Home / Pennsylvania / Pittsburgh
505 Weyman Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 · Allegheny County · (412) 884-3500
166 certified beds, about 144 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1999
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 396066 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 7, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 33 health citations since October 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $45,050 in the last three years; the largest was $45,050, and the latest is dated May 7, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.45 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.99 of those hours.
50.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 33 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility review of policy, manufacturer's instructions, clinical records, and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify physicians of elevated or decreased Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) levels, failed to assess residents for hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) and hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) resulting in immediate jeopardy for 7 of 36 residents (R3, R17, R64, R84, R116, R145, and R148).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for two of four nursing units as required (TCU 1st. floor, and ARU1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the specific competencies and skill sets related to the use of ACE wraps (elastic bandages) for 11 of 14 residents (Resident R16, R32, R50, R62, R74, R97, R117, R123, R130, R147, and R174).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of job descriptions, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to effectively manage the facility to ensure provider notification of resident changes in condition. This failure resulted in immediate jeopardy for seven of 36 residents (R3, R17, R64, R84, R116, R145, and R148).
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of facility policy, observations, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurate for three of eight residents (Residents R13, R48 and R75).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical records, staff interviews, facility documents, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to implement a good faith attempt to correct quality deficiencies and make certain that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively for seven of 36 residents (Resident R3, R17, 64, R84, R116, R145, and R148).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to avoid injuries for one of three residents (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy and documents, information provided by the State Ombudsman Office, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or their representative received written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of transfer for four of six residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident R6, R89, R123, and R138) and failed to notify the State Ombudsman Office of resident transfers and discharges for two years (11/2023 through 12/2023, 1/2024 through 12/2024, and 1/2025 through 4/2025) as required. Findings Include: Review of federal regulation §483.15(d) Notice of Bed-Hold Policy, indicated: -Facilities must provide written information about these policies to residents prior to and upon transfer for such absences. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set ( MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for two of eight residents (Resident R30 and R50).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medications were properly stored and/or disposed of in two of three medication rooms (First and Second floor medication rooms) and two of five medication carts (MedBridge A-hall, MedBridge B-hall).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify resident representatives of a transfer to the hospital for one of five residents (Resident R89).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care for one of four residents (Resident R21)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medications were properly secured in one of two medication carts (Second-floor medication cart for rooms 220-231).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure medication in one medication refrigerator (Family Conference room), and one of three medication carts observed (ARU 1 nursing unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy, resident interview, observations, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to assess the clinical appropriateness of medication self-administration for two of 14 residents (Resident R1 and R2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to fully investigate an incident to eliminate possible abuse or neglect for one of seven residents (Resident R3).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medications were properly stored and/or disposed of in three of three medication carts (Medbridge B-hall, Medbridge A-hall, and the TCU-1 medication carts).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of seven of 12 residents (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Activity of Daily Living (ADLs) dated 1/30/24, indicated the center must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's activities of daily living (ADL) abilities are maintained. Activities of daily living include hygiene care and will be recorded in the medical record. During an interview on 9/8/24, at 1:58 p.m. Resident R1, when asked if she felt the facility maintained sufficient staff, stated, No. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation and resident and staff interviews, it was revealed that the facility failed to prevent involuntary seclusion for two of 10 residents reviewed (Resident R1, and R2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure two of 10 residents observed (Resident R1, and R2) were free from physical restraints by being pushed up to a table with a wheelchair blocking the side exit.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from staff initiated verbal abuse for two of nine residents (Resident R74 and R156).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of care needs) assessments were completed in the required time frame for 12 of 16 residents (Resident R104, R120, R262, R263, R264, R265, R320, R321, R322, R362, R363, and R364).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to establish a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission/readmission for three of twelve residents (Resident R61, R72 and R324).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that showers were consistently provided for three of six residents (Resident R74, R85, and R124, R328).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and documents, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, and resident care records, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of nine of 32 residents (Resident R74, R85, R124, R128, and R328) and four of nine group residents (R401, R402, R403, and R404). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Activity of Daily Living (ADLs) dated 1/30/24, indicated the center must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident ' s activities of daily living (ADL) abilities are maintained. Activities of daily living include hygiene care and will be recorded in the medical record. During an interview on 5/6/24, at 1:10 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set's (MDS -periodic assessment of care needs) to the required electronic system within the mandated time frame for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident R20).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the care of pressure ulcers for one of four residents (Resident R128).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for four of ten staff members (Employees E2, E3, E4, and E5).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, staff education records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct at least 12 hours of in-service education, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, for nurse aides as required for two of five nurse aides (Nurse Aide (NA)Employees E2 and E3).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to comply with state laws regarding mandated minimum staffing requirements.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, resident council group meeting minutes, resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to answer call bells in a timely manner for six of six residents observed and failed to have an ample linen supply at the staffs immediate disposal (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, resident council minutes, group and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to respond to resident concerns and grievances identified during resident council minutes for two of two months (October through November 2023).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to keep essential equipment in working order from July 2023 till October 2023.
4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on May 7, 2026, 1 on May 16, 2025, 2 on May 9, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | Fine | $45,050 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.45 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.16 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.96 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.50 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.3% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 39.1% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 5.35 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.56 on weekdays and 3.16 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 22.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.24 in April to June 2025 to 3.45 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.45 | 0.99 | 3.56 | 3.16 | 22.9% | 0 of 90 | 144 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.63 | 1.00 | 3.68 | 3.48 | 27.4% | 0 of 92 | 143 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.45 | 0.94 | 3.53 | 3.27 | 26.2% | 0 of 92 | 136 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.24 | 1.15 | 3.32 | 3.04 | 9.7% | 0 of 91 | 133 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.0 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.8 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.2 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.8 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.8 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Whitehall Borough Post Acute's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 274 eligible stays.
11.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 267 eligible stays.
8.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 177 eligible stays.
68.4% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 95 residents counted.
0.8% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 131 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 129 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WEYMAN SNF HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apt, Frederick | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Apt, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| PACS Group, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| PACS Holdings, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Providence Group Nh, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Apt, Frederick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Pa Holdco 1 Whitehall LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Pa Holdco 2 Whitehall LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Hancock, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Murray, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.