Home / Pennsylvania / Pittsburgh
1848 Greentree Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 · Allegheny County · (412) 344-7744
180 certified beds, about 150 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395743 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 13, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 42 health citations since March 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,419 in the last three years; the largest was $10,419, and the latest is dated October 11, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.31 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.67 of those hours.
65.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 42 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to permit one of three residents reviewed to return to the facility after hospitalization (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical records, medication regimen reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to respond in a timely manner to pharmacy recommendations for two of five residents (Resident R2 and R22).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility document, personnel in-service training records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program for three of ten staff members (Employee E1, E2, E3).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents are free of significant medication errors for one of three residents (Resident R1). Review of facility policy Medication Monitoring dated 3/14/25, indicated staff monitor and document events including medication error. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/12/25, included diagnoses of peritoneal abscess (abscess near the large bowel), colitis (inflammation in the colon), and high blood pressure. Review of the provider orders reveal the residents Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) is to run a cycle for twelve hours from 9 p.m. to 9 a.m. daily. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel records and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing staff annual performance evaluations based on the date of hire for five of five nurse aides (Employees E11, E12, E13, E14, and E15).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, resident interviews, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prompt assistance to meet residents care needs for three of fourteen residents who require care (Residents R63, R67, and R8).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, facility records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance for 15 of 22 residents as required (Resident R500, R501, R502, R503, R504, R505, R506, R507, R508, R509, R8, R68, R69, R125, and R243).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that medications were properly stored and/or disposed of in the unused dining room on the first floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies, the Four-week Spring Summer (SS) cycle menu diet extension sheets, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to follow a preplanned cycle menu (lunch meal on 4/14/25), as required and failed to provide resident's their preferences and standing order food choices (Residents R47 and R90).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Infection Control for seven of ten staff members (Employee E11, E13, E14, E15, E16, E17, and E18).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for eight of ten staff members (Employee E11, E12, E13, E15, E16, E17, E18, and E19).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident representative of changes in appointment and transportation times for one of four residents (Resident R69).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy , observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment in the facility (resident dining rooms) for one of four resident dining locations (first floor nursing unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined the facility failed to provide a qualified professional to direct the activities program as required for one of 12 months (3/3/25 through 4/14/25).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and documents, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services after hospitalization for one of three residents (Resident R68). Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 3/24/25, included diagnoses of anemia (too little iron in the body causing fatigue), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function), and osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection). Review of hospital discharge instructions dated 3/19/25, indicated for the facility to reinforce the dressing. No direction for changing the dressing was documented. Review of a progress note dated 3/20/25, at 9:07 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure availability of prescribed medications for one of five residents (Residents R244).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the call bell system was in full working order for one of four nursing units (Second Floor Nursing unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional and clean environment for two of 33 residents of the Third floor B wing nursing unit (Resident R99 and R112).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Prevention of Abuse and Neglect for one of ten staff members (Employee E18).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, staff education records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct at least 12 hours of in-service education, within 12 months of their hire date anniversary, for nurse aides as required for two of five nurse aides (Employees Employee E11 and E15).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Department of Health most recent survey results were readily accessible to residents and visitors, for four of four locations (first floor lobby, nursing units ground, second and third floors). Findings Include: During an observation on 4/14/25, at 9:20 a.m. in the lobby, no survey result book could be located. During an observation on 4/14/25, at 9:25 a.m. on the second floor, no survey result book could be located. During an observation on 4/14/25, at 9:28 a.m. on the third floor, no survey result book could be located. During an observation on 4/14/25, at 9:32 a.m. on the ground floor, no survey result book could be located. During an interview on 2/12/25, at 9:25 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, posted documents, observations, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain grievance/concern forms can be filed anonymously for all residents and/or their representatives on five of five locations where grievance/complaint forms are provided (four nursing units and the lobby).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Effective Communication for seven of eight staff members (Employee E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, and E19).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Resident Rights for eight of ten staff members (Employee E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, E17, E19, and E20).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) for ten of ten staff members (Employee E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, E17, E18, E19, and E20).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, personnel in-service training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Compliance and Ethics for four of ten staff members (Employee E11, E15, E16, and E19).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and care for five of ten residents (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and resident interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident need for ten of thirteen residents (Resident R2, R6, R7, R8, R9, and R10, and four confidential residents: RB, RC, RD, and RE).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility documentation, cited deficiencies from previous surveys, review of plan of correction documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility ' s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program failed to correct previously cited deficiencies. This has the potential to affect 16 of 140 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, manufacturer ' s instructions, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently maintain an infection prevention and control program, which ensured proper cleaning and disinfecting of glucometers (a device used to test the amount of sugar in a person's blood) to prevent the potential for cross-contamination for one of three medication carts (Third Floor Cart Rooms 308-321).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines, clinical records, facility policies, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure consistent care by initiating Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to an unresponsive resident for one of eighty-seven residents (Resident R1), resulting in immediate jeopardy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary, functional environment in the main laundry room.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical and facility record review, facility submitted documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to be aware of resident's departure from the facility for one of seven residents (Resident R1). Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 2/11/24, included diagnoses of high blood pressure and obesity. Review of an Elopement Risk Assessment completed on 11/10/23, indicated Resident R1 was not risk for elopement. Review of Resident R1's plan of care for Potential for Discharge initiated 11/9/23, indicated that Resident R1 will be discharged home when clinical and rehabilitation goals are met. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of dish machine temperature/sanitation logs, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and temperature procedures for the dish machine operation allowing for the potential for cross contamination in the main kitchen for seven of nine months (July 2023, August 2023, October 2023, November 2023, January 2024, February 2024 and March 2024).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, resident group meeting and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to demonstrate a response to grievances for resident group meeting for five of six residents held during the annual survey (Residents R100, R101, R102, R103, R104).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy and clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the opportunity to formulate an advance directive (written instructions such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care for when the individual is incapacitated) for eight of the twelve residents reviewed (Resident R16, R21,R29, R32, R39, R44, R47, R67, R68, R127, R134, R142). Findings Include: A review of the facility policy Advanced Directives on 7/19/2023, 1/23/2024, indicated the facility will comply with the requirements related to maintaining written policies and procedures regarding advance directives, including provisions to inform and provide written information to all adult residents concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and formulate an advance directive. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on the facility policy, observations, Resident group meeting and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide residents access to grievance forms, failed to provide the right to file grievances anonymously, and failed to post the name of the Grievance Official for residents to file a grievance orally (meaning spoken) for 155 of 155 residents at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of resident council meeting minutes, facility concern/grievance log and clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate potential abuse and/or neglect for three of 35 residents(Resident R209, R302 and R37).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that residents were provided appropriate treatment and care for four of four residents (Resident R20, R45, R83, and R145).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) documents, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility to make certain that medications and medical supplies were properly stored and/or disposed of on one of two nursing units (Second-Floor Nursing Unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the potential for cross-contamination for two of four medication carts (2nd A/B Hall Treatment Cart and B/C Hall Treatment Cart).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that weight loss was identified and addressed and failed to identify needs for increased nutrition for one of five residents (Residents R78).
34 fire safety citations on file: 18 on March 13, 2026, 6 on April 18, 2025, 10 on March 22, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 11, 2024 | Fine | $10,419 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.31 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.98 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.77 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.87 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 65.6% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 45.2% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 5.55 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.45 on weekdays and 2.98 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 38.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.60 in April to June 2025 to 3.31 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.31 | 0.67 | 3.45 | 2.98 | 38.7% | 0 of 90 | 150 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.43 | 0.73 | 3.57 | 3.08 | 32.5% | 0 of 92 | 137 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.28 | 0.78 | 3.46 | 2.84 | 28.4% | 0 of 92 | 133 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.60 | 0.86 | 3.74 | 3.24 | 33.5% | 0 of 91 | 128 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.4 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.7 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.3 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.9 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Carnegie Park Post Acute's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
45.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 171 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 166 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 104 eligible stays.
48.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 92 residents counted.
9.2% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 92 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GREENTREE SNF HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apt, Frederick | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| PACS Group, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| PACS Holdings, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Providence Group Nh, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Apt, Frederick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| 1848 Greentree Road Pa Owner LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Keystone Property Investments LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Pa Holdco 1 Greentree LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Pa Holdco 2 Greentree LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Zoozen LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2024 | |
| Hancock, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 | |
| Murray, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.