Home / New Mexico / Clovis
1400 West 21st Street, Clovis, NM 88101 · Curry County · (575) 762-4705
70 certified beds, about 55 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 325076 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 14, 2025, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the New Mexico average is 17.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 49 health citations since June 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $24,271 in the last three years; the largest was $12,223, and the latest is dated January 2, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.26 hours per resident per day, against 3.54 across New Mexico and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.
59.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Mexico average 53.3%).
CMS links it to Genesis Healthcare, an affiliated group of 184 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 49 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards for 4 (R #2, R #3, R #5, and R #6) of 4 (R #2, R #3, R #5, and R #6) residents reviewed for respiratory care when the staff failed to:1. Ensure medical orders included the amount of oxygen (a specific flow rate; measurement of the volume of liquid or gas moving per unit of time) and the delivery method (i.e. Nasal canula, simple mask, or non-rebreather mask) for R #6.2. Ensure oxygen tubing included a label with a date indicating when tubing was changed for R #2, R #3, and R #5). These deficient practices are likely to result in residents receiving too much, not enough oxygen, and increase their risk of infection which can lead to worsening of their conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely acquisition and provision of ordered narcotic pain medication for 1 (R #6) of 1(R #6) resident who required post operative pain management. This failure resulted in a delay in receiving prescribed narcotic medication which has the potential to cause the resident unnecessary pain and anguish.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs by ensuring adequate indication of use for medications based off of the residents' diagnosis for 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice could likely lead to adverse drug effects and poor patient outcomes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices by not ensuring the following:1. The medication carts were locked while unattended, 2. The medical supply storage rooms were kept free of expired medications, 3. Supplies and medications were stored according to manufacturer's temperature instructions. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all 61 residents as identified by the census provided by the Activities Coordinator on 08/10/25. If the facility does not ensure safe storage practices, then residents are at risk for unauthorized persons to have access to medications and adverse effects due to improper storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs and preferences were met for all 61 residents listed on the facility census provided by the Administrator (ADM) on 08/10/25, when staff failed to complete the following: 1. Serve food items that were listed on the menu. 2. Provide residents with the opportunity to select their choice from the menu or alternate menu in advance of meal service. These deficient practices are likely to lead to residents experiencing frustration, depression, and weight loss due to not knowing what food is being served or being able to choose what they eat.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner when staff failed to complete the following: 1. Maintain the ice machine in a manner to prevent contamination and foodborne pathogens, 2. Maintain the coffee, juice, and tea machines in a clean and sanitary manner, 3. Properly store food items,4. Maintain the kitchen environment in a clean and sanitary manner. These failures have the potential to result in cross contamination, the growth of foodborne pathogens, and foodborne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an ongoing infection prevention and control program (a program that is used to prevent, recognize, and control the onset and spread of infections) by not providing the following:Enhanced Barrier (EBP) signs not visible outside of rooms with precautions,Hand Sanitizing,This failed practice has the potential to result in the spread of infectious diseases and residents to be at risk of contracting infections, hospitalization, and death.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 (an acute respiratory disease in humans characterized mainly by fever and cough and capable of progressing to severe symptoms and in some cases death, especially in older people and those with underlying health conditions) vaccinations (treatment with a vaccine to produce immunity to a particular infections disease or pathogen) for 4 (CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, and CNA #4) of 4 (CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, and CNA #4) staff members reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations and at a minimum provide the following:1. Staff were given education of the COVID-19 vaccination regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine,2. Staff were offered the COVID-19 vaccine or information on obtaining COVID-19 vaccine. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was in safe operating condition by not cleaning, repairing, or replacing the following: 1. The cleaning solution dispenser above the three-compartment sink.2. The walk-in refrigerator. 3. The freezer located in the kitchen. 4. The water heater located in the kitchen. If the facility does not keep essential equipment in the kitchen in safe operating condition, then all 61 residents residing in the facility (according to the facility census that was provided by the administrator (ADM) on 08/10/25) could experience increase in foodborne illnesses and food not being prepared properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the State Survey Agency within five working days of an incident for 2 (R #32 and R #64) of 2 (R #32 and R #64) residents reviewed for abuse or neglect. If the facility is not submitting the summary of the facility's investigation to the State Survey Agency, then the State Survey Agency is unable to appropriately triage (review) the allegation for further investigation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from physical restraints for 1 (R #4) of 1 (R #4) resident reviewed for restrictions when staff used a wander guard (wearable technology used to keep residents from wandering or eloping from the facility unattended) for a resident that no longer needs a wander guard. This deficient practice could likely result in R #4 being unnecessarily restricted.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the care plan for 1 (R #32) of 3 (R #9, R #32, and R #65) residents reviewed when staff failed revise R #34's care plan to include elopement risk and use of a wander guard (wearable technology used to keep residents from wandering or eloping from the facility unattended). This deficient practice is likely to result in residents' care and needs not being addressed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data daily, at the beginning of the shift that included the following: 1. Facility name. 2. The current date. 3. The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: 1. Registered nurses. 2. Licensed practical nurses. 3. Certified nurse aides. 4. Resident census. This deficient practice could likely result in residents and visitors not having the staffing information readily available.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors by not administering medications as ordered for 1 (R #2) of 1 (R #2) resident reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice could likely lead to severe negative effects on the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct an in-dept investigation, correct the grievance allegations, and notify residents of the outcome of their grievances. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all 62 residents (residents were identified using the census provided by the Administrator on 05/28/25) residing in the facility. If the facility is not investigating, correcting, and notifying residents of their grievance allegations then residents are likely to feel unheard and unimportant.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to secure medications in a medication cart and a treatment cart for all 62 residents living in the facility (residents were identified by the census list provided by the Administrator on 05/28/25). This deficient practice could result in residents obtaining medication not prescribed to them resulting in adverse side effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to serve food that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 62 residents' ability to eat and enjoy their meals, may decrease their quality of life, and could likely lose weight.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment by: 1. Not repairing the peeling and chipped paint, 2. Not repainting areas of repair to match the rest of the wall, 3. Handrails in the 200-hall appeared worn and needed repair/refinishing, 4. Using an overhead paging system to announce phone calls for staff members and to call staff members to the office. These deficient practices could affect everyone that lives in the 200-hall as identified by the Daily Census provided by the Administrator (ADM) on 05/28/25 and will likely cause residents to feel like they are not living in a comfortable home-like environment and make them feel they are not valued.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, the facility failed to have evidence that all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated to prevent further incidents from occurring. This deficient practice could likely affect all 62 residents residing in the facility according to the census provided by the Administrator (ADM) on 05/28/25. If the facility is not thoroughly investigating and maintaining evidence of the investigations then residents are at a higher risk of being abused, neglected, exploited, or mistreated.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was accurate for 2 (R #1 and R #7) of 2 (R #1 and R #7) residents reviewed for care plan accuracy. This deficient practice could likely result in staff not understanding and implementing the most appropriate interventions and treatments for the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living ADL; (activities related to personal care such as bathing, showering, dressing, walking, toileting, and eating) assistance for baths and showers for 1 (R #7) of 1 (R #7) dependent resident sampled for ADLs. If the facility is not assisting the residents to bathe or shower, then residents are likely to feel unimportant, dirty and could develop further or worsening health issues.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to keep residents free from accidents for 2 (R #5 and R #7) of 2 (R #5 and R #7) residents reviewed for accidents when staff failed to: 1. Put interventions in place to reduce the risk of falls for R #5. 2. Implement appropriate post-fall interventions (ensure the health and safety of residents after a fall by completing actions such as neurochecks) for R #5 and R #7. These deficient practices could likely result in residents getting injured during falls or injuries going unnoticed after a fall.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards for 3 (R #2, R #3, and R #4) of 3 (R #2, R #3, and R #4) residents reviewed for respiratory care when staff failed to change the oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provides extra oxygen) tubing. If the facility fails to provide new, clean tubing for oxygen concentrators then residents are at risk of becoming ill.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the resident's medical chart and to ensure the resident's current advance directive and New Mexico Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form (a document which provides an individual's wishes for emergency and lifesaving care) matched the order in the electronic health record (EHR) for 1 (R #7) of 2 (R #1 and R #7) residents reviewed for advance directives when staff failed to update the resident's code status. This deficient practice is likely to result in confusion, delay, and residents not having their wishes honored if a life-threatening event occurred.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pain relief for 8 hours since admission to the facility for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #5, and R #8) residents reviewed for pain. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #1 experiencing significant pain which led to her calling 911 for relief and discharging from the facility against medical advice.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to ensure staff served meals that were attractive and palatable (pleasant to taste) for 4 (R #2, #5, #6, and #7) of 6 (R #2, #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8) residents reviewed for meal quality. This deficient practice could likely reduce residents' ability to eat and enjoy meals, decrease their quality of life, and they could lose weight.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an accurate, person-centered comprehensive care plan for 1 (R #1) of 3 (R #1, R #2, and R #3) residents reviewed. If the facility is not updating the care plan to reflect the treatment needs for wound care, then the residents could likely experience a worsening of existing wounds or the development of new wounds.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a discharge summary that included a recapitulation (a summary describing the resident's course of treatment while residing in the facility) and a reconciliation of all medications at the time of discharge for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident reviewed for discharge. This deficient practice could likely lead to the receiving facility, community agency, or family member not knowing what the current care needs and/or current medications are for the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the environment was free of accident hazards when water temperatures were not maintained at a safe temperature level for six of 20 residents (Resident (R) 31, R23, R43, R22, R18, and R41) residing on the dementia care unit. 0n 07/19/24, water temperatures at the hand washing sinks on the dementia care unit were recorded to be 123.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Water temperatures were adjusted but no monitoring occurred. On 07/24/24, water temperatures in two resident bathrooms were noted to be 122 degrees F and 125 degrees F. The water temperatures were not adjusted after water was measured to be in excess of 120-degree F. The failure to maintain water temperatures at a safe level had the potential to cause serious burns or injuries for the residents, and 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and documentation review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to result in the spread of infections and food born illnesses for 59 of 59 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility documents and policies, the facility failed to maintain the walk-in refrigerator to ensure it functioned properly and maintained a safe operating temperature. This had the potential to result in food-borne illness as the result of not holding food at a safe temperature level. This had the potential to affect 59 of 59 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure restorative services were provided as ordered by the physician for five of eight residents (Residents (R) 47, R54, R46, R11, and R34) reviewed for restorative services out of a total sample of 23. This had the potential to cause avoidable decline in the residents' functional abilities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the needs and interests of five of six residents (Resident (R) 43, R38, R47, R22, and R42) reviewed for activities out of a total sample of 23. This failure had the potential to cause diminished quality of life for all residents who resided on the dementia care unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain an environment free of flies. Flies were observed in resident rooms, dining rooms, hallways, and in the therapy room, landing on residents and their food. This had the potential to affect 59 of 59 residents who resided at the facility, and the potential to result in food borne illness and the spread of infection and diseases.
Inspectors wroteBased on an interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to participate in the care planning process for two of two residents (Resident (R) 32 and R48) reviewed for care plans out of a total sample of 23. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs due to a lack of resident involvement in their care. Findings Include: 1. Review of R32's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disease. It was recorded R32 was her own representative. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications in a manner to prevent cross contamination for five of eight residents (Resident (R) 18, R43, R9, R42, and R5) residents observed receiving medications out of a total census of 59 and failed to complete wound care in a manner to prevent cross contamination for one of one resident (R11) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a total sample of 23. The failure had the potential to cause residents to be exposed to pathogens and increased the risk of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to post the actual hours worked for the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff, including Registered Nurses, Licensed Nurses, and Nursing Assistants. This had the potential to affect 59 of 59 residents who resided at the facility and any visitors to the facility. This had the potential to cause residents and staff to be uninformed of the facility's staffing data.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff reviewed Resident's Rights during the resident's stay or Resident Council Meetings for 11 (R #1, R #5, R #6, R #13, R #14, R #18, R #19, R #32, R #35, R #41, and R #42) of 11 (R #1, R #5, R #6, R #13, R #14, R #18, R #19, R #32, R #35, R #41, and R #42) residents sampled during a Resident's Council meeting. This deficient practice could likely result in residents feeling uninformed, not respected, vulnerable and susceptible to abuse or neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the most recent survey results completed by Federal and State Surveyors and any plans of correction in effect is readily and easily accessible for residents, visitors, and their legal representatives. This deficient practice has the potential of affecting all 49 residents identified on the facility census list provided by the Administrator on 06/11/23.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that five (5) Certified Nursing Aides (CNA's) (CNA's #2, #3, #5, #7 and #8) of 5 (CNA's #2, #3, #5, #7 and #8) CNA's had documented and demonstrated competencies (ability of an individual to do a job properly), before they worked with the residents. All 49 residents, as identified by the facility census provided by the Administrator on 06/11/23, residents could likely be affected by this deficient practice, which could lead to the residents not receiving the care and services as described on their care plan and making them susceptible to improper care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and maintain foods under sanitary conditions by not ensuring food items in the dry storage, refrigerator, and freezer were properly labeled and/or dated. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 49 residents listed on the resident census list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/11/23, and could lead to foodborne illnesses in residents if food is not being stored properly and safe food handling practices are not adhered to.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for all 49 residents, as identified by the facility census provided by the Administrator on 06/11/23, by failing to maintain, repair and resurface building/walls and the hand rail system. This deficient practice is likely to affect their safety and psychosocial well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify residents of the findings of their grievances. This deficient practice could likely affect all 49 residents who reside at the facility grievances. If the facility does not provide responses to grievances, then residents may not feel that their concerns are being resolved or important to the facility administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan and implement a comprehensive care plan for 3 (R #7, 22, and 47) of 4 (R #7, 22, 47, and 49) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans: Develop a comprehensive care plan for R #7 and R #47 residents; Implement a comprehensive care plan for R #22. This failure is likely to delay residents in receiving benefits from, or improving, related to plans of care that are effective for their optimal well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have physician orders for 1 (R #7) of 1 (R #7) resident by administering oxygen without a physician's order. If the facility fails to obtain orders for the administering of oxygen, it could likely cause the resident to not receive the therapeutic benefits, resulting in possible harm to the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment is in safe operating condition. This failure is likely to cause residents to not receive meals as scheduled, or be served at appetizing temperatures, or be stored in accordance with industry standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan had been revised for 1 (R #21) of 1 (R #21) resident reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to update the care plan to include removal of a catheter (device used to drain the bladder). This deficient practice is likely to result in residents care and needs not being addressed if care plans are not updated.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a Wanderguard (a device worn by a resident used to notify the facility of resident trying to leave the facility) to prevent accidents for 1 (R #45) of 1 (R #45) resident reviewed for accidents. If the facility does not implement safety devices, accidents could occur, resulting in injury to residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage can lids on garbage cans were closed completely or had a lid within the kitchen area. A. On 06/17/23 at 11:00 am, during observation of the kitchen, a trash can on wheels was sitting uncovered in the kitchen area, by the back door. B. On 06/17/23 at 11:01 am, during an interview with Dietary Services Director (DSD), when asked if the garbage cans in the kitchen needed to be covered, she replied yes. She then picked up the lid from next to the trash can and placed it on the trash can. C. Record review of Trash Removal policy dated 07/15/22 revealed the following: Policy Title: Trash Removal . Process: . 2. Covered trash containers are used for collection. 5. Trash containers and lids are cleaned when visibly soiled and disinfected at least monthly. 6. [...]
35 fire safety citations on file: 25 on August 14, 2025, 5 on July 26, 2024, 5 on June 15, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 2, 2025 | Fine | $12,048 |
| July 26, 2024 | Fine | $12,223 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Mexico | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.26 | 3.54 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.35 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.86 | 3.10 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.05 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.86 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 59.6% | 53.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 77.8% | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.14 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.42 on weekdays and 2.86 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 18.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.76 in April to June 2025 to 3.26 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.35 | 3.42 | 2.86 | 18.2% | 0 of 90 | 55 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.10 | 0.35 | 3.17 | 2.93 | 12.9% | 0 of 92 | 59 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.05 | 0.33 | 3.12 | 2.86 | 8.4% | 0 of 92 | 61 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.76 | 0.28 | 2.80 | 2.67 | 2.0% | 0 of 91 | 61 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Mexico, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.52 | 0.60 | 3.69 | 3.10 | 14.2% | 1.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.94 | $17.94 to $21.83 | 4,750 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.52 | $18.93 to $35.14 | 2,460 |
| Registered nurses | $45.36 | $38.92 to $49.40 | 17,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Mexico | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 11.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 11.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 37.5 | 14.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.7 | 22.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.4 | 15.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.1 | 2.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for St. Anthony Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
46.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New Mexico: 15 better, 4 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
9.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New Mexico: 0 better, 2 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 46 eligible stays.
7.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New Mexico: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
61.8% this home
Median of homes: New Mexico66.5% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 34 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New Mexico0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 49 residents counted.
3.8% this home
Median of homes: New Mexico2.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 49 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: New Mexico97.2% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ST. ANTHONY HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Genesis Healthcare, a group of 184 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summit Care LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/25/2007 |
| Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Gen Operations I LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Gen Operations II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Genesis Healthcare Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/25/2007 | |
| Genesis Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Skilled Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Summit Care Parent LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2013 | |
| Sun Healthcare Group Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/02/2015 | |
| Whitman, Arnold | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/02/2015 | |
| Berg, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/02/2015 | |
| Bridgeford, Laura | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Mendelson, Avi | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Gonzalez, Alice | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Morris, Diane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Ortiz, Raymond | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Gonzalez, Alice | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/21/2025 | |
| Ortiz, Raymond | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/21/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New Mexico. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.