Home / Ohio / Garfield Heights
5200 Marymount Village Drive, Garfield Heights, OH 44125 · Cuyahoga County · (216) 332-1100
130 certified beds, about 105 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2007
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366335 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 13, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since June 2021, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $83,603 in the last three years; the largest was $54,002, and the latest is dated March 13, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.03 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.
63.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and observation the facility failed to ensure preventive maintenance measures were in place to ensure Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system functioned properly to keep the air temperature in proper range. This had the potential to affect all twenty-two (22) Residents residing on the Care Hall. Facility census was 95.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 was safely assisted with activities of daily living to prevent a fall with major injury. Actual harm occurred on 02/06/25 when Resident #16, who was comprehensively assessed and ordered to need two staff members to assist when giving personal care, received incontinence care by only one staff member, resulting in a fall, hospitalization, and fractured hip. This affected one resident (#16) of five residents reviewed for falls. The total census was 110.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility did not ensure food was served at a palatable temperature. This had the potential to affect 107 residents who received food from nutrition services. The facility census was 110.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and sanitary. This had the potential to affect all 107 residents receiving food from the kitchen as three residents (Resident #30, #102, and #167) received no food by mouth. The facility census was 110.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to have quarterly Quality Assurance meetings. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 110. Findings Include: Review of the Quality Assurance (QA) meeting minutes revealed minutes starting in October 2024 to current date. Interview on 03/13/25 at 2:22 P.M. with the Administrator revealed he developed the QA program when he started at the facility in October 2024. He stated there were no prior meeting minutes for review.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or representatives were provided education regarding the benefits and potential side affects of the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations and the resident's records reflected the consent or refusal of the vaccines and the education provided. This finding affected four (Residents #80, #166, #215 and #217) of five residents reviewed for immunizations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with respect and dignity. This affected one resident (Resident #81) of four residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 110.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate timely assistance with eating and oral hygiene. This affected two residents (Resident #16 and Resident #223) of three residents investigated for activities of daily living (ADL) care. The facility census was 110.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview the facility failed to monitor and implement nutrition oral supplements as recommended by the registered dietitian and implement weekly weights as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident ( Resident # 166) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 110.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #216's antibiotic medication was discontinued timely following notification of a negative urine culture. This finding affected one (Resident #216) of six residents reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the glucometer blood glucose testing (BGT) machine was appropriately sanitized and disinfected to prevent the potential of cross contamination of blood borne pathogens. This finding affected two residents (Residents #80 and #166) of three residents (Residents #80, #166 and #209) who receive medications from the Hall One medication administration cart.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of facility investigation documents, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 88 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than five percent (%.) This affected two (Resident #12 and Resident #85) of four residents observed during medication administration. The medication error rate was eight % with 37 medication opportunities and three errors. The facility census was 88 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the resident bedside. This affected two (Residents #56 and #85 ) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 88 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene during medication administration. This affected three (Residents #12, #17, and #37) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 88 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide preventive care consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing of a pressure ulcer wound for Resident #98. This affected one (Resident #98) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 97. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #92, who was care-planned as one-staff assistance with meals, was assisted with a meal. This affected one (Resident #92) of three residents reviewed for meal assistance. The census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to consistently implement physician wound care orders for a skin tear and vascular wounds for Resident #98. This affected one (Resident #98) of three residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds. The census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation was maintained during food preparation, failed to ensure dishes were adequately cleaned, and failed to ensure the dishwasher was maintained in optimal condition to properly clean dishes, eating utensils, and food preparation utensils. This had the potential to affect all 98 residents who the facility identified as receiving food from the kitchen. The facility identified two (#55 and #207) residents who do not eat food prepared in the kitchen. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of email correspondence, review of infection control tracking documents, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to maintain an infection surveillance program which adequately tracked location, organisms, antibiotic use, and other metrics to determine infection trends. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff had means to sanitize their hands in the laundry room. This had the potential to affect all 100 residents in the facility. The census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed as ordered. This affected one (#29) of one resident reviewed for oxygen. The facility census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident and staff interview interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling urinary catheters were provided routine catheter care and urinary output was monitored. This affected one (#206) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, power of attorney (POA) interview, resident interview, review of a Self -Reported Incident (SRI) and investigation, review of facility sign out sheets, and review of the facility policy for signing residents out, the facility failed to provide supervision and follow the facility policy for a resident signing out for a leave of absence (LOA) to ensure the whereabouts for one resident (Resident #87) who had left the facility after reporting she was leaving on a LOA. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious harm, injury or death, on 10/24/23 at approximately 4:30 P.M. when Resident #87, who had mild dementia and required supervision and assistance for activities of daily living, informed staff she was leaving with a friend for an LOA. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for Resident #33. Actual Harm occurred on 10/09/23 when Resident #33, who required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility and activity of daily living care including turning and repositioning, developed an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left buttocks without being provided adequate pressure relief. Additionally, the resident was left soiled with stool that was in contact with the pressure ulcer wound. This affected one resident (#33) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided in a timely manner to one (#33) out of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The facility census was 104.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prepare food. This had the potential to affect 92 out of 93 residents residing in the facility. One resident (Resident #32) did not receive food from the kitchen. Facility census was 93. Finding Include: 1. On 06/01/21 the initial tour of the kitchen from 8:43 A.M. through 9: 21 A.M. revealed the oven, shelf over the oven, stovetop, fryer, and steamer all had dried food spatters down the sides, and accumulated grease, dust, and/or grime on them. The handles and knobs of the equipment had accumulated grease and grime. The vents over the equipment were greasy. The small [NAME] mixer stand had dried spatters on the side of the mixer and on the stand. 2. On 06/01/21 at 12:47 P.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, revealed the facility failed to ensure Resident #301 who had an order to test her stool for occult blood (a test to check for hidden blood in the stool) was completed as ordered and/ or the physician or nurse practitioner was notified the ordered test was not completed. This affected one resident (Resident #301) out of one resident (Resident #301) reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 93.
38 fire safety citations on file: 9 on March 13, 2025, 10 on November 30, 2023, 19 on June 4, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 13, 2025 | Fine | $29,601 |
| February 20, 2024 | Payment Denial | 5 days from March 19, 2024 |
| November 8, 2023 | Fine | $54,002 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.03 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.46 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.39 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.17 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.39 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 63.1% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 53.8% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.12 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.29 on weekdays and 3.39 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.42 in April to June 2025 to 4.03 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.03 | 0.46 | 4.29 | 3.39 | 0.4% | 0 of 90 | 105 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.10 | 0.39 | 4.32 | 3.55 | 0.2% | 0 of 92 | 111 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.34 | 0.39 | 4.59 | 3.69 | 0.4% | 0 of 92 | 101 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.42 | 0.43 | 4.62 | 3.92 | 6.8% | 0 of 91 | 102 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.6 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.4 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.4 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for SNF-the Villa at Marymount's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (59.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
59.6% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 263 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 256 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 117 eligible stays.
46.7% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 90 residents counted.
0.8% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 133 residents counted.
4.9% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 133 residents counted.
89.3% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MARYMOUNT HEALTHCARE LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marymount Healthcare Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/30/2023 |
| Cth Irrevocable Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2023 | |
| Cth Nightingale LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2023 | |
| Cutlass Op Family Trust II | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2023 | |
| Cutlass Op Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2023 | |
| Sri Family Irrevocable Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2023 | |
| Sri Nightingale LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2023 | |
| Wellspring at Marymount LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 06/30/2023 | |
| Braun, Dov | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Gutman, Isaac | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Jakobowitch, Avi | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/21/2026 | |
| Taub, Jacob | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Jakobowitch, David | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Braun, Dov | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Braun, Dov | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Corrigan, Kimberly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/12/2025 | |
| Rastogi, Vijay | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2023 | |
| Braun, Dov | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Corrigan, Kimberly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/03/2025 | |
| Jakobowitch, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/30/2023 | |
| Rastogi, Vijay | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.