1325 Rockport Rd, Boonville, IN 47601 · Warrick County · (812) 897-4114
60 certified beds, about 52 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155682 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 2, 2025, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 28 health citations since June 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.11 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
49.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Trilogy Health Services, an affiliated group of 127 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for resident rights. An employee took an unauthorized video of a cognitively impaired resident with a personal cell phone. (Resident C) This deficient practice was corrected on May 11, 2026, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were available to provide physician prescribed routine medications to 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Physician prescribed routine medications were not administered due to the medications being unavailable at the facility. (Resident B, Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medications errors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. A resident received a double dose of insulin and received another resident's medications. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the failed the obtain the temperature of the food prior to serving the residents for 1 of 1 plating observations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify a Resident's code status for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for advanced directives. A resident's current Physician's Order did not match the signed Indiana Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment form, and staff was unaware of Resident's wishes. (Resident 56)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation. interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI), 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and 2 of 5 reviewed for unnecessary medications. Residents who were not on antianxiety medication and no longer had a UTI had care plans that were not removed and a resident with multiple pressure ulcers did not have wound specific care plans. (Resident 6, Resident 18, Resident 45, Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility met professional standards of quality for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition and 1 of 4 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI) and pressure ulcers. Weights were not monitored and discontinuation of contact precautions were not completed as ordered, a dressing was not initialed or dated, staff documented treatments completed on a pressure ulcer that had been healed, and a nurse signed off on a treatment that another staff member completed. (Resident 45, Resident 1, Resident 8)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received ordered treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. A wound specific care plan was not developed, treatment orders were not followed, wound assessments were not completed accurately, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were not used when providing wound care. (Resident 6)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Fall interventions were not in place for a resident with multiple falls and neurological (neuro) checks were not fully completed after unwitnessed falls. (Resident 5)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 31) observed during the medication pass. There were 25 opportunities for error observed with 3 medication errors, resulting in a medication error rate of 12 percent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic use protocols were followed to monitor antibiotic use. Residents received an antibiotic prior to obtaining culture results, and received an antibiotic without an indication for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI). (Resident 45, Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure posted nurse staffing forms were accurate for 4 of 6 days during the survey. Census information was not correct on the forms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to help mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Staff failed to complete proper hand hygiene, touched resident furnishings without performing hand hygiene, and placed a dirty glove on top of a medication cart during 2 of 3 observations of care. (Resident C, Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure storage of food in a safe and sanitary manner and failed to follow proper sanitation for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. Food items were observed unlabeled and open to air. The dishwasher did not reach the proper rinse temperature. Temperature logs were not completed correctly. (Kitchen)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were completed. Quarterly care plan conferences were not completed for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 28, Resident 8, Resident 19, Resident 29)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and homelike environment was provided for 3 of 3 resident halls observed and 1 of 1 shower room. Resident toilets were visibly soiled, fracture pans and urine hats were uncovered and placed between the handrail and wall, vitals machine and lift equipment were visibly soiled. The carpet was stained on the 200 Hall. The shower room grout was soiled, tiles were chipped, and there was a broken tile by the bathroom wall. (100 Hall, 200 Hall, 300 Hall, Shower Room) Findings Include: 1. On 7/22/24 at 11:02 A.M., the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed. There was a brown substance on the back of the toilet and an uncovered fractured (flattened) bedpan on the handrail. There were black scuffs on the walls. On 7/26/24 8:21 A.M., the same was observed. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents observed for incontinence care. Gloves were not changed and hands were not sanitized between dirty and clean tasks. A resident's incontinence pad was laid on the bathroom floor before it was placed on the resident. (Resident 39, Resident 7)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure posted nurse staffing sheets were posted and contained the correct information daily for 1 of 6 days reviewed during the survey. (July 21)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was in place to prevent a resident with a history of exit-seeking behavior from exiting the facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement. A resident unknowingly exited the facility and was found in the facility's parking lot approximately 45 minutes later. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents did not receive assistance with ADL's (bathing) according to the plan of care and bathing schedule. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident D, Resident F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident experienced a dignified existence for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respect and dignity. (Resident 199)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure compliance with the requirements for advance directives. An advanced directive order and DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) form was not signed by the physician for 1 of 2 reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident 24)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an intervention was implemented for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. Resident's bathroom did not have non skid strips placed in front of the toilet. (Resident 24)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided care according to the physician orders and maintenance of the respiratory equipment for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 8)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavioral health services were provided to maintain resident's highest practicable well-being. A Resident that required behavioral health monitoring was not evaluated for these services and not monitored for behaviors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident G)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for antibiotic use. A resident received 9 doses of an antibiotic that were double the ordered dose and a resident's as needed anti-anxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days. (Resident 9, Resident 13)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 2 of 4 observations of resident care. Handwashing was not completed between dirty to clean tasks. Gloves were not changed between dirty and clean tasks. (Resident G, Resident 15)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure posted nurse staffing records contained the correct information daily for 1 of 6 days during the survey.
19 fire safety citations on file: 6 on September 2, 2025, 6 on July 26, 2024, 7 on June 9, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.11 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.74 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.84 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.68 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 49.0% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 28.6% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.47 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.26 on weekdays and 2.74 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.35 in April to June 2025 to 3.11 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.11 | 0.59 | 3.26 | 2.74 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 52 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.22 | 0.50 | 3.38 | 2.81 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 53 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.48 | 0.60 | 3.66 | 3.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 51 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.35 | 0.65 | 3.54 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 51 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.7 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.3 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.1 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.6 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Woodmont Health Campus's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (60.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
60.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 99 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 116 eligible stays.
9.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 73 eligible stays.
64.5% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 62 residents counted.
3.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 100 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 100 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Trilogy Health Services, a group of 127 nursing homes averaging 4.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good Samaritan Hospital | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2015 |
| Keybank National Association | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 09/11/2018 | |
| Corbin, Kathy | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2015 | |
| McLin, Robert | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/06/1992 | |
| Schuckman, Matthew | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/21/2021 | |
| Thacker, Adam | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Good Samaritan Hospital | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2015 | |
| Trilogy Healthcare of Boonville, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2014 | |
| Deyne, Jennie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| McLin, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/06/1992 | |
| Sash, Karl | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2014 | |
| Schuckman, Matthew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/15/2021 | |
| Thacker, Adam | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Davis, David | Limited partnership interest | Individual | 12/31/2019 | |
| Barney, Leigh | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 10/03/2025 | |
| American Healthcare Reit Holdings LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| American Healthcare Reit Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Continental Merger Sub LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2021 | |
| Gahc3 Trilogy Jv LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Gahc4 Trilogy Jv LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Keybank National Association | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/20/2025 | |
| Paragon Outpatient Rehabilitation Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Trilogy Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Trilogy Healthcare Master Tenant IV LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/03/2025 | |
| Trilogy Investors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Trilogy Management Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/10/2025 | |
| Trilogy Propco Finance LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Trilogy Property Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Trilogy Real Estate Boonville, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Trilogy Real Estate Investment Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Trilogy Reit Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2015 | |
| Deyne, Jennie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/02/2025 | |
| McLin, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/1992 | |
| Sash, Karl | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/02/2025 | |
| Schuckman, Matthew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/15/2021 | |
| Thacker, Adam | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2013 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.