17108 Us Highway 62, Campbell, MO 63933 · Dunklin County · (573) 246-2155
90 certified beds, about 73 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265677 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 22, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 27 health citations since April 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.91 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.
52.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).
CMS links it to Pointe Management, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions increasing the risk of cross-contamination. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 63. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff) in a timely manner and in accordance with guidelines for three residents (Residents #27, #36 and #51) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 63. Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Submission, undated, showed:- It is the policy of this facility to complete and submit all MDS assessments timely, accurately, and in compliance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual standards and Missouri regulatory requirements. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan with specific interventions tailored to meet individual needs for three residents (Residents #5, #51, and #71) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 63. Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, undated, showed: - It is the policy of this facility to ensure that every resident is admitted to the skilled nursing facility has a comprehensive, person-centered care, plan, developed, implemented, and reviewed according to federal and state regulations; - To promote quality of life, safety, and optimal outcomes for each resident; - To involve the resident and/or representative and care decisions; - A comprehensive assessment must be completed within 14 days of admission; - The baseline care plan will be completed within 48 hours of admission; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and revise care plans with specific interventions tailored to meet individual needs for two residents (Residents #12 and #58) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility census was 63. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reconciled narcotics (a process that allows one staff to reconcile the exact narcotic inventory on hand with another staff) at each shift change for two out of four medication carts and one out of one medication storage room. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 63. Review of the facility's policy titled, Narcotic Medication Reconciliation Policy and Procedure, undated, showed:- The purpose of this policy is to ensure accurate reconciliation of all narcotic medications when received, transferred, or discontinued in the facility, prevention diversion, loss, or administration errors;- All narcotic medications must be reconciled at key transition points: admission to the facility, receipt from the pharmacy, change of shift counts, discontinuation or destruction of narcotics; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when staff performed incontinent care for one resident (Resident #6) and indwelling catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care for one resident (Resident #13) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 63. Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, last reviewed 07/15/25, showed:- Will follow Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for EBP to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO's) in nursing home settings. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and side rails as a part of a regular maintenance program for three residents (Residents #5, #40, and #52) out of three sampled residents and one resident (Resident #43) outside the sample. The facility census was 63. Review of the facility's policy titled, Side Rail Assessment, undated, showed: - It is the policy of this facility that side rails (bed rails) will not be used as restraints and will only be implemented when medically, necessary, functionally, beneficial, on individualized assessment; - Side rails use must comply with regulations, guidance, and resident rights require requirements; - Upon admission, nursing staff must complete a side rail risk/benefit assessment; - Assessment must address medical need (mobility, repositioning aid, transfers); [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitation, revised November 2022, showed: - The food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner; - All kitchen areas and dining areas are kept clean; - All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment are kept clean, maintained in good repair and free of breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, revised November 2022, showed: - Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and in a respectful manner by leaving two residents (Residents #9 and #11) out of 18 sampled residents exposed during care. The facility census was 72. The facility did not provide a policy regarding maintaining a resident's dignity. 1. Review of Resident #9's medical record showed: - admission date of 05/20/24; - Diagnoses of cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), apraxia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (neurological disorder that makes it difficult to perform certain movements), contracture, right hand (a permanent tightening of muscles, tendons, causing the joints to shorten and become stiff); [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, revised February 2021, showed: - Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible; - The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting which include a clean, sanitary and orderly environment. 1. Observations made on 09/09/24 at 9:38 A.M. and 09/11/24 at 11:02 A.M., of the 500 hall unit, showed: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the resident and/or the resident's responsible party and to the representative of the Office of Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a program that advocates for residents, provides information and help resolve problems) for three residents (Residents #9 and #21) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge Policy, revised March 2021, showed: - Residents and/or representatives are notified in writing, and in a language and format they understand prior to transfer or discharge; - The resident and representative are notified in writing of the specific reason for transfer, the effective date, the location, and the bed-hold policy; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility) assessment within 14 days for one resident (Resident #66) out of three sampled closed resident records. The facility's census was 72. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Assessments, revised October 2023 , showed: - Comprehensive MDS assessments are conducted to assist in developing person-centered plans; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to document an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) for one resident (Resident #9) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #15) outside the sample. The facility's census was 72. The facility did not provide a MDS policy. 1. Review of Resident #9's medical record showed: - admission date of 05/20/24; - Diagnoses of cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), apraxia following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (neurological disorder that makes it difficult to perform certain movements), - Resident had a fall and sent to hospital on [DATE]; Review of the resident's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed no prior falls. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - No falls; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federally mandated preliminary assessment to determine whether a resident may have a mental illness or an intellectual disorder to determine the level of care needed) for two residents (Residents #21 and #43) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility's census was 72. The facility did not provide a PASARR policy. 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record showed: - An admission date of 07/30/23; - Diagnoses of schizophrenia (a disorder that affects one's ability to think, feel and behave clearly) violent behavior and generalized anxiety disorder (an excessive, ongoing anxiety and worry that are difficult to control); - No level I PASARR. 2. Review of Resident #43's medical record showed: - An admission date of 07/30/21; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan (initial plan for delivering of care and services) included specific interventions and the resident and/or guardian received a written summary of the baseline care plan for one resident (Resident #120) out of two sampled residents. The facility was census was 72. Review of the facility's policy titled, Baseline Care Plan Policy, revised 03/2022, showed: - The baseline care plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order for fall mats (a soft landing surface to help prevent injuries) for one resident (Resident #6) out of two sampled residents. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility's policy titled, Attending Physician Responsibilities, revised August 2014, showed: - The attending physician's shall be the primary practitioners responsibility for providing medical services and coordinating the healthcare of each resident in the facility; - The physician will provide orders to ensure that individuals have appropriate comfort and supportive measures as needed; - The policy did not address facility following physician orders. 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record showed: - admitted on [DATE]; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess and provide supportive interventions for one resident (Resident #52) with a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event) out of one sampled resident. The facility's census was 72. Review of the facility's policy titled, Trauma Informed Care, revised March 2019, showed: - To guide staff in appropriate and compassionate care specifics to individuals who have experienced trauma; - All staff are provided in-service training about trauma, its impact on health, and post-traumatic stress disorder in the context of the healthcare setting; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to answer call lights in a timely manner to meet each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial (how someone feels and copes with changes in their social environment) well-being. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility's policy titled, Answering the Call Light, undated, showed: - The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs; - Explain the call light to the new resident; - Demonstrate the use of the call light; - Ask the resident to return the demonstration so that you will be sure that the resident can operate the system; - Be sure the call light is plugged in and functioning at all times; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices during incontinent care for one resident (Resident #9) out of four sampled residents and during wound care for one resident (Resident #24) out of two sampled residents. The facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for four residents (Residents #7, #9, #11 and #31) out of six sampled residents during care. The facility also failed to implement a risk management process specific to Legionella disease (a serious type of pneumonia caused by legionella bacteria) which had the potential to affect all residents, staff and the public. The kitchen staff failed to perform hand hygiene between the residents during a meal pass. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility's policy titled, Wound Care, revised, October 2019, showed: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to document pertinent education provided to the residents or the resident's representative regarding benefits, side effects or warnings of the influenza (a viral respiratory infection) and/or the pneumococcal (an infectious lung disease) vaccine for five residents (Residents #2, #6, #21, #24, and #31) out of five sampled residents. The facility's census was 72. Review of the facility's policy, titled, Influenza Vaccine, revised March 2022, showed: - Prior to the vaccination, the resident (or resident's legal representative) will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza vaccine. Provision of such education shall be documented in the resident's medical record. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview an record review, the facility failed to conduct at least twelve hours of nurse aide in-service education per year for two out of two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) out of two sampled CNAs. The facility census was 72. Review of the policy titled, In-Service Training, All Staff, revised August 2022 showed: - All staff must participate in initial orientation and annual in-service training. - The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the resident's quality of life and quality of care and can demonstrate competency in the topic areas of the training. - Completed training is documented by the staff development coordinator, or his or her designee and includes: a. the date and time of the training; b. topic of the training; c. the method used for training' d. a summary of the competency assessment; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner nor did they ensure staff had functioning call devices in their possession to answer resident calls via the wireless nurse call system per the facility's call light exception, approved by the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's exception letter, approved by DHSS, dated 11/27/19 showed, the facility is required to comply with the stipulations that follow: 1. The operator will ensure the wireless nurse call system is fully operational twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days a week. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 56. Record review of the facility's Maintenance Service policy, undated, showed: - Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds and equipment; - The Maintenance Department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times; - The Maintenance Director is responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule of maintenance service to assure that the buildings, grounds, and equipment are maintained in a safe and operable manner; - The Maintenance Director is responsible for inspections of the building and work order requests; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a code status was consistently documented throughout the medical record for two residents (Residents #29 and Resident #33 ) out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 56. Record review of the facility's Advance Directives policy, undated, showed: - Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy; - The plan of care for each reach resident will be consistent with his/her documented treatment preferences and/or advance directive; - The interdisciplinary team (IDT) (a group of health care professionals from diverse fields who work in a coordinated effort toward a common goal for a resident) will review annually with the resident his/her advance directive to ensure that such directives are still the wishes of the resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and closed record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge planning process was in place which addressed goals and needs and involved the resident and/or the resident's legal guardian and the interdisciplinary team (IDT) (a group of health care professionals from diverse fields who work in a coordinated effort toward a common goal for a resident) in developing a discharge plan for one resident (Resident #63) out of one sampled discharged resident. The facility census was 56. 1. Record review of Resident #63's closed medical record showed: - admission date of 7/19/22; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and closed record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive discharge summary for one resident (Resident #63) out of one sampled discharged resident. The facility census was 56. Record review of the facility's Discharge of Resident/Recapitulation of Stay policy, undated, showed: - Social services will initiate the discharge packet upon notification of plans to discharge by the resident or the responsible party; - A discharge meeting will be arranged to include the resident, family or power of attorney (POA) (legal authorization for a designated person to make decisions about another person's property, finances or medical care), and a representative from social services, activities, dietary, nursing and therapy departments; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control interventions designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment by not wearing source control (facemasks) based on the community transmission (CT) level (the amount of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (a highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (a member of a large family of viruses called coronaviruses) spread within each county), having the potential to affect all residents, and failed to disinfect the glucometer (a device used to measure blood sugar) per the manufacturer's instructions and failed to sanitize hands for one sampled resident (Resident #27) and six residents (Resident #47, #8, #41, #17, [...]
13 fire safety citations on file: 8 on August 22, 2025, 2 on September 12, 2024, 3 on April 21, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Missouri | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.91 | 3.43 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.48 | 3.01 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.90 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.63 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.1% | 56.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 47.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.79 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.08 on weekdays and 2.48 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.54 in April to June 2025 to 2.91 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.91 | 0.37 | 3.08 | 2.48 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 73 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.19 | 0.38 | 3.35 | 2.79 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.64 | 0.43 | 3.87 | 3.07 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 65 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.54 | 0.31 | 3.72 | 3.09 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 64 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Missouri, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.34 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 3.9% | 1.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.11 | $17.02 to $20.00 | 34,050 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.58 | $27.06 to $33.77 | 14,700 |
| Registered nurses | $39.32 | $36.56 to $47.39 | 76,310 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Missouri | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.3 | 18.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 4.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.4 | 17.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.3 | 23.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 40.9 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.1 | 13.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.9 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Campbell Healthcare & Senior Living's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (31.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
31.3% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Missouri: 41 better, 31 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 30 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Missouri: 0 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Missouri: 1 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 20 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Missouri51.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Missouri0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Missouri2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Missouri100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CAMPBELL HEALTHCARE & SENIOR LIVING LLC. CMS links this home to Pointe Management, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 1.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lincoln Hcg LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 20% | 04/01/2023 |
| S & C Holdings Illinois LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 30% | 04/01/2023 |
| Stonewall Hcg LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 20% | 04/01/2023 |
| Chankin, Kevin | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 7% | 04/01/2023 |
| Mermelstein, Michael | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 20% | 04/01/2023 |
| Cole, John | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Pointe Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2023 | |
| Levovitz, Yeruchom | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Webster, Shimon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.