How many deficiencies did Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?

6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 29, 2026. The Florida average is 7.1.

Has Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center?

CMS lists 16 owners and managers, and links the home to Ventura Services. Legal business name: APOPKA OPCO LLC.

Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center: Inspections

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 29, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

None of its 23 health citations since April 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.58 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.62 of those hours.

48.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).

CMS links it to Ventura Services, an affiliated group of 14 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

504/22

1104/24

701/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

19D

Potential for minimal harm

January 29, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations

E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions during dishwashing operations when the dishwasher was malfunctioning; and failed to ensure hot food was served at safe temperatures.
D

Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify resident guardian of missing dentures for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dental, of a total sample of 56 residents, (# 139).
D

Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.

F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely complete Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment, of a total of 56 residents, (#77, #162).
D

Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.

F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely complete Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment, of a total of 56 residents, (#2, #127, #142, #151).
D

PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities

F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a positive Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level I who required a level II, was evaluated for required specialized services for 1 of 1 residents (#82) reviewed for mood and behavior out of a total sample of 56 residents.
D

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders and according to professional standards of practice for 1 of 56 residents reviewed for medication administration, (#71).
D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing high contact care to a resident per enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), for one of seven residents reviewed for infection control, of a total sample of 56 residents, (#194).

April 5, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations

E

Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the notice for transfer/discharge to the hospital was sent to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization, of a total sample of 48 residents, (#136).
E

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate pertaining to splint application for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Range of Motion (ROM)/Mobility, (#66), and failed to ensure medical records were accurate, and systematically organized for 1 resident (#136), of a total sample of 48 residents.
D

Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote the right to self-administer medication for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for choices, out of a total sample of 48 residents, (#87 and #161).
D

Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor resident's rights to choose their preferred shower days and time for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for choices, of a total sample of 48 residents (#21).
D

Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's wishes for a Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNRO) were honored for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospice, of a total sample of 48 residents (#151) .
D

Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment within the required timeframe of 14 days for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for Hospice services, of a total sample of 48 residents, (#151).
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered plan of care for end-of-life care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Hospice, of a total sample of 48 residents, (#151).
D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) related to bathing, skin care, and shaving for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs, out of a total sample of 48 residents, (#134 and #87).
D

Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a right-hand resting splint was applied per physician order and the resident's plan of care, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for range of motion/mobility, of a total sample of 48 residents, (#66).
D

Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.

F694 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services for an intravenous (IV) access site according to professional standards of practice to prevent infection for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for IVs, of a total sample of 48 residents, (#18).
D

Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.

F660 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective discharge planning process to prevent a delay in provision of necessary care and services after discharge from the facility for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for discharge planning, out of a total sample of 48 residents, (#166).

April 28, 2022Standard inspection · 5 citations

E

Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for medication administration and failed to provide an explanation for medications not administered for 7 of 11 residents reviewed for medication administration of a total sample of 47 residents, (#57, #54, #46, #521, #60, #109, #520).
D

Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after a fall with major injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents of a total sample of 47 residents, (#106).
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected health conditions regarding weight loss for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (#88) and failed to accurately assess antipsychotic drug use on a routine basis for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, (#51) of a total sample of 47 residents.
D

Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an on-going activity program for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities, of a total sample of 47 residents, (#516).
D

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent medication errors greater than 5 per cent for 1 of 4 residents sampled for medication administration, (#26). There were 3 errors in 26 opportunities on 1 of 2 units by 1 of 4 nurses observed, for a medication error rate of 11.54%.

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 3 on January 29, 2026.

Every fire safety citation3 citations

F
Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).

E 4 · January 29, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · January 29, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.

K 911 · January 29, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Florida	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	3.58	3.82	3.86
Registered nurses	0.62	0.73	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.30	3.49	3.42
Nurse aides	2.11
Licensed practical nurses	0.85
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	48.2%	41.4%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	50.0%	46.0%	42.9%
Administrators who left	1

CMS expects 3.91 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.69 on weekdays and 3.30 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.90 in April to June 2025 to 3.58 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	3.58	0.62	3.69	3.30	0.0%	0 of 90	170
Oct to Dec 2025	3.79	0.61	3.92	3.44	0.0%	0 of 92	162
Jul to Sep 2025	3.77	0.66	3.93	3.35	0.0%	0 of 92	158
Apr to Jun 2025	3.90	0.50	4.07	3.47	0.0%	0 of 91	156
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Florida, Jan to Mar 2026	3.76	0.70	3.90	3.44	1.1%	0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Florida

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Florida, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$18.03	$17.33 to $20.34	96,960
LPNs and LVNs	$29.70	$28.14 to $31.11	38,620
Registered nurses	$40.48	$37.82 to $48.64	229,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Florida	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.0	8.7	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.3	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.7	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.6	2.5	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.9	1.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.9	9.5	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.2	4.5	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.9	8.6	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	28.8	26.1	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	10.5	9.1	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	2.4	2.1	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.4	1.1	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

51.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 172 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 207 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

9.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 147 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

52.5% this home

Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 139 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 200 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

3.0% this home

Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 200 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

97.4% this home

Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 77 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: APOPKA OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Ventura Services, a group of 14 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Apopka Holdco LLC	Direct ownership interest	Organization	10/01/2024
Apopka Opco Investco LLC	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	10/01/2024
Apopka Ventura Opco Investco LLC	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	10/01/2024
Copper Fl Trust II	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	07/19/2024
Gold Fl Trust II	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	07/19/2024
Philipson Family Limited Liability Company, LLC	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	10/01/2024
Silver Fl Trust II	Indirect ownership interest	Organization	07/19/2024
Bengio, Jacob	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	10/01/2024
Paritzky, Jeremie	Indirect ownership interest	Individual	10/01/2024
Agard, Tanya	Managing control - governing body	Individual	10/01/2024
Stoutjesdijk, Wendy	Managing control - governing body	Individual	10/01/2024
Agard, Tanya	Operational/managerial control	Individual	10/01/2024
Bengio, Jacob	Operational/managerial control	Individual	10/01/2024
Agard, Tanya	Adp of the SNF	Individual	10/01/2024
Paritzky, Jeremie	Adp of the SNF	Individual	10/01/2024
Stoutjesdijk, Wendy	Adp of the SNF	Individual	10/01/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on January 29, 2026: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 29, 2026: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 5, 2024: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 28, 2022: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.30 hours per resident per day, below the Florida average of 3.49.
How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Solaris Healthcare Apopka
Apopka, 3.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 4 citations
Solaris Healthcare Forest Lake
Apopka, 5.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 7 citations
Health Central Park
Winter Garden, 5.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 20 citations
Lake Bennet Center for Rehabilitation & Healing
Ocoee, 6.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 16 citations
Vivo Healthcare West Orange
Ocoee, 6.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 17 citations
Winter Garden Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Winter Garden, 6.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 24 citations
Orlando Health Center for Rehabilitation
Ocoee, 6.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 9 citations
Harborview Health Center West Altamonte
Altamonte Springs, 6.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 19 citations

Florida contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, Long Term Care Services Unit, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Florida Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-888-831-0404. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: FloridaHealthFinder, where Florida publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?: 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 29, 2026. The Florida average is 7.1.
Has Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Apopka Health and Rehabilitation Center?: CMS lists 16 owners and managers, and links the home to Ventura Services. Legal business name: APOPKA OPCO LLC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.