Home / Pennsylvania / Norristown
2751 Dekalb Pike, Norristown, PA 19401 · Montgomery County · (610) 278-2700
119 certified beds, about 112 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395912 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 19, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
None of its 20 health citations since May 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.38 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
40.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were afforded privacy related to the use of a telephone and medical assessment for two of 23 residents. (Resident R8 and Resident 82)
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, review of clinical records, and facility documentation and policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an investigation related to a resident's fall was complete and thoroughly investigated to rule out neglect for one 24 resident records reviewed (Resident R6).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater for two of three residents observed during medication administration (R13, R124).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and review of resident records, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly notify physician of a change in residents' condition when radiology report confirmed positive for fracture for one of 23 records reviewed (Resident R6).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medication administration times were following according to physician order for three of three residents reviewed. (Resident R1, Resident R2, Resident R3)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, interviews with residents and staff and reviews of the job descriptions, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safety of one of two resident reviewed after the resident was returned to the facility from a contracted transportation company, who transported the resident to a medical appointment. (Resident R1)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased upon interviews with residents and staff, review of clinical records, facility documentation and policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for one of 21 resident records reviewed (Resident R94).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for one of two residents reviewed for wandering/elopement (Resident R308). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Elopement/Unauthorized Absence dated August 2, 2024, revealed the facility will identify residents with potential and/or actual risk factors for elopement and protect the resident through development and implementation of safety interventions. In the event of a resident elopement the facility will implement its policies and procedures promptly to locate the resident in a timely manner. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely provision of professional services furnished by outside providers, for one of 21 resident records reviewed (Resident R93).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not maintain complete and accurate medical records related to diagnoses for physician ordered medications for two of 21 records reviewed (Residents R18 and R81).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of resident records and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility did not ensure antibiotics were administered with adequate indication for use for one of 21 resident records reviewed (Resident R94).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of two residents out of 21 sampled (Residents R48 & R93).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure meals were served in accordance with resident preferences for two of two nursing units (1st and 2nd floor). Findings Include: Interview on May 14, 2024, at 12:30 p.m. with Resident R100 revealed lunch used to be served at noon. Recently, lunch has been coming later since change in process of delivering food trucks. Interview on May 14, 2024, at 12:35 p.n. with alert and oriented Resident R68 and R81 revealed residents were upset because lunch is supposed to be served at noon but still has not been delivered. Further interview revealed lunch has been getting served late and has come late as 2:00 p.m. Observations on May 14, 2024, at 12:42 p.m. revealed a lunch truck was just delivered to the 1st floor dining room. Interview on May 14, 2024, at 1: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one of two nursing units observed (2 floor nursing unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans related to medication administration and recovery of history alcohol abuse to meet the care needs for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident R50)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate Activity of Daily Living (ADL) for three of 21 residents reviewed who were unable to carryout ADL care independently. (Resident R19, R29, and R75)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of safety data sheet, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision during transfers for two of three residents reviewed for falls (Resident R84 and R30) and failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards related to access to cleaning agents and the security of windows. Findings Include: Review of facility policy Mechanical Lift revised January 7, 2022, revealed a mechanical lift may be used for transferring residents that cannot be safely transferred by themselves or with staff assistance. Two staff person assist/oversight is required for total body lifts. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents call systems was accessible for 11 out of 11 residents reviewed (Residents R29, R49, R75, R103, R95, R76, R81, R8, R66, R85, R53).
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of facility policy, observations and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a functional, sanitary environment on one of two nursing units observed (2nd floor nursing units) and for for 6 out of 10 residents reviewed. (Residents R4, R131, R66, R56, R29, and R50).
31 fire safety citations on file: 4 on March 19, 2026, 10 on April 3, 2025, 17 on May 17, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.38 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.03 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.93 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.01 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 40.7% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 57.1% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.63 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.52 on weekdays and 3.03 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 11.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.36 in April to June 2025 to 3.38 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.38 | 0.44 | 3.52 | 3.03 | 11.0% | 0 of 90 | 112 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.45 | 3.51 | 3.00 | 7.7% | 0 of 92 | 111 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.25 | 0.44 | 3.41 | 2.85 | 9.1% | 0 of 92 | 109 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.36 | 0.46 | 3.48 | 3.06 | 12.1% | 0 of 91 | 106 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program for its own hires (state list: PDE Approved NATCEP by County, as of March 1, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Suburban Woods Health & Rehab Center CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.0 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.9 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.9 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.4 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Suburban Woods Health & Reha's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (56.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
56.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 96 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 107 eligible stays.
6.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 76 eligible stays.
65.2% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 90 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 90 residents counted.
98.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SUBURBAN WOODS HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saber Pa Holdings, LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2025 | |
| Saber Healthcare Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/12/2018 | |
| Wiw Dynasty LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/12/2018 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Shg Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Carroll, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/25/2024 | |
| Dukmen, Courtney | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/13/2025 | |
| Williams, Cameron | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Weisberg, William | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/29/2026 | |
| Benjamin N. Volpe Family Dynasty Trust (dated December 29, 2020) | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Bnv Dynasty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Cibc Bank USA | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/02/2022 | |
| Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/12/2018 | |
| Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Rkl LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/26/2023 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Saber Healthcare Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/12/2018 | |
| Shg Recs, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/29/2026 | |
| Suburban Woods Re Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/02/2022 | |
| Wiw Dynasty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Carroll, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/25/2024 | |
| Dukmen, Courtney | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/13/2025 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/12/2018 | |
| Williams, Cameron | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.