What is The Club at Lake Gibson's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates The Club at Lake Gibson 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did The Club at Lake Gibson get at its last inspection?

2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 30, 2025. The Florida average is 7.1.

Has The Club at Lake Gibson been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does The Club at Lake Gibson accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns The Club at Lake Gibson?

CMS lists 26 owners and managers, and links the home to Gold Fl Trust II. Legal business name: CLUB AT LAKE GIBSON LLC.

The Club at Lake Gibson: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 30, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

Of 21 health citations since May 2021, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.54 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.53 of those hours.

54.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).

CMS links it to Gold Fl Trust II, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

005/21

1312/22

107/24

310/24

201/25

205/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

14D

Potential for minimal harm

May 8, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations

G

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and appropriate use of equipment to safely transfer one resident (#1) out of five residents reviewed for sit to stand transfers with the assistance of two staff members.
G

Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.

F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent in using the sit to stand mechanical lift for one resident (#1) of five residents sampled. Findings Included:On 4/12/26 staff failed to review and follow Resident #1's care plans related to functional abilities and the resident slid from a [vendor 3000] sit to stand machine and sustained a fractured femur and dislocated shoulder. On 4/12/26 at approximately 8:00 p.m. Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) used the [vendor 3000] sit to stand mechanical lift to transfer Resident #1. [...]

January 30, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations

E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 1, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective infection control and prevention program to prevent the spread of infection was implemented by 1.) failing to use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while performing care for three residents (#113, #49, and #84) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions on three (Upper 300 Hall, Lower 400 Hall, and Upper 400 Hall) of four facility Halls and 2.) failing to follow professional standards of practice for storage of respiratory equipment for one resident (#269) of four residents observed on respiratory therapy.
D

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 1, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were securely stored for one resident (Resident #43) of one resident sampled for medication storage.

October 24, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations

D

Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

F552 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 24, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to administer medications in accordance with resident preference for one (#1) of three residents sampled for medication administration.
D

Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.

F694 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 24, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to assess, maintain in a sanitary manner, and provide dressing changes for one (#5) of three residents with central intravenous (IV) catheters.
D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 24, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#5 and #7) of three residents sampled for Intravenous (IV) sites had Enhanced Barrier Precautions posted and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) available nearby.

July 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation

F

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 13, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication was stored appropriately in three out of three medication carts audited and on two out of two units related to unlocked treatment cart, medication on the floor, and medication unlocked on medication carts.

December 2, 2022Standard inspection · 13 citations

G

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to 1.) ensure staff implemented training received related to usage of a transfer lift, which resulted in a fractured right arm for one (Resident #50) of seven residents reviewed for falls; and 2.) assess, document, and treat an staff/resident incident, which resulted in a right elbow skin injury for one (Resident #322) of thirteen residents reviewed for accidents.
E

Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.

F725 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nursing and related services that enabled residents to attain and maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for seven (Residents #52, #59, #92, #321, #323, #26, and #50) of forty-four sampled residents related to call light response when assistance was required.
E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection prevention and control standards were maintained related to 1.) two (Residents #49 and #68) diagnosed with scabies; 2.) cleaning and maintenance of shared resident care equipment for two (Resident #75 and one unidentified); 3.) hand hygiene during wound care procedures for one Resident #52); 4.) sanitary maintenance of respiratory care equipment for two (Residents #323 and #325); and 5.) sanitary maintenance of urine catheter drainage bags for three (Residents #326, #21, and #224) residents of forty-four sampled residents.
D

Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure an accurate advance directive for code status based on the resident's expressed wishes for one resident (#323) out of forty-four sampled residents.
D

Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the resident's Minimum Data Set Assessments, medical record, and facility policy on Hospice/Palliative/End of Life Care, and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment when one resident (#16 ) of a total sample of 44 residents, chose the Hospice benefit.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for two residents (#21, and #98) of five residents related to hearing aids and pain.
D

Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.

F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for four (Residents #52, #59, #92, and #323) of 44 sampled residents were provided within an acceptable time frame.
D

Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observations record review and interview the facility failed to provide activities to meet the needs for residents with vision sensory deficits for one resident (#224) of two residents sampled for activities.
D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the resident's medical record, review of the facility's policy on Hospice/Palliative /End of Life Care and the agreement with the hospice provider and interview with facility staff and the hospice nurse, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care between the facility and hospice, for one resident (#16) of one resident reviewed for hospice care.
D

Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.

F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed adequately provide pain management to 2 (#98, #221) of 6 residents sampled for pain out of a total sample of 44 residents.
D

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely and inaccessible by unauthorized staff, residents, and visitors for two residents (#324 and #52) out of a sample of 44 residents.
D

Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.

F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and policy review the facility did not ensure one resident (#43) out of forty-four residents sampled was provided dental provided or made aware of dental services available to residents.
D

Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.

F867 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and the Plan of Correction (POC) review, the facility failed to ensure it had a functioning Quality Assurance (QA) Committee. The facility was actively involved in the effective creation, implementation, and monitoring of the POC for deficient practice identified during a recertification survey conducted on [DATE]. The facility was cited during the recertification survey for F 578. On [DATE] a revisit survey was conducted and the facility was recited at F 578. The facility had developed a Plan of Correction with a completion date by [DATE]. The facility had not comprehensively implemented the Plan of Correction for the identified quality deficiencies.

May 6, 2021Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

4 fire safety citations on file: 4 on December 2, 2022.

Every fire safety citation4 citations

D
Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.

K 223 · December 2, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · December 2, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.

K 761 · December 2, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.

K 914 · December 2, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Florida	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	3.54	3.82	3.86
Registered nurses	0.53	0.73	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.18	3.49	3.42
Nurse aides	2.15
Licensed practical nurses	0.86
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	54.7%	41.4%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	56.5%	46.0%	42.9%
Administrators who left	1

CMS expects 3.96 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.69 on weekdays and 3.18 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.62 in April to June 2025 to 3.54 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	3.54	0.53	3.69	3.18	0.0%	0 of 90	120
Oct to Dec 2025	3.50	0.42	3.62	3.18	0.0%	0 of 92	118
Jul to Sep 2025	3.50	0.46	3.69	3.04	0.0%	0 of 92	117
Apr to Jun 2025	3.62	0.68	3.76	3.27	0.0%	0 of 91	117
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Florida, Jan to Mar 2026	3.76	0.70	3.90	3.44	1.1%	0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Florida

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Florida, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$18.03	$17.33 to $20.34	96,960
LPNs and LVNs	$29.70	$28.14 to $31.11	38,620
Registered nurses	$40.48	$37.82 to $48.64	229,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Florida	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.0	8.7	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.3	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.7	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.7	2.5	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.4	1.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	9.5	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.5	4.5	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.1	8.6	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	30.0	26.1	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	11.2	9.1	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	2.0	2.1	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.7	1.1	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Club at Lake Gibson's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

47.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 270 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 288 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

10.3% this home

Worse than the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 193 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

56.3% this home

Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 192 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.6% this home

Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 312 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.9% this home

Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 312 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

91.2% this home

Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 34 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CLUB AT LAKE GIBSON LLC. CMS links this home to Gold Fl Trust II, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
Lake Gibson SNF Holdco LLC	Direct ownership interest	Organization		10/01/2024
Katz, Aharon	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Individual	10%	10/01/2024
Buah Md Trust	Indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/01/2024
Copper Fl Trust II	Indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/01/2024
Gold Fl Trust II	Indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/01/2024
Silver Fl Trust II	Indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/01/2024
Bank Hapoalim B.m.	5% or greater mortgage interest	Organization		10/01/2024
Kamara, Marie	Managing control - governing body	Individual		01/05/2025
McDaniel, Clay	Managing control - governing body	Individual		10/01/2024
Willis, Angela	Managing control - governing body	Individual		10/01/2024
Lake Gibson SNF Holdco LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		10/01/2024
Kamara, Marie	Operational/managerial control	Individual		01/05/2025
Rios, Jolian	Operational/managerial control	Individual		11/27/2024
Apex Global Solutions LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		10/01/2024
Asure Wound Solutions LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		06/26/2025
Bank Hapoalim B.m.	Adp of the SNF	Organization		10/01/2024
Chaim Gitelis Do PC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		10/01/2024
Forvis Mazars LLP	Adp of the SNF	Organization		10/01/2024
Healthlink Diagnostic Laboratories Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		10/01/2024
Lion Care Services LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		10/01/2024
Ellenbogen, Moss	Adp of the SNF	Individual		06/26/2025
Kamara, Marie	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/31/2024
Katz, Aharon	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/01/2024
McDaniel, Clay	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/01/2024
Rios, Jolian	Adp of the SNF	Individual		11/27/2024
Willis, Angela	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/01/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on May 8, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 8, 2026: "Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.18 hours per resident per day, below the Florida average of 3.49.
How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Manor at Carpenters, the
Lakeland, 0 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Wedgewood Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
Lakeland, 0 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 19 citations
Valencia Hills Health and Rehabilitation Center
Lakeland, 0.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 45 citations
Breezy Hills Rehab and Care Center
Lakeland, 1.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
Vivo Healthcare Lakeland
Lakeland, 2.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 34 citations
Lakeland Hills Center
Lakeland, 2.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
Charming Lakes Rehab
Lakeland, 2.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
Florida Presbyterian Homes Inc
Lakeland, 4.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations

Assisted living in Lakeland

Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Florida inspection record.

Villa at Carpenters (the)
Lakeland, 0.2 mi · licensed for 52 · 8 deficiencies in 5 years
Lake Gibson Village
Lakeland, 0.3 mi · licensed for 165 · 0 deficiencies in 5 years
Maravida Lakeland Mgt LLC
Lakeland, 0.5 mi · licensed for 38 · 31 deficiencies in 5 years
Arbor Oaks at Lakeland Hills
Lakeland, 1.1 mi · licensed for 95 · 14 deficiencies in 5 years
Grace Manor Suites LLC
Lakeland, 1.1 mi · licensed for 77 · 3 deficiencies in 5 years

Assisted living in Florida

Florida contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, Long Term Care Services Unit, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Florida Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-888-831-0404. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: FloridaHealthFinder, where Florida publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is The Club at Lake Gibson's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates The Club at Lake Gibson 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did The Club at Lake Gibson get at its last inspection?: 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 30, 2025. The Florida average is 7.1.
Has The Club at Lake Gibson been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does The Club at Lake Gibson accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns The Club at Lake Gibson?: CMS lists 26 owners and managers, and links the home to Gold Fl Trust II. Legal business name: CLUB AT LAKE GIBSON LLC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.