55432 Colby St., Dowagiac, MI 49047 · Cass County · (269) 782-7828
108 certified beds, about 100 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235652 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
None of its 42 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.46 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.69 of those hours.
28.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Atrium Centers, an affiliated group of 26 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 42 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes #2998895 and #3000521. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident-to-resident sexual abuse for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse when Resident #4 who had a known history of sexual behaviors and who could propel her wheelchair throughout the facility touched Resident #2 sexually when he did not give consent, resulting in Resident #2 experiencing fear, wanting Resident #4 to stop coming to his room and wanting to discharge from the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #2735635Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 30-day notification of discharge and implement appropriate discharge processes for 2 (Resident #100 and Resident #101) of 4 residents reviewed for facility-initiated discharge resulting in a lack of resident education related to care needs, lack of medical supplies needed for care at home, and the unapproved discharge of both residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP), resulting in the potential for increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for 4 residents (R91, R45, R5, and R14) of 4 residents reviewed for a safe, clean, and homelike environment resulting in a loud oxygen concentrator, unclean bed linens and wheelchair cushion, and holes in bed sheets, with the potential for a reasonable person to experience feelings of embarrassment, shame, and/or loss of self-esteem.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was consistently provided with showers/bathing for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #31, #36, and #41) and nail care for 1 (Resident #41) of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living, resulting in unmet personal hygiene needs with the potential for decreased self-esteem.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide resident centered activities designed to support leisure needs for 3 (Resident #70, Resident #60 and Resident #75) of 4 residents reviewed for activities, resulting in feelings of boredom and the potential for worsening symptoms of depression, as well as a decline in physical and cognitive well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care to maintain foot health in 1 (Resident #36) of 1 resident reviewed for foot care, resulting in delay of treatment for podiatry concerns and pain/discomfort of Resident #36's feet.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions for positioning and contractures for 2 of 2 residents (R5 and R41) reviewed for range of motion, resulting in the potential for worsening of contracture and developing skin breakdown.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care to prevent bowel incontinence for a continent resident in 1 (Resident #31) of 1 resident reviewed for bowel incontinence, resulting in delay of treatment for diarrhea and the potential for dehydration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for risk of entrapment and informed consent was obtained prior to installation of bedrails for 1 (Resident #78) of 1 resident reviewed for bed rails, resulting in the risk for entrapment and injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per the physician's order for 1(Resident #60) of 1 resident reviewed for significant medication errors, resulting in the potential for adverse effects of the administration of digoxin without checking the resident's pulse and/or administering the medication if below the parameter of <60 beats per minute as outlined in the physician order.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to MI00149672, MI00150373, MI00150362, MI00150996 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ an Activity Director who possessed the required qualifications resulting in the potential for unmet met psychosocial needs, feelings of boredom, isolation, and a lack of person-centered activities. This citation has the potential to impact any resident who relies on the activities program to support their leisure involvement.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to MI00149672, MI00150373, MI00150362, MI00150546 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized activities based on resident preferences, needs, and abilities for 4 of 4 Residents (Resident #100, Resident #101, Resident #102, and Resident#103) reviewed for activities, resulting in a potential for social isolation, decreased connectedness to the resident's environment, and decreased overall well-being.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes MI00150362 & MI00149672. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 1 resident (Resident #103) of 3 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records, resulting in the lack of proper documentation of involvement in activities programs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions for 1 (Resident #104) of 3 residents reviewed for isolation precautions, resulting in the potential for the spread of infection, cross-contamination, and disease transmission for residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Properly label/date and securely store food product once opened or prepared; 2. Discard expired food items; and 3. ensure cleanliness of food and non-food contact surfaces. These conditions resulted in an increased risk of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness that affected all residents who consume food/supplement from the kitchen and from nourishment room refrigerators/freezers.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor mealtime preferences for 3 anonymous residents (attending a resident council meeting) and Resident #78, resulting in expressed feelings of discontent and a potential for increased loneliness.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely notification of exhaustion of Medicare Part A benefits in 1 (Resident #90) of 4 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification resulting in Resident #90 being unaware of changes in regard to financial liability, and frustration.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 2 (Resident #53 and Resident #90) of 20 residents reviewed for care planning resulting in the potential for unmet medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care in accordance with professional standards in 1 (Resident #353) of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in Resident #353 having dysuria (pain with urination) for approximately 7 days and the potential for a decline in overall physical, mental and psychosocial well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized activities based on resident preferences, needs, and abilities for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #55) reviewed for activities, resulting in a potential for social isolation, decreased connectedness to the resident's environment, and decreased overall well-being.
Inspectors wroteThis intake pertains to intake MI00146328. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent elopement for 1 (R82) of 6 residents reviewed for elopement, resulting in R82 leaving the facility alone, unbeknownst to staff, for an extended period, and was later found under a bush next to the facility resulting in potential for further successful elopements.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely and consistent weight monitoring for one resident (Resident #76) of 4 residents reviewed for nutritional status resulting in undetected weight loss, nutritional status decline and unmet nutritional needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of education to the resident/representative on the intended or actual benefit versus potential risk(s) or adverse consequences associated with a psychotropic medication (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for 1 (Resident #35) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for lack of awareness of medication risks versus benefits.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' food preferences at meals were consistently honored for 2 (Residents #27 and #78) of 18 residents reviewed for food concerns resulting in resident/representative complaints of food choices not being honored and the potential for decreased meal enjoyment, feelings of frustration, and the potential for weight loss and nutritional decline.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of infection control with resident's tube feeding equipment for one of one resident (R50) reviewed for infection control resulting in the potential for harborage and cross-contamination of pathogens in a vulnerable population.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were screened for eligibility to receive Pneumococcal vaccinations and receive vaccination if eligible for 3 (Resident #18, #35 and #48 ) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations, resulting in the potential of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from pneumococcal pneumonia.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 immunization were offered to 2 (Resident #18 and #48) out of 5 residents, reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations, resulting in the higher likelihood of infection and complications from COVID-19.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clean and sanitary room and equipment conditions for 2 (Resident #27 and #55) of 20 sampled residents reviewed for sanitary conditions resulting in: 1.) a stained and soiled privacy curtain and dusty blinds for Resident #27, and 2.) a visibly soiled wheelchair for Resident #55.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake MI00143214 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report timely and accurately to the State Agency a required reportable incident of resident to resident abuse in 2 (Resident #104 and Resident #105) of 3 residents reviewed for reportable incidents resulting in the potential for additional reportable incidents go unreported and/or cause a delay in the investigative process.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe transport of a resident in a wheelchair with foot pedals was in place in 1 (Resident #106) of 1 resident reviewed for accidents resulting in the potential for injury to the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: (1) properly store medications in a secure manner in 3 of 3 treatment carts reviewed and (2) ensure that treatment carts remained secure resulting in the potential for residents, visitors, and/or staff to access the medication in the facility with a current census of 104 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during medication administration in 3 (Resident #107, Resident #108, Resident #109) of 3 residents reviewed for hand hygiene during medication administration, resulting in the potential for the spread of infection, cross-contamination, and disease transmission for residents who receive medication while residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure general cleaning and general repair of the kitchen; 2. Clean food and non-food contact surfaces to sight and touch; 3. Maintain an environment free from pests; 4. Properly store food product; and 5. Ensure a convenient number of hand sinks in the kitchen. These conditions resulted in an increased risk of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness that affected 93 residents who consume food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate less than 5% (total error rate of 29.63%) in 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #15, Resident #70, and Resident #301) reviewed for medication administration, resulting in the potential for reduced medication efficacy, increased risk of adverse reaction and/or side effects, and administration of wrong medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appetizing and temperature appropriate food products to 3 residents (Resident #53, #57, and #16) of 4 residents reviewed for food palatability, resulting in dissatisfaction with meals, and the potential for decreased food acceptance and nutritional decline.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of the facility bed hold policy upon discharge to an acute care hospital for 2 ( Resident #1, Resident #72) residents reviewed for emergency hospital transfer resulting in the potential for unanticipated expense or the loss of desired room placement in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care in accordance with physician orders in 1 of 20 residents (Resident #73) reviewed for standards of care, resulting in the delay in care and the potential for further health complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with Activities for Daily Living (ADL) care was provided for 1 (Resident #9) of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in the potential for avoidable negative physical and psychosocial outcomes for Resident #9.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately monitor and/or track resident's behaviors in 2 (Resident #44 and Resident #52) of 20 residents reviewed for behaviors, resulting in the potential for inadequate individualized care, insufficient behavioral data, and the inability to attain their highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being.
Inspectors wroteThis citation has 2 DPS Statements. DPS A Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1.) properly maintain infection control practices in a contact isolation room and 2.) adequately clean frequently touched surfaces, resident use equipment, and ensure general cleanliness in the facility for 3 of 25 residents (Resident #56, # 9 and #35) reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections to a vulnerable population.
15 fire safety citations on file: 8 on January 8, 2026, 4 on October 31, 2024, 3 on October 11, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.46 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.88 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.66 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 28.9% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 38.1% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.21 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.70 on weekdays and 2.88 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.40 in April to June 2025 to 3.46 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.46 | 0.69 | 3.70 | 2.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 100 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.41 | 0.63 | 3.60 | 2.93 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 100 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.36 | 0.66 | 3.52 | 2.95 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 97 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.40 | 0.76 | 3.57 | 3.00 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 94 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.9 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.8 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.5 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.1 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Timbers of Cass County's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
52.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 89 eligible stays.
11.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 94 eligible stays.
6.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
75.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 39 residents counted.
2.7% this home
Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 39 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ATRIUM TIMBERS LLC. CMS links this home to Atrium Centers, a group of 26 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orion Operating Services LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/31/2008 |
| Paredes, Miguel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/18/2021 | |
| Lument Real Estate Capital LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 05/01/2022 | |
| Heller, David | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Johnson, Cindy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Amicus Capital Holdings Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/18/2021 | |
| Atrium Centers Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/18/2024 | |
| Atrium Centers, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/31/2008 | |
| Orion Operating Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/31/2008 | |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2018 | |
| Amsbury, Julie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/15/2024 | |
| Anderson, Curt | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Cherry, Jill | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Clarke, Deann | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Dorsey, Jasmine | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Geniac, Samuel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/29/2025 | |
| Heller, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Johnson, Cindy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Schmidt, Robert | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/23/2026 | |
| Amicus Capital Holdings Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/18/2021 | |
| Amicus Capital Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/18/2021 | |
| Amicus Properties LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2021 | |
| Atrium Centers Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/18/2024 | |
| Broad River Rehabilitation | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2021 | |
| Evergreen Two LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/24/2026 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Leaderstat Ltd | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Ocs Real Estate Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2021 | |
| Omnicare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Orion Properties Ten LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2022 | |
| Plante & Moran PLLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Albright Ross, Susan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/02/2018 | |
| Amsbury, Julie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/15/2024 | |
| Anderson, Curt | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Cherry, Jill | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Clarke, Deann | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Dorsey, Jasmine | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Geniac, Samuel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/29/2025 | |
| Heller, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Johnson, Cindy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/18/2024 | |
| Paredes, Miguel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/18/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.