Home / Connecticut / Plainfield
16 Windsor Ave, Plainfield, CT 06374 · Northeastern Ct County · (860) 564-4081
90 certified beds, about 83 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075310 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 8, 2024, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 25 health citations since November 2019, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $12,735 in the last three years; the largest was $12,735, and the latest is dated October 23, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.06 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.86 of those hours.
48.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, for 3 residents (Resident #9, 1 and 50), the facility failed to administer medications and/or monitor blood sugar according to professional standards and physician's orders. For 1 resident (Resident #9) reviewed for medication errors, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the physician's order for Xanax (antianxiety medication) administration after a change in the dose. For 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure blood glucose monitoring was performed as prescribed by the provider. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #19/victim and Resident #71/victim) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to protect Resident #19 from physical abuse by Resident #9/perpetrator, who had a history of pinching and for Resident #71 the facility failed to protect Resident #71 from physical abuse by Resident #68/perpetrator.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and staff interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance during transfers. Specifically, staff failed to recognize and respond to signs of increasing transfer instability in the weeks prior to a fall; failed to recognize that Resident #1 was unable to bear weight at the initiation of a transfer and continued the transfer without seeking assistance; left Resident #1 unattended on the floor following a fall with a head strike; and transferred Resident #1 off the floor despite observable signs of significant pain. Resident #1 subsequently sustained an acute intertrochanteric fracture of the right proximal femur requiring surgical repair. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and staff interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pain management, the facility failed to manage Resident #1's pain in accordance with facility policy and the resident's care plan. Specifically, licensed nurses failed to reassess pain within one (1) hour after administration of as-needed pain medication on multiple occasions; failed to recognize observable signs of significant pain during post-fall transfers as a change in condition requiring provider notification; and failed to administer pain medication in a timely manner following a fall that resulted in a major injury. Resident #1 subsequently sustained an acute intertrochanteric fracture of the right proximal femur requiring surgical repair. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record, facility documentation, and facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure resident was transferred safely to prevent an injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure resident was free from mistreatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse timely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were dated when opened and staff personal food/fluids were not stored in the facility walk-in refrigerator.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews for 2 of 2 residents, (Resident #40 and Resident #46) reviewed for advance directives, for Resident #40, the facility failed to transcribe advance directives according to the signed resident's wishes and for Resident #46, the facility failed to ensure the advance directive consent had been signed and available in the medical record.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, observations, review of the clinical record, and facility policy for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions as per the Resident Care Plan (RCP).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #30), reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to follow the physician order for blood sugars and blood pressures, and for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #34), reviewed for accidents and hazards, the facility failed to administer medications to the appropriate resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to appropriately supervise a resident during mealtime per the physician's order and during the initial facility tour, the facility failed to ensure water temperatures were maintained within acceptable parameters of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit for 17 of 50 rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident, (Resident #49), reviewed for hemolytic treatment, the facility failed to communicate a new allergy to the treatment center.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and review of facility policy for 1 of 3 units for 1 resident (Resident #6), the facility failed to ensure furniture was in good repair to provide a home-like environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 6 residents, (Resident #3, Resident #51, Resident #588, Resident #52 and Resident #12) reviewed for grievances, the facility failed to investigate grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for elopement risk, (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure a resident who was at risk for elopement did not leave the building unsupervised.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility's documentation, review of the facility's policy and interviews for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #26 and #49) reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from physical abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #229) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care consistent with professional practices.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents #1, #33, #34 and #51) who were at risk for elopement, the facility failed to ensure the resident's wanderguard bracelets were tested daily for functioning per policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #6), the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual mistreatment to the State Agency.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #6), the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of mistreatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of clinical record, review of facility policy, and staff interviews for one resident observed with unattended medication (Resident #5), the facility failed to ensure medication was administered according to professional standards of practice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, (Resident #20), the facility failed to ensure a monthly weight was completed for a resident with a weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of one sampled resident reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #5), the facility failed to notify the long-term care Ombudsman of an acute care hospital transfer with admission.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, and interview for 12 of 19 residents reviewed for Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #18, Resident #19, Resident #20, and Resident #21), the facility failed to ensure timely completions of Quarterly MDS assessments.
6 fire safety citations on file: 3 on November 8, 2024, 2 on June 30, 2022, 1 on November 8, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 23, 2025 | Fine | $12,735 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.06 | 3.73 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.86 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.71 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.48 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.72 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 48.1% | 37.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 35.3% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.49 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.20 on weekdays and 3.71 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.73 in April to June 2025 to 4.06 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.06 | 0.86 | 4.20 | 3.71 | 0.8% | 0 of 90 | 83 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.89 | 0.76 | 4.03 | 3.52 | 1.7% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.85 | 0.69 | 4.00 | 3.48 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.73 | 0.87 | 3.89 | 3.34 | 1.9% | 0 of 91 | 86 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Connecticut, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.66 | 0.61 | 3.80 | 3.31 | 6.0% | 1.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.53 | $20.14 to $22.68 | 21,380 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $35.43 | $32.05 to $36.94 | 8,540 |
| Registered nurses | $49.39 | $41.40 to $58.58 | 40,110 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.3 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.9 | 16.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.4 | 17.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 35.2 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.9 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Colonial Health & Rehab Center of Plainfield, LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Connecticut: 75 better, 2 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 113 eligible stays.
10.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Connecticut: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 125 eligible stays.
7.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Connecticut: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 88 eligible stays.
76.2% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut58.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 63 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Connecticut100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: COLONIAL HEALTH & REHAB CENTER OF PLAINFIELD LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colonial Health & Rehab LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 12/29/2012 | |
| Darigan, Robert | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/29/2012 | |
| Rodowicz, Curtis | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/29/2012 | |
| Greystone Funding Company LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 11/01/2019 | |
| Family First Ar of Plainfield LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 03/28/2019 | |
| Alessandro, Joseph | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Darigan, Robert | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/29/2012 | |
| Rodowicz, Curtis | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/29/2012 | |
| Darigan, Robert | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/28/2012 | |
| Rodowicz, Curtis | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/28/2012 | |
| Family First Ar of Plainfield LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/28/2019 | |
| Hdc Care Solutions LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Alessandro, Joseph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Rodowicz, Curtis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/29/2012 | |
| 508 Pomfret Street LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Aa Northeast LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/11/2024 | |
| Colonial Health & Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/29/2012 | |
| Family First Ar of Plainfield LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/28/2019 | |
| Favorite Healthcare Staffing LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/22/2023 | |
| Hdc Care Solutions LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/15/2025 | |
| Healthpro Heritage LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2011 | |
| Mdsrescue LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/08/2020 | |
| Alessandro, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Coleman, Faith | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Darigan, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/28/2019 | |
| Rodowicz, Curtis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/29/2012 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.