7336 W State Road 165, Owensville, IN 47665 · Gibson County · (812) 729-7901
68 certified beds, about 53 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155502 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 8, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 29 health citations since August 2022, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $16,036 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated April 2, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.90 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.
40.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices for 1 of 2 resident's observed for catheter care and during 2 of 3 observations of care. A residents catheter tubing was left dragging the floor following care, staff failed to don (put on) required personal protection equipment (PPE) for a resident in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and staff failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes. (Resident D, Resident K)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that annual influenza immunizations were offered to 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. Residents who had given consent to receive the influenza immunization had no record that they had received the immunization or that the immunization was medically contraindicated. (Resident D, Resident G)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen manager met required qualifications for 1 of 1 dietary manager qualifications reviewed. (Food Services Director)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received consistent implementation of interventions to prevent falls for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents related to falls. Fall interventions were observed out of place. (Resident 6, Resident 28, Resident 46, and Resident 45)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, labeled, and dated properly in accordance with professional standards for food service for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. (Kitchen)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff promoted dignity by allowing a resident to use the bathroom when requested for 1 of 1 dining observations. (Resident 18)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were completed quarterly for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 27) and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident 14).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were self-administering medications were assessed for capability to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 residents observed with medications in their room. (Resident 203)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for wound treatment, labs were obtained prior to antibiotic use, and antibiotics were administered for the duration ordered for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed for wound treatments. (Resident 14)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during wound treatment for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed for wound treatments. (Resident 14)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq ft) per resident in multiple resident occupancy rooms in 1 of 34 rooms reviewed. (room [ROOM NUMBER])
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the state agency for 1 of 1 allegations of abuse reviewed. After being made aware of an allegation of abuse the facility failed to report the incident and findings to the state agency. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective services were provided to prevent the development of a facility-acquired stage two pressure injuries for Resident 46 and Resident 9, who were admitted to the facility without pressure injuries, and were identified by the facility upon admission to be at risk to develop pressure injuries. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 46 developing a facility-acquired stage two pressure injury on the coccyx that deteriorated to an unstageable pressure injury with infection and required hospitalization for intravenous antibiotic therapy of wound-based sepsis, and surgical debridement of the facility-acquired unstageable pressure injury to a stage four pressure injury. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional care and services including failure to identify significant weight loss, failure to notify the physician of poor intakes, and failure to be reviewed by the Registered Dietician, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 46). This deficient practice resulted in the resident experiencing a 20% weight loss in 35 days, developing a facility-acquired stage two pressure injury on the 12/28/23 that deteriorated to an infected unstageable pressure injury, and requiring a hospitalization for sepsis, dehydration, and malnutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) required information regarding direct care staffing for the first Fiscal Quarter from 10/1/23 thru 12/31/23. Finding Includes: During a review of the facility's PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report [NAME] Report 1705D on 3/25/24 at 11:15 A.M., the staffing data report included, Failed to Submit Data for the Quarter 10/1/23 thru 12/31/23. During an interview on 3/28/24 at 12:20 P.M., the BOM (business office manager) indicated the payroll based journal information is automatically generated and is the responsibility of outside staff to ensure the information is submitted to CMS timely. On 3/28/24 at 1:24 P.M., the BOM supplied an undated facility policy titled Reporting Direct Care Staffing Information (Payroll-Based Journal). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed accurately for 4 of 17 residents reviewed for resident assessment. (Resident 46, Resident 22, Resident 5, Resident 45)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were conducted in a timely manner every 3 months and revised with changes for 9 of 12 residents and revised reviewed for care plans. (Resident 8, Resident 4, Resident 34, Resident 46, Resident 49, Resident 11, Resident 5, Resident 45, Resident 4)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handling of tableware and hand hygiene during 1 of 2 observations of dining. Staff handled a resident's coffee mug by placing their thumb on the inside rim of the mug when refilling the mug, and staff failed to perform hand hygiene after coming in contact with residents while providing dining services. (Resident 16, Resident 6, Resident 42, Resident 21)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative of changes in a resident's medical status for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for weight loss. The physician was not notified of a resident's refusal of food and the resident's representative was not notified of significant weight loss or a newly identified pressure injury. (Resident 46, Resident 45)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Resident was provided restorative therapy services to prevent avoidable decline in range of motion and progression of muscle atrophy for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for mobility. (Resident 41)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent falls for 1 or 1 resident reviewed for accidents. Care plans were not revised and new interventions were not implemented following falls. (Resident 4)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 44) observed during medication pass. Two (2) medication errors were observed during 27 opportunities for error in medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 7.41 percent.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview ,and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and nutrition. (Resident 46, Resident 5)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq ft) per resident in double occupancy rooms and 100 sq ft in single occupancy rooms. This was evidenced in 1 of 34 rooms. (room [ROOM NUMBER])
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident call system was functioning in 3 of 11 room call systems observed. A resident's bathroom call system was not functioning, and a resident's pull cord located on the bathroom call system was broken. ( room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER])
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure at least 8 consecutive hours of registered nurse (RN) coverage during 3 days in a review period from 10/1/23 to 12/31/23. RN coverage was lacking on weekends.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and handled in accordance with food safety standards to maintain a sanitary environment and prevent foodborne illness during 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Food was stored in containers resting on the floor of the walk-in refrigerator and freezer, an air vent had built up dust, and a kitchen staff member handled food while wearing acrylic nails.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 5 of 7 observations of resident care and 1 of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Gloves were not changed between dirty and clean tasks during incontinence care, handwashing was completed for less than 20 seconds, a nurse failed to wipe the rubber stopper with an alcohol wipe prior to screwing on the needle, and PPE was not put on before entering an isolation room.(Resident 19, Resident 29, Resident 22, Resident 43, Resident 9)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 33 resident rooms reviewed met the requirement of 80 square feet per resident. (room [ROOM NUMBER])
23 fire safety citations on file: 3 on May 8, 2025, 13 on April 2, 2024, 7 on August 25, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 2, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
| April 2, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.90 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.47 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.54 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.97 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.46 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 40.5% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 37.5% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.46 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.05 on weekdays and 2.54 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.89 in April to June 2025 to 2.90 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.90 | 0.47 | 3.05 | 2.54 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 53 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.72 | 0.39 | 2.86 | 2.35 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 55 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.88 | 0.43 | 3.04 | 2.46 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 51 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.89 | 0.49 | 3.05 | 2.49 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 51 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.4 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.7 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.0 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Transcendent Healthcare of Owensville's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 14 eligible stays.
10.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 21 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
6.6% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MAJOR HOSPITAL.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haehl, Phillip | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Claxton, Ryan | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/26/2025 | |
| Transcendent Healthcare, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2015 | |
| Bradshaw Preusz, Melinda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2014 | |
| Brink, Bruce | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2007 | |
| Claxton, Ryan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/26/2025 | |
| Alkire, Kelsey | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/03/2026 | |
| Hape, Keenan | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/03/2026 | |
| Neal, Michael | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/03/2026 | |
| O'Niones, Tommy | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/21/2026 | |
| Transcendent Healthcare of Boonville-North Real Estate, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2015 | |
| Transcendent Healthcare Rehabilitation Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2015 | |
| Transcendent Healthcare, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/08/2025 | |
| Bradshaw Preusz, Melinda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2014 | |
| Brink, Bruce | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2007 | |
| Claxton, Ryan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/26/2025 | |
| Gipson, Sara | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/14/2023 | |
| Haehl, Phillip | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Hall, Eva Sue | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/17/2014 | |
| Hammond, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/19/2025 | |
| Hedge, Adrian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2020 | |
| Sweatt, Meghan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/29/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.