1401 North California, Chicago, IL 60622 · Cook County · (773) 782-8700
156 certified beds, about 123 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2004
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 146062 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 23, 2026, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 77 health citations since September 2023, 13 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 6 fines totaling $401,599 in the last three years; the largest was $178,736, and the latest is dated August 2, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.86 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.
45.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Icare Consulting Services, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 77 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to have appropriate interventions and supervision in place to prevent residents (R1 and R2) from falling. This failure affected two (R1 and R2) of five residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a subdural hematoma (brain bleed) and R2 sustaining a right humerus fracture. 1. R1's face sheet dated 07/29/2026 documents, in part, that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Alzheimer's disease, aneurysm of the heart, insomnia, essential hypertension diabetes mellitus, orthostatic hypotension convulsions, altered mental status, left artificial hip joint, muscle weakness, and hyperlipidemia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care in accordance with the facility assessment. This failure places all 118 residents in the facility at risk to be provided with inappropriate care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies by a) not ensuring all food items in the kitchen were labeled/dated and b) not following manufacturer instructions to use the three-compartment sink. This failure has the potential to effect 113 residents that eat food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy by not properly maintaining their dumpster area. This failure has the potential to effect all residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and update policies and procedures related to infection control prevention and failed to follow the facility policy for maintaining clothes and linen free off contamination in the laundry area. These failures have the potential to affect 118 residents living in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of records and interview the facility failed to follow infection control policies on offering vaccination for 4 out of 5 residents (R20, R90, R123, and R129) for a total sample of 24 residents reviewed for immunization, failed to include all facility staff in screening for Covid-19 vaccination, and failed to follow policy in offering Covid-19 vaccination to facility staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from hazards. This failure has the potential to affect the 37 residents that reside on floor three.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to a.) administer resident's prescribed medications in a timely manner according to the physician orders and b.) ensure controlled substances were counted, and documented, at the beginning and end of each shift for 9 out of 115 shifts. These failures have the potential to affect 54 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for five (R13, R66, R77, R91, R108) residents reviewed for medication administration in a total sample of 24 residents reviewed, resulting in a 27.27% error rate. Findings Include: R66's electronic medication administration record/eMAR dated 01/22/2026 documents: Cholecalciferol Oral Capsule 25 MCG (1000 UT) (Cholecalciferol) Give 2 capsule by mouth one time a day scheduled at 9:00AM. On 01/22/2026 at 7:54AM, surveyor observed V13 (Registered Nurse/RN) administer Cholecalciferol 25 MCG (1000 UT) 1 tablet to R66. R91's eMAR dated 1/22/2026 documents: Ergocalciferol Tablet 50 MCG (2000 UT) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day scheduled at 9:00AM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a.) label house stock medications that had been open and b.) remove and discard expired medications in two of five medication carts reviewed. These failures have the potential to affect 37 residents residing in the facility reviewed for medication labeling and storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of records and interview the facility failed to follow immunization program policy and procedure on offering vaccination for 4 out of 5 residents (R20, R90, R123, and R129) for a total sample of 24 residents reviewed for immunization. These failures are not in accordance with facility's immunization program policy and procedure which 4 residents (R20, R90, R123, and R129) did not receive influenza and/or pneumonia vaccine(s) that may help in preventing infection(s).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor one (R66) resident of six reviewed in a sample of 24. This failure led to R66 wandering into other residents' rooms. R66 is a [AGE] year-old individual whose current face sheet documents medical diagnosis to include but not limited to: dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, delusional disorders, depression, unspecified, and anxiety disorders. R66's MDS (Minimum Data Set) C-Cognitive Patterns dated [DATE], documents R66''s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as 1/15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 01/20/2026 at 11:00AM, R66 was observed in another resident's room sitting on one of the beds and remained sitting for forty minutes. R66 was not able to answer questions. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and records review, the facility failed to refer two residents (R40, R92) with newly diagnosed serious mental illness for PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) screenings in a total sample of 24 residents reviewed for PASRR.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of records and interview facility failed to acquire preadmission screening and resident review for 1 out of 5 residents (R63) in a total sample of 24 resident reviewed for resident assessment. These failures affect 1 resident (R63) in determining correct care settings for a resident with serious mental illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident in maintaining their vision by not following physician orders to obtain corrective lenses for one (R94) resident in a total sample of 24 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement infection control measures during storage of oxygen tubing for one resident (R114) out of five residents reviewed in a total sample of 24 residents. This failure places residents at risk to be provided with inappropriate care and services to meet the resident's physical, mental and/or psychosocial needs. On 1/20/2026 at 12:43 PM, R114's oxygen concentrator's oxygen tubing not covered and, on the floor, next to R114's bed. On 01/21/2026 at 12:47 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that the facility does have an oxygen equipment policy. V2 stated that for oxygen tubings, staff change the oxygen tubings weekly, and when not in use, staff keep them in bags. V2 stated that the tubing should not be on the floor because of infection control and the residents can place the oxygen tubing back in their nose. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure appropriate wound care treatment is met and carried out for one (R1) out of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 9. Findings Include:Section C documents in part BIMS (brief interview of mental status) of 11 which indicates that R1 is moderate cognitive impaired. On 12/23/2025 at 9:49 AM, surveyor observed R1 laying down on her bed, in an upright position while watching television. R1 seemed comfortable, under no pain or distress. R1 is alert and oriented to person. R1 is not alert and oriented to place and time, and has frequent confusion. Surveyor observed R1 holding the call light with her right hand. Surveyor observed a catheter bag; it was secured and off the ground. Surveyor observed a wheelchair and a walker at the bedside. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during provision of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for 1 (R2) resident out of 3 residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted with R2 falling while at the facility on 06/24/2025 and sustaining a facial laceration requiring sutures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring for residents. As a result of these failures, R3 fell in the facility on 05/24/2025, while being showered by staff and sustained facial lacerations requiring 12 sutures. These failures affect three (R3, R4, R5) out of five residents reviewed for supervision and monitoring in a total sample of five residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation , interview and document review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical equipment in safe operating condition. This failure affected all residents in the facility by not providing hot water due to equipment failure.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate measures to ensure adequate supervision for three of three residents (R1, R2, and R3) identified at high risk for falls reviewed for falls with injury in the sample. This failure affected R1, R2, and R3 who had multiple falls and unwitnessed falls with lacerations requiring adhesive strips, sutures, and staples to correct the lacerations at the local hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the call lights are within reach for 9 of 9 residents (R1, R2, R3, R6, R8, R10, R12, R13 and R14) reviewed for call lights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free from mental abuse for one (R5) of three residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in V4 (Former Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) taking inappropriate photos of R5 and sending them in a text to her peers. A reasonable person who had inappropriate photos taken of them and shared with others would have felt sad, humiliated, and angry.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy to complete a thorough abuse investigation for one of three residents reviewed for abuse (R4) in the sample of seven.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to follow the care plan addressing the resident will maintain adequate nutritional and hydration status and failed to implement current professional standards of practice to follow up and/or address a Registered Dietician's recommendations for one resident (R2) out of four residents reviewed for hydration. This failure places residents at risk to be provided with inappropriate care and services to meet the resident's physical, mental and/or psychosocial needs.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that staff were available to provide restorative care, failed to ensure that staff are aware of residents' restorative care needs, and/or failed to ensure that restorative care was provided as directed for four of 64 residents (R26, R49, R55, R86) in the sample. These failures have the potential to affect 104 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that nursing staff arrive on time and/or as scheduled, failed to implement the emergency staffing policy and failed to ensure that sufficient nursing staff were available to meet the needs for 15 of 64 residents (R11, R15, R26, R30, R34, R37, R43, R46, R48, R49, R55, R56, R57, R86, R169) in the sample. These failures have the potential to affect 114 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene when entering the kitchen, failed to ensure food storage temperatures were monitored, failed to ensure staff hair was fully covered, failed to label food upon opening, failed to ensure the solution used for the sanitation sink was checked, failed to ensure the kitchen drain was not clogged, and failed to ensure paint on the kitchen ceiling was not disintegrating in an effort to prevent foodborne illness. These failures have the potential to affect all 111 residents receiving oral nutrition at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the dumpster was not overflowing with trash and the dumpster's lid was closed in an effort to prevent pest and rodents migration to the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that isolation signs are posted properly, failed to ensure that assigned staff/visitors were made aware that (R11) requires contact isolation, failed to ensure that visitors don required PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) prior to entering an isolation room, and failed to ensure that staff perform hand hygiene during dining services. These failures have the potential to affect all 114 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record interview, the facility failed to follow their own policy of completing self-administration review, getting a physician' order to self-administer, and completing a careplan when initiating self-administration of medication. This failure affected 3 (R13, R66, and R84) residents reviewed for self-administration of medication and has the potential to affect all residents on the 2nd floor.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures and failed to ensure that medications were administered and/or documented within regulatory requirements for seven of 64 residents (R30, R34, R43, R46, R48, R57, R169) in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the environment was free from hazards for two residents (R44 and R95). This failure has the potential to affect all 39 residents on the third-floor unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure controlled medication for two residents (R8 and R103) were securely locked in the medication room refrigerator; failed to ensure that insulin and eye medication for four residents (R14, R20, R51 and R113) had open and expiration dates; and failed to ensure that expired insulin for one resident (R113) was removed from the medication cart. This failure has the potential to affect all residents that reside on the first floor and four residents on the third floor (R14, R20, R51 and R113).
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a thermometer was in (R3's) refrigerator, failed to ensure that (R3's) daily temperature log was not pre-signed, failed to ensure that staff are aware of the required refrigerator temperature range, failed to ensure that refrigerated perishable items were maintained below 40F (Fahrenheit), failed to defrost resident refrigerators, and failed to document daily refrigerator temperatures for six of 64 residents (R3, R15, R26, R49, R66, R84) in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a home-like environment by not replacing missing window coverings which affected one resident (R51) reviewed in the total sample of 64 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care was provided to three of 64 dependent residents (R11, R37, R56) in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a residents (R22) low air loss mattress (in use) was functioning properly, failed to obtain PRN (as needed) wound care orders for R37, failed to ensure that R56's (left) buttock treatment orders were transcribed on the TAR (Treatment Administration Record), failed to obtain treatment orders for R56's (right) buttock wound, and failed to follow Physician orders. These failures affected 3 residents (R22, R37, R56) in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, and failed to ensure that gastrostomy tube (g-tube) feedings were labeled for one of three residents (R11) reviewed for tube feeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and date oxygen equipment (nasal cannula tubing); and failed to properly contain oxygen equipment (nasal cannula tubing). These failures affected two residents (R3 and R109) reviewed for oxygen equipment, in a total sample of 64 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and, record review the facility failed to obtain a physicians order for a resident (R3) who requires dialysis. This failure affected one resident in the sample of 64 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that medications were re-ordered timely, and failed to ensure that prescribed medications were available for two of six residents (R48, R57) reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures and failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%. There were 12 medication errors out of 26 opportunities, resulting in a 46.15% medication error rate. Two of six residents (R48, R57) in the medication administration sample were affected.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures and failed to ensure that two of six residents (R48, R57) reviewed for medication administration remained free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to manage R3's pain by failing to have R3's Norco pain medication in stock. This failure resulted in R3 going without his medication for more then 24-hours and experiencing excruciating leg, wound, and body pain rated as 8 out of 10 on a numerical rating pain scale.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that sufficient Wound Care Nurses are available to meet resident needs, failed to provide timely incontinence care, failed to administer prescribed treatments, failed to ensure that staff are aware of required LALM (Low Air Loss Mattress) settings and failed to ensure that the LALM was on the correct setting for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for pressure ulcers. These failures resulted in R1 sustaining a (facility acquired) sacrum pressure ulcer with tailbone exposure/fracture and radiographic suggestion of osteomyelitis, R2 sustained a stage 3 (facility acquired) pressure ulcer, and R3 sustained a stage 3 (facility acquired) pressure ulcer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that Nursing staff arrive on time and/or as scheduled, and failed to ensure that sufficient nursing staff were available to meet the needs for three of three dependent residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. These failures have the potential to affect all 38 residents on the 2nd floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that staff were available to provide restorative care, and failed to ensure that restorative care was provided as directed for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) in the sample. These failures have the potential to affect all 38 residents on the second floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to implement care plan interventions, and failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care to two of three dependent residents (R2, R3) in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure they have a policy for scheduling/rescheduling appointments, failed to ensure that reported concerns were resolved and failed to re-schedule a Neurology appointment for one of three residents (R1) in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to transcribe Physician Orders, failed to ensure that indwelling urinary catheter treatments are on the TAR (Treatment Administration) record, and failed to monitor/record/report abnormal urine findings to the Physician for one of three residents (R1) in the sample reviewed for bowel/bladder incontinence.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate four separate incidents involving allegations of resident-to-resident physical abuse, verbal and physical abuse or neglect by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The facility also failed to separate the residents from the alleged perpetrator(s). These failures affected 5 residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, and R7) and has the potential for abuse and neglect to further occur, affecting all 119 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report 4 separate allegations of abuse/neglect to the state survey agency. This failure has the potential to affect 5 residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, and R7) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure staff report new behavior/s to appropriate supervisor and department head for one resident (R2) resulting with the resident to be observed on the floor and sustaining a laceration to the head, was sent out to the Hospital Emergency Department and treated with laceration repair (staples). This deficient practice affected one resident (R2) reviewed for quality of care in a total sample of 6 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure unusual occurrence, which resulted to a serious injury, was reported to the State Agency within the mandated time frame and failed to develop policies and procedures for reporting unusual occurrence, which resulted to a serious injury, within the mandated time frame. These failures affected 1 (R2) resident reviewed for reporting of unusual occurrence in the total sample of 6 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of resident unusual occurrence which resulted in an injury. This failure affected (R2) resident reviewed for investigation of unusual occurrence in the total sample of 6 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of records and interviews, the facility failed to provide bed hold notification when transferring to another facility, for 1 resident (R3) in a total sample of 3 residents reviewed. This failure affected 1 resident (R3) who was not afforded notification on the option to return to the facility after discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of records and interviews the facility failed to determine current status of resident before denial of re-admission for 1 resident (R3) in a total sample of 3 residents reviewed. This failure affected 1 resident (R3) that was not accepted and therefore did not receive services in the facility after discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of records and interview the facility failed to address behavioral concerns in the care plan for a resident that manifest self-harm for 1 resident (R3) in a total sample of 3 residents reviewed for person-centered care plan. This failure affected 1 resident (R3) resulting in a lack of intervention on resident behavioral services' needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor vital signs and to identify a change in condition for 1 resident (R2), out of a total sample of 3 residents reviewed for nursing services. This failure potentially affected 1 (R2) resident who was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with septic shock.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide emergency treatment and care for a resident (R3) with a low oxygen level, in accordance with professional standards of care, and failed to immediately contact 911 for an acute change in condition for R3 based on R3's code status of Do Not Resuscitate. This failure resulted in R3 not receiving timely care and treatment until 6 hours after the change in condition requiring hospitalization with admission diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (Deficiency In The Amount Of Oxygen Reaching The Tissues), Sepsis, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Severe Sepsis with Septic Shock, Urinary Tract Infection, Acidosis, and Coagulation Defect, and subsequently expiring at the hospital. This failure affected one (R3) of four residents reviewed for change in condition on the total sample list of 23. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing services to ensure residents safety and to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for the residents. This failure resulted in a delay in care for R3 being sent out 911 and interventions not being implemented for respiratory distress and has the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the nurses provided care, in accordance with professional standards of care for one (R3) of four residents who was experiencing a reduction in oxygenation and a delay in receiving emergency medical attention reviewed for change in condition on the total sample of 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy on involuntary transfer by failing to send the appropriate paperwork with one resident (R2) who required involuntary transfer to the hospital and as a result R2 returned to the facility without treatment and had to wait for the paperwork to be send out to emergency again for treatment. This failure has the potential to affect one of three residents (R2) reviewed for transfer/discharge on the total sample of 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to send the appropriate paperwork with one resident who required involuntary transfer to the hospital and notify a resident's power of attorney that a psychotropic medication was discontinued. This failure had the potential to affect all three residents (R2, R5 and R6) reviewed for facility's policy and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement fall prevention interventions for three of three residents (R2, R3 and R4) reviewed for accidents on the total sample list of seven.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the wiping cloths for the food contact surfaces are properly sanitized, failed to ensure that dry food is stored six inches above the floor, and failed to ensure that the fan blowing on the clean dishes is free of accumulated dust. These failures have the potential to cause food borne illness in a total of 103 residents who receive oral diets from the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the outside dumpster lid was closed to prevent pest and rodents from entering the garbage bin. This failure has the potential to affect all 105 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R32) did not receive insulin from a personal insulin pen that belonged to another resident, failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during medication administration for one resident (R32), failed to ensure oxygen tubing was properly stored while not in use for one resident (R249), and failed to ensure a urinary drainage bag was not directly touching the floor for one resident (R24) reviewed for infection control on the total sample list of 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that the call light was within reach for one resident (R249) out of the 47 residents reviewed for call lights on the total sample list of 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized fall prevention interventions, according to the care plan, for a cognitively impaired resident, who had repeated falls. This failure affected one resident (R30) of three residents, reviewed for falls, in a total sample of 47 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure an oxygen tank was not empty and oxygen tubing was connected for one resident (R31), and an oxygen humidifier bottle was not empty (without water) for one resident (R40). This failure has the potential to affect two of three residents reviewed for oxygen use on the total sample list of 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure expired insulin medication was removed from medication cart and discarded for two residents (R86 and R28) of six residents reviewed for insulin use on the total sample list of 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide and arrage dental services and follow Dentist's recommendation for a dental appliance for one resident (R31) of one residents reviewed for dental appliances on the total sample list of 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and review of records, the facility failed as follows: Failed to supervise and monitor an elopement risk resident with behavioral needs. Failed to maintain the right of a resident to be safe related to accessing facility area (stairwell). Failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for a newly admitted resident. Failed to follow individualized care plan policy in addressing hip precaution or safety measures on the plan of care for a resident that had undergone hip surgery. Failed to investigate an incident for a hip prosthesis dislocation. These failures affected 2 (R1, R2) out of 3 residents reviewed for safety, hazards, and incidents on a total sample of 5 residents. This failure resulted in (R2) sustaining a left hip fracture after a fall.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe resident environment and protect residents (R8 & R3) from physical abuse by (R9) for three of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of nine. This failure resulted in R9, a resident with known aggressive behavior, striking R8 in the face. As a result of the abuse, R8 was sent to the local hospital and diagnosed with subtle depressed fracture at the left nasal bone (broken nose).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a supply of towels and washcloths for residents and staff to perform incontinence and bathing care. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 35 residents residing on the third floor.
53 fire safety citations on file: 19 on January 16, 2025, 16 on November 9, 2023, 18 on October 21, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 2, 2025 | Fine | $14,722 |
| June 9, 2025 | Fine | $14,785 |
| March 27, 2025 | Fine | $32,086 |
| December 17, 2024 | Fine | $108,476 |
| December 17, 2024 | Payment Denial | 35 days from January 7, 2025 |
| April 18, 2024 | Fine | $178,736 |
| April 18, 2024 | Payment Denial | 38 days from May 11, 2024 |
| October 27, 2023 | Fine | $52,794 |
| October 27, 2023 | Payment Denial | 28 days from November 17, 2023 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.86 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.38 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.82 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.49 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.8% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 35.7% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.21 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.05 on weekdays and 2.38 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.13 in April to June 2025 to 2.86 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.86 | 0.55 | 3.05 | 2.38 | 0.5% | 0 of 90 | 123 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.99 | 0.49 | 3.14 | 2.60 | 0.6% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.15 | 0.50 | 3.32 | 2.70 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 111 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.13 | 0.50 | 3.32 | 2.67 | 0.5% | 0 of 91 | 111 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.5 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.5 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.0 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 32.6 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.8 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Center Home Hispanic Elderly's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
46.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.
12.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.
9.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
40.9% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CENTER HOME FOR HISPANIC ELDERLY, LLC. CMS links this home to Icare Consulting Services, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 1.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levovitz, Yeruchom | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 20% | 07/01/2010 |
| Webster, Shimon | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 20% | 07/01/2010 |
| Pointe Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/21/2020 | |
| Levovitz, Yeruchom | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2010 | |
| Webster, Shimon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2010 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.