401 W Airport Hwy, Swanton, OH 43558 · Fulton County · (419) 825-1111
92 certified beds, about 78 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365745 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 16, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 29 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $18,880 in the last three years; the largest was $18,880, and the latest is dated June 9, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.02 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
41.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Crown Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of a dialysis communication binder, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure collaborative communication was shared between the facility and the hemodialysis center. This affected one (#86) of one residents reviewed for hemodialysis. The facility census was 73.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff members maintained proper infection control measures by wearing appropriate personal protective equipment when providing direct care for residents on enhanced barrier precautions. This affected two (#5 and #8) of two residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 73. Findings Include: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented and thorough post-fall investigations were conducted. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for fall prevention in a facility census of 79.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to address bladder incontinence and ensure incontinence care was provided in a timely manner. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence in a facility census of 79.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record, observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of the facility policy, review of documentation on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website, and review of Public Safety Network guidance, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible when one resident (#11) continued to use vape pens (an electronic device that uses a battery to heat up a special liquid into an aerosol that users inhale) in the presence of oxygen. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious physical harm and/or injuries, when Resident #11 was allowed to keep her vape pen in her room and was known to use it while wearing her oxygen, which increased the risk of potentially causing the oxygen gas to ignite from the heat of the vape pen. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure dishes were cleaned and properly stored. This had the potential to affect 75 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#52) who received no food by mouth. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure room temperatures were comfortable for the residents. This affected four residents (#57, #19, #34 and #71) of four residents reviewed for comfortable room temperatures. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received a dignified assisted dining experience. This affected one (#30) of three residents observed for staff assistance with eating. The facility identified 12 additional residents (#4, #6, #21, #35, #37, #39, #42, #45, #49, #50, #58, and #64) who required staff assistance with eating. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of the medical record, the facility failed to ensure range of motion (ROM) exercises were provided to prevent further decline. This affected one (#46) of two residents reviewed for ROM. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered per physician orders. This affected three (#34, #57 and #5) of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility identified 10 residents who received oxygen therapy. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received routine dental services. This affected one (#40) of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adaptive equipment to support resident's independence was provided during meals. This affected one (#40) of six residents reviewed for dining. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the resident representative of changes of condition requiring as needed intramuscular injection for behavior. This affected one resident (#100) of one resident reviewed for notifications. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff schedule review, staff interview, review of the facility assessment the facility failed to maintain the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents currently residing in the facility. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of cleaning list, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen, ensure all food items were dated when opened and contained used by dates. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, testing log review, staff interview, review of material data sheet for disinfectant, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices when cleaning a resident's room in isolation precautions for Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff) infection; utilize proper hand hygiene; and failed to ensure water monitoring for Legionella was completed. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected four (#14, #23, #62 and #241) of twenty-one residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely provide an Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC). This affected one (#188) of three residents reviewed for timely NOMNC's. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to update resident care plans in a timely manner to reflect the resident's current needs. This affected two (#14 and #44) of 21 residents reviewed for accuracy of the care plan. This had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of fall investigations, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to facility failed to complete a thorough root cause analysis into why a resident continued to fall. In addition, the facility failed to implement effective fall interventions to prevent falls. This affected two (#62 and #65) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review and review of policy the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for oxygen therapy. This affected three residents (#23, #29 and #65) of three residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure medications were administered per prescribed parameters. This affected one (#48) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, review of policy, the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reductions were attempted for the use of psychotropic medications. This affected one (#54) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and appropriate to meet resident's needs and according to their assessment, physician order, and care plan. This affected two (#45 and #241) of two residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of a shower list, the facility failed to offer alternatives to meet a resident's preference for bathing. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were permitted the right to refuse showers. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a physical restraint was not used as a behaviorial intervention without a physician order, prior assessment, or care plan support. This affected one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent as evidenced by two medication errors out of 28 opportunities observed, resulting in a 7.14 percent (%) medication error rate. This affected one (Resident #7) of three residents observed for medication administration. The census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #7) of three residents observed for medication administration. The census was 80.
16 fire safety citations on file: 3 on June 16, 2026, 7 on December 5, 2024, 6 on February 8, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 9, 2025 | Fine | $18,880 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.02 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.80 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.63 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.91 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 41.8% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 58.3% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.12 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.10 on weekdays and 2.80 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.06 in April to June 2025 to 3.02 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.02 | 0.48 | 3.10 | 2.80 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 78 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.05 | 0.35 | 3.15 | 2.78 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 81 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.10 | 0.39 | 3.21 | 2.82 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.06 | 0.45 | 3.16 | 2.82 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 86 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.3 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.3 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.9 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Swanton Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 62 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 71 eligible stays.
8.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
16.7% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SWANTON VALLEY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Crown Healthcare Group, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crown Ohio Holdco II LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/01/2019 |
| Crown II Tbd Holdco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/29/2021 | |
| Crown Ohio Holdco II LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/29/2021 | |
| Fejcc Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/06/2025 | |
| Mdatas Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/06/2025 | |
| Mrs Family Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 02/06/2025 | |
| Friedman, Yisrael | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/01/2019 | |
| Neuman, Mark | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/01/2019 | |
| Singer, Meir | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/01/2019 | |
| Weintraub, Moshe | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/06/2025 | |
| Capital Finance LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 02/06/2025 | |
| Daubenmire, Kevin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/06/2025 | |
| Neuman, Mark | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2019 | |
| Singer, Meir | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2019 | |
| Capital Finance LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/06/2025 | |
| Elkins Way LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/31/2022 | |
| Daubenmire, Kevin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/06/2025 | |
| Garg, Anu | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Gregory, Jackie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/20/2022 | |
| Fejcc Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/06/2025 | |
| Mdatas Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/06/2025 | |
| Mrs Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/06/2025 | |
| Daubenmire, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/06/2025 | |
| Garg, Anu | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Gregory, Jackie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/20/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.