829 Yellow Springs - Fairfield Rd, Fairborn, OH 45324 · Greene County · (937) 878-7046
99 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365743 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 9, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 37 health citations since February 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.12 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.
44.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Crown Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility food safety policy, the facility failed to ensure food and food preparation services were protected from potential contamination. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility that received food from the kitchen, except one resident (#95) with an active NPO (nothing by mouth) order during the survey. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and review of a facility recipe for pureed food, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was prepared to the proper consistency and texture before serving the food to residents. This had the potential to affect seven (#15, #17, #7, #21, #26, #43, and #61) residents identified by the facility with pureed texture dietary orders. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, and family interviews, the facility failed to provide a written notification of a room change. This affected one (#95) of one residents reviewed for room changes. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, family interview, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and home-like environment. This affected one (#93) of two residents review for the physical environment. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide assessments and monitoring of a resident who tested positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This affected one (#92) of one residents reviewed for COVID-19. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a proper bed rail assessment, including measurements of the air mattress and obtaining proper consent. This affected one (#96) out of one residents reviewed for siderails. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications, when one resident received antibiotics without a an adequate indication for use. This affected one (#10) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure behaviors were documented in a resident's medical record. This affected one (#95) out of three residents reviewed for medical record documentation. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, witness statements, physician notes and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent sexual abuse of one Resident (#11) of three reviewed. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents residing in a secure memory care unit were observed when outside the unit. This affected one Resident (#10) of three reviewed. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident was sent out to the hospital in a timely manner after a fall with a fracture. This affected one (#90) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility also failed to ensure incontinent care was provided per standard this affected one, (#38) of three reviewed for incontinent care and had the potential to affect the 58 residents the facility identified as being incontinent. The census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure an X-ray was ordered and implemented in a timely manner. This affected one (#90) of three residents reviewed for X-rays. The census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure proper infection control was maintained during incontinence care. This affected one (#38) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility identified there were 58 residents who were incontinent. The census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for wound care dressing. This affected one (Resident #85) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 83.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of Self-Reported Incidents, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure resident medications were not misappropriated. This affected two (Residents #32, #84) of three reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as ordered. This affected one (Resident #32) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide specific and specialized training staff working on the Memory Care unit. This had to potential to affect 15 (#11, #22, #23, #30, #40, #44, #47, #48, #49, #52, #53, #54 ,#58, #324 #325) of 15 residents residing on the Memory Care unit. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents needs were met by answering call lights in a timely manner. This affected two (#124 and #126) of two residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice and physician order related to advance directives. This affected one (#73) of three residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete an investigation related to potential misappropriation of a resident's personal belongings. This affected one (#46) of three residents reviewed for potential misappropriation. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were screened for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) services upon admission and after new diagnoses for serious mental illness. This affected two(#36 and #59) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan to meet a resident's dental needs. This affected one (#41) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to hold timely care conferences. This affected two (#21 and #36) of 24 residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed as ordered and obtain orders for a treatment. In addition, the facility failed to clean scissors prior to use and perform hand hygiene during wound care. This affected two (#6 and #46) of six residents reviewed for wound treatments. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility to ensure wounds were assessed and staged timely and failed ot ensure pressure relieving devices were in place to prevent skin impairments. This affected two (#34 and #11) of five reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified there were five pressure ulcers in the facility. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for a resident. This affected one (#286) of one resident reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and treatment for incontinence care and ensure hand washing was completed post care. This affected one (#34) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care. The facility identified there was 51 incontinent residents. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received required dental services to meet the residents dental needs. This affected one (#41) of two residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents meals do not include food identified as an allergy. This affected two (#21 and #42) of two residents reviewed for food allergies. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the facility's policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked. This had the potential to affect twenty-three of twenty-five residents who were independently mobile residing on the west hallway. The facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a resident's significant weight loss in a timely manner. This affected one (#35) of four residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility identified 10 residents with weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interviews, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident and review of the facility's abuse policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by not thoroughly investigating an allegation of abuse and reporting an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated. This affected one (#35) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered plan of care for a resident who received oxygen. This affected one (Resident #32) of eighteen residents reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, review of the facility's policy and staff interview, the facility failed to hold activities that met the needs of the residents residing on the memory care unit. This affected three (Resident #10, #11, and #63) of three residents reviewed for activities. This had the potential to affect all 11 residents residing on the memory care unit. The facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, interview with staff and resident and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision of a resident who had a history of smoking in the facility. This affected one (#6) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified eight residents who were independent smokers.
12 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 24, 2026, 5 on March 16, 2023, 5 on February 12, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.12 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.39 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.91 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.88 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.86 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.3% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 64.3% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.49 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.20 on weekdays and 2.91 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.25 in April to June 2025 to 3.12 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.12 | 0.39 | 3.20 | 2.91 | 0.0% | 1 of 90 | 85 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.22 | 0.42 | 3.34 | 2.92 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.25 | 0.46 | 3.36 | 2.96 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 84 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.25 | 0.44 | 3.37 | 2.96 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 81 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.8 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.4 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.4 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.4 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Wright Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (59.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
59.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 90 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 93 eligible stays.
7.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 49 eligible stays.
59.1% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
1.4% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
95.5% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WRIGHT REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Crown Healthcare Group, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mrs Family Trust | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 09/20/2018 | |
| Crown Ohio Holdco Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/09/2021 | |
| Fejcc Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/20/2018 | |
| Mdatas Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/20/2018 | |
| Mrs Family Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/20/2018 | |
| Shkop, Benjamin | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/20/2018 | |
| Singer, Meir | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/20/2018 | |
| Weintraub, Moshe | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/20/2018 | |
| Capital Finance LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 09/20/2018 | |
| Weintraub, Moshe | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/20/2018 | |
| Singer, Meir | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/05/2018 | |
| Capital Finance LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/20/2018 | |
| Daubenmire, Kevin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/20/2018 | |
| McGee, Evelyn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/12/2022 | |
| Venkatesh, Latha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2021 | |
| Mrs Family Trust | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 09/20/2018 | |
| Singer, Meir | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 09/20/2018 | |
| Fejcc Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/20/2018 | |
| Mdatas Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/20/2018 | |
| Mrs Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/20/2018 | |
| Daubenmire, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/20/2018 | |
| McGee, Evelyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/12/2022 | |
| Venkatesh, Latha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2021 | |
| Weintraub, Moshe | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/20/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.