What is The Meadows at Osborn Park's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates The Meadows at Osborn Park 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did The Meadows at Osborn Park get at its last inspection?

11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 25, 2026. The Ohio average is 10.5.

Has The Meadows at Osborn Park been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does The Meadows at Osborn Park accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns The Meadows at Osborn Park?

CMS lists 9 owners and managers. Legal business name: ERIE COUNTY OFFICE OF AUDITOR.

The Meadows at Osborn Park: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 25, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 21 health citations since February 2020, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.76 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.

36.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

702/20

203/23

104/26

1106/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

16D

Potential for minimal harm

June 25, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations

F

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of manufacturer instructions, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store and manage medications safely, including improper dating, disposal, labeling of multi-does and insulin medications, and leaving medication carts unsecured. This had the potential to affect all 119 residents residing in the facility.
E

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the mechanical lift and mechanical lift slings manufacturer's instructions, observation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred safely following physician orders and ensure staff were monitoring the mechanical lift slings for signs of damage. This had the potential to affect 39 residents (#4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #15, #22, #32, #33, #34, #38, #42, #45, #48, #51, #54, #59, #60, #65, #72, #74, #75, #76, #77, #88, #90, #94, #95, #99, #100, #104, #107, #108, #109, #112, #118, and #119) who the facility identified as requiring the use of a mechanical lift for transfers. The facility census was 119.
E

Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility menus, record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve the correct food portions of pureed foods to the residents. This affected seven (#22, #32, #45, #60, #72, #74, and #104) of seven residents who were ordered pureed diets. The facility census was 119.
D

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity when his wheelchair safety harness was visibly soiled. This affected one resident (#65) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 119.
D

Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's advanced directives were accurate in the paper and electronic medical record (EMR). This affected one (#86) of three residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 119.
D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a resident who was dependent on staff for showers/bathing received routine showers/bathing. This affected one (#64) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 119.
D

Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a resident with a urinary catheter with the means to secure the catheter to prevent possible dislodgement. This affected one (#107) of three residents reviewed for catheter. The facility census was 119.
D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered per physician orders. This affected two residents (#60 and #94) of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility census was 119.
D

Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.

F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure alternatives to bed rails were attempted and failed to provide ongoing monitoring and supervision for a resident who utilized a bed rail. This affected one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for bed rail safety. The facility census was 119.
D

Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled substances by maintaining controlled substance records that reconciled with the actual quantity of medication on hand. This affected one (Resident #87) of one resident reviewed for control substance records.
D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high-contact resident care activities for residents who had physician orders for EBP. This affected two (#51 and #74) of two residents reviewed for EBPs. The facility identified 35 residents with physician orders for EBP. The facility census was 119.

April 30, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation

G

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 22, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, hospital record review, resident, family, staff, physician, and agency staff interviews, review of staff statements, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure safe mechanical lift transfers and further failed to adequately assess, timely notify the physician and resident representative, address resident pain, and conduct a thorough investigation following a fall from a mechanical lift. This resulted in Actual Harm to Resident #36 when on the morning of 04/22/26, the resident fell during a mechanical lift transfer and was found to have sustained a displaced fracture of the distal femur and a distal fifth metacarpal fracture of the left hand. Facility staff failed to thoroughly assess the resident at the time of the incident and the resident cried out in pain throughout the night. [...]

March 16, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations

D

Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure nutritional interventions were implemented per physician order and the plan of care, for residents identified at nutritional risk. This affected two (#39 and #52) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 95.
D

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records regarding documentation for nutritional supplements. This affected one (#52) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 95.

February 6, 2020Standard inspection · 7 citations

E

Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of dietary menus, review of dietary spreadsheets, and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve the identified portion sizes of pureed chicken to 12 residents (#4, #5, #9, #16, #23, #57, #59, #65, #76, #80, #93 and #94) who received pureed diets. The facility census was 119.
D

Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, family interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for three (#45, #57, #65) of 24 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 119.
D

Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical records review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to honor resident choice on roommates and who to eat meals with for two (#62 and #85) of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 119.
D

Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of facility policy, family interview, review of financial records, and staff interview, the facility failed provide the notice of bedhold policy upon discharge to the hospital for one (#166) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 119.
D

Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, family interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to participate in their care planning meetings. This affected one (#166) of four residents reviewed for participation in care planning. The facility census was 119.
D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for the application of a boot to the lower extremity for one (#1) of five residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 119.
D

Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.

F685 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2020

Inspectors wroteBased of review of a nurse's note, review of a vision provider note, review of an Eye Glass Tracker form, review of a Vision Care form, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, revealed the facility failed to timely follow up with a vision care provider regarding ordered eye glasses not yet received. This affected one (#91) of one resident reviewed for vision care services. The facility census was 119.

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 3 on June 25, 2026, 2 on March 16, 2023, 5 on February 6, 2020.

Every fire safety citation10 citations

E
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · June 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

K 372 · June 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.

K 711 · June 25, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

K 222 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

K 324 · March 16, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.

K 347 · February 6, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · February 6, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · February 6, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have exits that are accessible at all times.

K 271 · February 6, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.

K 920 · February 6, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Ohio	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	3.76	3.69	3.86
Registered nurses	0.39	0.64	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.27	3.28	3.42
Nurse aides	2.31
Licensed practical nurses	1.06
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	36.4%	48.7%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	56.3%	43.9%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.55 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.95 on weekdays and 3.27 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 9.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.46 in April to June 2025 to 3.76 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	3.76	0.39	3.95	3.27	9.3%	0 of 90	121
Oct to Dec 2025	3.98	0.29	4.19	3.44	6.3%	0 of 92	120
Jul to Sep 2025	4.15	0.37	4.44	3.43	2.1%	0 of 92	113
Apr to Jun 2025	4.46	0.49	4.74	3.76	0.0%	0 of 91	107
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026	3.64	0.60	3.80	3.24	4.6%	0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Ohio

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Ohio, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$18.76	$17.93 to $21.44	63,280
LPNs and LVNs	$29.78	$27.34 to $31.68	39,900
Registered nurses	$39.67	$38.08 to $47.61	143,730
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Ohio	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	8.7	5.3	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.2	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.4	0.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.1	3.2	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.8	1.2	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	9.0	6.1	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.6	3.4	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	26.5	8.8	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	17.4	24.9	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	10.8	12.9	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.8	1.7	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.1	1.8	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Meadows at Osborn Park's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (41.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

41.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 65 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

12.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 90 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

9.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 68 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

10.2% this home

Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 49 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 59 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 59 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ERIE COUNTY OFFICE OF AUDITOR.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
Erie County Office of Auditor	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	100%	07/04/1976
Patrick, Donna	Corporate director	Individual		01/26/1998
Patrick, Donna	Corporate officer	Individual		01/26/1998
Dennie, Robert	Operational/managerial control	Individual		04/08/2024
Patrick, Donna	Operational/managerial control	Individual		01/26/1998
Vaschak, Robert	Operational/managerial control	Individual		06/01/2010
Dennie, Robert	Adp of the SNF	Individual		04/08/2024
Patrick, Donna	Adp of the SNF	Individual		01/26/1998
Vaschak, Robert	Adp of the SNF	Individual		06/01/2010

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on June 25, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 25, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 25, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 25, 2026: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.27 hours per resident per day, below the Ohio average of 3.28.

Other nursing homes nearby

Parkvue Health Care Center
Sandusky, 1.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Admirals Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation
Huron, 2.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
Ohio Veterans Home
Sandusky, 2.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 24 citations
Concord Care and Rehabilitation Center
Sandusky, 3.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 29 citations
Providence Care Center
Sandusky, 4.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 42 citations
Vista Care Center of Milan
Milan, 9.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
Otterbein North Shore
Lakeside, 10.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 21 citations
Twilight Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation
Norwalk, 12.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations

Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is The Meadows at Osborn Park's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates The Meadows at Osborn Park 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did The Meadows at Osborn Park get at its last inspection?: 11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 25, 2026. The Ohio average is 10.5.
Has The Meadows at Osborn Park been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does The Meadows at Osborn Park accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns The Meadows at Osborn Park?: CMS lists 9 owners and managers. Legal business name: ERIE COUNTY OFFICE OF AUDITOR.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.