5233 Rosebud Lane, Newburgh, IN 47630 · Warrick County · (812) 473-4761
104 certified beds, about 92 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1999
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155670 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 3, 2025, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 40 health citations since August 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.33 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
61.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Majestic Care, an affiliated group of 26 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 40 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physicians' orders were followed for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for medications. Medications were observed at a resident's bedside table; the medication was held without a physician's order. ( Resident B, Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was sanitizing dishes properly and staff knew how to properly test for sanitization for 1 of 1 kitchens in the facility. (Kitchen)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) tasks were provided showers or baths for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident 27, Resident 97, Resident 11, and Resident 36)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled for 4 of 5 medication carts reviewed and 1 treatment cart reviewed. (100 Hall Cart 1, 100 Hall Cart 2, 200 Hall Cart 1, 200 Hall Cart 2, 100 Hall Treatment Cart)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention practices were implemented during laundry services during 1 of 1 observations of laundry services. (Laundry Room)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) medications administered by a Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) were preauthorized by a licensed nurse for 2 of 5 resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 66 and Resident 87)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care according to professional standards of a gastro/jejunal feeding tube (G-Tube) in 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tube feeding. The resident was not checked for residual as ordered prior to feedings. (Resident 44)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper airway management for 1 of 1 residents reviewed with a laryngectomy. A self-assessment for care was not performed, documentation was not accurate, and the facility did not have the correct parts for the laryngectomy tube ([NAME] Tube). (Resident 44)
Inspectors wrote2. On 6/30/25 at 8:11 A.M., Resident 98's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/22/25, indicated Resident 98 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff (staff does all of the effort) for toileting, bathing, and transfers. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Metoprolol 50 milligrams (mg) Extended Release (ER) - Give one tablet by mouth one time a day; Start Date 9/1/21. Care plans included, but were not limited to: (Resident) is at risk for impaired cardiac output; Observe for signs/symptoms of cardiac dysfunction such as .increased or decreased heart rate or blood pressure. Document abnormal findings and notify physician. Date Initiated: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post a current Posted Nurse Staffing sheet for 1 of 5 days during the survey period.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. A resident was given a straw to drink with, and hand splints were not applied. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, and served in a sanitary manner for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The kitchen floors had debris build up, and equipment was soiled. ( Kitchen)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the failed to ensure a resident who entered the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter was effectively assessed for adverse outcomes of an indwelling urinary catheter, received treatment and services to prevent infection in accordance with the physician orders and the plan of care, or was effectively monitored for complications of bloody urine after the catheter was suspected to be pulled for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 35 being hospitalized for the treatment of urethral obstruction and sepsis. (Resident 35)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at an appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 trays tested for temperature. (Resident 21, Resident 246, Resident 74, Resident 73, Resident 87, Resident 4, Resident 24, Resident 55, Resident 25)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions during 4 of 4 kitchen observations and 1 of 1 nutrition pantry observation. Food was not labeled, left open to air, and expired food was not disposed of from the refrigerator, hair nets were not worn, and hand hygiene was not completed. (Kitchen, 100 hall nutrition pantry, Dietary Aide 3, Dietary Aide 21, Dietary Manager)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's family of a resident to resident altercation for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for notification of changes. (Resident 35)
Inspectors wroteBased on record and interview the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed accurately for 3 of 19 residents reviewed. Antipsychotic medications, dental status, and significant weight loss were coded inaccurately. (Resident 25, Resident 246, Resident 55)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility, failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. The call light was not within reach. (Resident 26)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility, failed to ensure that documentation of interventions were not revised for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 56)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was given according to physician orders for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A blood pressure medication was given outside of parameters and glucagon was administered without an order. (Resident 246)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional care and services including the failure to obtain weekly weights, failure to provide assistance with meals and alternative food/supplement choices, and failure to notify the physician and address the resident's refusal of nutritional supplements and poor intakes resulting in a significant weight loss of 18.37% in less than 30 days 1 of 3 residents reviewed for significant weight loss and ensure a resident was receiving adequate fluids resulting in dehydration and a urinary tract infection 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dehydration. (Resident 55 and Resident 75)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was labeled and oxygen administration signs were in place for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen administration. (Resident 24, Resident 73, Resident 88)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain assessments and provide pain management in accordance with the resident's comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 residents reviewed pain. (Resident 55)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure CNA's had a current and valid certificate to work in the facility for 1 of 27 CNA's reviewed. (CNA 2)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate greater than 5% for 2 of 26 opportunities observed to administer medications, resulting in an error rate of 7.7%. (Residents 7, Resident 15)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure deteriorated medications were discarded for 1 of 3 medication carts observed. (100 Hall Cart 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food to accommodate a resident's food allergy for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition. Milk was given with a meal to a resident who had a lactose allergy. (Resident 246)
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, 1 of 3 residents observed for medication administration, and 1 of 2 residents reviewed falls. (Resident 246, Resident 15, Resident 26)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented for 2 of 2 residents observed for wound care. Hand hygiene and glove changes were not completed. (Resident 12, Resident 11, LPN 8, CNA 7, RN 7, Nurse Practitioner 19)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fall interventions were in place to prevent a fall for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for falls. ( Resident E)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, and served in a sanitary manner for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The kitchen floors had debris build up, equipment was soiled, and food was open to air and undated. ( Kitchen)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. The correct dose of a resident's pain medication was not given. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appetizing and palatable meals for 1 of 1 lunch trays sampled on 1 of 2 halls. Residents complained of cold food temperatures at meals and distasteful food during meals. (100 Hall, Resident B, Resident J)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 breakfast trays sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for 4 of 6 residents during observation of perineal care, medication administration, placement for Foley catheter bag and 1 of 1 resident receiving a Covid 19 test. Gloves were not changed between dirty and clean tasks during peri care, staff was observed not wearing a mask with a resident present, a medication was picked up from the top of a medication cart with bare hands and given to a resident, and Foley catheter bag and tubing was touching the floor. (Resident 156, Resident 221, Resident 226, Resident 122, Resident 229, Resident 2)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident in order to meet medical needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Staff did not implement care plan interventions, or follow MD orders for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for implementation of the care plan intervention for respiratory care, urinary care, and weight management while on enteral feedings. (Resident G, Resident 10, Resident 44)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and prevent falls for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. Fall interventions were not in place for residents with multiple falls. (Resident 25, Resident 9)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who experienced weight loss had new interventions instituted and that the registered dietitian and the physician were notified of a significant weight loss for 1 of 3 reviewed for nutrition. (Resident G)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A GDR (gradual dose reduction) was not completed to reduce a psychotropic medication. A resident's as needed anti-anxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days. (Resident 32, Resident 55)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure completed staffing sheets were posted daily for 7 of 7 days during the survey.
25 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 3, 2025, 20 on May 9, 2024, 4 on August 12, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.33 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.92 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.15 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.69 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 61.1% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.60 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.50 on weekdays and 2.92 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.20 in April to June 2025 to 3.33 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.50 | 3.50 | 2.92 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 92 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.31 | 0.44 | 3.48 | 2.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 92 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.33 | 0.39 | 3.50 | 2.88 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 91 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.20 | 0.41 | 3.37 | 2.77 | 8.5% | 0 of 91 | 95 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.6 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.5 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.2 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Majestic Care of Newburgh's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (39.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
39.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 53 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
22.7% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 34 residents counted.
2.3% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 34 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PULASKI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Majestic Care, a group of 26 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bennett, Adam | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Hutton, Charles | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Kauffman, Clinton | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| McKay, Michael | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Mellon, Jennifer | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Smith, Jennifer | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| White, Taylor | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| LTC Consulting Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Majestic Care of Newburgh LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Majestic Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Pulaski Memorial Hospital | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Hayes, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Jarosinski, Stephen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Malott, Gregg | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Pruitt, Paul | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Shatrov, Anzhelika | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Thompson, Brandi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Bennett, Adam | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Hutton, Charles | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Kauffman, Clinton | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| McKay, Michael | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Mellon, Jennifer | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Smith, Jennifer | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| White, Taylor | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| 4 Mdr of Queens Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Dem Family Trust I | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2026 | |
| LTC Consulting Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Majestic Care of Newburgh LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Majestic Indiana Operations III LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2026 | |
| Majestic Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Mdg Majestic Indiana Realty III LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Mdg Real Estate Global Limited | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Newburgh Hc Realty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Pulaski Memorial Hospital | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2026 | |
| Alexander, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Chamberlain, Margaret | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Hayes, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Jarosinski, Stephen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Malott, Gregg | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Marx, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Pruitt, Paul | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Rewa, Angela | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Russell, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Shatrov, Anzhelika | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Thompson, Brandi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 | |
| Wolfe, Eric | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.