190 East Queenwood Road, Morton, IL 61550 · Tazewell County · (309) 266-9741
106 certified beds, about 80 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1973
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145248 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 20, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 57 health citations since December 2022, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 6 fines totaling $326,818 in the last three years; the largest was $152,589, and the latest is dated January 6, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.81 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.32 of those hours.
54.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Aperion Care, an affiliated group of 33 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 57 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer care as ordered for three of three residents (R5, R6, and R7) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of seven.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a full-time qualified Director of Nursing. This failure has the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to answer and follow up with call lights in a timely manner for three of three residents (R3, R4, and R5) in a sample of six.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement isolation precautions for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for infection control in a sample of six.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that sufficient staff was available to meet the needs of residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 77 residents currently residing at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure fresh ice water is passed to residents three times per day per facility policy. This failure has the potential to affect all 77 residents residing within the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical and verbal abuse for three of four residents (R3, R4, and R6) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 12.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to employee a full-time Director of Nursing. This failure has the potential to affect all 78 Residents residing in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions while providing indwelling urinary catheter care for one of three Residents (R7) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter care. This failure has the potential to affect 22 additional Residents residing in the Facility (R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R20, R31, R32, R44, R34) and failed to maintain a sanitary homelike environment for two of eight Residents (R11 and R12) reviewed for physical environment in a sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide showers at least weekly for residents and failed to provide incontinence cares forcing residents to sit in their own urine and feces for long periods of time for five out of six residents (R5, R7, R8, R12, and R13) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 21. This failure resulted in R5, R7, and R13 experiencing pain/discomfort and developing psychosocial harm leaving them to feel degraded, angry, and helpless. Findings Include:The Resident Rights policy revised 08/2017 documents Purpose: To promote the exercise of rights for each resident, including any who face barriers (such as communication problems, hearing problems and cognition limits) in the exercise of these rights. A resident, even though determined to be incompetent, should be able to assert these rights based on his or her degree of capability. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide enough food at meals for all residents to receive the meal listed on the menu, provide enough food to allow staff to cook residents the assigned menu, and answer call lights timely for eight of eight residents reviewed for dietary needs and call lights (R5, R6, R7, R8, R12, R13, R14, and R15) in a sample of 21. This failure has the potential to affect all 83 residents who reside at the facility. Findings Include: The facility's Midnight Census Report dated 12/29/2025 documents 83 residents reside at the facility. The Resident Rights policy revised 08/2017 documents Purpose: To promote the exercise of rights for each resident, including any who face barriers (such as communication problems, hearing problems and cognition limits) in the exercise of these rights. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all resident rooms were cleaned daily and trash was taken out daily for three of three residents (R2, R5, and R7) reviewed for housekeeping in the sample of 21. These failures have the potential to affect all 83 residents who reside in the facility. Findings Include: The facility's Midnight Census Report dated 12/29/2025 documents 83 residents reside at the facility. The Housekeeper Job Description revised 07/2023 documents Summary: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have enough staff to answer call lights, provide showers, provide incontinent care, clean residents' rooms daily, and prevent falls. The facility also failed to accurately report the number of staff that worked on the daily staffing report and failed to update the Facility Assessment Tool with the number of staff needed. This has the potential to affect all 83 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent falls, investigate one fall, notify the Physician and Residents Representative of two falls, and failed to put interventions in place for two falls for one resident (R19) of five residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions/EBP or perform hand hygiene during indwelling urinary catheter care for 1 resident (R9) of 3 residents reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to document all complaints and/or concerns voiced in resident council meeting. This failure has the potential to affect all 82 residents that currently reside in the facility. Findings Include:The Facility's Resident Council policy dated 02/2025 documents The purpose of the Resident Council is to allow the residents the opportunity to express their thoughts and ideas in a safe and confidential manor. Additionally, the council serves to promote improvement and control concerning the quality of life at the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff were available to meet the needs of residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement adequate housekeeping services to keep the facility clean and free of odors. These failures have the potential to affect all 85 residents residing within the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly provide medical care for a resident promptly after a decline in condition for one of five residents (R2) reviewed for change in condition in a sample of nine.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve food that was visually appealing and palatable to residents. This failure has the potential to affect 78 residents in the facility who are prescribed oral intake.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two large trash dumpsters are secured from pest and rodents, in that the lids of the trash dumpsters were not closed. This failure has the potential to affect all 80 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) and/or Level II Resident Reviews for three residents (R17, R32, R60) of six residents reviewed for diagnosed mental illness in the sample of 18.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the appropriate state mental health/intellectual disability authorities for newly diagnosed mental illness for two residents (R17, R60) of six residents reviewed for mental illness in the sample of 18.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to maintain intact right inner thigh and left inner ankle wound dressings for one Resident (R12) of 18 Residents reviewed for skin conditions in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an appropriate indication for use of antipsychotic medication for one of five (R83) with a diagnosis of dementia in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 34 opportunities with eight errors resulting in a 23.53% error rate. This applies to one of seven Residents (R12) observed in the medication pass.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to perform hand hygiene after providing care, when removing contaminated gloves and touching contaminated gloves for one Resident (R51) and failed to follow their policy on Enhanced Barrier Precautions for two residents (R35, R64) of 18 reviewed for Infection Control in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify in writing, and maintain a copy in the medical record notification to the Ombudsman and resident/resident representatives of residents that were reviewed for notices before transfers. This failure has the potential to affect all 70 Residents residing in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify in writing, and maintain a copy in the medical record notification of the bed hold policy to the resident/resident representatives of residents that were reviewed for bed-holds. This failure has the potential to affect all 70 Residents residing in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions. This has the potential to affect all 70 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents know who the Grievance Officer is, failed to provide a private area for resident council meetings, and failed to provide a response, action or rationale for Resident Council concerns for five (R17, R22, R34, R41, and R65) of five residents reviewed during Resident Council meeting in the sample of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code visual status for one (R12) of 20 residents reviewed for accurate resident assessments in a sample of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a vision careplan for one (R12) of 20 residents reviewed for careplans in a sample of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a Comprehensive Care Plan for two residents (R52, R62) of 20 residents reviewed for Care Plan revision in a sample of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure shower and nail care were performed for one (R125) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have orders for indwelling catheter care and to record catheter output for two (R12 and R275) of five residents reviewed for indwelling catheters in a sample of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post required State and Federal postings for Long-Term Care Facility Resident use. This failure has the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse for one resident (R2) of three residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 15. This failure resulted in R2 being sent to the hospital diagnosed with an orbital fracture and suffering psychosocial harm that any reasonable person would after being abused. This past non-compliance, which involved R2, occurred from 3/09/23 to 3/14/23. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. Prior to the survey date of 3/29/2024, the facility had taken the following actions to correct the non-compliance: 1) Immediate actions taken for those residents identified: On 3/9/24, R2 was assessed and sent to the hospital. On 3/11/24, R2's Abuse screening and Care Plan were reviewed and updated accordingly. On 3/9/24 R1 was assessed and placed on a 1:1 until he was sent to the hospital. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during a facility fire as directed by the facility's policy for a known wandering resident with Dementia, failed to ensure staff were aware of the exit doors being unlocked when the fire alarm sounded and their responsibility to monitor wandering, confused residents during an emergency, and failed to keep the Wandering Resident binders updated, completed, and accessible for two (R2 and R9) of three residents reviewed for Elopement risk in a sample of 10. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure physical abuse did not occur for one (R2) of ten residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 25. These failures resulted in R1 hitting R2 in the right shoulder and punching R2 in the nose twice resulting in R2 bleeding from (R2's) nose and complaining of right shoulder pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to perform hand hygiene, wear proper Personal Protective Equipment/PPE (N95 masks, gowns, face shields and gloves), failed to keep garbage and linen off the floor, failed to keep COVID positive room doors closed; failed to follow dining room tray procedures, failed to have accessible PPE available for isolation rooms, and failed to have dedicated isolation waste disposal receptacles available. This failure has the potential to affect all 76 Residents residing in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have toilet paper for R8, clean hallways on B wing affecting R1, R2, R3, R4, R7, and R8, clean resident rooms for R7 and R8, and ensure housekeepers were hired and in the facility for six of nine residents reviewed for a clean environment in a sample of ten.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control procedures of testing COVID-19 symptomatic staff members, perform contact tracing testing on staff and residents with direct exposure to the COVID-19 positive staff member and resident, and perform facility wide testing to prevent the potential spread of a highly contagious and potentially deadly disease to residents and staff. Direct care staff, while working with signs and symptoms of COVID-19 (headache, fatigue, and body aches) unnecessarily exposed residents to an infectious disease. These failures had the potential to affect all 77 residents residing within the facility. These failures resulted in R6 being hospitalized with the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to affect all 77 residents residing within the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean comfortable homelike environment. These failures had the potential to affect all 77 residents residing within the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed provide sufficient staff to care for dependent residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a staff member dedicated to the Infection Preventionist role. This had the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect a resident's dignity by providing adult incontinent briefs for eight of eight residents (R7, R8, R9, R11, R15, R16, R18, R19) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident mechanical lifts were maintained in a safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect all 19 residents (R2, R3, R7-R18, R28-R32) who require the use of a mechanical lift for transfers in the sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a dignified dining experience for nine of 84 residents (R54, R22, R36, R31, R58, R62, R15, R64, R82) reviewed for dignity while dining in a sample of 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide ROM (Range of Motion) programming for residents with limited ROM, for four of 11 residents (R13, R76, R39, R74) reviewed for limitations in ROM, in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteThe facility's failures resulted in two deficient practice statements. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide feeding and dressing assistance to one of two residents (R13) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living, in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure abnormal blood glucose readings were reported to the physician and clarify hospital medication discharge instructions for a resident with Type II Diabetes Mellitus, for one of six residents (R39) reviewed for Insulin administration , in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff supervised a resident with Dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) while eating, for one of four residents (R13) reviewed for supervision in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure urinary drainage tubing from an indwelling catheter was not secured to a leg band and failed to ensure an indwelling catheter drainage bag was in a dignity bag for one of two residents (R57) for indwelling catheters in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet with supplements as ordered for one of three residents (R62) reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the resident rooms, corridors, and dining room in good repair. This failure has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility.
31 fire safety citations on file: 12 on February 20, 2025, 14 on April 12, 2024, 5 on December 1, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 6, 2026 | Fine | $22,386 |
| August 21, 2025 | Fine | $152,589 |
| April 2, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
| February 23, 2024 | Fine | $12,604 |
| January 12, 2024 | Fine | $28,958 |
| September 19, 2023 | Fine | $93,480 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.81 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.32 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.69 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.85 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.64 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 54.0% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 5.21 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.86 on weekdays and 2.69 on weekends, 6% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 19.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.53 in April to June 2025 to 2.81 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.81 | 0.32 | 2.86 | 2.69 | 19.8% | 0 of 90 | 80 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.61 | 0.28 | 2.59 | 2.65 | 18.0% | 1 of 92 | 84 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.42 | 0.31 | 2.46 | 2.31 | 6.0% | 1 of 92 | 83 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.53 | 0.37 | 2.62 | 2.29 | 11.0% | 1 of 91 | 85 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.5 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.9 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 33.7 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.7 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Arcadia Care Morton's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
46.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.
7.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 47 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 47 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ARCADIA CARE MORTON LLC. CMS links this home to Aperion Care, a group of 33 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seitler, Dovid | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Berkowitz, David | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Meystel, Yosef | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ahearn, Michael | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Helms, Gavin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Seitler, Dovid | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Corporate director | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Cooper, Brandy | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| McClure, Michelle | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2024 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Arcadia Care Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Curis Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ahearn, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Helms, Gavin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Kenny, Christina | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Seitler, Dovid | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| 190 East Queenwood Rd, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Arcadia Care Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/22/2025 | |
| Curis Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/03/2025 | |
| David a Berkowitz Delta Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Yosef Meystel Delta Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Ahearn, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Berkowitz, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Cooper, Brandy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Helms, Gavin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Kenny, Christina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| McClure, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Meystel, Yosef | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Seitler, Dovid | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.