130 Sand Creek Highway, Adrian, MI 49221 · Lenawee County · (517) 265-6554
113 certified beds, about 91 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235504 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 27, 2026, inspectors cited 19 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 40 health citations since October 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.44 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.
46.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Avon Healthcare, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 40 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake 2803162 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall as well as conduct a thorough root-cause analysis investigation into falls for five residents (R3, R17, R71, R98, and R106), of six residents reviewed for falls resulting in transfer to hospital and major injuries including fractures and subdural hematoma.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and maintain a Quality Assistance and Process Improvement (QAPI) program which identified and prioritized quality deficiencies, systematically analyzed the underlying causes of systemic quality deficiencies, and implemented effective corrective action or performance improvement activities to remedy those deficiencies. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the safety and quality of life of all 93 residents at the facility. Findings Included: On 03/27/2026 at 01:01 p.m. an interview was conducted with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A regarding concerns identified during the current Recertification Survey. NHA A explained that during the last year the QAPI committee had identified areas of concerns as return to hospital, weight loss, falls, and dietary menus. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately address and make good faith effort to resolve grievances for 7 of 7 Resident Council members. Finding incleude:Review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated 9/30/25 the council members complained in part, they were not receiving certain menu items and had concerns regarding the quality of the food. The response signed off by Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A was to print menus ahead of time. There was no response provided the concern related to the quality of food being served. The Resident council meeting minutes 10/27/25 reflected the quality of food was bad and food was cold and some meals were being served late and menu items that were requested were not provided. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 7 of 7 of the Resident Council members were informed of their right on how to file a grievance with the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 7 of 7 of the resident council members food preferences were met on a daily basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate advance directive (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) information was in place for one resident (#100) of two resident reviewed for advance directives.
Inspectors wroteThrough interview and observations, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment without the overpowering smell of urine for two residents (R7 and R11) of two residents reviewed for a homelike environment with the potential to affect all residents on that hall. Findings IncludeResident #11 (R11)Review of the medical record reflected that R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of paraplegia, acute kidney failure, encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device, abnormal gait and mobility. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/11/2026 revealed R11 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively impact) out of 15. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a significant change Minimum Data Set was completed timely in one (Resident 3) out of 19 reviewed for Significant Change Minimum Date Sets.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to revise care plans for three residents (R1, R4 and R7) to reflect a room change, use of hand rolls and receiving hospice services of 19 residents reviewed. Findings IncludeResident #1 (R1)Review of the medical record reflected that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with lower respiratory infection, weakness, presence of vascular implants and grafts, disorder of the brain, dementia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, colon cancer with a colostomy bag, anxiety and depression. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/12/2025 revealed R1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively impact) out of 15. [...]
Inspectors wroteThrough observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three residents (R1, R7 and R22) of four were bathed, had their hair washed, had their facial hair shaved to maintain the highest practicalable physical, emotional and psychological wellbeing. Findings IncludePertains to Intake #2728007Resident #1 (R1)Review of the medical record reflected that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with lower respiratory infection, weakness, presence of vascular implants and grafts, disorder of the brain, dementia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, colon cancer with a colostomy bag, anxiety and depression. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/12/2025 revealed R1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively impact) out of 15. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review this facility failed to maintain range of motion in one resident (R#4) of two residents reviewed for range of motion resulting in failure to participate in her activities of daily living. Findings IncludeResident #4 (R4)Review of the medical record reflected that R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, urinary tract infection, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) chronic respiratory failure, pressure ulcer of sacral region- stage 3, paraplegia- incomplete, chronic pain, muscle wasting and atrophy. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) revealed R4 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively impact) out of 15. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care, including tracheal suctioning was provided consistent with professional standard of practice for one Residents (#6) of three Residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings Included:Resident #6 (R6)Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that include dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cerebral infarction (stroke), tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the trachea), gastrostomy (a feeding tube inserted through the abdomen directly into the stomach to provide nutrition), chronic respiratory failure, pressure injury to right heel, anxiety, insomnia, abnormal posture, lack of coordination, language deficits, paralysis right side of body, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux, and protein-calorie malnutrition. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to remove all expired medications from two of four medication administration carts used to administer medications to residents with the potential to affect half of the facility census of 93. Findings Include During observation and interview on 03/25/2026 at 8:16 AM, writer asked to look through medication cart labeled Hall A. Writer found Allergy Relief 24 hr. 180mg tab expired 01/26. Naproxen Sodium 220mg tab expiration date has been removed, all white with no date. During observation and interview on 03/25/2026 at 8:36 AM, writer asked to look through medication cart labeled Hall B. Writer found Cetirizine HCI 10 mg tab- Expiration date had been removed, wiped off, plain white area where expiration date was. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the published menu was served as planned to six residents and residents were consistently informed in advance of any menu changes affecting all residents consuming food from the kitchen resulting in resident dissatisfaction with their meal experience and feelings of frustration related to meals voiced in confidential resident group the the potential to effect all 93 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure palatable and appetizing food was served to two (Resident #2 and Resident #49) of 2 residents reviewed for receiving palatable and appetizing food, resulting in potential for decreased oral intake.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility Arbitration Agreement failed to explicitly state that neither the resident nor his or her representative was required to sign an agreement for binding arbitration as a condition of admission, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at the facility and state that the binding arbitration agreement allows the resident or anyone else to communicate with federal, state, or local officials such as federal and state surveyors, other federal or state health departement employees and representatives of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for one resident (#73) of three Resident reviewed for Arbitration Agreements. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility Arbitration Agreement failed to explicitly state that the agreement provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties for one resident (#73) of three Resident reviewed for Arbitration Agreements. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide coordination of care for hospice services for one resident (R7) of one reviewed for additional services above and beyond the facilities provides. Findings IncludeResident #7 (R7)Review of the medical record reflected that R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and signed onto hospice 02/12/2026. Diagnoses of Huntington's disease, dementia, other disorders of the muscles, emotional deficit related to cerebrovascular disease, protein-caloric malnutrition, weakness and repeated falls. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/26/2025 revealed R7 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment) out of 15. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that appropriate hand hygiene was conducted during dressing changes for two residents (#63, #88) and during medication administration observation with the potential to affect facility census of 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the Comprehensive Care Plan for one (R6) of three reviewed.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake 2697023. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) ensure the accuracy of medication orders for one (R4); and 2) administer medication according to Physician Orders for one (R4) of three reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcers for two resident (#2, #8) of three residents reviewed for the development of pressure ulcers. Findings Included: Resident #2 (R2) Review of the medical record revealed R2 was admitted to the facility 11/21/2024 with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, Alzheimer's disease, lack of coordination, difficulty walking, Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), stage 3 kidney disease, cognitive communication deficit, abnormal posture, protein-calorie malnutrition, congestive heart failure (CHF), insomnia, obesity, anxiety, depression, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), atrial fibrillation, and arthropathy (any disease of the joints). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the Care Plan for one (Resident #33) of 18 reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nephrostomy tube care was ordered and completed for one (Resident #47) of one residents reviewed for nephrostomy care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to initiate intervention for the prevention of repeated falls at bedside for 1 resident (R38) of 3 residents reviewed for falls resulting in the potential for repeated falls at bedside. On 12/17/24 at 3:53 PM during observation and interview R38 pointed at her eye which appeared bruised extending around the entire eye. R38 responded, uh huh when asked if she had fallen. R38 was quite busy in her room, moving place to place independently in the wheelchair. A nurse on the unit said that R38 had recently fallen twice in one day. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R38's original admission date was 3/27/23 and recent admission date was 4/15/23. R38 had the following pertinent diagnoses: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure water was available for 1 resident (R24) of 1 resident reviewed for hydration resulting in the potential for inadequate fluid intake. Findings Include: On 12/17/24 at 1:33 PM during observation and interview R24 was upright in bed and established strong eye contact and was able to participate in an interview. It was noted during observation that R24's water cup was on a bedside table positioned to the left side of the bed and up against the wall. This positioned the table and water to the left and behind her head and out of sight and reach. There was also a rolling type of bedside table near the bed, and within resident's reach, but no water cup on it. When asked if R24 enjoyed drinking water her response was, I love it. On 12/17/24 at 4:42 PM during observation and interview R24 smiled and said a few words. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication with the dialysis center, pertaining to a fluid restriction, for one (Resident #42) of one reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) failed to ensure justification for an increase in psychotropic medications and 2) failed to attempt nonpharmacological interventions for two (Resident #9, Resident #33) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to, 1) ensure appropriate storage of medications, including narcotics; and 2) ensure one medication cart was free of expired medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to coordinate hospice services for one resident (#56) out of one resident reviewed for coordination of hospice services. Findings Included: Resident #56 (R56) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #56 (R56) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of brain. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/1/24, reflected R56 scored three out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). The same MDS revealed that R56 was utilizing hospice services. On 12/18/24 at 12:23 PM, R56's Hospice Communication binder was reviewed. R56's Hospice Care Plan was not located in the binder. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 11 of 12 residents in group knew what their resident rights were, where the posting of resident rights, the Ombudsman and State Agency contact information was located. Findings Included: During group meeting on 12/19/2024 at 11:03 AM, 11 of the 12 residents in attendance did not know who the Ombudsman was, or where the posting was located with the Ombudsman contact information. The 11 residents also did not know where the State agency contact information was located nor were the 11 residents aware that they had the right to put in a complaint with the State agency. 11 of the residents also stated they did not know what resident's right were, and were not ever told of them. [...]
Inspectors wroteDPS B: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement ordered devices to prevent accidents/falls for 1 resident (Resident #31) of 2 reviewed for accidents, from a total sample of 19, resulting in the risk for falls and potential for injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: (1) effectively date mark all potentially hazardous ready-to-eat food products, (2) effectively don hair and beard restraints, (3) effectively clean and maintain food service equipment, and (4) monitor food for safe temperatures prior to serving and maintain temperature logs effecting 74 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and resident foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable bathroom for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident #42), resulting in an environment in disrepair.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1. Dispose of expired eye drops; 2. ensure medications/treatment carts remained secured in 1 of 2 medication/treatment carts reviewed, resulting in the potential for medications given to residents to have decreased potency, reduced strength, effect, and medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure updated and accurate advance directive information was in place for three residents (Resident #8, #18 and #52) of four reviewed for advance directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time), resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility, or other healthcare providers. Findings Include: Review of the MICHIGAN DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE PROCEDURE ACT, Act 193 of 1996 revealed that, An order executed under this section shall be on a form described in section 4. The order shall be dated and executed voluntarily and signed by each of the following persons: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans, for one of 19 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #42), resulting in the potential for falls, pressure ulcers, and unmet needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician ordered parameters upon administration of blood pressure medications for 1 resident (Resident #37) of 5 reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for adverse drug consequences.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent when 3 medication errors were observed from a total of 39 opportunities for one resident (R1) of nine residents observed during medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.69%.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were honored for 1 resident (Resident #30) of 3 reviewed for food preferences and for 9 of 9 residents in the confidential group, resulting in meal dissatisfaction and frustration when food choices were not honored and disliked foods continued to be served on meal trays. Resident #30 Review of the medical record reflected that Resident #30 (R30) was readmitted to facility 6/19/2023 with diagnoses including obesity, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/16/23 reflected that R30 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). [...]
11 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 27, 2026, 5 on December 20, 2024, 5 on October 11, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.44 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.35 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.23 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.13 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.97 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.4% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.23 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.53 on weekdays and 3.23 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.44 in April to June 2025 to 3.44 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.44 | 0.35 | 3.53 | 3.23 | 0.2% | 0 of 90 | 91 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.31 | 0.35 | 3.46 | 2.95 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 88 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.54 | 0.41 | 3.74 | 3.05 | 3.5% | 0 of 92 | 89 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.44 | 0.47 | 3.62 | 3.00 | 0.1% | 0 of 91 | 89 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.4 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.7 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.7 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.3 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Springcreek Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
52.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 64 eligible stays.
11.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 101 eligible stays.
5.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 53 eligible stays.
70.5% this home
Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 78 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 106 residents counted.
6.8% this home
Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 105 residents counted.
95.7% this home
Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 47 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ADRIAN MI SNF MANAGEMENT LLC. CMS links this home to Avon Healthcare, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renewal Healthcare LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2022 | |
| Gottlieb, Moshe | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 45% | 05/10/2022 |
| Freund, Eliyahu | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 05/10/2022 | |
| Koenig, Joshua | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 05/10/2022 | |
| Scratch, Dana | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2022 | |
| Frankel, Eliyahu | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Freund, Eliyahu | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/10/2022 | |
| Illuminate Hc LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2022 | |
| Frankel, Eliyahu | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Heidger, Sandra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/22/2024 | |
| Johncox, Kellie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/09/2022 | |
| Yalavarthi, Jyothsna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/10/2025 | |
| Adrian Propco | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/10/2022 | |
| Freund, Eliyahu | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/10/2022 | |
| Gottlieb, Moshe | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/10/2022 | |
| Johncox, Kellie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/09/2022 | |
| Koenig, Joshua | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/10/2022 | |
| Yalavarthi, Jyothsna | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/26/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.