individual	08/30/2023
Haynes, Kenneth	Managing control - governing body	Individual	06/21/2019
Rissmiller, Scott	Managing control - governing body	Individual	06/21/2019
Ball, Rodney	Corporate officer	Individual	02/01/2023
Haynes, Kenneth	Corporate officer	Individual	12/20/2019
Advocate Health Inc	Operational/managerial control	Organization	12/02/2022
Atrium Health Inc	Operational/managerial control	Organization	10/09/2020
Broad River Rehabilitation	Operational/managerial control	Organization	06/01/2023
Pro Diversity Partners, LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization	08/01/2021
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority	Operational/managerial control	Organization	02/01/2020
Clode, Colin	Operational/managerial control	Individual	02/01/2020
Patel, Dupal	Operational/managerial control	Individual	05/06/2024
Ball, Rodney	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	08/30/2023
Haynes, Kenneth	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	06/21/2019
Rissmiller, Scott	Trustee of the SNF	Individual	06/21/2019
Advocate Health Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization	04/14/2025
Atrium Health Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization	04/14/2025
Broad River Rehabilitation	Adp of the SNF	Organization	05/05/2025
Pro Diversity Partners, LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization	04/14/2025
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority	Adp of the SNF	Organization	04/14/2025
Clode, Colin	Adp of the SNF	Individual	02/01/2020
Patel, Dupal	Adp of the SNF	Individual	05/06/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on December 18, 2025: "Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 18, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 27, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on September 27, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.45 hours per resident per day, below the North Carolina average of 3.42.

Other nursing homes nearby

Pelican Health Randolph LLC
Charlotte, 1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 47 citations
Brookdale Carriage Club Providence
Charlotte, 1.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
White Oak Manor - Charlotte
Charlotte, 2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 21 citations
The Sharon at Southpark
Charlotte, 2.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 10 citations
Briar Creek Health Center
Charlotte, 2.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 8 citations
Pelican Health at Charlotte
Charlotte, 3.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 39 citations
The Stewart Health Center
Charlotte, 3.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Redwood Health & Rehab
Charlotte, 3.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 18 citations

North Carolina contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: NC Division of Health Service Regulation, Nursing Home Licensure and Certification Section, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: North Carolina Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: NC DHSR Regulated Facilities search (Statements of Deficiencies), where North Carolina publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Sardis Oaks's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Sardis Oaks 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Sardis Oaks get at its last inspection?: 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 18, 2025. The North Carolina average is 4.7.
Has Sardis Oaks been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Sardis Oaks accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Sardis Oaks?: CMS lists 22 owners and managers, and links the home to Atrium Health. Legal business name: AHSNF, INC..

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.