555 West Kahler, Wilmington, IL 60481 · Will County · (815) 476-2200
171 certified beds, about 161 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145316 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 18, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 50 health citations since January 2023, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $153,859 in the last three years; the largest was $101,742, and the latest is dated February 14, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.15 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.
43.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Aperion Care, an affiliated group of 33 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 50 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by another resident. This applies to 4 residents (R1, R2, R3 and R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse. This applies to 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for abuse investigations in a sample of 5 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from verbal and physical abuse by a resident who frequently demonstrated verbal and physical abuse to others in the facility. This applies to 4 of 6 residents (R20, R37, R93, R145) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 33. A reasonable person would feel targeted, paranoid, and not safe based on R133's behaviors and physical abuse to other residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident. This applies to 1 resident (R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 3 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a resident to resident abuse allegation to the state surveying agency and to the police. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R1,R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 3 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents have a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable restroom environment. This applies to 18 of 18 residents (R3, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24) reviewed for restroom environment in sample of 24.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident-to-resident physical abuse. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an accurate allegation of abuse to the state surveying agency in a timely manner. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and investigate an allegation of resident-to-resident physical abuse. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify law enforcement and the state surveying agency of the attempted diversion of narcotic medications. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R7 and R8) reviewed for control of narcotic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to securely store controlled substances in the medication room. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R7 and R8) reviewed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and report an allegation of abuse. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the state surveying agency and the police within required timeframes. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse allegations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by failing to timely investigate an allegation of abuse and suspend the alleged perpetrator. This applies to 1 resident (R1) reviewed for abuse allegations in a sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired resident who is at risk for abuse (R1) from being physically and emotionally abused by another resident (R2). The facility also failed to develop interventions to address the potential for abuse for two of three residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 4. This failure resulted in R2 physically slapping R1 on the face, scratching R1's upper body, and biting R1's hand, which caused R1 to experience emotional distress.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This applies to 163 residents in the facility receiving dietary services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall risk precautions for residents at risk for falls. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R3, R15, R21, R48, and R117) reviewed for accidents and supervision in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store resident medications. This applies to 4 residents (R37, R61, R103, and R137) reviewed for medication storage in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives written notification of the reason for transfer to the hospital. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R57, R93, and R113) reviewed for discharge in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or their representative of the facility's policy for bed hold in writing. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R113) reviewed for discharge in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent decline and decrease in ROM (Range of Motion). This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R107) reviewed for range of motion in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide catheter care in a sanitary manner, failed to utilize an indwelling catheter securing device, and failed to keep the indwelling catheter bag off the floor. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R65 and 123) reviewed for catheter care in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were available for administration. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R134, R101) reviewed for pharmacy services in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the minimum 12 hour per year competency training requirements of CNAs (Certified Nurse Assistants). This applies to all residents that receive care and assistance from CNAs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the grievance policy to residents. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R83, R101, R134, and R130) reviewed for grievances in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. This failure resulted in R1 being bitten by R2, causing bleeding, hospital transfer, and antibiotic therapy for injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to adequately maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to help prevent and control the transmission of a highly contagious communicable disease, the norovirus. This failure has the potential to affect all 165 residents that currently reside at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and insert an indwelling catheter utilizing the smallest size catheter as ordered by the physician. This applies to 1 of 3 resident (R1) reviewed for indwelling catheters in a sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored, distributed, and served to residents in a manner to prevent food contamination. The facility failed to have a system in place for sanitizing dishware and food service equipment during the renovations of the kitchen. This failure resulted in the local health department revoking the facility's permit to prepare food on site and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. This has the potential to affect all 161 residents that consume food from the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to timely complete a physician order for an X-Ray for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with personal hygiene. This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R12, R46, R51 and R120) reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living) in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that it was free of tripping hazard in a common area of the facility. This applies to 35 of 35 residents (R6, R12, R14, R15, R23, R27, R34, R37, R42, R50, R54, R55, R56, R57, R70, R74, R75, R78, R79, R82, R85, R88, R92, R94, R98, R101, R112, R114, R115, R143, R152, R156, R158, R162, and R164) reviewed for falls. The Findings Include: On March 26, 2024 at 12:05pm, there was a difference in height of 1½ inches between the concrete slab immediately outside the front door and the next slab, approximately 6 feet from the front door to the facility. All persons coming into the front door must navigate this uneven pathway. On March 26, 2024, R143 stated he tripped on the uneven concrete outside the front door to the facility on March 22, 2024 and on one time before. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order for medication administration. There were 25 medication opportunities with 6 errors resulting to 24% medication error rate. This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R88, R110, R120 and R127) observed during medication administration in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the nutritive value was maintained during preparation of pureed diet. This applies to 10 of 10 residents (R56, R69, R71, R83, R100, R129, R131, R132, R133, R140) reviewed for pureed diet in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve lunch meal as in accordance with their schedule meal service times. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R93, R115, R124 and R156) review for mealtime preference in the sample of 34. The Findings Include: 1. R124 had multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, based on the face sheet. R124's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated 3/13/2024 showed that the resident was cognitively intact and required set up assistance with eating. On March 25, 2024 at 10:31 AM, R124 was in his room, alert, oriented and verbally responsive. R124 stated the facility's lunch service is slow and that he had to wait for a long time for his meals. On March 25, 2024 at 1:05 PM, R124 was served his lunch meal inside the main dining room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident that was NPO (Nothing by Mouth) was not left in the dining room during meal service and failed to ensure that a resident was clothed adequately during dining. This applies to 2 of 4 (R52 and R64) residents reviewed for dignity in the sample of 34. The Findings Include: 1. R52's face sheet included diagnoses of gastrostomy, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination and anoxic brain damage. R52's admission MDS (minimum data set) showed that R52 was moderately impaired with cognition and required maximum assistance from the staff with mobility and transfers. On March 25, 2024 at 12:20 PM, R52 was seated in the dining room at a table with R18 who was eating her lunch. R52 was receiving tube feeding from a container that was hung on a pole and covered with a cloth. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was safe to keep and administer his own medications. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R127) reviewed for medication pass/administration in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the urinary catheter tubing was off the floor. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R107) reviewed for urinary catheter in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify the diagnosis and specific behaviors for the use of antipsychotic medication. In addition, the facility also failed to attempt gradual dose reduction (GDR) for a resident on psychotropic medication. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R73, R90) reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribe physician's order for an anticoagulant medication. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R27) reviewed for anticoagulant medications in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements as ordered by the Physician. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R11, R86 and R140) observed during dining in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices with regards to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of incontinence care and blood glucose level check. This applies to 3 of 34 residents (R38, R90, R105) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R2) was free from abuse. This failure resulted in R2 being physically abused by V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) on 11/2/23; R2 complaining of leg pain and limping on 11/5/23; a new order for morphine sulfate every six hours for pain being placed on 11/6/23; and R2 using a wheelchair for leg pain relief.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report to the abuse coordinator an allegation of physical abuse to a resident (R2). This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify an infectious outbreak, implement measures to prevent the spread of this infectious outbreak, and failed to have an infection control program in place to monitor and track infectious diseases at the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 166 residents residing at the facility. The Facility Data Sheet dated 8/29/2023 documents 166 residents reside at the facility. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/11/2023 at 12:37 PM after R1 tested positive for scabies and the facility failed to implement measures to prevent the spread. The Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 9/7/23. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 9/7/23 at 9am. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive meals in a timely manner and at the required temperatures that affect palatability. This applies to R12, R76, R140, R144 and 73 of 78 residents reviewed for temperatures and timeliness of food delivery in the sample of 34
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program to prevent house flies and gnats in resident rooms and facility hallways. This applies to all 154 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment by failing to repair headboards and doors in residents rooms. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R25, R69, R99, and R454) reviewed for safe environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, The facility failed to provide monthly drug regimen review for 1 resident (R11) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 34. On 01/19/23 at 01:28 PM a record review of R11 showed that she is a [AGE] year old female with impaired cognition (12/5/22 Minimum Data Set), and diagnoses including delusional disorders, major depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, essential hypertension, arteriosclerotic heart disease, long term use of anticoagulants, personal history of diseases of the circulatory system, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, The facility failed to maintain infection control practices while providing care to 3 residents (R108, R454 and R126) who were reviewed for infection control in a sample of 34. 1. R454 is an [AGE] year-old female with severe cognitive impairment per MDS dated [DATE]. Record review on wound assessment dated [DATE] documented a stage 4 (4.14 x 2.82 x 1.2 centimeter) sacral wound. On 1/17/23 at 12:41 PM, the surveyor observed V3 (Registered Nurse) providing wound care to R454's sacral wound. V3 removed the soiled dressing with drainage, cleaned the wound with wound cleanser and patted the wound dry. V3 did not wash hands or sanitize his hands after removing the old dressing with drainage. [...]
2 fire safety citations on file: 1 on April 18, 2025, 1 on March 28, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 14, 2025 | Fine | $21,453 |
| September 9, 2024 | Fine | $30,664 |
| November 21, 2023 | Fine | $101,742 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.15 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.46 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 1.94 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.26 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.43 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.3% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 52.0% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.20 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.23 on weekdays and 1.94 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.07 in April to June 2025 to 2.15 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.15 | 0.46 | 2.23 | 1.94 | 3.1% | 0 of 90 | 161 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.13 | 0.47 | 2.24 | 1.84 | 1.3% | 0 of 92 | 165 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.18 | 0.53 | 2.34 | 1.78 | 1.4% | 0 of 92 | 164 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.07 | 0.56 | 2.20 | 1.73 | 10.1% | 0 of 91 | 165 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 71.8 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.9 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.0 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Aperion Care Wilmington's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 20 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 39 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 15 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
3.3% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ISLAND CITY REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Aperion Care, a group of 33 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Rajchenbach Family Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 17% | 09/01/2013 |
| Frederick S Frankel Trust | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Frank, Maria | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Jude, Jodie | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Aperion Care Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| Aladin, Mustafa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Frank, Maria | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Hardaman, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Berkowitz, David | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/17/2026 | |
| Frankel, Frederick | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/03/2025 | |
| Meystel, Yosef | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/17/2026 | |
| Rajchenbach, Chaim | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/17/2026 | |
| Rajchenbach, Moshe | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/03/2025 | |
| 555 W Kahler, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/31/2025 | |
| Aci Equities, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| Aperion Care Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/16/2025 | |
| Aperion Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| Curis Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| David a. Berkowitz Revocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| Declaration of Trust of Yosef Meystel | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| The Rajchenbach Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| Aladin, Mustafa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Frank, Maria | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Hardaman, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Jude, Jodie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Lipshitz, Rita | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2013 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2013 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.