Home / Massachusetts / Amherst
150 University Drive, Amherst, MA 01002 · Hampshire County · (413) 256-8181
134 certified beds, about 126 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225420 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 4, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 34 health citations since March 2023, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $48,550 in the last three years; the largest was $28,915, and the latest is dated April 7, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.34 hours per resident per day, against 3.86 across Massachusetts and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.25 of those hours.
39.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).
CMS links it to Shimon Lefkowitz, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 34 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who was non-ambulatory and per his/her care plan required the assistance of two staff members with a mechanical lift for all transfers, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed his/her care plan interventions for transfers, when on 03/14/26, Certified Nurse Aide #1 transferred Resident #1 by herself using a stand pivot transfer technique, Resident #1 was later diagnosed with a left ankle fracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who was non-weight bearing and required two staff members and a mechanical lift for all transfers, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance and assistive devices, to maintain his/her safety to prevent an incident/accident resulting in an injury, when on 03/14/26, Certified Nurse Aide #1 transferred Resident #1 alone, without a mechanical lift, using a stand pivot type transfer. Resident #1 was later found with bruising and swelling to his/her left ankle and was diagnosed with a left ankle fracture, (which was consistent with the type of injury that could occur with the twisting motion of a stand-pivot a pivot transfer).
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had right sided weakness from a stroke and whose care plan interventions included that he/she required the assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, including turning and repositioning in bed, the Facility failed to ensure that staff consistently implemented and followed interventions from his/her plan of care. When on [DATE] at 1:15 P.M., while attempting to change his/her bed sheets, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 turned and repositioned Resident #1 on his/her left side in bed, without having another staff member present to assist her, Resident #1 rolled out of the bed and landed on his/her knees on the floor. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had right sided weakness from a stroke and required the assistance of two staff members for turning and repositioning in bed, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance to maintain his/her safety and prevent an incident/accident resulting serious injury and death. On [DATE] at 1:15 P.M., while attempting to change his/her bed sheets, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, without another staff member to assist her, positioned Resident #1 on his/her left side away from her, and Resident #1 rolled out of the bed, landing on his/her knees on the floor. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent deterioration of a pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) for one Resident (#41), of five applicable residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care and services, out of a total sample of 26 residents. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident meal trays were served timely for three Units (West 1, [NAME] 2 and Dharma), out of three units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that resident meals were delivered timely and coordinated with medication administration times for residents that required meals in order for medications to be appropriately administered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -storage for resident food/fluids remained clean and free of foul odors -shelves that maintained clean pots/pans/dishware used for resident meals were clean and free from debris -fans in the facility kitchen were free of dust/debris
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services per professional standards of practice related to monitoring the use of Vitamin D (vitamin that helps regulate calcium and phosphorus in the body, crucial for bone health and immune system) medication for one Resident (#116) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #116, the facility failed to obtain Physician orders to monitor serum laboratory results to determine appropriate decrease of the dosage of Vitamin D medication, when the Resident was administered high doses of Vitamin D medication weekly, putting him/her at risk for adverse effects of the medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled employee personnel files, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse policies related to background checks when Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) and Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) checks were not conducted on CNA #1 as required, prior to employment at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for care, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when on 10/13/24 at 9:00 A.M., two staff members witnessed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 directing profanity at Resident #1 and treating him/her in a demeaning, insulting manner during care.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who required staff assistance with ambulation and was usually continent, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy related to the need to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the Administrator and/or designee, when on 03/14/24 at approximately 5:00 A.M., Resident #1 reported to the Nurse Supervisor that a Certified Nurse Aide (later identified as CNA #1) told him/her that he/she was not allowed to get out of bed to use the bathroom until the morning. Although the Nurse Supervisor was made aware of the allegation, Facility Administration was not made aware of the incident until 9:30 A.M. [...]
Inspectors wrote2. Review of the facility policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident - Care Items and Equipment, revised September 2022, indicated the following: -Reusable items are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents (e.g., stethoscopes, durable medical equipment [DME]). On 4/8/24 at 8:23 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #3 using the portable vital signs machine to obtain measurements from a resident. The surveyor observed Nurse #3 apply the blood pressure cuff to the resident's upper arm and the pulse oximeter (device that measures a person's blood oxygen saturation [the amount of oxygen that is in the blood]) to the resident's finger. Nurse #3 proceeded to obtain the resident's vital signs from the machine. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintained a clean and sanitary facility kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to: -ensure that a rinse temperature issue with the facility dish machine was addressed according to professional standards when the minimum temperature and sanitation requirements were not being met as required. -ensure the use of a commercial grade chlorine-based sanitizer and not household bleach was used in the dish machine to sanitize the facility dish ware.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a dignified existence for the facility residents in one dining room ([NAME]) out of three dining rooms observed on the Dharma Unit (Dementia Special Care Unit - DSCU). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. the staff spoke respectfully of residents. 2. staff were seated while assisting residents with their meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Non-Physician Practitioner (NPP/ Nurse Practitioner) of a significant change in condition for two Residents (#54 and #74) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to notify the Physician/NPP: 1. To determine the need to alter medication treatment when Resident #54 had recurrent seizure activities. 2. When Resident #74 experienced an unplanned, significant weight loss in one month.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review the facility failed to ensure that a homelike environment was maintained for residents in one dining area ([NAME]) out of three dining areas observed on the Dharma Unit (Dementia Special Care Unit). Specifically, the facility and staff failed to ensure that the dining experience for residents was a homelike environment by adding tablecloths to the dining room tables and removing meals from the meal trays prior to serving the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were accurately coded for two Residents (#101 and #122), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the MDS Assessment: 1. For Resident #101, was accurately coded relative to receiving hospice services. 2. For Resident #122, was accurately coded relative to the use of antibiotic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to achieve or maintain bladder function for one Resident (#122) out of three applicable residents, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, for Resident #122, the facility staff failed to obtain Physician's orders for the care and services of an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to allow for urine flow) to prevent complications and urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately implement a psychotropic medication (medication that affects brain activity) gradual dose reduction (GDR) as recommended by the Psychiatric Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP) for one Resident (#94) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: -For Resident #94, ensure that the recommendation made by the Psychiatric CNP for a GDR of Zyprexa (an antipsychotic medication) morning dose from 5 milligrams (mg) to 2.5 mg was accurately implemented, when the morning dose of Zyprexa was increased back to 5 mg without any further recommendations, thereby cancelling the GDR process.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to re-evaluate a performance improvement plan (PIP) when the identified interventions were no longer making progress toward the identified goal for improving lunch meal tray arrival times for one unit (Dharma Unit) out of three units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that an effective system was maintained for implementing changes, monitoring performance, and obtaining feedback from residents and family representatives, related to consistently late lunch time meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the required members were included in the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meetings. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence: -that the Infection Preventionist (IP) was a required member of the QAPI committee and the IP attended two out of the four quarterly meetings. -that the Medical Doctor (MD) attended one out of the four quarterly meetings.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment, according to the required Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process, for one Resident (#77) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to assess Resident #77's cognitive status through the resident interview process and instead proceeded to the staff interview process on three consecutive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff 1. assessed residents for eligibility to offer a pneumococcal vaccination and 2. administered a pneumococcal vaccination when a resident and/or their resident representative consented to the vaccination for two Residents (#3 and #4) out of five sampled residents. Specifically, 1. for Resident #3 the facility failed to assess the need for additional pneumococcal vaccination once the Resident was one year past their last vaccination per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and 2. for Resident #4 the facility failed to ensure a requested pneumococcal vaccination was administered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure recommended COVID-19 vaccination was offered to one Staff Member (#1) out of one staff member sampled. Specifically, for Staff Member #1 the facility failed to ensure they maintained documentation that any additional COVID-19 vaccination was offered to the staff member after he/she had received their initial COVID-19 series.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff: 1. performed the proper sanitation of kitchen utensils in the main kitchen, and 2. adhered to safe and sanitary food storage practices on two of three units, to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. Specifically, the facility failed to keep the disinfectant level in the disinfecting sink at the manufacturer's recommended guidelines, failed to keep the refrigerators and microwaves clean, and discard unlabeled food brought into the facility per facility protocol for safe and sanitary food storage practices.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained laundry equipment according to the manufacturer's guidelines, and proper storage of both clean and soiled linens. Specifically, failure to: 1. clean two filters on one out of three washing machines to prevent contamination, and 2. ensure staff stored and secured soiled and clean linen carts to prevent access to clean and potentially contaminated linens by one Resident (#36) on the DSCU.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained the dignity during a meal for one Resident (#264), out of a sample of 25 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff obtained orders for monitoring an incision site after return from the hospital one Resident (#43), out of a sample of 25 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure its staff provided the Resident and/or Resident's Representative with a copy of the Resident's baseline care plan for one Resident (#102) out of a sample of 25 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for one Resident (#38), out of a sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to obtain blood pressure (BP) and pulse/ heart rate (HR) measurements prior to the administration of Metoprolol (a medication used to treat high blood pressure that affects the heart and circulation), as ordered by the Physician and per facility policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. ensure its staff provided sufficient Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) for its residents, in accordance with the Facility Assessment, (an assessment used by facilities to determine what resources are necessary to competently care for residents during regular operations and emergencies), for three out of three units observed, and 2. provide grooming assistance for one Resident (#261), out of a total sample of 25 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documented evidence that preventative skin treatments and repositioning were consistently implemented to prevent the development of a left heel pressure injury for one Resident (#261), out of a total sample of 25 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure its staff completed the necessary Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) to accurately convey a resident's level of cognitive function for five Residents (#23, #94, #35, #2, and #53), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to complete Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS-a tool used to assess cognitive status) assessments within the seven day look back period (period of time facility staff have to complete assessments to be utilized in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment), for Residents who were understood verbally, at least some of the time. Findings Include: 1. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility in June 2022. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff identified the need for a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for one Resident (#104), out of a sample of 25 residents.
6 fire safety citations on file: 1 on April 10, 2024, 5 on March 15, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 7, 2026 | Fine | $19,635 |
| June 4, 2025 | Fine | $28,915 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.34 | 3.86 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.25 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.24 | 3.48 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.18 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.90 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 39.3% | 38.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 42.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.48 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.37 on weekdays and 3.24 on weekends, 4% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.32 in April to June 2025 to 3.34 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.34 | 0.25 | 3.37 | 3.24 | 5.1% | 0 of 90 | 126 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.42 | 0.30 | 3.50 | 3.19 | 7.3% | 0 of 92 | 129 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.30 | 0.27 | 3.37 | 3.12 | 6.1% | 0 of 92 | 131 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.32 | 0.26 | 3.40 | 3.12 | 6.1% | 0 of 91 | 130 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 3.94 | 3.41 | 5.0% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.44 | $21.32 to $23.94 | 38,130 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.57 | $34.91 to $40.66 | 13,210 |
| Registered nurses | $50.27 | $42.05 to $65.44 | 88,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.7 | 16.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.4 | 15.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 29.5 | 21.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.5 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.8 | 11.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Center for Extended Care at Amherst's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
51.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Massachusetts: 121 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 86 eligible stays.
8.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Massachusetts: 4 better, 15 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 109 eligible stays.
5.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Massachusetts: 5 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 75 eligible stays.
25.3% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts51.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 79 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 100 residents counted.
2.6% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 100 residents counted.
97.4% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 39 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: AMHERST NURSING HOME, INC. CMS links this home to Shimon Lefkowitz, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lefkowitz, Shimon | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 25% | 11/03/2015 |
| Loffler, Abraham | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 11/03/2015 |
| Loffler, Israel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 11/03/2015 |
| Loffler, Solomon | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 11/03/2015 |
| Shimon, Miriam | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 18% | 11/03/2015 |
| Simha, David | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 11/03/2015 | |
| Lefkowitz, Shimon | Corporate director | Individual | 11/03/2015 | |
| Loffler, Abraham | Corporate director | Individual | 11/03/2015 | |
| Shimon, Miriam | Corporate director | Individual | 11/03/2015 | |
| Simha, David | Corporate director | Individual | 11/03/2015 | |
| Loffler, Abraham | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/03/2015 | |
| Simha, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/03/2015 | |
| Mavado Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/15/2015 | |
| Mintz, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2013 | |
| Rackliffe, Thomas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2013 | |
| Simha, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/03/2015 | |
| Amherst LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/15/2014 | |
| Mavado Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/04/2025 | |
| Lefkowitz, Shimon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2015 | |
| Loffler, Abraham | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2015 | |
| Mintz, Joshua | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/04/2025 | |
| Rackliffe, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/04/2025 | |
| Simha, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.