6765 State Road, Parma, OH 44134 · Cuyahoga County · (440) 843-7800
153 certified beds, about 141 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366071 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 12, 2024, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 29 health citations since July 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.88 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.
48.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Franciscan Communities, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY Based on Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, medical record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This affected two residents (Residents #2 and #4) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 147.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation in the appropriate time frame to the state agency. This affected one resident (Resident #15) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 147.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interviews, staff interviews, facility documents and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were served a variety of meal choices. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility except three Residents (#29, #54 and #125) who were identified by the facility as not receiving food by mouth (NPO) or from the kitchen. The facility census was 136.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a timely manner to ensure proper temperature and failed to ensure hairnets were worn to ensure proper sanitation. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility except three Residents (#29, #54 and #125) who were identified by the facility as not receiving food by mouth (NPO) or from the kitchen. The facility census was 136.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident record reviews, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity during dining. This affected one resident (#30) of two reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 136.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #139's new wound was identified and treated before developing a large size, becoming infected, and beginning to heal independent of facility action. This affected one of three residents reviewed for changes in status. The total census was 136.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure restorative programs were implemented. This affected three residents (#24, #31, #130) of three reviewed for restorative services. The facility census was 136.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent a fall during a mechanical lift transfer. This affected one resident (#24) of three reviewed for falls. The facility census was 136.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident meal preferences were honored. This affected one resident (#109) of one reviewed for preferences. The facility census was 136.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure blood glucose testing (BGT) was completed per the physician's order. This finding affected one (Resident #150) of three residents reviewed for BGT. The facility census was 140.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure food was served and stored in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 142 residents in the facility that consumed food from the kitchen. Findings Include: Observation of the kitchen area with Assistant Dietary Manager (ADM) #522 on 12/09/24 between 8:45 A.M. and 9:15 A.M. revealed the following that was observed and verified the time of discovery: 1. In the dry storage area an open packed of white rice with no date, an open bag of dinner rolls with no date, an open box of stuffing with no date, two containers of granulated sugar that were open with no date, an open box of bread crumbs with no date, and an open box of yellow cake with no date. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for Resident #9. This affected one of twenty six sampled residents for medical record accuracy. Findings Include: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, heart failure and Parkinson's disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was severely cognitive impaired and required hands on assistance of one staff person for completing activities of daily living such as toileting, transfers and bed mobility. The assessment further noted that Resident #9 required supervision for eating activities. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, staff training, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen and failed to ensure food and liquids were stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety. This had the potential to affect all 142 residents residing in the facility and receiving food from the facility's main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, review of facility menu and review of staff training, the facility failed to follow menus in regard to portion sizes and recipes in regard to food preparation. This affected 29 (#78, #80, #81, #82, #83, #86, #87, #88, #89, #91, #93, #96, #100, #101, #103, #104 #107, #108, #112, #113, #114, #115, #116, #118, #122, #123, #124, #125, and Resident #126) of 49 residents residing on the east wing of the third floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, review of facility menus, review of staff trainings, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to maintain appropriate and appetizing food temperatures. This had the potential to affect 29 (Resident #78, #80, #81, #82, #83, #86, #87, #88, #89, #91, #93, #96, #100, #101, #103, #104 #107, #108, #112, #113, #114, #115, #116, #118, #122, #123, #124, #125, and Resident #126) of 49 residents residing on the east wing of the third floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed timely to change the resident's suprapubic catheter (a catheter that drains urine from the bladder through a small incision in the abdomen). This affected one (Resident #64) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 144.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely report potential mistreatment or abuse to the State Agency identified for Resident #92. This affected one (Resident #92) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 145.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide palatable meals and failed to ensure food was served at adequate temperatures. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 151.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure timely meal service. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 151.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure staff wore eye protection to prevent the spread of Covid-19. This had the potential to affect 135 residents residing at the facility. The facility also failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed weekly affecting Resident #33, #67 and #79 out of 38 residents receiving oxygen. The facility also failed to ensure the proper use of gloves during meal pass. This affected 135 residents in the facility. 1. Observation on 06/06/22 at 11:30 A.M. of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #791 walking out of a resident's room revealed STNA #791 was wearing an N95 mask and no eyewear. Interview at this time, with STNA #791 revealed she was an agency nurse and the facility gave her an N95 mask to wear at the start of her shift. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at the resident bedside. This affected one ( Resident #79) of 135 residents observed for environmental safety. The census was 135. Findings Included: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 08/12/21 and diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and emphysema. Review of orders for June 2022 revealed Ventolin HFA Aerosol solution 90 micromilligram (mcg)/Actuation Breath Activated Powder Inhaler (ACT) (used to treat wheezing and shortness of breath ) two puff inhale orally four times a day for shortness of breath (SOB) and one puff inhale orally every four hours as needed for SOB. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director (MD) and the Administrator attended the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) and the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings quarterly. This had the potential to affect all 139 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify and involve Resident #35's power of attorney in care conferences and care planning. This affected one of one resident reviewed for participation in care planning. The facility census was 139.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement its abuse policy related to an allegation of verbal abuse by Resident #82's family. This affected one of two residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #82). The facility census was 139. Findings Include: Resident #82 was admitted the facility on 05/23/19 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, broken internal left knee prosthesis and chronic heart failure. Interview with the family member of Resident #82 on 07/16/19 at 2:30 P.M. revealed on 06/28/19 Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #900, while completing treatment with family present, began to speak to Resident #82 in a way that was not appropriate to Resident #82's family. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was reported to the state agency as required. This affected one of two residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #82). The facility census was 139. Findings Include: Resident #82 was admitted the facility on 05/23/19 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, broken internal left knee prosthesis and chronic heart failure. Interview with the family member of Resident #82 on 07/16/19 at 2:30 P.M. revealed on 06/28/19 Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #900, while completing treatment with family present, began to speak to Resident #82 in a way that was not appropriate to Resident #82's family. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an investigation of an allegation of verbal abuse. This affected one of two residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #82). The facility census was 139. Findings Include: Resident #82 was admitted the facility on 05/23/19 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, broken internal left knee prosthesis and chronic heart failure. Interview with the family member of Resident #82 on 07/16/19 at 2:30 P.M. revealed on 06/28/19 Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #900, while completing treatment with family present, began to speak to Resident #82 in a way that was not appropriate to Resident #82's family. Per Resident #82's family from the moment PTA #900 entered Resident #82's room PTA #900 had an unfriendly tone and was verbally abusive to Resident #82 regarding her home going situation and progress in therapy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #76 and #7's care plan. This affected two of 31 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 139.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for Resident #30. This affected one resident of two residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. The facility census was 139.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the state ombudsman was notified of resident transfers to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #149) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization and had the potential to affect all 139 residents currently residing in the facility.
41 fire safety citations on file: 9 on December 12, 2024, 5 on June 9, 2022, 27 on July 18, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.88 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.38 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.49 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.20 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.30 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 48.8% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 47.1% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.68 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.04 on weekdays and 3.49 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.13 in April to June 2025 to 3.88 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.88 | 0.38 | 4.04 | 3.49 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 141 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.93 | 0.40 | 4.07 | 3.56 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 141 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.93 | 0.49 | 4.07 | 3.57 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 139 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.13 | 0.46 | 4.30 | 3.71 | 1.1% | 0 of 91 | 136 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.3 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.7 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 32.8 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.4 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Mt Alverna Home Inc's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
45.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 348 eligible stays.
11.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 347 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 233 eligible stays.
54.1% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 183 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 261 residents counted.
4.5% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 261 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 68 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: FRANCISCAN COMMUNITIES, INC. CMS links this home to Franciscan Communities, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Franciscan Sisters of Chicago Services Corporation | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/07/2009 |
| Parkhill, Roberta | Corporate director | Individual | 08/05/2016 | |
| Ramirez-Justin, Andrea | Corporate director | Individual | 11/18/2015 | |
| Stark, James | Corporate director | Individual | 02/19/2014 | |
| Umanskiy, Regina | Corporate director | Individual | 07/05/2022 | |
| Parkhill, Roberta | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/18/2021 | |
| Ramirez-Justin, Andrea | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/23/2020 | |
| Rosenberger, Robert | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/11/2023 | |
| Stark, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/18/2021 | |
| Umanskiy, Regina | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/05/2022 | |
| Franciscan Communities, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2012 | |
| Welsh, Patrick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/05/2002 | |
| Franciscan Communities, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/24/2025 | |
| Welsh, Patrick | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/05/2002 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.