Home / North Carolina / Windsor
1306 South King Street, Windsor, NC 27983 · Bertie County · (252) 794-5146
82 certified beds, about 66 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 345339 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 13, 2026, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 52 health citations since August 2023, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $249,991 in the last three years; the largest was $179,771, and the latest is dated May 6, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.10 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.
79.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).
CMS links it to Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper, an affiliated group of 79 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 52 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff, Pharmacist, Medical Director and Physician interviews, the facility failed to clarify and resolve a discrepancy with an order for carvedilol (medication in the class of alpha and beta blockers used to treat conditions affecting the heart and blood vessels) which resulted in a significant medication error for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #7).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a complete and accurate Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and failed to have a complete and accurate Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 4 of 19 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy (Resident #76, Resident #36, Resident #54, and Resident #51).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to: 1.) to follow their infection control practices and procedures for Contact Precautions when Nurse Aide (NA) #1 entered resident's room under contact precautions without wearing a gown or gloves to pick up a meal tray 2.) follow their infection control practices and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high contact care for a resident with a chronic wound when NA #2 provided a bed bath without wearing a gown and when NA #2 left dirty linens on the floor of the resident's room instead of placing them in a bag and later picked them up and held them against her body. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interview, the facility failed to obtain consent and inform the resident's Responsible Party (RP) of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications prior to initiation or the treatment alternatives available. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #54).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and Medical Director, Nurse Practitioner (NP), staff and Responsible Party (RP) interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician/medical provider when an ordered medication was unavailable for administration (Resident #51) and failed to notify the resident's RP when a deep tissue pressure injury (DTI) developed on his right heel (Resident #78) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for notification of changes (Resident #51 and Resident #78).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from misappropriation of money from their personal funds' accounts for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for misappropriation of property (Residents #51, #8, and #37).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #51).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and resident, staff, Medical Director and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #51).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff, Pharmacist, Medical Director, Nurse Practitioner and Physician interviews, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician was informed of the pharmacy recommendation to clarify a physician's order for carvedilol (medication in the class of alpha and beta blockers used to treat conditions affecting the heart and blood vessels) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #7).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep medications in a locked treatment cart for 1 of 2 treatment carts observed (Treatment Cart #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a consent was documented prior to administering the Influenza vaccination for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccination status (Resident #80).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to receive mail delivered on Saturdays. This had the potential to affect 67 of 67 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and resident interviews, the facility failed to act in a dignified manner toward (Resident #1) and within hearing distance of (Resident #3) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #1 and Resident #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, staff interviews, and a resident interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident-to-resident physical abuse when Resident #3 struck Resident #4, resulting in a bruise to the right side of the face. This occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #4).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to: a.) follow their infection control practices and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high contact care for a resident with a chronic wound when Nurse #1 and Nurse Aide (NA) #1 provided wound care without wearing gowns for 2 of 2 staff observed for infection control (Nurse #1 and NA #1) and b.) to implement their policy for EPB for the current 41 of 61 residents that required the precautions due to chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist who was certified in infection prevention and control, to be responsible for the facility's Infection Control and Prevention Program. This had the potential to affect 72 of 72 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to have an effective system in place to train nurses and nurse aides (NAs) and verify their competency with infection control policies for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)/Infection Preventionist (IP) who was responsible for training staff on infection control practices and procedures was unaware that residents with chronic wounds and indwelling medical devices required EBP with high contact care. Nurse #1 and NA #1 failed to follow the infection control policy by providing wound care for a resident with chronic wounds without wearing gowns. The facility had 41 residents that required EBP due to chronic wounds or indwelling medical devices. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity when a resident wore a nightgown and no makeup to an outside appointment making the resident feel angry and unimportant for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 4) reviewed for dignity and respect.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain evidence of grievance investigation and decisions for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for grievances (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and family interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for physical abuse. Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident, was hit with a belt by a family member resulting in three whip-like marks on her left upper thigh and abdomen. A reasonable person would be traumatized by being hit with a belt.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff and family interviews, the facility failed to immediately identify abuse and respond to intervene to protect a resident from physical abuse. Facility staff delayed intervention when Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident, was hit with a belt by a family member resulting in three whip-like marks on her left upper thigh and abdomen and a visit to the emergency room. The facility also failed to notify the state agency within two hours of physical abuse that occurred in the facility. This occurred for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for adherence to abuse policies and procedures during physical abuse investigations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to implement their policy for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property in the areas of reporting and investigating when Nurse #2 and Nurse #3 reported to the Unit Manager, Assistant Director of Nursing, and Director of Nursing allegations that Resident #1's liquid morphine appeared to be tampered with and Nurse #1 appeared impaired. These allegations were not reported to the State Agency, law enforcement, or Adult Protective Services (APS) and were not thoroughly investigated. This deficient practice affected 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for misappropriation of property and placed all facility residents who were ordered narcotic medication at risk of misappropriation of property.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, nurse practitioner interview, physician interview, pharmacist, and psychiatry nurse practitioner interview the facility failed to administer 6 doses of a required antipsychotic medication for one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for significant medication errors. Resident #11 had an acute psychotic event after missing 6 doses of his antipsychotic medication resulting in a fall with a broken shoulder and hip that required surgical repair, acute blood loss and acute pain. Resident #11 has been bedbound since the incident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, nurse practitioner interview, physician interview, pharmacist interview, and psychiatry nurse practitioner interview the facility failed to obtain laboratory tests as ordered and provide laboratory results to the pharmacy as required for antipsychotic medication monitoring for one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for laboratory services. Resident #11 had an acute psychotic event after laboratory results were not obtained and faxed to the pharmacy for the renewal of his antipsychotic medication. Resident #11 suffered a fall with a broken shoulder and hip that required surgical repair, acute blood loss and acute pain. Resident #11 has been bedbound since the incident. Abrupt withdrawal from the medication can cause rebound psychosis (sudden return of psychotic symptoms).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews with resident, staff and the Physician, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from resident to resident abuse for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #222, Resident #61, and Resident #41). On 10/19/23 Resident #2, a male resident, entered Resident #222's room (a female resident) and punched her in her legs multiple times with a closed fist as she was sitting on her bed. On 6/22/24 Resident #2 punched Resident #61 (a female resident) in the face multiple times with a closed fist at the nurse's station due to the belief that she was cheating on him. Resident #222 and Resident #61 were vulnerable and were unable to protect themselves. The physical abuse had a high likelihood of resulting in serious physical and psychosocial harm. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days per week for 9 of 163 days reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner when staff referred to a resident who needed assistance with eating as a feeder for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #64). This caused Resident #64 to feel like an animal.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a sufficient number of clean mechanical lift pads were available to allow a resident to get out of bed in accordance with his preference (Resident #65) and failed to allow a resident who was assessed as a safe independent smoker to smoke in accordance with her preference (Resident #41). This was for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for self-determination.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a complete CMS-10055 (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) by omitting the estimated cost for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notices (Resident #49).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to submit a 5-day investigation report (Resident #172) and an initial 24 hour and 5-day investigation report to the State Agency and report to Adult Protective Services (APS) and local law enforcement after allegations of misappropriation of property (Resident #3). This was for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for misappropriation.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to code cognition, mood, and behavior for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident #66).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included the use of a mechanical lift device for transfers for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #65) whose comprehensive care plans were reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, Physician, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to update care plan interventions (Resident # 2) and invite residents to care plan meetings (Resident # 43 and Resident #11) for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for care planning.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from exiting the facility without staff knowledge for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #2). Resident #2 exited the building through a back door and was found by a staff member sitting outside in his wheelchair facing the door.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Resident #322 was driven to her physician's office in time to attend an 11:00 AM medical appointment. Resident #322 arrived one- and one-half hours late and the physician was unable to see her. The appointment had to be rescheduled for the following week. This deficient practice affected 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for medically related social services (Resident # 322).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date an opened vial of influenza vaccine stored in the medication room refrigerator for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff, and physician interviews the facility failed to provide a pneumococcal vaccine to a resident with a signed consent form to receive the vaccine. This was for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #61).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, Wound Care Physician interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately document treatments on a resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. (Resident #1)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to allow residents who were assessed to be safe smokers the ability to smoke independently per their individual preference for 2 of 8 residents (Resident # 38, and #41) reviewed for preferences.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to obtain post dialysis vital signs as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #33).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to date opened insulin for 2 of 3 (Hall 200 and Hall 300) medication carts reviewed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and resident, staff and physician interviews the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following the 9/2/20 focused infection control and complaint investigation survey, the 5/19/22 recertification and complaint investigation survey, the 10/19/22 complaint investigation survey, and the 3/8/23 complaint investigation survey. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to have a staff member stay out of work following testing positive for COVID-19 per the facility's return to work criteria, and the facility failed to don personal protective equipment (PPE) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for isolation precautions (Resident #31 and Resident #48).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to avoid the use of the term 'feeder' to refer to a resident who needed assistance with meals for 1 of 1 dining observation (Resident #22). The reasonable person concept was applied as individuals have the expectation of being treated with dignity and would not want to be labeled 'feeders'.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide showers, bed baths, or nail care for 2 of 5 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #33 & Resident #16).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident, staff, and Physician interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident (Resident #58) medications after returning from the hospital. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident, staff, and Physician interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician order for a pressure ulcer dressing change for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #39).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to schedule a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 2 days of 19 days (6-11-23 and 7-8-23) reviewed for staffing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to schedule an appointment for a mammogram as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #19) reviewed for medically related social services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident, staff, and Physician interview the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error by failing to administer a prescribed antibiotic for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #39 and Resident #58) reviewed for medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to offer the Pneumococcal 15-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV 15) or Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV 20) in accordance with nationally recognized standards for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #31).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to post accurate nurse staffing information for 19 of 92 days reviewed for daily posted staffing.
12 fire safety citations on file: 6 on January 13, 2026, 2 on October 15, 2024, 4 on August 10, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2025 | Fine | $70,220 |
| May 6, 2025 | Payment Denial | 17 days from May 27, 2025 |
| October 15, 2024 | Fine | $179,771 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.10 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.46 | 0.62 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.67 | 3.42 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.81 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.82 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 79.3% | 49.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 76.9% | 45.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.33 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.28 on weekdays and 2.67 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 25.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.04 in April to June 2025 to 3.10 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.10 | 0.46 | 3.28 | 2.67 | 25.4% | 1 of 90 | 66 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.98 | 0.39 | 3.16 | 2.53 | 17.3% | 0 of 92 | 67 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.15 | 0.46 | 3.34 | 2.65 | 21.8% | 1 of 92 | 64 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.04 | 0.50 | 3.25 | 2.51 | 27.9% | 0 of 91 | 68 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.53 | 3.82 | 3.25 | 8.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.49 | $17.28 to $21.08 | 64,010 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.42 | $28.50 to $33.51 | 18,010 |
| Registered nurses | $40.56 | $37.87 to $49.06 | 111,120 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.1 | 15.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.3 | 18.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.6 | 5.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.2 | 14.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.3 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.7 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Windsor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (36.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
36.4% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · North Carolina: 93 better, 25 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 83 eligible stays.
12.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · North Carolina: 1 better, 4 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 100 eligible stays.
6.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · North Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 61 eligible stays.
64.4% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina54.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 67 residents counted.
4.6% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina2.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 67 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina97.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WINDSOR OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper, a group of 79 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nc East Holding LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2023 |
| Alter, Tzvi | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 80% | 01/01/2023 |
| Murray, Chris | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.