Home / Connecticut / Sharon
27 Hospital Hill Road, Sharon, CT 06069 · Nw Hills County · (860) 364-1002
88 certified beds, about 79 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075379 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 29, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 35 health citations since July 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,385 in the last three years; the largest was $14,385, and the latest is dated April 27, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.55 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.75 of those hours.
31.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).
CMS links it to National Health Care Associates, an affiliated group of 42 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 35 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards and supervision, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision of a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and an unsteady gait requiring walker-assisted ambulation, failed to accurately assess elopement risk despite a BIMS score of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, and failed to ensure staff responded appropriately to an activated exit door alarm by searching for a resident or notifying the supervisor prior to deactivation. On 3/30/2026, Resident #1 exited the facility undetected, walked 0.3 miles on a two-way street without sidewalks or a crosswalk to the hospital emergency department, and remained unaccounted for by staff for one hour and 45 minutes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to review and respond to pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the correct portion of chicken was served, and corn bread or a similar substitute was provided per facility menu.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, review of the clinical record, and facility policy for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #1, Resident #34 and Resident #54) reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control techniques regarding social distancing (Resident #1 and Resident #34) and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when entering a room of a resident on droplet precautions (Resident #54).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and facility policy for 1 of 2 sampled residents observed with medication at the bedside (Resident #50), the facility failed to ensure Resident #50 was assessed and had a physician order to self-administer medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of clinical records, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for wounds, the facility failed to ensure Resident #46 was placed on the correct precautions to prevent Resident #46 from being confined to his/her room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and facility policy for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #48) observed with medication at the bedside, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff followed standards of practice for medication administration and remained with the resident until medication was consumed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury, the facility failed to obtain a timely nutritional evaluation for a resident with a new and worsening wound.
Inspectors wroteTop of FormBased on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #85), the facility failed to follow a physician's order for oxygen administration and failed to ensure oxygen was administered to a resident on continuous oxygen with a diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files and staff interviews for 3 of 3 employee files reviewed (Nurse Aide (NA) #4, NA #5, and NA #6), the facility failed to ensure the required annual performance evaluations were completed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, review of controlled substance (narcotic) records, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the completion of the controlled medication count by licensed staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a respectful and dignified manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to honor a resident's advance directives following a change in condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to monitor the resident's behaviors for a resident receiving antipsychotic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations of the noon meal, clinical record review, review of facility policy and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a manner that contained nutritive value, flavor and was not burned and for (Resident #34), the facility failed to ensure ice cream was not served in a softened form.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, facility policy, facility documentation, and interviews, the facility failed to contain food items appropriately in the dry storage room, to discard expired foods, to maintain their three-day emergency supply per menu and to complete daily temperature log sheets.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, review of facility policy and procedures and staff interview for 1 out of 3 sampled residents (Residents # 21) who required assistance with care, the facility failed to ensure that signs were not posted in resident's rooms that contained personal and confidential information regarding the resident's plan of care and treatment regimen within eyesight of public view.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #11) who was reviewed for Accidents/Falls, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and for 1 sampled resident (Resident #473) receiving antiviral medication to treat COVID-19, the facility failed to ensure that verbal medication order was transcribed to a written order in the resident's clinical record per facility policy and to meet professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation and staff interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #473) receiving antiviral medication to treat COVID-19, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #624) reviewed for accidents and education regarding water temperature monitoring in resident rooms, and for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #37), the facility failed to ensure a portable oxygen delivery device was secured to the adaptive equipment used for ambulation to prevent an accident with a injury, failed to ensure staff was educated regarding acceptable water temperature levels in resident rooms and how to proceed if temperatures were out of normal range, failed ensure a smoking receptacle was within reach and failed to attempt to provide assistance with re-applying a smoking apron during a smoking session.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and interviews for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #49) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered by the physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #13) reviewed for respiratory therapy, the facility failed to ensure that portable oxygen tanks contained oxygen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and interview for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #32) observed during the dining initial screening, the facility failed to provide the resident with an assistive device for beverage as prescribed.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation and staff interview for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #58) reviewed for end of life, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective QAPI program that met at least quarterly, develop, and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), review of facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective QAPI program that met at least quarterly, develop, and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies and obtain feedback from staff and residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility Infection Control Program, observations, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure face masks were properly worn during a COVID-19 outbreak.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #11 and # 28) who were reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure bedrails were securely attached to the resident's bed.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) submissions for Quarter 4 of 2022, Quarter 1 of 2023, and Quarter 2 of 2023, the facility failed to ensure that PBJ data was complete and accurate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to include state inspection survey results from investigations conducted after the previous re-certification survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two of four sampled residents (Resident #16 and Resident #39) who were incontinent and utilized incontinent products, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for the usage of urinary incontinence inserts.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure Resident #37 was free from abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interviews for one of three residents reviewed for Nutrition (Resident # 40), the facility failed to ensure a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed in a timely when the resident had a weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, review of facility documentation, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents, (Resident #11), reviewed for Accidents, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was implemented after a skin tear.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and interviews for one of three residents reviewed for Nutrition, (Resident # 40), the facility failed to ensure the resident's weight was monitored per facility policy and failed to ensure dietician recommendations were addressed or communicated in timely to ensure no further weight loss.
4 fire safety citations on file: 3 on August 23, 2023, 1 on July 14, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 27, 2026 | Fine | $14,385 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.55 | 3.73 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.25 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.95 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.85 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 31.4% | 37.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.15 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.67 on weekdays and 3.25 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 13.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.01 in April to June 2025 to 3.55 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.75 | 3.67 | 3.25 | 13.3% | 0 of 90 | 79 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.71 | 0.69 | 3.84 | 3.36 | 12.7% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.84 | 0.70 | 4.03 | 3.38 | 10.8% | 0 of 92 | 75 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.01 | 0.75 | 4.19 | 3.54 | 7.4% | 0 of 91 | 70 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Connecticut, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.66 | 0.61 | 3.80 | 3.31 | 6.0% | 1.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.53 | $20.14 to $22.68 | 21,380 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $35.43 | $32.05 to $36.94 | 8,540 |
| Registered nurses | $49.39 | $41.40 to $58.58 | 40,110 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.8 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.2 | 16.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 31.6 | 17.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.5 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.5 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Sharon Center for Health & Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (59.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
59.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Connecticut: 75 better, 2 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 130 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Connecticut: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 137 eligible stays.
7.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Connecticut: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 66 eligible stays.
61.9% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut58.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 42 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Connecticut100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SHARON ACQUISITION OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to National Health Care Associates, a group of 42 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mydert Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 51% | 06/07/2024 |
| Zadun Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 49% | 06/07/2024 |
| Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/07/2024 | |
| Ilana Ostreicher Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/07/2024 | |
| Juniper Capital Associates LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/07/2024 | |
| Marc Ephram Ostreicher Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/07/2024 | |
| Oak Management Capital LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/07/2024 | |
| Ysro Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/07/2024 | |
| Ehrenfeld, Mindy | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/07/2024 | |
| Gilmartin, Thomas | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/07/2024 | |
| Ostreicher, Marc | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/07/2024 | |
| National Health Care Associates Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/07/2024 | |
| Gilmartin, Thomas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/10/2024 | |
| Baker Tilly Advisory Group LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/07/2024 | |
| David Ostreicher Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/06/2025 | |
| Ilana Ostreicher Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/06/2025 | |
| Marc Ephram Ostreicher Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/06/2025 | |
| Michelle Ostreicher Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/06/2025 | |
| National Health Care Associates Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/07/2024 | |
| Preferred Therapy Solutions LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/07/2024 | |
| Procare LTC Holding LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/07/2024 | |
| Shayna Steg Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/03/2025 | |
| Yitzchok Steg Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/03/2025 | |
| Baker, Edward | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Cohen, Jesse | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Lopiansky, Rebecca | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.