Home / Connecticut / Bloomfield
Seabury
200 Seabury Drive, Bloomfield, CT 06002 · Capitol County · (860) 286-0243
72 certified beds, about 68 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
Last standard inspection more than 2 years ago Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075383 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 21, 2024, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 16 health citations since August 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $18,268 in the last three years; the largest was $18,268, and the latest is dated December 18, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.78 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.19 of those hours.
10.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
408/19
302/22
903/24
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
3E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 21, 2024Standard inspection · 9 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation in the Dietary Department, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated, and failed to ensure an adequately clean water filter system for the steam receptacles.
- E Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #7) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure a weekly skin check was conducted by a licensed staff member and for 1 of 5 sampled residents, (Resident #48) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding pain medications.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #28) reviewed for advanced directives, the facility failed to have a signed advanced directive available in either the paper or electronic clinical record.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #14) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to notify the provider of a significant change in the resident's weight.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #14) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to follow the provider's order for daily weights, and for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #18) reviewed for skin conditions the facility failed to ensure a treatment order was correctly transcribed to the [NAME] and that post-surgical wound treatments were performed.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and staff interviews for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #7), reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure that a weekly skin assessment was completed by a licensed staff member.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #10 and #215) reviewed for respiratory issues, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen administration.
- D Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #28) reviewed for hospice, the facility administered hospice services without a physician's order.
- D Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 sampled residents, (Resident #18), reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to obtain lab services per the physician order.
February 17, 2022Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #309) reviewed for admission/transfer/discharge, the facility failed to perform a full body skin assessment on admission, and to ensure pain medications were readily available to meet the resident's needs on admission.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews the facility failed to ensure the sanitizer solution used to clean contact surfaces in the kitchen contained the manufacturer recommended sanitizing levels.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility's documentation, facility policy and interview for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #9 and 17) reviewed for pneumococcal immunization, the facility failed to assess for pneumococcal immunization status on admission or offer the residents the immunization.
August 16, 2019Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, facility policy and interviews for two medication rooms, the facility failed to remove expired medications from inventory.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
- D Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and interviews for one of five resident's reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #38), the facility failed to review and/or revise the resident's plan of care to meet the resident's needs.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident # 39) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to implement the facility fall policy to prevent a second fall.
Fire safety inspections
2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 21, 2024.
Every fire safety citation2 citations
- D Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Meet other general requirements that are deficient.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 18, 2025 | Fine | $18,268 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.78 | 3.73 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.19 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.32 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.10 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.49 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 10.4% | 37.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 10.5% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.81 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.96 on weekdays and 4.32 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.96 in April to June 2025 to 4.78 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.78 | 1.19 | 4.96 | 4.32 | 4.9% | 2 of 90 | 68 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.69 | 1.15 | 4.87 | 4.24 | 5.8% | 0 of 92 | 70 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.78 | 1.15 | 4.99 | 4.24 | 5.2% | 0 of 92 | 67 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.96 | 1.27 | 5.17 | 4.44 | 4.0% | 0 of 91 | 66 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Connecticut, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.66 | 0.61 | 3.80 | 3.31 | 6.0% | 1.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.3 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 16.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.6 | 17.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.1 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.2 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CHURCH HOME OF HARTFORD, INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Babbitt, Bradford | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Burnett, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 11/02/2023 | |
| Dollar, Ellen | Corporate director | Individual | 11/06/2025 | |
| Findlay, Norvilla | Corporate director | Individual | 03/13/2025 | |
| Jacques, Cheryl | Corporate director | Individual | 01/15/2025 | |
| Jasminski, August | Corporate director | Individual | 03/07/2024 | |
| Mack, Diane | Corporate director | Individual | 11/02/2023 | |
| Mello, Jeffrey | Corporate director | Individual | 11/03/2022 | |
| Mihalcik, Matthew | Corporate director | Individual | 05/15/2026 | |
| Moore, Marian | Corporate director | Individual | 11/03/2022 | |
| Pickering, John | Corporate director | Individual | 11/06/2025 | |
| Purnell, Erl | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2015 | |
| Scott, Craig | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Sherrill, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 11/07/2019 | |
| Stanley, Lynne | Corporate director | Individual | 11/06/2025 | |
| Theriault, Ronald | Corporate director | Individual | 11/02/2023 | |
| Tonkin, Russell | Corporate director | Individual | 11/05/2020 | |
| Ziegenhagen, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 06/26/2025 | |
| Bernasconi, Renee | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2019 | |
| Kuzmenko, Ruslan | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Oakes, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/30/2019 | |
| Cliftonlarsonallen LLP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| Healthpro Heritage LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/01/2017 | |
| Bernasconi, Renee | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2019 | |
| Bompastore, Jacob | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/10/2019 | |
| Knittel, Rose | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Kuzmenko, Ruslan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/09/2026 | |
| Oakes, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/30/2019 | |
| Cliftonlarsonallen LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/02/2025 | |
| Healthpro Heritage LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/02/2025 | |
| Bernasconi, Renee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2019 | |
| Bompastore, Jacob | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/10/2019 | |
| Knittel, Rose | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/23/2025 | |
| Kuzmenko, Ruslan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 21, 2024: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 21, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 21, 2024: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 21, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Touchpoints at Bloomfield Bloomfield, 0.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Bloomfield Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation Bloomfield, 0.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Complete Care at Kimberly Hall-South Windsor, 2.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Complete Care at Kimberly Hall North Windsor, 2.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 42 citations
- Caleb Hitchcock Health Center Bloomfield, 2.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Saint Mary Home West Hartford, 3.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at Windsor Windsor, 3.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 51 citations
- Chelsea Place Care Center LLC Hartford, 4.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 58 citations
Connecticut contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Connecticut Department of Public Health, Facility Licensing and Investigations Section, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Connecticut Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, 860-424-5200. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Connecticut DPH Nursing Home Site, survey findings by facility, where Connecticut publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Seabury's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Seabury 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Seabury get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 21, 2024. The Connecticut average is 13.4.
- Has Seabury been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $18,268 in the last three years.
- Does Seabury accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Seabury?
- CMS lists 34 owners and managers. Legal business name: CHURCH HOME OF HARTFORD, INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.