Home / West Virginia / New Richmond
236 Warrior Way, New Richmond, WV 24867 · Wyoming County · (304) 294-7586
60 certified beds, about 56 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 515164 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 19, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the West Virginia average is 11.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 32 health citations since September 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $268,733 in the last three years; the largest was $268,733, and the latest is dated March 27, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.78 hours per resident per day, against 3.67 across West Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.91 of those hours.
29.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (West Virginia average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Communicare Health, an affiliated group of 110 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 32 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for Residents #5, #19, and #39, and failed to include required 1:1 visit interventions in the care plan for Resident #23, this was found true for four (4) of 17 care plans reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #5, #19, #39 and #23 Facility Census: 56Findings include:a) Residents #5, #19, #39During record review on 11/18/25 of residents #5, #19, #39 person centered care plan revealed all three (3) residents had the same Focus statement which read as follows; Resident is self-directed for activities in and out of the room daily, and Resident is dependent on staff for activities, cognitive stimulation or social interaction. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #57's Minimum Data Set was accurate in the area of dental status. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: 57. Facility Census: 56.
Inspectors wroteBased upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate diagnoses on the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) in coordination with the Medical Diagnostic Screening (MDS). This was found to be true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed during the annual survey process. Resident identifier: #8. Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update the resident's care plan prior after completion of the quarterly assessment as required. At the time of the survey, the care plan for Resident #4 had a target date of 10/24/25 and had not been revised when the quarterly assessment was completed in early October 2025. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #4. Facility Census: 56Findings include:A review of Resident #4's medical record revealed a comprehensive care plan with 10/24/25 as the target date for all goals contained on the care plan. Further review showed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment had been completed in early October 2025. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that necessary hearing and/or vision aides and services were provided and maintained in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of hearing and vision. Resident #55 was never seen by the audiologist or optometrist in regards to hearing and vision impairments. The resident had a signed consent on file for the services but the facility failed to follow through and did not ensure the resident was evaluated for new glasses and hearing aides. Resident Identifier: #55. Facility Census: 56.
Inspectors wroteBased upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director responded to the Pharmacist's irregularities reported on the medication regimen review (MRR). This was found to be true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #6. Facility census: 56Findings included: (A) Medical Record Review Resident #6 had the following diagnoses in the medical record related to mental illness/neurological diseases: UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITHOUT BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCE, PSYCHOTIC DISTURBANCE, MOOD DISTURBANCE, AND ANXIETY 05/07/2025 During StayANXIETY DISORDER, UNSPECIFIED 04/28/2024 During StayMAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, RECURRENT, MILD 04/23/2024 Present on admission The resident had the following medication orders: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical, sexual, and verbal abuse. Multiple incidents took place in which Resident #213 inappropriately touched and verbally and physically assaulted other residents. The facility failed to properly document, investigate, or report these incidents of abuse. The facility was unable to identify any victims of the abuse due to the failure to properly document and investigate each incident of abuse. Resident identifier: 213. Facility census: 55. The state agency (SA) determined these failures caused the victims of Resident #213's abuse to suffer physical and psychosocial harm. Because the victims were unable to be identified, the reasonable person standard was applied. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to employ qualified dietary staff by failing to have each member of the dietary staff obtain food handlers cards before working in the dietary department. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner and maintain sanitary equipment. This had the ability to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to have the appropriate members of the quality assessment and assurance committee attend the quarterly meetings. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a clean homelike environment in the dining room. This was found during the observation of the lunch meal on 03/25/24 and has the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse from Resident #213 to other residents in the facility. This was true for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for allegations of abuse. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: 213. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a care plan for 1:1 visits, a diagnosis for Schizoaffective Disorder, Bed Rails, Wander Guard, Trauma and Dementia diagnosis, Fall Interventions, and Tube Feeding. This was true for eight (8) of 16 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: 36, 33, 7, 25, 48, 20, 213, and 31 Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner. Resident #162 was administered medication in the dining room on two (2) occasions and Resident #36 was taken to Bingo and the day lounge to watch television in a shirt soiled with tube feeding. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #36 and #162. Facility Census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to identify a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder on a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS). This was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for Resident #20. Resident identifier: #20. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for Resident #6, after the resident was diagnosed with a major mental disorder after admission to the facility. This was true for one (1) of 16 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifier: #6. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to add a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder for one (1) of (16) residents reviewed for the care area of pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) this failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents in facility. Resident identifier: #20. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to revise Resident #36's care plan when the use of a vest for positioning was discontinued. This was true for one (1) of 16 sampled residents. Resident Identifier: #36. Facility Census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to complete neurological assessments after a fall for Resident #213 and #31, failed to notify the physician of hyperglycemia results for Resident #8, and to administer medication per physician's order for Resident #49. This was true for four (4) out of four (4) residents reviewed for quality of care during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #213, #31, #8, #49. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, family interview, staff interview and record review the facility failed to provide toenail care to Resident #29. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #29. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident #31 did not have his fall interventions in place. The facility to failed to implement fall interventions for Resident #213 regarding his risk for elopement. This was true for two (2) of the 16 sampled residents. Resident identifiers: #31 and #213. Facility Census: 55. Findings Include: a) Resident #31 A review of Resident #31's medical record on 03/26/24 found a fall intervention of bed bolsters to the bed. An observation with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Registered Nurse #85 on 03/26/24 at 10:18 AM confirmed Resident #31's bed bolsters were not in place as directed by his care plan. b) Resident #213 At approximately 3:30 PM on 03/25/24, a review of the care plan for Resident #213 was conducted. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of the enteral feeding tube unless unavoidable. Resident Identifier: Resident #36. Facility Census: 55. Findings Include: a) Resident #36 An observation of medication administration for Resident #36 began on 03/27/24 beginning at 1:10 PM found Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN ) #35 was preparing medication for Resident #36. LPN #35 stated, I am giving medication to (Name of Resident #36) this is her noon and 2:00 PM medications. LPN #35 was asked to read each medication as she was pulling them from the medication cart. LPN #35 indicated she was giving the following medication: 1. Isosource 1.5 2. Haldol Tablet five (5) milligrams 3. Midodrine 10 milligrams 4. Norco 5-325 milligrams 5. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to properly assess Resident #213 for the use of bed rails. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for bed rails during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: 213. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #35 had the appropriate nurse competencies to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of the enteral feeding tube unless unavoidable. LPN #35 did not administer medications and or feedings to Resident #36 via the enteral tube in a correct manner. The facility was unable to show LPN #35's competencies and skills regarding feeding tube care was reviewed upon her hire to the facility in January of 2024. Resident identifier: #36. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in baseline behaviors immediately, for a resident with dementia. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for dementia care during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #213. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the facility's medication error rate was five (5) percent or less. The facility's medication error rate was 16.67 percent. Resident identifier: Resident #36. Facility census: 55.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete record for two (2) of 16 residents reviewed during the survey process. Residents #19 and #26 did not have an accurate and complete record. Resident #19's record had an incomplete transfer form. Resident #26's record was incomplete in Physician's Scope of Orders for Treatment (POST) form. Resident Identifiers: #19 and #26 . Facility Census: 55. Findings Include: a) Resident #19 On 03/26/24 at 11:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #26. The review found the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 03/15/24. However, the transfer form was reviewed, and the date was listed as 01/28/24. On 03/26/24 at 11:30 AM, the Administrator and the Corporate Registered Nurse (RN) #85 were notified and confirmed the transfer date on the transfer form was incorrect. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to offer an eligible resident the pneumococcal immunization for one (1) out of five (5) residents reviewed for immunizations. Resident identifier: #39. Facility census 57.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the ombudsman was notified of all residents' transfers to the hospital. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitlizations. Resident indentifier: #35. Facility census: 53.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately revise the comprehensive care plan for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of pressure ulcers. Resident identifier: #44. Facility census: 53.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to follow physician's orders for medication parameters and failed to perform neurological assessments according to professional standards of practice. This had the potential to affect one (1) of 15 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #35. Facility census: 53.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation for administration and dispensing of pain medication for Resident #46 and #55. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #46, and #55. Facility census: 53.
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on March 27, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 27, 2024 | Fine | $268,733 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.78 | 3.67 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.91 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.28 | 3.17 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.83 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.03 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 29.4% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 27.3% | 42.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.01 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.98 on weekdays and 3.28 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.87 in April to June 2025 to 3.78 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.78 | 0.91 | 3.98 | 3.28 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 56 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.83 | 0.83 | 4.00 | 3.38 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 56 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.96 | 0.79 | 4.18 | 3.40 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 55 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.87 | 0.76 | 4.09 | 3.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 53 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| West Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.67 | 3.75 | 3.08 | 3.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.66 | $17.05 to $18.47 | 9,390 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $26.61 | $23.71 to $29.47 | 6,050 |
| Registered nurses | $38.52 | $32.77 to $47.97 | 23,430 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.7 | 14.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.3 | 15.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 13.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.3 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.7 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Wyoming Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (37.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
37.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · West Virginia: 9 better, 28 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.
12.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · West Virginia: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 48 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · West Virginia: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.
65.4% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia1.2% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: West Virginia97.6% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WARRIOR LEASING CO LLC. CMS links this home to Communicare Health, a group of 110 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zenith Holdings Op Co., LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/14/2023 |
| C.r. Stoltz Family Investment Company Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| C.r. Stoltz Irrevocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Health Care Holdings, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| I. Rosedale Family Investment Company Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| I. Rosedale Irrevocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Marantz Wv Holdings, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| R.s. Wilheim Irrevocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Ronald S Wilheim 2012 Spousal Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Rosedale Family Investment Company, Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Rrw, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| S.l. Rosedale Irrevocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Wilheim Family Investment Company, Inc. | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Zenith Healthcare Holdings, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Stoltz, Charles | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Wilheim, Ronald | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Warrior Mgt Co., LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Foltz, Sherry | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Groves, Donna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Saval, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Odenthal, Richard | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 09/22/2025 | |
| C.r. Stoltz Family Investment Company Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| C.r. Stoltz Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Health Care Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| I. Rosedale Family Investment Company Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| I. Rosedale Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Marantz Wv Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| R.s. Wilheim Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Ronald S Wilheim 2012 Spousal Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Rosedale Family Investment Company, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Rrw, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| S.l. Rosedale Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Warrior Mgt Co., LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/24/2025 | |
| Wilheim Family Investment Company, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Zenith Healthcare Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2023 | |
| Foltz, Sherry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Saval, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/13/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in West Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.