500 Hickory Hollow Terrace, Antioch, TN 37013 · Davidson County · (615) 731-7130
110 certified beds, about 86 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 445170 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 2, 2023, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the Tennessee average is 4.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 28 health citations since April 2018, 10 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (5 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $132,760 in the last three years; the largest was $125,418, and the latest is dated October 9, 2025.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, behavioral hospital record review, medical record review, hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 of 4 (Resident #2) sampled residents reviewed. The facility failed to provide the necessary structure and processes to meet the care needs of Resident #2 when staff failed to effectively supervise and monitor for potential accident hazards, and provide a safe environment, which resulted in bodily injury. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a Behavioral Health Hospital where she had exhibited behaviors of eating non-food items which included items large enough to pose suffocation hazards. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, facility incident report review, staffing agency timeslip review, Metropolitan Police Department Public Record Request Response review, and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for allegations of sexual abuse for 1 of 4 (Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. On 3/6/2024, Resident #4 reported she was sexually assaulted by a man fitting the description of an agency employee working in the facility. Resident #4 reported the male entered her room, pulled his penis out, turned her over and stuck his penis in her rectum. The facility's failure to thoroughly investigate allegations of sexual abuse to determine if necessary actions were needed to ensure the protection of all residents from abuse resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for Resident #4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, employee file review, National Weather Service statistics review, Grievance Log review, Hospital documentation review, medical record review, police report review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment and provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 5 (Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed. Resident #3, a severely cognitively impaired resident with known exit seeking behaviors, who was incontinent and dependent for toileting hygiene and supervision for eating, left the facility through a window in his room. The facility was unaware Resident #3 was missing, alone and unattended from the facility for an undetermined length of time. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, facility camera footage review, weather website review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and ensure a safe and secure environment to prevent an incident of elopement for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #9 and Resident #174). Resident #9 had three elopments on 6/16/2023: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, facility document review, medical rcord review, observation, and interview, the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to reassess and monitor ongoing concerns and develop an effective QAPI program that recognized concerns related to exit seeking behavior, and failed to ensure systems and processes were in place and consistently followed by staff to prevent an elopement. Failure of the QAPI Committee to identify the root cause of an elopement, develop and implement new interventions to prevent further elopements, and ensure a safe environment for residents placed 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #9 and Resident #174) in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety service for 69 of 71 residents who received meal trays in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facilty failed to properly store nebulizer equipment for 2 of 7 (Resident #40 and #58) residents reviewed for nebulizer treatments and facility failed to demonstrate measures to minimize the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in building water systems. Failure to minimize the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens could potentially affect all residents residing in the facility. The census upon entrance was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, job description, record review, and interview the Infection Preventionist (IP) failed to demonstrate knowledge in implementing an effective infection control program when he failed to implement a process for surveillance of Influenza and Pneumococcal immunizations and failed to participate in monitoring of water management system. The failure of the IP to implement a process for an effective infection control program has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census upon entrance was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, job description review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide effective housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean, safe, and homelike environment in 23 of 41 (room [ROOM NUMBER], #105, #106, #107, #108, #109, #110, #111, #112, #113, #114, #115, #304, #305, #306, #307, #308, #309, #310, #311, #505, #510, #516) rooms reviewed. The facility's failure to provide effective housekeeping and maintenance services resulted in urine odors in rooms, rusty and dirty overbed tables and chair, desilvering of bathroom mirrors, peeling paint, holes in drywall, dried debris scattered on floors, and 2 wheelchairs with damaged arm rests.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop an individualized comprehensive care plan for 9 of 36 (Resident #15, #17, #23, #32, #53 #55, #65, #66, and #70) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to promote care that maintained a resident's dignity, respect, and quality of care when staff failed to provide a privacy bag for 1 of 5 (Resident #55) residents reviewed with indwelling urinary catheters.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, facility camera footage review, and interview, the nursing staff failed to inform the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator of 1 of 5 elopements (Elopement #1 for Resident #9) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medical record and health status remained private and confidential for 2 of 36 (Residents #15 and Resident #374) residents reviewed who had sensitive medical data, which had the potential to allow unauthorized individuals access to the residents' private health information.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice for transfer or discharge for 1 of 1 (Resident #53) residents reviewed for discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 of 36 (Resident #17 and #55) residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide nail care for 1 of 36 (Resident #55) residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, Quarterly Payroll Based Journal (PBJ), and interview the facility failed to report PBJ for Quarter 1 2023 (October 1 - December 31).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the resident council minutes, review of the 4 week cycle menu, review of the posted and cooks menus, observation, and interview, the facility dietary department failed to have a menu for therapeutic diets, failed to specify the portions to be served per food item on the menu, failed to provide a variety of food, and failed to follow the posted and/or the cooks menu for 1 of 3 meals observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the resident council minutes, review of the resident posted menu, observation and interview, the facility dietary department failed to serve palatable pureed textured meat for 1 of 3 meals observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, Physician Order, Nurse's Notes, Radiology Report and interview, the facility failed to notify the Medical Director/Attending Physician immediately after 1 fall by 12 residents (Resident #239) sampled/reviewed for falls. The facility's failure to notify the Physician in a timely manner resulted in prolonged pain to the Resident and HARM (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance resulted in a negative outcome that had compromised the resident's ability to maintain and/or reach his/her hightest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well-being as defined by an accurate and comprehensive resident assessment, plan of care and provision of services).
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, Nurse's Notes, Physician's Orders, review of facility investigation and interview, the facility failed to provide goods and services necessary to treat pain and provide prompt medical attention which resulted in a fracture for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #239) resulting in HARM (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance resulted in a negative outcome that had compromised the resident's ability to maintain and/or reach his/her hightest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well-being as defined by an accurate and comprehensive resident assessment, plan of care and provision of services). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to identify interventions on a baseline Care Plan for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #239) reviewed which resulted in a HARM (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance resulted in a negative outcome that had compromised the resident's ability to maintain and/or reach his/her hightest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well-being as defined by an accurate and comprehensive resident assessment, plan of care and provision of services) for the facility's failure to provide fall interventions to keep the Resident safe after identification as 'high' falls risk.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, Physician's Orders, Radiology Report, Nurse's Notes, facility investigation and interview, the facility failed to prevent an accident which resulted in a fracture for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #239) resulting in a HARM.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pain management post-fall with a fracture (HARM) after verbal complaints of pain for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #239) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation and interview the facility failed to serve milk and protein shakes at the appropriate temperature for consumption for 87 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate advanced directives (code status) in the electronic medical record for 1 of 42 sampled residents (Resident #86) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview the facility failed to accurately assess the use of insulin on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 42 sampled residents (Resident # 50) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications had a 14 day limitation or prescriber documentation with medical rationale for continuation for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #238 and Resident #239) reviewed.
32 fire safety citations on file: 19 on August 2, 2023, 11 on May 2, 2019, 2 on April 18, 2018.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 9, 2025 | Fine | $125,418 |
| October 10, 2023 | Fine | $7,342 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Tennessee | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | not reported | 3.80 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | not reported | 0.60 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | not reported | 3.31 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | not reported | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | not reported | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 48.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 43.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS note on this home's staffing data: This facility did not submit staffing data.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In April to June 2025, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.66 on weekdays and 2.80 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 16% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 6.0% nationally.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.42 | 0.45 | 3.66 | 2.80 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 75 |
| United States, Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.78 | 0.62 | 3.96 | 3.33 | 6.0% | 0.5% of days | |
| Tennessee, Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.78 | 0.56 | 3.99 | 3.25 | 4.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.09 to $19.66 | 27,040 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.31 | $23.64 to $30.12 | 20,830 |
| Registered nurses | $39.18 | $36.28 to $45.79 | 72,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Tennessee | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.8 | 14.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.2 | 17.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.4 | 16.9 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Antioch Tn Opco, LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Tennessee: 62 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 17 eligible stays.
11.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Tennessee: 1 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Tennessee: 2 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 10 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Tennessee58.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Tennessee0.8% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Tennessee1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Tennessee98.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ANTIOCH TN OPCO, LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antioch Tn Holdco LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Kenigsberg, Max | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Kenigsberg, Max | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Kenigsberg, Max | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Rehman, Faiza | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Santos, Armando | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Kenigsberg, Max | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Rehman, Faiza | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2025 | |
| Santos, Armando | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Tennessee. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.