Home / West Virginia / Williamson
100 Hillcrest Drive, Williamson, WV 25661 · Mingo County · (304) 235-7005
90 certified beds, about 77 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1981
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 515069 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 28, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the West Virginia average is 11.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 29 health citations since November 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $25,237 in the last three years; the largest was $13,325, and the latest is dated March 13, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.49 hours per resident per day, against 3.67 across West Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.53 of those hours.
60.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (West Virginia average 44.1%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan in the area for dental services for resident #5 and activity preferences for Resident's #8 and #50 were developed. This was found true for three (3) of 25 residents' care plans reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers #8, #50, and #5 Facility Census: 82 a) Resident #8 During record review on 08/27/25 at approximately 2:00 PM of Resident #8's section F of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the resident enjoys Music, Pets, Religious activities and doing things with groups of people. Further record review of resident #8's personalized care plan interventions revealed the following interventions; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate Minimum Data (MDS) assessment in the area of hospice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the care area of hospice. Resident Identifiers: #62. Facility Census: 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive activities assessment was completed for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #8) reviewed for activities during the long-term care survey. Facility census: 82. Resident identifier: #8 Findings Include:a) Resident #8The facility's policy titled Timeframe for Completion of Activities Assessment on New Admissions states: An initial activities interest screening shall be completed by Activities staff or designee within 72 hours of admission to identify immediate preferences and needs. A full Activities Assessment, consistent with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and facility policy, shall be completed within 14 calendar days of admission. The Activities Assessment will be used to develop an individualized Activity Care Plan. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were stored and used safely, creating a potential chemical exposure hazard for residents residing in the long-term care facility, this was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory services in accordance with professional standards of practice. For one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the care area of respiratory care, the supplemental oxygen flow rate was not set to the rate ordered by the physician. Resident Identifier: #74. Facility Census: 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain dental services to meet the resident's needs. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the dental care area. Resident identifier: #5. Facility census: 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide physician-ordered adaptive eating devices for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition. Resident identifier: #48. Facility census: 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on review record, staff interviews, reportable's (immediate and five (5) day), and staff education, time line of the incident and plan of correction, the facility failed to ensure a resident was protected from neglect. Resident #42 sustained a fractured hip and a subdural hematoma from an unwitnessed event. The resident was sent to a local hospital where the subdural hematoma had ceased and the hip was repaired. This caused physical harm to the resident and will be cited a G at F600. Resident identifier: #42 Facility census: 81.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete a new pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) when four (4) of five (5) reviewed for the care area of PASARR received a new diagnosis of a serious mental disorder. Resident identifiers: 66, 10, 62, 24. Facility Census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one (1) of one (1) Resident reviewed for the care area of death received medications as ordered by the physician. Resident identifier: 80. Facility census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: 4. Facility Census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a facility initiated thirty day notice of discharge contained the date the discharge notice was issued and the effective discharge date . This was true for one (1) out of two (2) Residents reviewed for discharges. Resident identifier: #29. Facility census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on recorded review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to have an assessment that accurately reflected the resident's status. This was true for one (1) out of four (4) Residents reviewed for the care area of falls. Resident identifier: Resident # 32. Facility census 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure garbage storage area was maintained in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. It was discovered the dumpster's were full and overflowing with several garbage bags lying on each of the dumpster's. Facility census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility documentation and staff interview the facility failed to have completed temperature logs for the refrigerators, freezer and dishwasher. The facility failed to complete and document food temperatures of food before serving on 11/01/22 for breakfast and lunch. This was a random opportunity for discover. The failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility documentation and staff interview the facility failed to include direct staffing levels / direct overall number of staff for the resident acuity in the facility assessment. This has the potential to affect all resident in the facility. The Facility census 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to Resident #23 had a call system within reach. The bathrooms in rooms 405, 407, 404, and 406 did not a cord to activate the call system to contact staff. These observations were a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a Resident was free from neglect. The failed practice was true for one (1) of three (3) Residents reviewed for abuse. Resident identifier: #20. Facility census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of (1) residents having a physical restraint, received care according to standards of practices during the time in which a restraint was used. Resident #48 did not receive restraint checks and releases from the restraint in a timely manner. The facility failed to ensure Resident #48 had the correct device applied as ordered by the physician, and did not receive periodic evaluations by all members of the interdisciplinary team to identify less restrictive means to the restraint usage. The facility also failed to identify a continued need for treatment on a periodic basis. Resident identifier: Resident #48. Census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a Resident was free from neglect. The failed practice was true for one (1) of three (3) Residents reviewed for abuse. Resident identifier: #20. Facility census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan. This was true for two (2) out of twenty-three (23) Residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #330 and #77 Facility Census: 77 a) Resident # 77 Resident #77 is currently a smoker. Her name is on the smokers list provided by the facility. She has a smoking evaluation dated 10/13/22. According to this evaluation she is to be supervised while smoking. The resident was observed smoking with supervision on 11/01/22 at 1:10 PM. According to the Smoking Policy with a revision date of 4/2021 .The resident's smoking status will be documented in the care plan . Resident #77 does not have a focus of smoking on her care plan. This was confirmed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 32 at 11/02/22 at 9:45 AM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to follow a physicians order for a life vest to be on the Resident at all times. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #330 Facility Census: 77. a) Resident #330 Resident #330 has an current order dated 10/26/22 for a life vest to be worn at all times, change the battery every 24 hours. Upon the initial long term survey process on 10/31/22 at 10:10 AM, the Resident was not wearing the life vest. This was confirmed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #32 on 10/31/22 at 10:12 AM. On 11/01/22 at 9:08 AM, the Resident did not have the life vest on. This was confirmed with LPN #61 at 9:10 AM. At this time, LPN #61 stated she could not find the life vest. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure supervision and devices to prevent accidents that could lead to injury. Resident #130 had orders for devices to prevent injury due to poor safety awareness that were not provided in accordance to the physician's orders This was true to one (1) of one (1) reviewed for accident/injury concerns. Resident identifier: Resident #130. Census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status to prevent weight loss. This failed practice was true for one (1) out of six (6) residents reviewed for nutrition. Resident identifier: #15. Facility census 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure enteral feedings were administered in accordance to professional standards. The facility failed to ensure enteral feedings were identified with a label as to the type of feeding being administered, by a pump and time of administration to ensure safety of contents and accuracy of administration, to a resident. This was found to be true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier: Resident #130. Census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy in accordance with professional standards and practices. The facility failed to ensure the flow rate of oxygen was administered in accordance with physician's orders. This failed practice was true for two (2) of two (2) residents receiving oxygen therapy, reviewed during the Long -Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifiers: Resident #68 and #61. Census: 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed was free from unnecessary medications. Resident Identifier: #12. Facility census 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the garbage dumpster was in good and sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. This was a random opportunity for discovery. The failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of Residents. Facility census: 77.
2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on August 28, 2025.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 13, 2024 | Fine | $11,912 |
| February 9, 2024 | Fine | $13,325 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.49 | 3.67 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.53 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.21 | 3.17 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.47 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 2.49 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 60.4% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 75.0% | 42.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.81 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.00 on weekdays and 4.21 on weekends, 30% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 49.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.62 in April to June 2025 to 5.49 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.49 | 0.53 | 6.00 | 4.21 | 49.1% | 0 of 90 | 77 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.06 | 0.45 | 5.53 | 3.86 | 45.0% | 0 of 92 | 80 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.99 | 0.45 | 5.52 | 3.67 | 40.7% | 0 of 92 | 80 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.62 | 0.52 | 6.22 | 4.13 | 42.1% | 0 of 91 | 73 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| West Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.67 | 3.75 | 3.08 | 3.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.66 | $17.05 to $18.47 | 9,390 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $26.61 | $23.71 to $29.47 | 6,050 |
| Registered nurses | $38.52 | $32.77 to $47.97 | 23,430 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.6 | 14.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 28.9 | 15.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 13.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.0 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.3 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Trinity Health Care of Mingo's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · West Virginia: 9 better, 28 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 12 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · West Virginia: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 30 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · West Virginia: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 17 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: West Virginia50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
3.5% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia1.2% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
4.3% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: West Virginia97.6% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: TRINITY HEALTH CARE SERVICES OF MINGO INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Health Care Services Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/07/2008 |
| Vance, Ronald | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2006 | |
| Bevins, Kenneth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Reynolds, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Vance, Ronald | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/06/2006 | |
| Vance, Ronald | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2006 | |
| Bevins, Kenneth | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/27/2026 | |
| Reynolds, Christopher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/27/2026 | |
| Vance, Ronald | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/27/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in West Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.