1249 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10029 · New York County · (212) 360-1000
679 certified beds, about 513 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1983
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335665 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on October 28, 2024, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 25 health citations since January 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.38 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.68 of those hours.
39.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Archcare, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medical records are maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices to be complete and accurately documented. This was evident for one (Resident #5) of one resident investigated for medication error. Specifically, Registered Nurse #5 failed to accurately document the time Resident #5 received hydromorphone and Registered Nurse #5 failed to document that Resident #5 received a second dose of hydromorphone approximately two and a half hours later.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/21/2024 to 10/28/2024, the facility did not ensure infection control practices and procedures were maintained. This was evident in 2 (Resident #208 and Resident #269) of 4 residents reviewed for Infection Control out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) Licensed Practical Nurse #6 failed to perform hand hygiene and glove changes while performing wound treatment for Resident #208 and 2. ) Enhanced Barrier Precautions were not maintained when Licensed Practical Nurse #5 flushed Resident #269's indwelling urinary catheter. In addition, Licensed Practical Nurse #5 failed to clean / sanitize the Resident's bedside table after using it for the procedure.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/21/2024 to 10/28/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents are treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. This was evident in 1 (Resident #28) of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. Specifically, Resident #28 was observed wearing the same outfit two days in a row.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY00349557) Survey, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from sexual abuse. This was evident in 2 (Residents #447 and #463) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, on 07/26/2024 at approximately 6:00 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant #4 observed Residents #447 and #463 lying in bed with no undergarments. Resident #447's hand was observed touching Resident #463's private area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/21/2024 to 10/28/2024, the facility did not ensure that a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan was developed and implemented to meet the resident's goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs. This was evident in 1 (Resident #28) of 2 residents reviewed for care planning out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #28 who had a diagnoses and was receiving treatment for Glaucoma, had no comprehensive care plan developed to address the Resident's impaired vision.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 10/21/2024 to 10/28/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received food that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences. This was evident in 1 (Resident #841) of 3 residents reviewed out of 37 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #841, who had a documented allergy to fish and fish containing products, received a lunch tray containing fish.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the accuracy of a resident's assessment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #77) of 7 residents reviewed for Accidents out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, the Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment documented Resident #77 had wandering behavior and using a Wander/elopement alarm.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews conducted during a Recertification Survey from 09/29/22 to 10/06/22, the facility did not ensure that the resident and their representative were provided with a written summary of the Baseline Care Plan (BCP). This was evident for 1 resident of 1 resident reviewed for Tube Feeding, and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Meds, out of 38 sampled residents. (Residents #170 and #387)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview and record review conducted during a Recertification and Complaint survey (NY00295603) from 09/29/22 to 10/06/22, the facility did not ensure that a person-centered care plan with measurable goals, time frames and interventions were developed and implemented to address resident concerns, consistent with the resident rights to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, 1). a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was not developed and implemented for a resident with diagnosis of Uterine prolapse and 2). a CCP was not developed and implemented for resident with impaired skin integrity. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for UTI/Catheter and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Skin Conditions out of 38 sampled residents (Residents #417 and #6).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 9/29/2022 to 10/6/2022, the facility did not ensure that resident's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was reviewed and revised to accurately reflect the current residents status. Specifically, 1). Activities of Daily Living and a respiratory care plan was not reviewed and revised in a timely manner, and 2). A comprehensive care plan was not reviewed and revised for a resident with a history of a fall. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Respiratory Care and 1 of 7 residents reviewed for Accidents out of 38 sampled residents (Residents #83 & Resident #332)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident who is fed by enteral means received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Tube Feeding. (Resident #170). Specifically, Resident #170 was observed doing self-administration of tube feeding, and there was no documented evidence the resident was assessed or educated regarding self-administration of tube feeding. In addition, the staff were not aware the resident was doing self-administration of tube feeding or monitoring the tube feeding completed by the resident to prevent complications. The finding is: Resident #170 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Cancer and Malnutrition. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint survey (NY00295603) from 9/29/2022 to 10/6/22, the facility did not ensure that medical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. Specifically, there was no documented evidence in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that Resident #6 and Resident #212 received their wound care treatment and preventative treatment as per physician's order on multiple occasions. This was evident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Skin Conditions out of a sample of 38 residents. (Resident #6 and Resident #212)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 9/29/22 to 10/6/22, the facility did not ensure infection control practices and procedures were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, a resident receiving Tube feedings was not properly monitored and supervised to ensure that proper infection control measures were maintained to prevent the development and transmission of infections. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Tube Feeding out of 38 sampled residents. (Resident #170)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive and non-comprehensive assessments were electronically transmitted to the Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in a timely manner. This was evident for 13 of 16 residents reviewed for the Resident Assessment facility task (Resident #s 12, 7, 13, 11, 19, 17, 6, 16, 10, 14, 15, 4, and 20). Specifically, comprehensive assessments for Resident #s 12, 7, 13, 11, 19, 17, 6, 16, 10, 14, 15, 4, and 20 were not transmitted and submitted to QIES within 14 days of their completion date.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00250470), the facility did not ensure that maintenance and housekeeping services to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment were provided. Specifically, resident rooms were observed with the following: air conditioner (AC) unit exterior panels with rust with debris, broken floor tiles, rusted sink water knobs, peeling wall paint, a dirty bedside table, and torn bed bumper guards. This was evident for 8 resident rooms (resident rooms #s C706, C714, C717, C718, C720, C722, C726, and C115) on 2 out of 16 units observed for Environmental Observations (C-7 and C-1).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive and non-comprehensive assessments were electronically transmitted to the Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in a timely manner. Specifically, Annual assessments were not transmitted within 14 days of the care plan completion date, and Quarterly MDS assessments were not submitted and transmitted within 14 calendar days from the MDS Completion Date. This was evident for 11 of 11 residents reviewed for the Resident Assessment Facility Task (Residents #s 12, 13, 15, 10, 21, 7, 8, 9, 14, 20, and 16).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Specifically, the two garbage compactors were observed with open lids during several observations. This was evident during the Kitchen Observation facility task.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification and abbreviated survey (NY 00250470), the facility did not ensure that infection control practices were maintained. Specifically (1) contact precautions were not maintained by multiple staff members for a resident with a diagnosis of clostridium difficile (C-diff); (2) A Registered Nurse did not practice appropriate hand hygiene before and during Tracheostomy care (Resident #28); and (3) hand hygiene was not performed with glove changes during wound care and feces was not cleaned prior to beginning wound care (Resident #150). This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Infections (Resident #110), 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Respiratory Care/Tracheostomy (Resident #28), and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Pressure Ulcer (Resident #150) out of a total sample of 35 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not provide the appropriate liability notice of Medicare beneficiaries. Specifically, the facility did not provide residents/representatives with Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) at the termination of Medicare Part A benefits. This was evident fro 3 of 3 residents reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification out of a total sample of 40 residents (Residents #868, #225, and #411).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that required documentation was sent to the receiving provider in a hospital transfer. Specifically, there was no transfer summary completed and no evidence that documentation accompanied the resident to the hospital. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Hospitalization (Resident#241).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a copy of the Notice of Transfer was sent to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman within a timely manner when a resident was discharged from the facility to the hospital. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Hospitalization (Resident #141).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that services provided met preofessional standards of quality. Specifically, pain levels were not taken before and after a resident received opioid pain medications to ensure the resident's pain managment was being adequately monitored for effectiveness, and opioid pain medication was administered when the pain level was below the ordered parameters. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Pain Management out of a total sample of 43 residents (Resident #515).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that pain management consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. Specifically, pain levels were not taken before and after a resident received opioid pain medications to ensure the resident's pain management was being adequately monitored for effectiveness. Opioid pain medication was administered when the pain level was below the ordered parameters, and the pain level parameters for Tramadol and Acetaminophen overlapped. In addition, the comprehensive care plan did not include any person-centered non-pharmacological or pharmacological interventions regarding how the resident's pain would be addressed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure that an expired medication was properly discarded according to the manufacturer's recommendation. Specifically, Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) was not disposed of 30 days after opening. This was evident for 1 of 8 units reviewed for medication Storage. ( Hospital- 1st Floor- North side) The finding is: The facility policy titled, Multi-Dose Vials-Injectables revised date 10/19/19 documents: Nurse administering medication- 1) Write date on vial when opened. 2) Discard after 6 months or as per manufacturers's recommendation. i.e. PPD - discard after 30 days after opening. 3) Check label to determine storage conditions, i.e. Refrigerate, store at room temperature, etc. 4) Discard vials into sharps container. 5) Check open vials nightly to ensure the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that all equipment was being maintained in a clean, sanitary manner. Specifically, During an interview a member of the kitchen staff stated that they had cleaned the meat slicer. However, grime and debris was still observed on both the knob to turn the meat slicer on and off and the switch for manual or automatic slicing. This was evident during kitchen inspection. The Findings Include: The manufacturer's manual for the Globe Food equipment instructs: sanitize all removal parts and the entire slicer in a clean sink solution of warm, clean water and properly diluted sanitizer, soak the removal parts and allow them to air dry without removing the sanitizer from the surface. [...]
12 fire safety citations on file: 4 on October 28, 2024, 4 on October 6, 2022, 4 on January 31, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.38 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.03 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.15 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.55 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 39.6% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 47.0% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.57 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.52 on weekdays and 3.03 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.47 in April to June 2025 to 3.38 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.38 | 0.68 | 3.52 | 3.03 | 3.9% | 0 of 90 | 513 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.26 | 0.64 | 3.39 | 2.92 | 6.1% | 0 of 92 | 528 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.34 | 0.68 | 3.53 | 2.86 | 10.6% | 0 of 92 | 531 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.47 | 0.76 | 3.64 | 3.03 | 11.4% | 0 of 91 | 532 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.1 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.0 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.4 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.7 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (36.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
36.2% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 447 eligible stays.
9.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 443 eligible stays.
5.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 297 eligible stays.
78.2% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 266 residents counted.
0.5% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 437 residents counted.
0.5% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 437 residents counted.
97.7% this home
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 129 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: TERENCE CARDINAL COOKE HEALTH CARE CENTER. CMS links this home to Archcare, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 3.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 05/20/2014 | |
| Bujno, Stephen | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Cahill, John | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Cortes, Tara | Corporate director | Individual | 04/04/2019 | |
| Fahey, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 01/29/2010 | |
| Feldmann, Eric | Corporate director | Individual | 04/04/2019 | |
| Gleason, John | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Gray, Karen | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Johnson, Clarion | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Kasergrande, Leslie | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Kelleher, Rory | Corporate director | Individual | 01/29/2010 | |
| Lamorte, Joseph | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| O'Brien, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 04/04/2019 | |
| Park, Richard | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Roberti, Cynthia | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Rooney, Kathryn | Corporate director | Individual | 04/04/2019 | |
| Saporito, Joseph | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Serbaroli, Frank | Corporate director | Individual | 05/20/2014 | |
| Sweeney, Gerald | Corporate director | Individual | 05/20/2014 | |
| Tooker, Patricia | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Whiston, William | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Covone, Annmarie | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/29/2010 | |
| Catholic Health Care Systems | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2005 | |
| Augustine, Gemma | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Bernard, Rosalie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/15/2018 | |
| Covone, Annmarie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Larue, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Zakai, Shama | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2024 | |
| Bernard, Rosalie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2025 | |
| Zakai, Shama | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.