Home / Indiana / Michigan City
1101 E Coolspring Ave, Michigan City, IN 46360 · La Porte County · (219) 874-5211
180 certified beds, about 119 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1974
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155156 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 9, 2025, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 67 health citations since November 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,543 in the last three years; the largest was $16,543, and the latest is dated April 1, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.42 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
49.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Aperion Care, an affiliated group of 33 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 67 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and treatment related to oxygen not administered as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were available and administered as ordered when residents complained of pain for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pain. (Residents B and D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain comfortable and home like environment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for environment. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate effective resident-specific interventions and provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement from the facility of a resident with a diagnosis of dementia, a history of exit-seeking behaviors and a wanderguard (door alarm bracelet) in place for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement risk. The resident exited the building without the knowledge of the staff working in the facility and was found the next day by the local police department and was taken to the hospital Emergency Room. (Resident B)The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE], when the facility was unaware that the resident had exited the facility without supervision. The resident walked independently and was found over 24 hours later by local police, and Emergency Services transported the resident to the hospital. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide treatments as ordered and did not complete a skin assessment upon readmission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents related to the removal of facial hair, dirty fingernails, and hair care for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility also failed to ensure a dependent resident received a sack lunch to take with him to dialysis for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Residents 5, 11, 6 and 7)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure follow up documentation after a fall was completed for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility also failed to ensure a treatment to a skin tear was completed as ordered, areas of bruising and skin lesions were assessed and monitored, and geri-sleeves and/or long sleeves were in use for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for skin conditions non-pressure related. The facility also failed to monitor and assess edema for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for edema. (Residents 6, 9, 70, 14, and 28)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented related to documentation of food consumption for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility also failed to ensure documentation was completed on the medication and treatment records as well as in the nursing progress notes related to medication administration and oxygen use for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen. There was also no discharge note completed for a resident who left the facility against medical advice (AMA) for 1 of 3 closed records reviewed. (Residents 59, 8, 74, 11, 12, and 123)
Inspectors wroteBased on random observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to the storage of urinals and wash basins for 3 of 4 units throughout the facility. The facility also failed to ensure the glucometer was disinfected correctly for 1 of 1 glucometer observed as well as nursing staff dispensing pills into their bare hand for 1 of 11 residents observed during medication administration. (Residents 59, 88, and 10, the 100, 200, and 300 units)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep the resident's environment clean and in good repair related to marred walls and door frames, dirty ceiling vents, walls, windows, and closet shelves, warped floor tile, missing paper towel covers, rusted toilet bolts and missing covers, stained toilets, and broken medication drawers on the medication carts for 3 of 4 units. (Units 100, 200, and 300)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's dignity was maintained related to not offering a resident a snack while others were eating around him and a resident's abdomen being exposed during an activity for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for dignity. (Residents 8 and 93)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to report allegations of resident-to-resident abuse to the State Agency for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. (Resident 117)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with hearing loss, was seen by an Audiologist for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for vision and hearing. (Resident 9)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall precautions were in place for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 9)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) were treated in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary tract infections. (Resident 8)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care related to following physician's orders for oxygen administration, and the lack of pre and post nebulizer assessments for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 127 and 14)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received routine dental services and a denture follow up appointment had been completed for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dental services. (Residents 5 and 9)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident's family or representative was notified of changes related to a dislodged gastrostomy tube (g-tube; a tube inserted through the skin into the stomach to provide nutrition and mediations) and antibiotic orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for g-tubes. (Resident C)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and treatment related to antibiotics not given as ordered, wound treatments not provided as ordered and incomplete wound assessments for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for infections. (Residents C, B and D)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for a dependent resident related to lack of showers provided twice a week for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment was completed as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels for 27 of 27 residents who resided on the memory care unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed ensure only licensed qualified persons poured, prepared, and passed medications for 5 memory care residents on the midnight shift. (Residents 14, 60, 86, 87, and 90)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions related to touching toast with bare hands and transporting uncovered food down the hallway for 1 of 4 units. (The Memory Care Unit). This had the potential to affect 27 of 27 residents residing on the unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were documented and attempted prior to administering a PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety medication for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents 89 and 91)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an ongoing activity program was implemented for cognitively impaired and dependent residents for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities. (Resident 44)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment was completed as ordered for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Resident 48)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate treatment was completed for a resident with an existing pressure ulcer for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 91)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a limited range of motion had a physician-ordered splint in place for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Residents 21 and 5)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents in the memory care unit were supervised during meals for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for supervision. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen and flow rate was documented per titration and oxygen was on at the correct flow rate for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Residents 23 and 322)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly and not expired for 2 of 5 medication carts observed. (100 Unit Cart 1 and 400 Unit Odd Cart)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to the disposal of used lancets into the garbage can for 1 of 1 glucometer (machine used to test blood sugar levels) testing observed and the placement of clean treatment materials on dirty tables for 2 of 5 treatments observed. (Residents 18, 48 and 317)
Inspectors wrote3. The record for Resident T was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:11 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia without behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, and stress incontinence. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was cognitively impaired for daily decision making. She required partial to moderate assistance with rolling left and right in bed and had one Stage 2 (a partial thickness loss of skin) pressure ulcer, one Stage 4 (damage through all layers of the skin) pressure area, and one Unstageable (full thickness tissue loss that is covered by necrotic tissue) pressure ulcer. A Care Plan, dated [DATE], indicated the resident had a pressure ulcer to her right and left hip and right knee related to history of ulcers, immobility, and progression of disease process. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents related to greasy hair, incontinence care, providing assistance in getting out of bed, facial hair, dirty fingernails, assistance with turning and repositioning, and assistance with dressing for 7 of 9 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents Q, P, G, C, F, H, and R)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed as ordered and bruises were assessed and monitored for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions, medications were signed out as ordered for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, signs and symptoms of constipation were addressed for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for constipation, and assessments were documented prior to being discharged to the hospital for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization. (Residents Q, G, F, D, B, M, N, and R)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored in clean, sanitary conditions for 4 of 4 medication carts observed (Even Cart for 400 hall, Cart 1 for 200 hall, Odd Cart for 400 hall, and Cart 1 for 300 hall) and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed (200 hall).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had snacks available for 8 of 8 residents who attended the Resident Council meeting. (Residents 8, 13, 29, 39, 52, 63, 109 and 110) This had the potential to affect all residents who were able to request and receive oral snacks.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to having no personal protective equipment (PPE) in enhanced barrier precaution rooms, staff failing to perform hand hygiene after glove removal, using gloved hands to apply ointment for 1 of 10 pressure ulcer treatments observed, not cleaning multi-use equipment, soiled washcloth used during bathing to clean urinary catheter tubing and a gastrostomy tube site, and staff failing to remove soiled PPE during a treatment during random infection control observations. (Residents K, C, H, and U)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's dignity was maintained related to wearing a hospital gown while in bed during the day and a personal care sign posted above the bed for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity. (Residents P and F)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to participate in his care related to not being able to receive medications during their scheduled time window for 1 of 8 residents observed for medication administration. (Resident L)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer medications and had Physician's Orders for the medications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 60)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to file a grievance form, thoroughly investigate, and resolve grievances for missing personal items that were reported to staff for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for grievances. (Resident S)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was invited to attend and participate in care planning conferences for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for participation in care planning. (Resident U)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall precautions were in place to prevent injury from a fall for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident J)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food consumption logs were completed for a resident with a history of weight loss for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 3)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's peg tube (a tube inserted directly into the stomach for nutrition) was monitored, assessed and being cleaned as ordered for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for tube feeding. (Residents C and H)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' pain medications were available for administration for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pain. (Residents K and 101)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as ordered to prevent significant medication errors for 1 of 8 residents observed for medication administration. (Resident L)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) assistance to dependant residents related to bathing, incontinence care, nail care, oral care, and dressing for 5 of 7 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Residents B, E, C, D, and F)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered as ordered by the Physician, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospice. (Residents D and E)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and/or maintain a system that accounted for, periodically reconciled, and ensured the disposition of all controlled drugs, related to incomplete and inaccurate documentation of narcotic medications, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospice. (Resident E)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medical record was complete and accurately documented, related to a resident death, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospice. (Resident E)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse, related to a physical altercation by a resident with a history of aggression towards others, which resulted in physical contact with two residents, and was witnessed by another resident. (Residents D, E, and S)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to residents in the designated smoking area, which resulted in resident to resident physical altercations involving 3 residents. (Residents C, D, and E)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure gastrostomy tubes (g-tubes/ feeding tubes) were cleaned at the insertion site as ordered by the Physician, for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for g-tubes. (Residents B and M)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was sanitary and comfortable, related to dirty bathrooms, broken and chipped toilets, dirty walls, debris on the floor, unsanitary storing of personal use items, holes in the walls, unmade beds, a dirty fan, over the bed table veneer loose and coming off, flooring coming up in the bathroom, and tears on the wheelchair arms for 11 of 24 rooms observed on 4 of 4 units (100, 200, 300, and 400)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was thoroughly assessed for self-administration of insulin and received a Physician's Order that the resident was appropriate for self-administration for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medications. (Resident S)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a Physician for a follow up consult/appointment as ordered and failed to notify a resident's responsible party in a timely manner about skin tear injuries for 2 of 13 residents reviewed for Physician notification. (Residents B and M)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure injuries to residents were thoroughly investigated for the cause of the injury to rule out potential abuse for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for injuries and abuse. (Residents M and L)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure individualized Care Plans were developed and implemented related to behaviors and self-administration of medications, for 3 of 13 residents reviewed for care plan development and implementation. (Residents M, Q, and S)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required set up assistance with eating was assisted with his supper meal for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for meal assistance. (Resident Q)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent for dietary and fluid intake was assisted with the evening meal and was fed slowly and in an enjoyable manner, for 1 of 2 dependent residents observed during meal times. (Resident H)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to a resident during a transfer related to a mechanical lift transfer (Resident H). The facility also failed to ensure a Care Planned intervention was in place to prevent injury to the skin related to geri-sleeves (skin protector) for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for injuries and assistive devices. (Resident L)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who had a Physician's Order for a dietary supplement to assist with caloric and protein needs, received the supplement as ordered for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutritional status. (Resident Q)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to manage medications appropriately, related to missing medication doses, not administering or ensuring insulin was administered, and blood sugar monitoring not completed as ordered for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident S)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications related to a lack of a GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) for anti-anxiety and antidepressant medications completed for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents B and H)
12 fire safety citations on file: 6 on December 9, 2025, 3 on June 3, 2025, 2 on December 13, 2024, 1 on January 24, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2026 | Fine | $16,543 |
| December 13, 2024 | Payment Denial | 24 days from January 7, 2025 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.42 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.94 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.00 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.91 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 49.6% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.10 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.62 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.48 in April to June 2025 to 3.42 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.42 | 0.52 | 3.62 | 2.94 | 1.2% | 0 of 90 | 119 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.42 | 0.50 | 3.59 | 2.99 | 3.7% | 0 of 92 | 119 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.28 | 0.39 | 3.49 | 2.76 | 2.8% | 0 of 92 | 122 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.48 | 0.50 | 3.69 | 2.94 | 8.5% | 0 of 91 | 116 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.5 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.4 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.7 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.5 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Aperion Care Arbors Michigan City's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 135 eligible stays.
14.8% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 159 eligible stays.
8.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 91 eligible stays.
56.3% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 122 residents counted.
4.7% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 122 residents counted.
98.5% this home
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MAJOR HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Aperion Care, a group of 33 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aperion Indiana Investor Group, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 16% | 08/01/2012 |
| Battery Arbors, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 14% | 08/01/2012 |
| Aperion Care Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2012 | |
| Major Hospital | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2013 | |
| The Arbors Operator LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2012 | |
| Ahmed, Umair | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Claxton, Ryan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/27/2025 | |
| Livers, Dorothy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Smith, Todd | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Berkowitz, David | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/15/2025 | |
| Meystel, Yosef | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/15/2025 | |
| Aperion Care Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/15/2025 | |
| Aperion Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2012 | |
| Curis Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2012 | |
| The Arbors Operator LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/15/2025 | |
| Ahmed, Umair | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Attinger, Jeffery | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Claxton, Ryan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/27/2025 | |
| Livers, Dorothy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Smith, Todd | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2012 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2012 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.