Home / Florida / Port Charlotte
2370 Harbor Blvd, Port Charlotte, FL 33952 · Charlotte County · (941) 624-5966
104 certified beds, about 98 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2006
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 106072 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 20, 2024, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since January 2021, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $291,005 in the last three years; the largest was $291,005, and the latest is dated June 11, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.19 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
38.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Gold Fl Trust II, an affiliated group of 36 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from neglect by failing to follow established processes to document and report a resident's fall to ensure timely and appropriate post-fall evaluation for 1 (Resident #900) of 3 residents reviewed. Resident #900 had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living, including transfers. On 4/17/25 at 7:30 p.m., Resident #900 was found on the floor in his room. The licensed nurse on duty failed to document the fall, failed to evaluate the resident for injuries such as fractures, and failed to notify the Director of Nursing or physician of the fall. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interviews the facility failed to protect 1 (Resident #900) of 3 residents reviewed from avoidable falls and fall related serious injuries by failing to ensure an effective system was in place to consistently document, report and follow up on residents' falls. Resident #900 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of falls resulting in hospitalization. Resident #900's cognition was severely impaired. On 4/17/25 at 7:30 p.m., Resident #900 was found on the floor in his room. The facility failed to evaluate Resident #900 after the fall, failed to document the fall in the clinical record, and failed to notify the physician and Director of Nursing for post-fall assessment. There was no evidence of a fall investigation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility's policy and procedures and staff interviews the facility failed ensure nursing staff had the appropriate skills set, competencies and oversight to provide safe nursing care and meet the needs of 1(Resident #900) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Resident #900 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a fall resulting in hospitalization. Resident #900's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. The resident was rarely understood. On 4/17/25 Resident #900 was found on the floor in his room. The nursing staff failed to document the fall, failed to notify the physician and failed to report the fall to the next shift and therapy department to ensure appropriate follow up assessment and interventions to prevent further falls. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy and procedure the facility administration failed to utilize its resources effectively to prevent the neglect of 1 (Resident #900) of 3 sampled residents and maintain oversight to ensure nursing staff competency to deliver safe nursing care and related services. Resident #900 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #900's cognition was severely impaired. Resident #900 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. On 4/17/25 Resident #900 was found on the floor in his room. The fall was not documented in the clinical record. There was no post fall assessment or physician notification. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement processes to prevent the misappropriation of residents' medications for 4 (Residents #8, #1, #10, and #22) of 4 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, staff and residents interviews, the facility failed to ensure grievances filed by residents were promptly reviewed and investigated to keep the residents apprised of progress toward a resolution for 5 Residents (#36, #37, #41, #422, and #272) of 5 residents reviewed for grievances.
Inspectors wrote5. On 6/17/24 at 11:41 a.m., in an interview with Resident #21 and Resident #21's granddaughter, they said since Resident #21's admission to the facility on 5/05/24 the facility staff did not give Resident #21 her scheduled showers as asked. Resident #21's granddaughter said due to her grandmother being incontinent of urine, the family had requested for Resident #21 receive a shower at least 2 times a week but the requested showers were not being completed as requested by Resident #21 and/or the family. On 6/19/24 at 1:37 p.m., in an interview with Staff H, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), she said she had taken care of Resident #21 multiple times since Resident #21's admission to the facility. She said Resident #21's shower days were on Wednesday and Saturday. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 (Resident #6, #47, and #423) of 6 residents reviewed with physician ordered treatments and positioning devices.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a multi-resident use glucometer (device to check blood sugar levels), was properly disinfected, and/or standard precautions were followed during medication pass for 2 (Resident #9, and #56) of 5 residents reviewed for infection control.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a care plan conference was conducted with the resident and/or resident representative after completion of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 (Resident #13 and #54) of 4 residents reviewed. This did not allow the resident and/ or representative to participate in decision making related to the plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent the development or worsening of pressure ulcers for 2 (Residents #40 and #47) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent a decline in range of motion for 3 (Residents #14, #15, and #40) of 3 sampled residents reviewed with limited range of motion.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility policy review, staff and family interview the facility failed to promote the rights to retain and use their personal possessions for 1 (Resident #422) of 2 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility policy review, staff and family interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of changes in condition for 1 (Resident #422) of 2 resident reviewed for change in condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident council interviews, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to act promptly upon grievances expressed during resident council meetings. This has the potential to affect quality of life for residents at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, staff and residents' interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents are aware the results of the most recent inspection of the facility conducted by a federal or state agency are available to read, and where results are located. The resident census was 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility record review, staff and family interview, the facility failed to respond to resolve a grievance for 1 (Resident #20) of 2 residents reviewed for lost items.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care to address critical medication usage for 2 (Residents #19 and #90) of 5 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement individualized one-to-one activity for two residents (Resident #7 and #12) of 5 residents surveyed. The lack of activities has a potential to cause mental and physical decline due to a lack of physical activity and mental stimulation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unsecured and unattended at bedside for 1 Resident (Resident #19) of 20 Residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Restorative Services as ordered by Physician for 2 (Residents #12 and #68) of 3 Residents reviewed for Restorative Services. This has the potential to increase ADL functions and contractures in non-active Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the state's Long-Term Care Ombudsman Council (LTCOC) of facility-initiated transfers and discharges since October 2020. The local Ombudsman office was not notified of 3 (Residents #20, #36 and #70) of 3 sampled facility-initiated transfer/discharged of a total of 17 facility initiated transfers to the hospital from [DATE] through 1/6/21. The failure to send notices of facility-initiated transfers and discharges to the LTCOC potentially prevents inappropriately discharged resident's access to an advocate to inform them of their options and rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview and record review, the facility failed to honor personal choices for 1 (Resident #73) of 3 residents reviewed for personal choices. The facility's failure to promote and facilitate the resident choices could cause psychosocial and mental harm to the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents #9 and #65) of 3 residents reviewed for vision impairment received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain their vision at optimal condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to demonstrate effective coordination and follow physician orders and care plan interventions for the application of knee braces for 1 (Resident #7) of 2 residents reviewed with contractures (a tightening of muscles, tendons and ligaments that prevent joint movement). This had the potential to cause pain and worsening of the contracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of policy, menu and physician's orders, observation and interview the facility failed to provide the physician ordered diet for 2 (Residents #44 and #388) of 3 sampled residents with prescribed renal diets. The failure to follow the prescribed physician's diet order could negatively affect the residents' nutritional status.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence of a functioning antibiotic stewardship program to monitor the use of antibiotics.
4 fire safety citations on file: 3 on June 20, 2024, 1 on January 7, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 11, 2025 | Fine | $291,005 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.19 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.68 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.51 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.09 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.7% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 65.0% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.17 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.39 on weekdays and 3.68 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.87 in April to June 2025 to 4.19 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 0.59 | 4.39 | 3.68 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 98 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.08 | 0.55 | 4.26 | 3.62 | 1.4% | 0 of 92 | 96 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.96 | 0.62 | 4.16 | 3.44 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 97 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.87 | 0.63 | 4.01 | 3.53 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 98 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.0 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.0 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.8 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Village Place Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 76 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 75 eligible stays.
9.8% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 106 eligible stays.
51.6% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 215 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 350 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 350 residents counted.
97.9% this home
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 144 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: VILLAGE PLACE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Gold Fl Trust II, a group of 36 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Village SNF Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/23/2022 |
| Fl Master Opco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/27/2022 |
| Shepard, Melissa | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/27/2022 | |
| Shelby, Jack | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/27/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.