Home / Pennsylvania / Franklin
103 N. Thirteenth Street, Franklin, PA 16323 · Venango County · (814) 432-4491
100 certified beds, about 94 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395959 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 2, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 25 health citations since February 2024, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated November 8, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.79 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.42 of those hours.
54.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital and failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day), for five of six residents reviewed (Residents R2, R5, R43, R55, and R94).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for five of 30 residents reviewed (Residents R10, R39, R42, R55, and R79).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clinical rationale for the continued use of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic (affecting the mind) medication beyond 14-days and failed to provide evidence that non-pharmacological interventions (interventions attempted to calm a resident other than medication) were attempted prior to the administration of a PRN psychotropic medication for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R8).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility policy and documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to perform a transfer in a safe manner for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident R62).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, manufacturer's guidelines, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were properly dated when opened in one of two medication rooms reviewed (First Floor Main Medication Room).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and documents, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have adequate housekeeping staff to maintain clean and sanitary hallways on two of two floors observed and clean and sanitary resident rooms on one of two floors observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for two of four medication carts reviewed and one of two medication rooms reviewed (first floor C-wing and second floor C-wing medication carts and second floor medication room). Review of facility policy entitled Medication Storage and Handling dated [DATE], indicated Medications will be monitored. to assure that they are not expired. Review of facility policy entitled Administering Medications dated [DATE], indicated When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. Review of Active liquid protein label indicated three-month shelf life from date open. Review of manufacturer's guidelines revealed that an open pen of Lispro Insulin must be used within 28 days after opening or be discarded. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day), failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer, and failed to have complete documentation related to a transfer for three of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R3, R31, and R105).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen and change/date oxygen tubing according to physician's orders for two of two residents reviewed for respiratory services (Residents R45 and R58).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders for residents receiving dialysis (method of mechanically cleaning the blood) for one of two residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident R12).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assure the call bell was accessible for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R103). Review of facility policy entitled Resident Call System dated 2/18/25, indicated Each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his/her bed. Review of Resident R103's clinical record revealed an admission date of 9/10/24, with diagnoses that included anxiety (a condition that causes a person to be nervous, uneasy, or worried about something or someone), and hypothyroidism (a condition when the thyroid produces low amounts of thyroid hormones). Observations on 7/16/25, at 9:05 a.m. revealed Resident R103 in their bed with the head of the bed elevated to a sitting position and his/her call bell was lying under his/her bed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, facility documentation and clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents reviewed (Resident R2) was free from neglect during care which resulted in actual harm of a left femur (upper leg) fracture. This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation and clinical record, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately transfer a resident as identified in the plan of care for two of three residents reviewed (Residents R2 and R3), with one transfer which resulted in actual harm of a left femur (upper leg) fracture for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R2). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, facility documentation and review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to appropriately transfer a resident to ensure the resident was free from neglect which resulted in actual harm of a fracture of the right humeral head of the right shoulder for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders for residents receiving dialysis (method of mechanically cleaning the blood) for one of two residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident R66).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) Form CMS-10055 as required to one of three residents reviewed (Resident R43).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review and/or revise resident care plans for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R38).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for three of 18 residents reviewed (Residents R66, R28, and R67).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the provision of oxygen therapy for one of two residents reviewed for respiratory services (Resident R293).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clinical rationale for the continued use of a PRN (as needed) psychotropic (affecting the mind) medication beyond 14 days for one of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident R10) and failed to provided evidence that non-pharmacological interventions (interventions attempted to calm a resident other than medication) were attempted prior to the administration of a PRN psychotropic medication for three of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents R10, R38, and R293).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store Schedule II-V medications in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment in one of one medication rooms reviewed (First Floor) and the facility failed to appropriately discard outdated medications for one of two medication carts reviewed (C wing medication cart).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly clean and prevent the potential for cross contamination during the use of a blood glucose meter (BGM-a device to collect and measure the level of glucose (sugar) in the blood) for one of seven residents observed during the administration of medications (Resident R75).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician reviewed the residents' total program of care including medications during physician visits for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly conduct thorough monthly drug regimen reviews to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to fully investigate an injury of unknown origin in a timely manner for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R1).
12 fire safety citations on file: 6 on July 2, 2026, 5 on July 18, 2025, 1 on August 9, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 8, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.79 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.42 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.48 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.36 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.01 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 54.9% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 53.8% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.58 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.91 on weekdays and 3.48 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 24.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.37 in April to June 2025 to 3.79 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.42 | 3.91 | 3.48 | 24.1% | 0 of 90 | 94 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.67 | 0.39 | 3.81 | 3.31 | 21.2% | 0 of 92 | 95 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.60 | 0.36 | 3.74 | 3.23 | 23.9% | 0 of 92 | 96 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.37 | 0.32 | 3.46 | 3.15 | 32.2% | 0 of 91 | 97 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.9 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.0 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.1 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.2 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Caring Place, the's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 110 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 127 eligible stays.
7.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 71 eligible stays.
51.8% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 56 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 64 residents counted.
12.1% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 64 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GROVE MANOR CORPORATION.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dunlap, Elizabeth | Corporate director | Individual | 01/14/2014 | |
| Guy, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2014 | |
| Scott, Nancy | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Scott, Phil | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Weston, Garet | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.