What is Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills get at its last inspection?

8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 12, 2024. The Minnesota average is 7.1.

Has Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills?

CMS lists 19 owners and managers, and links the home to Presbyterian Homes & Services. Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF ARDEN HILLS INC.

Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills: Inspections & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 12, 2024, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

Of 22 health citations since March 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.16 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.81 of those hours.

19.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).

CMS links it to Presbyterian Homes & Services, an affiliated group of 21 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

003/22

1008/23

809/24

104/25

105/25

106/25

106/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

17D

Potential for minimal harm

June 29, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to review and revise a care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R1) whose care plan was reviewed for revisions.

June 6, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

G

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and scheduled toileting to reduce the risk for falls for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who had a history of falls. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who had an unwitnessed fall requiring emergency department (ED) services, sustained a laceration to the head, received five staples, and was admitted to the hospital for further observation. The facility implemented corrective action prior to the survey so the deficient practice was issued at past non-compliance.

May 1, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 5, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician for a need to alter treatment significantly for one of one resident (R1) reviewed. This practice resulted in a delay of treatment to R1's pressure ulcers.

April 16, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to use proper personal protective equipment (PPE) who are on enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for falls.

September 12, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations

E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 29, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure food was properly disposed of after their best by dates in 2 of 4 serving kitchens and failed to ensure food was properly stored in 2 of 4 of the serving kitchens reviewed. This had the potential to impact residents who reside on the unit the serving kitchen is located.
E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 29, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate transmission-based precautions (TBP) were used for 3 of 3 residents (R69, R108, R4) who had COVID-19. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was used for 1 of 1 residents (R72) observed during personal care.
D

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 29, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to report to the state agency (SA) allegations of potential neglect and verbal abuse for 2 of 3 residents (R30, R37).
D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 29, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure R30 received a pillow for positioning for prevention of pressure ulcers and that aided in comfort associate with contractures.
D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 29, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure supplemental oxygen was properly maintained per professional standards for 1 of 1 resident (R30).
D

Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.

F699 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 29, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on inteview and document review the facility failed to identify potential triggers and offer specialized services for 1 of 1 resident (R275) who had a history of trauma.
D

Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 29, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the provider for 1 of 3 residents (R72) observed during medication administration.
D

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 29, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure medication errors were prevented for 2 of 4 residents (R72, R109) observed during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 7.69%.

August 30, 2023Standard inspection · 10 citations

F

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled, free from freezer burn, and the freezers were cleaned and maintained. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure use of hair restraints during food preparation and the refrigerators in the unit dining rooms were maintained.
E

Keep all essential equipment working safely.

F908 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide air bed monitoring for safety and function for 1 or 1 resident (R6), reviewed for air bed safety.
D

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 2 of 2 residents (R6, R8) reviewed for dignity.
D

Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents (R25, R98) had been assessed to safely self-administer medications.
D

Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide interpreter services for 1 of 1 resident (R98) with a preferred language of Cantonese reviewed for communication.
D

Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide privacy for 1 of 1 resident (R98), when a topical medication was administered. R98's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], lacked indication of a R98's cognitive status with Care Area Assessment (CAA) triggered for cognitive loss, dementia and communication. R98 required extensive assist of one staff for bed mobiity, and personal hygiene. [...]
D

Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

F585 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to initiate a grievance process to address family member (FM) concerns pertaining to level of care changes for 1 of 2 residents (R5) reviewed for grievances.
D

Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate management of an indwelling catheter was provided for 2 of 2 resident (R31, R6) reviewed for indwelling catheters.
D

Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.

F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor side effects for 1 of 3 (R43) residents reviewed for anticoagulation (blood thinner) therapy.
D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 13, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed during catheter cares and catheter cares were provided to minimize risk of infection for2 of 2 residents (R31, R6) observed for indwelling catheters. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed for 1 of 1 residents (R20) observed for incontinent cares.

March 10, 2022Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 3 on September 12, 2024, 3 on August 30, 2023, 2 on March 10, 2022.

Every fire safety citation8 citations

F
Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.

K 351 · September 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.

K 362 · September 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · September 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

K 324 · August 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · August 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.

K 511 · August 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
C
Properly install and monitor supervisory attachments on automatic sprinkler systems.

K 352 · March 10, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
C
Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.

K 916 · March 10, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Minnesota	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	4.16	4.19	3.86
Registered nurses	0.81	1.06	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.84	3.71	3.42
Nurse aides	2.95
Licensed practical nurses	0.41
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	19.4%	42.2%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	26.7%	38.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	1

CMS expects 3.23 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.29 on weekdays and 3.84 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.46 in April to June 2025 to 4.16 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	4.16	0.81	4.29	3.84	0.0%	0 of 90	125
Oct to Dec 2025	4.10	0.81	4.20	3.86	0.1%	0 of 92	125
Jul to Sep 2025	4.18	0.77	4.29	3.92	0.0%	0 of 92	125
Apr to Jun 2025	4.46	0.84	4.60	4.12	0.0%	0 of 91	123
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026	4.19	1.05	4.38	3.73	5.2%	0.8% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Minnesota

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Minnesota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$22.44	$19.39 to $23.72	29,120
LPNs and LVNs	$30.65	$28.83 to $34.26	12,840
Registered nurses	$48.80	$42.76 to $55.17	70,110
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Minnesota	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	28.6	18.2	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.8	1.9	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.7	2.6	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.8	4.0	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	8.1	1.9	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	36.9	20.5	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.7	5.2	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	15.1	17.1	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	7.3	23.5	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	17.9	14.8	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.3	1.6	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.4	1.9	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (38.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

38.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

52.6% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

2.1% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 48 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

5.1% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 47 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF ARDEN HILLS INC. CMS links this home to Presbyterian Homes & Services, a group of 21 nursing homes averaging 4.3 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
Presbyterian Homes and Services	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	100%	04/01/2020
Bremer Bank National Association	5% or greater mortgage interest	Organization		09/30/2011
Bremer Bank National Association	5% or greater security interest	Organization		09/30/2011
Fletcher, Jonathan	Corporate director	Individual		02/01/2025
Pederson, Mark	Corporate director	Individual		01/01/2023
Fletcher, Jonathan	Corporate officer	Individual		02/01/2025
Meyer, Mark	Corporate officer	Individual		01/01/1995
Phs Management, LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		03/11/2011
Fletcher, Jonathan	Operational/managerial control	Individual		01/01/2023
Lippert, Stacey	Operational/managerial control	Individual		06/18/2024
Meyer, Mark	Operational/managerial control	Individual		03/11/2011
Mielke, John	Operational/managerial control	Individual		08/29/2019
Peterson, Heidi	Operational/managerial control	Individual		01/01/2023
Phs Management, LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		07/15/2025
Fletcher, Jonathan	Adp of the SNF	Individual		02/01/2025
Lippert, Stacey	Adp of the SNF	Individual		06/18/2024
Meyer, Mark	Adp of the SNF	Individual		03/11/2011
Mielke, John	Adp of the SNF	Individual		08/29/2019
Peterson, Heidi	Adp of the SNF	Individual		01/01/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 1, 2025: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 6, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 16, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 12, 2024: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Langton Shores
Roseville, 1.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 2 citations
St. Anthony Health & Rehabilitation
St. Anthony, 1.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 32 citations
The Villas at New Brighton
New Brighton, 1.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 61 citations
New Brighton Care Center
New Brighton, 1.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 26 citations
The Estates at Roseville LLC
Roseville, 2.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 30 citations
The Villas at Roseville
Roseville, 2.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 19 citations
Crest View Lutheran Home
Columbia Heights, 2.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 47 citations
Benedictine Health Center Innsbruck
New Brighton, 3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 44 citations

Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills get at its last inspection?: 8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 12, 2024. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
Has Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills?: CMS lists 19 owners and managers, and links the home to Presbyterian Homes & Services. Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF ARDEN HILLS INC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.